Posthuman Potentials: Considering Collaborative Indigenous Archaeology
This essay argues for the diversity and promise of posthuman approaches in archaeology by dispelling blanket critiques, by differentiating between distinct lines of post-anthropocentric thought and by pointing to parallels between Posthumanism and collaborative Indigenous archaeologies. It begins by...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cambridge archaeological journal 2021-08, Vol.31 (3), p.509-514 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 514 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 509 |
container_title | Cambridge archaeological journal |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Cipolla, Craig N. |
description | This essay argues for the diversity and promise of posthuman approaches in archaeology by dispelling blanket critiques, by differentiating between distinct lines of post-anthropocentric thought and by pointing to parallels between Posthumanism and collaborative Indigenous archaeologies. It begins by arguing that symmetrical archaeology is but one part of the diverse body of thought labelled ‘posthuman’. Next, it explores broader posthuman engagements with political issues relevant for collaborative Indigenous archaeologies, particularly concerns regarding under-represented groups in the field. Finally, it identifies flat ontologies as key components of posthuman approaches, clarifying what this term means for different lines of post-anthropocentric thought and briefly considering how the concept of flatness compares with Indigenous metaphysics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0959774321000202 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2563406130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0959774321000202</cupid><sourcerecordid>2563406130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-40199999f77510119c58df05ed2ddde5138a0771d9056f09089df573707d55103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFFLwzAQx4MoOKcfwLeCz9W7pmkW38ZwczBwoD6XrEm7jC6ZSSvs25uygQ_ivdzB3e9_d39C7hEeEZA_vYNggvOcZggAGWQXZIQ5z1NgOVyS0dBOh_41uQlhB4AUOB2R-dqFbtvvpU3WrtO2M7INz8nM2WCU9sY2sW5buXFeduZbJ0urTKOt60My9dVWate65nhLruoI6rtzHpPP-cvH7DVdvS2Ws-kqrSjyLs0BxRA15yyejaJiE1UD0ypTSmmGdCKBc1QCWFGDgIlQNeOUA1csEnRMHk66B---eh26cud6b-PKMmMFzaGIf8UpPE1V3oXgdV0evNlLfywRysGu8o9dkaFnRu433qhG_0r_T_0AojZqtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2563406130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Posthuman Potentials: Considering Collaborative Indigenous Archaeology</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Cipolla, Craig N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cipolla, Craig N.</creatorcontrib><description>This essay argues for the diversity and promise of posthuman approaches in archaeology by dispelling blanket critiques, by differentiating between distinct lines of post-anthropocentric thought and by pointing to parallels between Posthumanism and collaborative Indigenous archaeologies. It begins by arguing that symmetrical archaeology is but one part of the diverse body of thought labelled ‘posthuman’. Next, it explores broader posthuman engagements with political issues relevant for collaborative Indigenous archaeologies, particularly concerns regarding under-represented groups in the field. Finally, it identifies flat ontologies as key components of posthuman approaches, clarifying what this term means for different lines of post-anthropocentric thought and briefly considering how the concept of flatness compares with Indigenous metaphysics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-7743</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0540</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0959774321000202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Actor-network theory ; Anthropocentrism ; Archaeology ; Collaboration ; Epistemology ; Ontology ; Philosophers ; Philosophy ; Posthumanism ; Social exclusion ; Special Section: Debating Posthumanism in Archaeology</subject><ispartof>Cambridge archaeological journal, 2021-08, Vol.31 (3), p.509-514</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-40199999f77510119c58df05ed2ddde5138a0771d9056f09089df573707d55103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-40199999f77510119c58df05ed2ddde5138a0771d9056f09089df573707d55103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0959774321000202/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cipolla, Craig N.</creatorcontrib><title>Posthuman Potentials: Considering Collaborative Indigenous Archaeology</title><title>Cambridge archaeological journal</title><addtitle>CAJ</addtitle><description>This essay argues for the diversity and promise of posthuman approaches in archaeology by dispelling blanket critiques, by differentiating between distinct lines of post-anthropocentric thought and by pointing to parallels between Posthumanism and collaborative Indigenous archaeologies. It begins by arguing that symmetrical archaeology is but one part of the diverse body of thought labelled ‘posthuman’. Next, it explores broader posthuman engagements with political issues relevant for collaborative Indigenous archaeologies, particularly concerns regarding under-represented groups in the field. Finally, it identifies flat ontologies as key components of posthuman approaches, clarifying what this term means for different lines of post-anthropocentric thought and briefly considering how the concept of flatness compares with Indigenous metaphysics.</description><subject>Actor-network theory</subject><subject>Anthropocentrism</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Posthumanism</subject><subject>Social exclusion</subject><subject>Special Section: Debating Posthumanism in Archaeology</subject><issn>0959-7743</issn><issn>1474-0540</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFFLwzAQx4MoOKcfwLeCz9W7pmkW38ZwczBwoD6XrEm7jC6ZSSvs25uygQ_ivdzB3e9_d39C7hEeEZA_vYNggvOcZggAGWQXZIQ5z1NgOVyS0dBOh_41uQlhB4AUOB2R-dqFbtvvpU3WrtO2M7INz8nM2WCU9sY2sW5buXFeduZbJ0urTKOt60My9dVWate65nhLruoI6rtzHpPP-cvH7DVdvS2Ws-kqrSjyLs0BxRA15yyejaJiE1UD0ypTSmmGdCKBc1QCWFGDgIlQNeOUA1csEnRMHk66B---eh26cud6b-PKMmMFzaGIf8UpPE1V3oXgdV0evNlLfywRysGu8o9dkaFnRu433qhG_0r_T_0AojZqtQ</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Cipolla, Craig N.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Posthuman Potentials: Considering Collaborative Indigenous Archaeology</title><author>Cipolla, Craig N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-40199999f77510119c58df05ed2ddde5138a0771d9056f09089df573707d55103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Actor-network theory</topic><topic>Anthropocentrism</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Posthumanism</topic><topic>Social exclusion</topic><topic>Special Section: Debating Posthumanism in Archaeology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cipolla, Craig N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Cambridge archaeological journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cipolla, Craig N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Posthuman Potentials: Considering Collaborative Indigenous Archaeology</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge archaeological journal</jtitle><addtitle>CAJ</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>514</epage><pages>509-514</pages><issn>0959-7743</issn><eissn>1474-0540</eissn><abstract>This essay argues for the diversity and promise of posthuman approaches in archaeology by dispelling blanket critiques, by differentiating between distinct lines of post-anthropocentric thought and by pointing to parallels between Posthumanism and collaborative Indigenous archaeologies. It begins by arguing that symmetrical archaeology is but one part of the diverse body of thought labelled ‘posthuman’. Next, it explores broader posthuman engagements with political issues relevant for collaborative Indigenous archaeologies, particularly concerns regarding under-represented groups in the field. Finally, it identifies flat ontologies as key components of posthuman approaches, clarifying what this term means for different lines of post-anthropocentric thought and briefly considering how the concept of flatness compares with Indigenous metaphysics.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0959774321000202</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-7743 |
ispartof | Cambridge archaeological journal, 2021-08, Vol.31 (3), p.509-514 |
issn | 0959-7743 1474-0540 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2563406130 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Actor-network theory Anthropocentrism Archaeology Collaboration Epistemology Ontology Philosophers Philosophy Posthumanism Social exclusion Special Section: Debating Posthumanism in Archaeology |
title | Posthuman Potentials: Considering Collaborative Indigenous Archaeology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T13%3A25%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Posthuman%20Potentials:%20Considering%20Collaborative%20Indigenous%20Archaeology&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20archaeological%20journal&rft.au=Cipolla,%20Craig%20N.&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=514&rft.pages=509-514&rft.issn=0959-7743&rft.eissn=1474-0540&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0959774321000202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2563406130%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2563406130&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0959774321000202&rfr_iscdi=true |