Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands
Soil quality is an important determinant of the productivity, environmental quality and resilience of agricultural ecosystems. In addition to the farmer, there are other actors who may have different interests in soil quality, hampering the implementation of sustainable soil management. To date, the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Land use policy 2021-08, Vol.107, p.105491, Article 105491 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 105491 |
container_title | Land use policy |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Kik, M.C. Claassen, G.D.H. Meuwissen, M.P.M. Smit, A.B. Saatkamp, H.W. |
description | Soil quality is an important determinant of the productivity, environmental quality and resilience of agricultural ecosystems. In addition to the farmer, there are other actors who may have different interests in soil quality, hampering the implementation of sustainable soil management. To date, these actors have received surprisingly little attention. This study presents an inventory of actors involved in sustainable soil management, including farmers, but also value chain participants (e.g. input suppliers and processors), environmentally engaged actors and policy makers. We applied Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to elicit actors’ priorities for soil sustainability criteria. AHP is a method of multi-criteria analysis that uses pairwise comparisons to assess the relative importance of criteria. Additionally, we differentiated actors based on their involvement and perceived ability to influence decision-making. Based on the results of a survey, actors were placed in a power-interest grid. In this grid, the self-perceived power and interest of actors was differentiated from their power and interest as perceived by other actors. The main findings were that a complex and heterogenous network of actors exists around the farmer. Within this network, farmers and related value chain participants showed a priority for economic soil sustainability criteria. Environmentally engaged actors were confirmed to have a clear priority for environmental criteria. The power-interest grids underscored the prime role of farmers and the relatively high power of value chain participants. The self-assessment of power-interest compared to assessment by others revealed noticeable differences, especially for NGOs and environmentally engaged actors. This study provides an overview of which actors to involve in decision-making on sustainable soil management, which is illustrated for the EU mission “Soil Health and Food”.
[Display omitted]
•We made an inventory of 30 actors in sustainable soil management in the Netherlands.•Farmers show priority for economic criteria of sustainable soil management.•Value chain actors have high power and interest in sustainable soil management.•Power-interest self-assessment of actors compared to assessment by other actors.•We provide insights for quantitative research and policy making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105491 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2563486292</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837721002143</els_id><sourcerecordid>2563486292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-307f49434d81dac6c9a05b5c1d9d8a066d248c5ed4bcd10ff6212202894908253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1PAyEQJUYTa_U_kHjeCiywcKyNX4nRSz0TCqyy2S4VWJPe_A_-Q3-JNGvi0ctMZt6bl3kPAIjRAiPMr7pFrwc7JrcL_YIggsuaUYmPwAyLpq5Yw-gxmCHCaSXqpjkFZyl1CCEuMZmB9dLkEKEedL9PPsG2DGlMWftBb3oHU_A93Bb41W3dkOH35xdcQqNTgfJo97CNYQvzm4NPrtR4eCadg5NW98ld_PY5eLm9Wa_uq8fnu4fV8rEyteS5qlHTUklragW22nAjNWIbZrCVVmjEuSVUGOYs3RiLUdtygkmxKCSVSBBWz8HlpLuL4X10KasujLFYSYowXlPBiSSFJSaWiSGl6Fq1i36r415hpA4Zqk79ZagOGaopw3J6PZ264uLDu6iS8W4wzvroTFY2-P9FfgCvcoAi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2563486292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kik, M.C. ; Claassen, G.D.H. ; Meuwissen, M.P.M. ; Smit, A.B. ; Saatkamp, H.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kik, M.C. ; Claassen, G.D.H. ; Meuwissen, M.P.M. ; Smit, A.B. ; Saatkamp, H.W.</creatorcontrib><description>Soil quality is an important determinant of the productivity, environmental quality and resilience of agricultural ecosystems. In addition to the farmer, there are other actors who may have different interests in soil quality, hampering the implementation of sustainable soil management. To date, these actors have received surprisingly little attention. This study presents an inventory of actors involved in sustainable soil management, including farmers, but also value chain participants (e.g. input suppliers and processors), environmentally engaged actors and policy makers. We applied Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to elicit actors’ priorities for soil sustainability criteria. AHP is a method of multi-criteria analysis that uses pairwise comparisons to assess the relative importance of criteria. Additionally, we differentiated actors based on their involvement and perceived ability to influence decision-making. Based on the results of a survey, actors were placed in a power-interest grid. In this grid, the self-perceived power and interest of actors was differentiated from their power and interest as perceived by other actors. The main findings were that a complex and heterogenous network of actors exists around the farmer. Within this network, farmers and related value chain participants showed a priority for economic soil sustainability criteria. Environmentally engaged actors were confirmed to have a clear priority for environmental criteria. The power-interest grids underscored the prime role of farmers and the relatively high power of value chain participants. The self-assessment of power-interest compared to assessment by others revealed noticeable differences, especially for NGOs and environmentally engaged actors. This study provides an overview of which actors to involve in decision-making on sustainable soil management, which is illustrated for the EU mission “Soil Health and Food”.
[Display omitted]
•We made an inventory of 30 actors in sustainable soil management in the Netherlands.•Farmers show priority for economic criteria of sustainable soil management.•Value chain actors have high power and interest in sustainable soil management.•Power-interest self-assessment of actors compared to assessment by other actors.•We provide insights for quantitative research and policy making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105491</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Actor analysis ; Agricultural ecosystems ; Analytic hierarchy process ; Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) ; Case studies ; Criteria ; Decision making ; Ecosystems ; Environmental quality ; Farmers ; Food ; Inventory ; Land use ; Management ; Multiple criterion ; NGOs ; Nongovernmental organizations ; Policy making ; Power ; Power-interest mapping ; Productivity ; Quality ; Self-assessment ; Soil analysis ; Soil management ; Soil quality ; Soils ; Sustainability ; Sustainability management ; Sustainable soil management ; Value ; Value chain ; Value engineering</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2021-08, Vol.107, p.105491, Article 105491</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-307f49434d81dac6c9a05b5c1d9d8a066d248c5ed4bcd10ff6212202894908253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-307f49434d81dac6c9a05b5c1d9d8a066d248c5ed4bcd10ff6212202894908253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105491$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kik, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claassen, G.D.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meuwissen, M.P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smit, A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saatkamp, H.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>Soil quality is an important determinant of the productivity, environmental quality and resilience of agricultural ecosystems. In addition to the farmer, there are other actors who may have different interests in soil quality, hampering the implementation of sustainable soil management. To date, these actors have received surprisingly little attention. This study presents an inventory of actors involved in sustainable soil management, including farmers, but also value chain participants (e.g. input suppliers and processors), environmentally engaged actors and policy makers. We applied Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to elicit actors’ priorities for soil sustainability criteria. AHP is a method of multi-criteria analysis that uses pairwise comparisons to assess the relative importance of criteria. Additionally, we differentiated actors based on their involvement and perceived ability to influence decision-making. Based on the results of a survey, actors were placed in a power-interest grid. In this grid, the self-perceived power and interest of actors was differentiated from their power and interest as perceived by other actors. The main findings were that a complex and heterogenous network of actors exists around the farmer. Within this network, farmers and related value chain participants showed a priority for economic soil sustainability criteria. Environmentally engaged actors were confirmed to have a clear priority for environmental criteria. The power-interest grids underscored the prime role of farmers and the relatively high power of value chain participants. The self-assessment of power-interest compared to assessment by others revealed noticeable differences, especially for NGOs and environmentally engaged actors. This study provides an overview of which actors to involve in decision-making on sustainable soil management, which is illustrated for the EU mission “Soil Health and Food”.
[Display omitted]
•We made an inventory of 30 actors in sustainable soil management in the Netherlands.•Farmers show priority for economic criteria of sustainable soil management.•Value chain actors have high power and interest in sustainable soil management.•Power-interest self-assessment of actors compared to assessment by other actors.•We provide insights for quantitative research and policy making.</description><subject>Actor analysis</subject><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>NGOs</subject><subject>Nongovernmental organizations</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Power-interest mapping</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Self-assessment</subject><subject>Soil analysis</subject><subject>Soil management</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainability management</subject><subject>Sustainable soil management</subject><subject>Value</subject><subject>Value chain</subject><subject>Value engineering</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1PAyEQJUYTa_U_kHjeCiywcKyNX4nRSz0TCqyy2S4VWJPe_A_-Q3-JNGvi0ctMZt6bl3kPAIjRAiPMr7pFrwc7JrcL_YIggsuaUYmPwAyLpq5Yw-gxmCHCaSXqpjkFZyl1CCEuMZmB9dLkEKEedL9PPsG2DGlMWftBb3oHU_A93Bb41W3dkOH35xdcQqNTgfJo97CNYQvzm4NPrtR4eCadg5NW98ld_PY5eLm9Wa_uq8fnu4fV8rEyteS5qlHTUklragW22nAjNWIbZrCVVmjEuSVUGOYs3RiLUdtygkmxKCSVSBBWz8HlpLuL4X10KasujLFYSYowXlPBiSSFJSaWiSGl6Fq1i36r415hpA4Zqk79ZagOGaopw3J6PZ264uLDu6iS8W4wzvroTFY2-P9FfgCvcoAi</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Kik, M.C.</creator><creator>Claassen, G.D.H.</creator><creator>Meuwissen, M.P.M.</creator><creator>Smit, A.B.</creator><creator>Saatkamp, H.W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands</title><author>Kik, M.C. ; Claassen, G.D.H. ; Meuwissen, M.P.M. ; Smit, A.B. ; Saatkamp, H.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-307f49434d81dac6c9a05b5c1d9d8a066d248c5ed4bcd10ff6212202894908253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Actor analysis</topic><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>NGOs</topic><topic>Nongovernmental organizations</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Power-interest mapping</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Self-assessment</topic><topic>Soil analysis</topic><topic>Soil management</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainability management</topic><topic>Sustainable soil management</topic><topic>Value</topic><topic>Value chain</topic><topic>Value engineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kik, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claassen, G.D.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meuwissen, M.P.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smit, A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saatkamp, H.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kik, M.C.</au><au>Claassen, G.D.H.</au><au>Meuwissen, M.P.M.</au><au>Smit, A.B.</au><au>Saatkamp, H.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>107</volume><spage>105491</spage><pages>105491-</pages><artnum>105491</artnum><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>Soil quality is an important determinant of the productivity, environmental quality and resilience of agricultural ecosystems. In addition to the farmer, there are other actors who may have different interests in soil quality, hampering the implementation of sustainable soil management. To date, these actors have received surprisingly little attention. This study presents an inventory of actors involved in sustainable soil management, including farmers, but also value chain participants (e.g. input suppliers and processors), environmentally engaged actors and policy makers. We applied Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to elicit actors’ priorities for soil sustainability criteria. AHP is a method of multi-criteria analysis that uses pairwise comparisons to assess the relative importance of criteria. Additionally, we differentiated actors based on their involvement and perceived ability to influence decision-making. Based on the results of a survey, actors were placed in a power-interest grid. In this grid, the self-perceived power and interest of actors was differentiated from their power and interest as perceived by other actors. The main findings were that a complex and heterogenous network of actors exists around the farmer. Within this network, farmers and related value chain participants showed a priority for economic soil sustainability criteria. Environmentally engaged actors were confirmed to have a clear priority for environmental criteria. The power-interest grids underscored the prime role of farmers and the relatively high power of value chain participants. The self-assessment of power-interest compared to assessment by others revealed noticeable differences, especially for NGOs and environmentally engaged actors. This study provides an overview of which actors to involve in decision-making on sustainable soil management, which is illustrated for the EU mission “Soil Health and Food”.
[Display omitted]
•We made an inventory of 30 actors in sustainable soil management in the Netherlands.•Farmers show priority for economic criteria of sustainable soil management.•Value chain actors have high power and interest in sustainable soil management.•Power-interest self-assessment of actors compared to assessment by other actors.•We provide insights for quantitative research and policy making.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105491</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-8377 |
ispartof | Land use policy, 2021-08, Vol.107, p.105491, Article 105491 |
issn | 0264-8377 1873-5754 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2563486292 |
source | PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Actor analysis Agricultural ecosystems Analytic hierarchy process Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Case studies Criteria Decision making Ecosystems Environmental quality Farmers Food Inventory Land use Management Multiple criterion NGOs Nongovernmental organizations Policy making Power Power-interest mapping Productivity Quality Self-assessment Soil analysis Soil management Soil quality Soils Sustainability Sustainability management Sustainable soil management Value Value chain Value engineering |
title | Actor analysis for sustainable soil management – A case study from the Netherlands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T09%3A20%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Actor%20analysis%20for%20sustainable%20soil%20management%20%E2%80%93%20A%20case%20study%20from%20the%20Netherlands&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Kik,%20M.C.&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=107&rft.spage=105491&rft.pages=105491-&rft.artnum=105491&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105491&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2563486292%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2563486292&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837721002143&rfr_iscdi=true |