Selecting on age of female reproduction affects lifespan in both sexes and age-dependent reproductive effort in female (but not male) Ceratitis cosyra

The trade-off between lifespan and reproduction is central to our understanding of life-history evolution. Laboratory selection experiments have been a powerful tool for quantifying this trade-off, but these tend to be restricted in taxonomic scope, which may limit our understanding. In addition, re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2021-08, Vol.75 (8), Article 123
Hauptverfasser: Malod, Kevin, Roets, Petrus D., Bosua, Henrika, Archer, C. Ruth, Weldon, Christopher W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Behavioral ecology and sociobiology
container_volume 75
creator Malod, Kevin
Roets, Petrus D.
Bosua, Henrika
Archer, C. Ruth
Weldon, Christopher W.
description The trade-off between lifespan and reproduction is central to our understanding of life-history evolution. Laboratory selection experiments have been a powerful tool for quantifying this trade-off, but these tend to be restricted in taxonomic scope, which may limit our understanding. In addition, research often focuses on the trade-off between lifespan and reproductive effort in females, and far less data test how lifespan trades off with different aspects of male reproduction (e.g. pre- and post-copulatory reproductive investment). Here, we examined the trade-off between lifespan and reproduction in females and males of the marula fruit fly, Ceratitis cosyra (Walker) (Diptera: Tephritidae). To do so, we selected downward or upward on age of peak female egg laying in C. cosyra for twenty generations. In multiple generations, we measured female and male lifespan and body size, female daily and lifetime fecundity, male courtship and mating success, as well as the number of sperm transferred at different ages and sperm storage asymmetry in spermathecae. Our selection regime appeared to achieve its aim; egg laying peaked earlier in females from downward selected lines than upward selected lines. The number of sperm transferred by males decreased in the upward selected flies, but other male reproductive traits remained the same across selection regimes. In contrast, with the wider literature, upward selection did not extend the lifespan of females or males after ten generations of selection. While lifespan in both sexes responded to selection on female egg laying schedules, it did not do so in a straightforward way. Moreover, male investment in reproductive traits was largely independent of selection regime. These counter-intuitive findings highlight the importance of working with a broad range of species and of considering the trade-off between reproduction and lifespan in both sexes. Significance statement The trade-off between lifespan and reproduction has been extensively studied in model species using various types of laboratory selection. A limited number of species have been considered using this approach, and the majority of the studies have focused on female, rather than male, reproductive effort. Here, we selected downwards and upwards on age of female reproduction in the marula fruit fly and measured survival, female fecundity, reproductive schedule, as well as male sperm transfer, sperm storage asymmetry, mating and calling success. We found a moder
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00265-021-03063-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2562366698</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2562366698</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e2e5eba66369b1dd11cecba4bc5ca2e5935a94e29551a374cefda7e914f638eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KxDAUhYMoOI6-gKuAG11E89Nm2qUM_oHgQl2HNL0ZO3SSmqTivIjPa2sHdOXqcjnnO_dyEDpl9JJRuriKlHKZE8oZoYJKQYo9NGOZ4IQuJN9HMyoySvIsE4foKMY1pVSyopihr2dowaTGrbB3WK8Ae4stbHQLOEAXfN0P6ihZO_gibhsLsdMONw5XPr3hCJ8QsXb1SJMaOnA1uPSH_gAM1vqQRmaXfV71CTuf8Lhd4CUEnZrURGx83AZ9jA6sbiOc7OYcvd7evCzvyePT3cPy-pEYwcpEgEMOlZZSyLJidc2YAVPprDK50YNWilyXGfAyz5kWi8yArfUCSpZZKQqoxBydTbnDr-89xKTWvg9uOKl4LrmQUpbF4OKTywQfYwCrutBsdNgqRtXYv5r6V0P_6qd_NUJiguJgdisIv9H_UN_h0Yuk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2562366698</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selecting on age of female reproduction affects lifespan in both sexes and age-dependent reproductive effort in female (but not male) Ceratitis cosyra</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Malod, Kevin ; Roets, Petrus D. ; Bosua, Henrika ; Archer, C. Ruth ; Weldon, Christopher W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Malod, Kevin ; Roets, Petrus D. ; Bosua, Henrika ; Archer, C. Ruth ; Weldon, Christopher W.</creatorcontrib><description>The trade-off between lifespan and reproduction is central to our understanding of life-history evolution. Laboratory selection experiments have been a powerful tool for quantifying this trade-off, but these tend to be restricted in taxonomic scope, which may limit our understanding. In addition, research often focuses on the trade-off between lifespan and reproductive effort in females, and far less data test how lifespan trades off with different aspects of male reproduction (e.g. pre- and post-copulatory reproductive investment). Here, we examined the trade-off between lifespan and reproduction in females and males of the marula fruit fly, Ceratitis cosyra (Walker) (Diptera: Tephritidae). To do so, we selected downward or upward on age of peak female egg laying in C. cosyra for twenty generations. In multiple generations, we measured female and male lifespan and body size, female daily and lifetime fecundity, male courtship and mating success, as well as the number of sperm transferred at different ages and sperm storage asymmetry in spermathecae. Our selection regime appeared to achieve its aim; egg laying peaked earlier in females from downward selected lines than upward selected lines. The number of sperm transferred by males decreased in the upward selected flies, but other male reproductive traits remained the same across selection regimes. In contrast, with the wider literature, upward selection did not extend the lifespan of females or males after ten generations of selection. While lifespan in both sexes responded to selection on female egg laying schedules, it did not do so in a straightforward way. Moreover, male investment in reproductive traits was largely independent of selection regime. These counter-intuitive findings highlight the importance of working with a broad range of species and of considering the trade-off between reproduction and lifespan in both sexes. Significance statement The trade-off between lifespan and reproduction has been extensively studied in model species using various types of laboratory selection. A limited number of species have been considered using this approach, and the majority of the studies have focused on female, rather than male, reproductive effort. Here, we selected downwards and upwards on age of female reproduction in the marula fruit fly and measured survival, female fecundity, reproductive schedule, as well as male sperm transfer, sperm storage asymmetry, mating and calling success. We found a moderate trade-off between lifespan and early fecundity in downward selected flies, whereas no obvious trade-off was observed in upward selected lines. Regardless of the selection regime, reproductive scheduling was affected in females but not in males, while lifespan was affected in both sexes. Our results show that the timing of reproduction can evolve independently across the sexes, highlighting the importance of studying both females and males.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-021-03063-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Age ; Animal Ecology ; Animal reproduction ; Asymmetry ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Body size ; Ceratitis cosyra ; Courtship ; Egg laying ; Eggs ; Fecundity ; Females ; Fruit flies ; Fruits ; Laboratories ; Life history ; Life Sciences ; Life span ; Males ; Mating ; Original Article ; Reproduction ; Reproduction (biology) ; Reproductive effort ; Schedules ; Sexual Conflict and Aging ; Sexual Selection ; Species ; Sperm ; Tradeoffs ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2021-08, Vol.75 (8), Article 123</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e2e5eba66369b1dd11cecba4bc5ca2e5935a94e29551a374cefda7e914f638eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e2e5eba66369b1dd11cecba4bc5ca2e5935a94e29551a374cefda7e914f638eb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6811-2717</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00265-021-03063-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00265-021-03063-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malod, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roets, Petrus D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosua, Henrika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archer, C. Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weldon, Christopher W.</creatorcontrib><title>Selecting on age of female reproduction affects lifespan in both sexes and age-dependent reproductive effort in female (but not male) Ceratitis cosyra</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><addtitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</addtitle><description>The trade-off between lifespan and reproduction is central to our understanding of life-history evolution. Laboratory selection experiments have been a powerful tool for quantifying this trade-off, but these tend to be restricted in taxonomic scope, which may limit our understanding. In addition, research often focuses on the trade-off between lifespan and reproductive effort in females, and far less data test how lifespan trades off with different aspects of male reproduction (e.g. pre- and post-copulatory reproductive investment). Here, we examined the trade-off between lifespan and reproduction in females and males of the marula fruit fly, Ceratitis cosyra (Walker) (Diptera: Tephritidae). To do so, we selected downward or upward on age of peak female egg laying in C. cosyra for twenty generations. In multiple generations, we measured female and male lifespan and body size, female daily and lifetime fecundity, male courtship and mating success, as well as the number of sperm transferred at different ages and sperm storage asymmetry in spermathecae. Our selection regime appeared to achieve its aim; egg laying peaked earlier in females from downward selected lines than upward selected lines. The number of sperm transferred by males decreased in the upward selected flies, but other male reproductive traits remained the same across selection regimes. In contrast, with the wider literature, upward selection did not extend the lifespan of females or males after ten generations of selection. While lifespan in both sexes responded to selection on female egg laying schedules, it did not do so in a straightforward way. Moreover, male investment in reproductive traits was largely independent of selection regime. These counter-intuitive findings highlight the importance of working with a broad range of species and of considering the trade-off between reproduction and lifespan in both sexes. Significance statement The trade-off between lifespan and reproduction has been extensively studied in model species using various types of laboratory selection. A limited number of species have been considered using this approach, and the majority of the studies have focused on female, rather than male, reproductive effort. Here, we selected downwards and upwards on age of female reproduction in the marula fruit fly and measured survival, female fecundity, reproductive schedule, as well as male sperm transfer, sperm storage asymmetry, mating and calling success. We found a moderate trade-off between lifespan and early fecundity in downward selected flies, whereas no obvious trade-off was observed in upward selected lines. Regardless of the selection regime, reproductive scheduling was affected in females but not in males, while lifespan was affected in both sexes. Our results show that the timing of reproduction can evolve independently across the sexes, highlighting the importance of studying both females and males.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Ceratitis cosyra</subject><subject>Courtship</subject><subject>Egg laying</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fruit flies</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Life span</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mating</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproduction (biology)</subject><subject>Reproductive effort</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Sexual Conflict and Aging</subject><subject>Sexual Selection</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sperm</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KxDAUhYMoOI6-gKuAG11E89Nm2qUM_oHgQl2HNL0ZO3SSmqTivIjPa2sHdOXqcjnnO_dyEDpl9JJRuriKlHKZE8oZoYJKQYo9NGOZ4IQuJN9HMyoySvIsE4foKMY1pVSyopihr2dowaTGrbB3WK8Ae4stbHQLOEAXfN0P6ihZO_gibhsLsdMONw5XPr3hCJ8QsXb1SJMaOnA1uPSH_gAM1vqQRmaXfV71CTuf8Lhd4CUEnZrURGx83AZ9jA6sbiOc7OYcvd7evCzvyePT3cPy-pEYwcpEgEMOlZZSyLJidc2YAVPprDK50YNWilyXGfAyz5kWi8yArfUCSpZZKQqoxBydTbnDr-89xKTWvg9uOKl4LrmQUpbF4OKTywQfYwCrutBsdNgqRtXYv5r6V0P_6qd_NUJiguJgdisIv9H_UN_h0Yuk</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Malod, Kevin</creator><creator>Roets, Petrus D.</creator><creator>Bosua, Henrika</creator><creator>Archer, C. Ruth</creator><creator>Weldon, Christopher W.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6811-2717</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Selecting on age of female reproduction affects lifespan in both sexes and age-dependent reproductive effort in female (but not male) Ceratitis cosyra</title><author>Malod, Kevin ; Roets, Petrus D. ; Bosua, Henrika ; Archer, C. Ruth ; Weldon, Christopher W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e2e5eba66369b1dd11cecba4bc5ca2e5935a94e29551a374cefda7e914f638eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Ceratitis cosyra</topic><topic>Courtship</topic><topic>Egg laying</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fruit flies</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Life span</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mating</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproduction (biology)</topic><topic>Reproductive effort</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Sexual Conflict and Aging</topic><topic>Sexual Selection</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sperm</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malod, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roets, Petrus D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosua, Henrika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archer, C. Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weldon, Christopher W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malod, Kevin</au><au>Roets, Petrus D.</au><au>Bosua, Henrika</au><au>Archer, C. Ruth</au><au>Weldon, Christopher W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selecting on age of female reproduction affects lifespan in both sexes and age-dependent reproductive effort in female (but not male) Ceratitis cosyra</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><stitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</stitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>8</issue><artnum>123</artnum><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><abstract>The trade-off between lifespan and reproduction is central to our understanding of life-history evolution. Laboratory selection experiments have been a powerful tool for quantifying this trade-off, but these tend to be restricted in taxonomic scope, which may limit our understanding. In addition, research often focuses on the trade-off between lifespan and reproductive effort in females, and far less data test how lifespan trades off with different aspects of male reproduction (e.g. pre- and post-copulatory reproductive investment). Here, we examined the trade-off between lifespan and reproduction in females and males of the marula fruit fly, Ceratitis cosyra (Walker) (Diptera: Tephritidae). To do so, we selected downward or upward on age of peak female egg laying in C. cosyra for twenty generations. In multiple generations, we measured female and male lifespan and body size, female daily and lifetime fecundity, male courtship and mating success, as well as the number of sperm transferred at different ages and sperm storage asymmetry in spermathecae. Our selection regime appeared to achieve its aim; egg laying peaked earlier in females from downward selected lines than upward selected lines. The number of sperm transferred by males decreased in the upward selected flies, but other male reproductive traits remained the same across selection regimes. In contrast, with the wider literature, upward selection did not extend the lifespan of females or males after ten generations of selection. While lifespan in both sexes responded to selection on female egg laying schedules, it did not do so in a straightforward way. Moreover, male investment in reproductive traits was largely independent of selection regime. These counter-intuitive findings highlight the importance of working with a broad range of species and of considering the trade-off between reproduction and lifespan in both sexes. Significance statement The trade-off between lifespan and reproduction has been extensively studied in model species using various types of laboratory selection. A limited number of species have been considered using this approach, and the majority of the studies have focused on female, rather than male, reproductive effort. Here, we selected downwards and upwards on age of female reproduction in the marula fruit fly and measured survival, female fecundity, reproductive schedule, as well as male sperm transfer, sperm storage asymmetry, mating and calling success. We found a moderate trade-off between lifespan and early fecundity in downward selected flies, whereas no obvious trade-off was observed in upward selected lines. Regardless of the selection regime, reproductive scheduling was affected in females but not in males, while lifespan was affected in both sexes. Our results show that the timing of reproduction can evolve independently across the sexes, highlighting the importance of studying both females and males.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-021-03063-8</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6811-2717</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-5443
ispartof Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2021-08, Vol.75 (8), Article 123
issn 0340-5443
1432-0762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2562366698
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Age
Animal Ecology
Animal reproduction
Asymmetry
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Body size
Ceratitis cosyra
Courtship
Egg laying
Eggs
Fecundity
Females
Fruit flies
Fruits
Laboratories
Life history
Life Sciences
Life span
Males
Mating
Original Article
Reproduction
Reproduction (biology)
Reproductive effort
Schedules
Sexual Conflict and Aging
Sexual Selection
Species
Sperm
Tradeoffs
Zoology
title Selecting on age of female reproduction affects lifespan in both sexes and age-dependent reproductive effort in female (but not male) Ceratitis cosyra
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A19%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selecting%20on%20age%20of%20female%20reproduction%20affects%20lifespan%20in%20both%20sexes%20and%20age-dependent%20reproductive%20effort%20in%20female%20(but%20not%20male)%20Ceratitis%20cosyra&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Malod,%20Kevin&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=8&rft.artnum=123&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-021-03063-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2562366698%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2562366698&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true