Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands

Soil quality is an important determinant of the productivity, environmental quality and resilience of agricultural ecosystems. In addition to the farmer, there are other actors who may have different interests in soil quality, hampering the implementation of sustainable soil management. To date, the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2021-08, Vol.107, p.105491, Article 105491
Hauptverfasser: Kik, M.C., Claassen, G.D.H., Meuwissen, M.P.M., Smit, A.B., Saatkamp, H.W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105491
container_title Land use policy
container_volume 107
creator Kik, M.C.
Claassen, G.D.H.
Meuwissen, M.P.M.
Smit, A.B.
Saatkamp, H.W.
description Soil quality is an important determinant of the productivity, environmental quality and resilience of agricultural ecosystems. In addition to the farmer, there are other actors who may have different interests in soil quality, hampering the implementation of sustainable soil management. To date, these actors have received surprisingly little attention. This study presents an inventory of actors involved in sustainable soil management, including farmers, but also value chain participants (e.g. input suppliers and processors), environmentally engaged actors and policy makers. We applied Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to elicit actors’ priorities for soil sustainability criteria. AHP is a method of multi-criteria analysis that uses pairwise comparisons to assess the relative importance of criteria. Additionally, we differentiated actors based on their involvement and perceived ability to influence decision-making. Based on the results of a survey, actors were placed in a power-interest grid. In this grid, the self-perceived power and interest of actors was differentiated from their power and interest as perceived by other actors. The main findings were that a complex and heterogenous network of actors exists around the farmer. Within this network, farmers and related value chain participants showed a priority for economic soil sustainability criteria. Environmentally engaged actors were confirmed to have a clear priority for environmental criteria. The power-interest grids underscored the prime role of farmers and the relatively high power of value chain participants. The self-assessment of power-interest compared to assessment by others revealed noticeable differences, especially for NGOs and environmentally engaged actors. This study provides an overview of which actors to involve in decision-making on sustainable soil management, which is illustrated for the EU mission “Soil Health and Food”. [Display omitted] •We made an inventory of 30 actors in sustainable soil management in the Netherlands.•Farmers show priority for economic criteria of sustainable soil management.•Value chain actors have high power and interest in sustainable soil management.•Power-interest self-assessment of actors compared to assessment by other actors.•We provide insights for quantitative research and policy making.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105491
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2563486292</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837721002143</els_id><sourcerecordid>2563486292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-307f49434d81dac6c9a05b5c1d9d8a066d248c5ed4bcd10ff6212202894908253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1PAyEQJUYTa_U_kHjeCiywcKyNX4nRSz0TCqyy2S4VWJPe_A_-Q3-JNGvi0ctMZt6bl3kPAIjRAiPMr7pFrwc7JrcL_YIggsuaUYmPwAyLpq5Yw-gxmCHCaSXqpjkFZyl1CCEuMZmB9dLkEKEedL9PPsG2DGlMWftBb3oHU_A93Bb41W3dkOH35xdcQqNTgfJo97CNYQvzm4NPrtR4eCadg5NW98ld_PY5eLm9Wa_uq8fnu4fV8rEyteS5qlHTUklragW22nAjNWIbZrCVVmjEuSVUGOYs3RiLUdtygkmxKCSVSBBWz8HlpLuL4X10KasujLFYSYowXlPBiSSFJSaWiSGl6Fq1i36r415hpA4Zqk79ZagOGaopw3J6PZ264uLDu6iS8W4wzvroTFY2-P9FfgCvcoAi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2563486292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kik, M.C. ; Claassen, G.D.H. ; Meuwissen, M.P.M. ; Smit, A.B. ; Saatkamp, H.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kik, M.C. ; Claassen, G.D.H. ; Meuwissen, M.P.M. ; Smit, A.B. ; Saatkamp, H.W.</creatorcontrib><description>Soil quality is an important determinant of the productivity, environmental quality and resilience of agricultural ecosystems. In addition to the farmer, there are other actors who may have different interests in soil quality, hampering the implementation of sustainable soil management. To date, these actors have received surprisingly little attention. This study presents an inventory of actors involved in sustainable soil management, including farmers, but also value chain participants (e.g. input suppliers and processors), environmentally engaged actors and policy makers. We applied Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to elicit actors’ priorities for soil sustainability criteria. AHP is a method of multi-criteria analysis that uses pairwise comparisons to assess the relative importance of criteria. Additionally, we differentiated actors based on their involvement and perceived ability to influence decision-making. Based on the results of a survey, actors were placed in a power-interest grid. In this grid, the self-perceived power and interest of actors was differentiated from their power and interest as perceived by other actors. The main findings were that a complex and heterogenous network of actors exists around the farmer. Within this network, farmers and related value chain participants showed a priority for economic soil sustainability criteria. Environmentally engaged actors were confirmed to have a clear priority for environmental criteria. The power-interest grids underscored the prime role of farmers and the relatively high power of value chain participants. The self-assessment of power-interest compared to assessment by others revealed noticeable differences, especially for NGOs and environmentally engaged actors. This study provides an overview of which actors to involve in decision-making on sustainable soil management, which is illustrated for the EU mission “Soil Health and Food”. [Display omitted] •We made an inventory of 30 actors in sustainable soil management in the Netherlands.•Farmers show priority for economic criteria of sustainable soil management.•Value chain actors have high power and interest in sustainable soil management.•Power-interest self-assessment of actors compared to assessment by other actors.•We provide insights for quantitative research and policy making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105491</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Actor analysis ; Agricultural ecosystems ; Analytic hierarchy process ; Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) ; Case studies ; Criteria ; Decision making ; Ecosystems ; Environmental quality ; Farmers ; Food ; Inventory ; Land use ; Management ; Multiple criterion ; NGOs ; Nongovernmental organizations ; Policy making ; Power ; Power-interest mapping ; Productivity ; Quality ; Self-assessment ; Soil analysis ; Soil management ; Soil quality ; Soils ; Sustainability ; Sustainability management ; Sustainable soil management ; Value ; Value chain ; Value engineering</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2021-08, Vol.107, p.105491, Article 105491</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-307f49434d81dac6c9a05b5c1d9d8a066d248c5ed4bcd10ff6212202894908253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-307f49434d81dac6c9a05b5c1d9d8a066d248c5ed4bcd10ff6212202894908253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105491$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kik, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claassen, G.D.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meuwissen, M.P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smit, A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saatkamp, H.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>Soil quality is an important determinant of the productivity, environmental quality and resilience of agricultural ecosystems. In addition to the farmer, there are other actors who may have different interests in soil quality, hampering the implementation of sustainable soil management. To date, these actors have received surprisingly little attention. This study presents an inventory of actors involved in sustainable soil management, including farmers, but also value chain participants (e.g. input suppliers and processors), environmentally engaged actors and policy makers. We applied Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to elicit actors’ priorities for soil sustainability criteria. AHP is a method of multi-criteria analysis that uses pairwise comparisons to assess the relative importance of criteria. Additionally, we differentiated actors based on their involvement and perceived ability to influence decision-making. Based on the results of a survey, actors were placed in a power-interest grid. In this grid, the self-perceived power and interest of actors was differentiated from their power and interest as perceived by other actors. The main findings were that a complex and heterogenous network of actors exists around the farmer. Within this network, farmers and related value chain participants showed a priority for economic soil sustainability criteria. Environmentally engaged actors were confirmed to have a clear priority for environmental criteria. The power-interest grids underscored the prime role of farmers and the relatively high power of value chain participants. The self-assessment of power-interest compared to assessment by others revealed noticeable differences, especially for NGOs and environmentally engaged actors. This study provides an overview of which actors to involve in decision-making on sustainable soil management, which is illustrated for the EU mission “Soil Health and Food”. [Display omitted] •We made an inventory of 30 actors in sustainable soil management in the Netherlands.•Farmers show priority for economic criteria of sustainable soil management.•Value chain actors have high power and interest in sustainable soil management.•Power-interest self-assessment of actors compared to assessment by other actors.•We provide insights for quantitative research and policy making.</description><subject>Actor analysis</subject><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>NGOs</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Power-interest mapping</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Self-assessment</subject><subject>Soil analysis</subject><subject>Soil management</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainability management</subject><subject>Sustainable soil management</subject><subject>Value</subject><subject>Value chain</subject><subject>Value engineering</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1PAyEQJUYTa_U_kHjeCiywcKyNX4nRSz0TCqyy2S4VWJPe_A_-Q3-JNGvi0ctMZt6bl3kPAIjRAiPMr7pFrwc7JrcL_YIggsuaUYmPwAyLpq5Yw-gxmCHCaSXqpjkFZyl1CCEuMZmB9dLkEKEedL9PPsG2DGlMWftBb3oHU_A93Bb41W3dkOH35xdcQqNTgfJo97CNYQvzm4NPrtR4eCadg5NW98ld_PY5eLm9Wa_uq8fnu4fV8rEyteS5qlHTUklragW22nAjNWIbZrCVVmjEuSVUGOYs3RiLUdtygkmxKCSVSBBWz8HlpLuL4X10KasujLFYSYowXlPBiSSFJSaWiSGl6Fq1i36r415hpA4Zqk79ZagOGaopw3J6PZ264uLDu6iS8W4wzvroTFY2-P9FfgCvcoAi</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Kik, M.C.</creator><creator>Claassen, G.D.H.</creator><creator>Meuwissen, M.P.M.</creator><creator>Smit, A.B.</creator><creator>Saatkamp, H.W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands</title><author>Kik, M.C. ; Claassen, G.D.H. ; Meuwissen, M.P.M. ; Smit, A.B. ; Saatkamp, H.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-307f49434d81dac6c9a05b5c1d9d8a066d248c5ed4bcd10ff6212202894908253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Actor analysis</topic><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>NGOs</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Power-interest mapping</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Self-assessment</topic><topic>Soil analysis</topic><topic>Soil management</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainability management</topic><topic>Sustainable soil management</topic><topic>Value</topic><topic>Value chain</topic><topic>Value engineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kik, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claassen, G.D.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meuwissen, M.P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smit, A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saatkamp, H.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kik, M.C.</au><au>Claassen, G.D.H.</au><au>Meuwissen, M.P.M.</au><au>Smit, A.B.</au><au>Saatkamp, H.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>107</volume><spage>105491</spage><pages>105491-</pages><artnum>105491</artnum><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>Soil quality is an important determinant of the productivity, environmental quality and resilience of agricultural ecosystems. In addition to the farmer, there are other actors who may have different interests in soil quality, hampering the implementation of sustainable soil management. To date, these actors have received surprisingly little attention. This study presents an inventory of actors involved in sustainable soil management, including farmers, but also value chain participants (e.g. input suppliers and processors), environmentally engaged actors and policy makers. We applied Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to elicit actors’ priorities for soil sustainability criteria. AHP is a method of multi-criteria analysis that uses pairwise comparisons to assess the relative importance of criteria. Additionally, we differentiated actors based on their involvement and perceived ability to influence decision-making. Based on the results of a survey, actors were placed in a power-interest grid. In this grid, the self-perceived power and interest of actors was differentiated from their power and interest as perceived by other actors. The main findings were that a complex and heterogenous network of actors exists around the farmer. Within this network, farmers and related value chain participants showed a priority for economic soil sustainability criteria. Environmentally engaged actors were confirmed to have a clear priority for environmental criteria. The power-interest grids underscored the prime role of farmers and the relatively high power of value chain participants. The self-assessment of power-interest compared to assessment by others revealed noticeable differences, especially for NGOs and environmentally engaged actors. This study provides an overview of which actors to involve in decision-making on sustainable soil management, which is illustrated for the EU mission “Soil Health and Food”. [Display omitted] •We made an inventory of 30 actors in sustainable soil management in the Netherlands.•Farmers show priority for economic criteria of sustainable soil management.•Value chain actors have high power and interest in sustainable soil management.•Power-interest self-assessment of actors compared to assessment by other actors.•We provide insights for quantitative research and policy making.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105491</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-8377
ispartof Land use policy, 2021-08, Vol.107, p.105491, Article 105491
issn 0264-8377
1873-5754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2563486292
source PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Actor analysis
Agricultural ecosystems
Analytic hierarchy process
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Case studies
Criteria
Decision making
Ecosystems
Environmental quality
Farmers
Food
Inventory
Land use
Management
Multiple criterion
NGOs
Nongovernmental organizations
Policy making
Power
Power-interest mapping
Productivity
Quality
Self-assessment
Soil analysis
Soil management
Soil quality
Soils
Sustainability
Sustainability management
Sustainable soil management
Value
Value chain
Value engineering
title Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T09%3A20%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Actor%20analysis%20for%20sustainable%20soil%20management%20%E2%80%93%20A%20case%20study%20from%20the%20Netherlands&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Kik,%20M.C.&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=107&rft.spage=105491&rft.pages=105491-&rft.artnum=105491&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105491&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2563486292%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2563486292&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837721002143&rfr_iscdi=true