Posthuman Potentials: Considering Collaborative Indigenous Archaeology

This essay argues for the diversity and promise of posthuman approaches in archaeology by dispelling blanket critiques, by differentiating between distinct lines of post-anthropocentric thought and by pointing to parallels between Posthumanism and collaborative Indigenous archaeologies. It begins by...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cambridge archaeological journal 2021-08, Vol.31 (3), p.509-514
1. Verfasser: Cipolla, Craig N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 514
container_issue 3
container_start_page 509
container_title Cambridge archaeological journal
container_volume 31
creator Cipolla, Craig N.
description This essay argues for the diversity and promise of posthuman approaches in archaeology by dispelling blanket critiques, by differentiating between distinct lines of post-anthropocentric thought and by pointing to parallels between Posthumanism and collaborative Indigenous archaeologies. It begins by arguing that symmetrical archaeology is but one part of the diverse body of thought labelled ‘posthuman’. Next, it explores broader posthuman engagements with political issues relevant for collaborative Indigenous archaeologies, particularly concerns regarding under-represented groups in the field. Finally, it identifies flat ontologies as key components of posthuman approaches, clarifying what this term means for different lines of post-anthropocentric thought and briefly considering how the concept of flatness compares with Indigenous metaphysics.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0959774321000202
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2563406130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0959774321000202</cupid><sourcerecordid>2563406130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-40199999f77510119c58df05ed2ddde5138a0771d9056f09089df573707d55103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFFLwzAQx4MoOKcfwLeCz9W7pmkW38ZwczBwoD6XrEm7jC6ZSSvs25uygQ_ivdzB3e9_d39C7hEeEZA_vYNggvOcZggAGWQXZIQ5z1NgOVyS0dBOh_41uQlhB4AUOB2R-dqFbtvvpU3WrtO2M7INz8nM2WCU9sY2sW5buXFeduZbJ0urTKOt60My9dVWate65nhLruoI6rtzHpPP-cvH7DVdvS2Ws-kqrSjyLs0BxRA15yyejaJiE1UD0ypTSmmGdCKBc1QCWFGDgIlQNeOUA1csEnRMHk66B---eh26cud6b-PKMmMFzaGIf8UpPE1V3oXgdV0evNlLfywRysGu8o9dkaFnRu433qhG_0r_T_0AojZqtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2563406130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Posthuman Potentials: Considering Collaborative Indigenous Archaeology</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Cipolla, Craig N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cipolla, Craig N.</creatorcontrib><description>This essay argues for the diversity and promise of posthuman approaches in archaeology by dispelling blanket critiques, by differentiating between distinct lines of post-anthropocentric thought and by pointing to parallels between Posthumanism and collaborative Indigenous archaeologies. It begins by arguing that symmetrical archaeology is but one part of the diverse body of thought labelled ‘posthuman’. Next, it explores broader posthuman engagements with political issues relevant for collaborative Indigenous archaeologies, particularly concerns regarding under-represented groups in the field. Finally, it identifies flat ontologies as key components of posthuman approaches, clarifying what this term means for different lines of post-anthropocentric thought and briefly considering how the concept of flatness compares with Indigenous metaphysics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-7743</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0540</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0959774321000202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Actor-network theory ; Anthropocentrism ; Archaeology ; Collaboration ; Epistemology ; Ontology ; Philosophers ; Philosophy ; Posthumanism ; Social exclusion ; Special Section: Debating Posthumanism in Archaeology</subject><ispartof>Cambridge archaeological journal, 2021-08, Vol.31 (3), p.509-514</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-40199999f77510119c58df05ed2ddde5138a0771d9056f09089df573707d55103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-40199999f77510119c58df05ed2ddde5138a0771d9056f09089df573707d55103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0959774321000202/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cipolla, Craig N.</creatorcontrib><title>Posthuman Potentials: Considering Collaborative Indigenous Archaeology</title><title>Cambridge archaeological journal</title><addtitle>CAJ</addtitle><description>This essay argues for the diversity and promise of posthuman approaches in archaeology by dispelling blanket critiques, by differentiating between distinct lines of post-anthropocentric thought and by pointing to parallels between Posthumanism and collaborative Indigenous archaeologies. It begins by arguing that symmetrical archaeology is but one part of the diverse body of thought labelled ‘posthuman’. Next, it explores broader posthuman engagements with political issues relevant for collaborative Indigenous archaeologies, particularly concerns regarding under-represented groups in the field. Finally, it identifies flat ontologies as key components of posthuman approaches, clarifying what this term means for different lines of post-anthropocentric thought and briefly considering how the concept of flatness compares with Indigenous metaphysics.</description><subject>Actor-network theory</subject><subject>Anthropocentrism</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Posthumanism</subject><subject>Social exclusion</subject><subject>Special Section: Debating Posthumanism in Archaeology</subject><issn>0959-7743</issn><issn>1474-0540</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFFLwzAQx4MoOKcfwLeCz9W7pmkW38ZwczBwoD6XrEm7jC6ZSSvs25uygQ_ivdzB3e9_d39C7hEeEZA_vYNggvOcZggAGWQXZIQ5z1NgOVyS0dBOh_41uQlhB4AUOB2R-dqFbtvvpU3WrtO2M7INz8nM2WCU9sY2sW5buXFeduZbJ0urTKOt60My9dVWate65nhLruoI6rtzHpPP-cvH7DVdvS2Ws-kqrSjyLs0BxRA15yyejaJiE1UD0ypTSmmGdCKBc1QCWFGDgIlQNeOUA1csEnRMHk66B---eh26cud6b-PKMmMFzaGIf8UpPE1V3oXgdV0evNlLfywRysGu8o9dkaFnRu433qhG_0r_T_0AojZqtQ</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Cipolla, Craig N.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Posthuman Potentials: Considering Collaborative Indigenous Archaeology</title><author>Cipolla, Craig N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-40199999f77510119c58df05ed2ddde5138a0771d9056f09089df573707d55103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Actor-network theory</topic><topic>Anthropocentrism</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Posthumanism</topic><topic>Social exclusion</topic><topic>Special Section: Debating Posthumanism in Archaeology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cipolla, Craig N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Cambridge archaeological journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cipolla, Craig N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Posthuman Potentials: Considering Collaborative Indigenous Archaeology</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge archaeological journal</jtitle><addtitle>CAJ</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>514</epage><pages>509-514</pages><issn>0959-7743</issn><eissn>1474-0540</eissn><abstract>This essay argues for the diversity and promise of posthuman approaches in archaeology by dispelling blanket critiques, by differentiating between distinct lines of post-anthropocentric thought and by pointing to parallels between Posthumanism and collaborative Indigenous archaeologies. It begins by arguing that symmetrical archaeology is but one part of the diverse body of thought labelled ‘posthuman’. Next, it explores broader posthuman engagements with political issues relevant for collaborative Indigenous archaeologies, particularly concerns regarding under-represented groups in the field. Finally, it identifies flat ontologies as key components of posthuman approaches, clarifying what this term means for different lines of post-anthropocentric thought and briefly considering how the concept of flatness compares with Indigenous metaphysics.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0959774321000202</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-7743
ispartof Cambridge archaeological journal, 2021-08, Vol.31 (3), p.509-514
issn 0959-7743
1474-0540
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2563406130
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Actor-network theory
Anthropocentrism
Archaeology
Collaboration
Epistemology
Ontology
Philosophers
Philosophy
Posthumanism
Social exclusion
Special Section: Debating Posthumanism in Archaeology
title Posthuman Potentials: Considering Collaborative Indigenous Archaeology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T13%3A25%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Posthuman%20Potentials:%20Considering%20Collaborative%20Indigenous%20Archaeology&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20archaeological%20journal&rft.au=Cipolla,%20Craig%20N.&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=514&rft.pages=509-514&rft.issn=0959-7743&rft.eissn=1474-0540&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0959774321000202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2563406130%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2563406130&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0959774321000202&rfr_iscdi=true