Investigation of central electrode artefacts of ionisation chamber effect on dose calculation using advanced calculation algorithms AAA and Acuros XB

Aim:To investigate the central electrode artefact effect of different ion chambers in the verification phantom using the dose calculation algorithms Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB.Materials and methods:The dosimetric study was conducted using an in-house fabricated polymethyl m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of radiotherapy in practice 2021-09, Vol.20 (3), p.351-356
Hauptverfasser: Shaiju, V. S., Kumar, Rajesh, Rajasekhar, K. V., Zacharia, George, Phani, Debjani, Bhasi, Saju, Nair, Raghuram K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 356
container_issue 3
container_start_page 351
container_title Journal of radiotherapy in practice
container_volume 20
creator Shaiju, V. S.
Kumar, Rajesh
Rajasekhar, K. V.
Zacharia, George
Phani, Debjani
Bhasi, Saju
Nair, Raghuram K
description Aim:To investigate the central electrode artefact effect of different ion chambers in the verification phantom using the dose calculation algorithms Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB.Materials and methods:The dosimetric study was conducted using an in-house fabricated polymethyl methacrylate head phantom. The treatment planning system (TPS)-calculated doses in the phantom with detectors were compared against the dummy detector fillets using AAA and Acuros XB algorithm. The planned and measured doses were compared for the study.Results:The mean percentage variation in volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans using Acuros XB and the measurement in the head phantom are statistically significant (p-value = 0.001) for FC65 and CC13 chambers. In small volume chambers (A14SL and CC01), the measured and TPS-calculated dose shows a good agreement.Findings:The study confirmed the CT set of the phantom with detectors (FC65 and CC13) give more artefacts/heterogeneity caused a significant variation in dose calculation using Acuros XB. Therefore, the study suggests a method of using phantom CT set with the dummy detector for mean dose calculation for the Acuros XB algorithm.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1460396920000448
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2562184019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1460396920000448</cupid><sourcerecordid>2562184019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-825de46944138b48ec58bee70e49ce4a8f27c2404969197506f3718d51ca21b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9KxDAQxoMouK4-gLeA52qmTZv2WBf_LCx4UMFbSdNJt0u3WZN2wQfxfU3tgoiYS8J8v29m8hFyCewaGIibZ-AJi7IkC5k_nKdHZOZLIgCI4Pj7zYJRPyVnzm1GhDMxI5_Lbo-ub2rZN6ajRlOFXW9lS7FF1VtTIZW2Ry1V70bZU42bYLWW2xItRa09Sn2lMg6pkq0a2gkZXNPVVFZ72SmsfkmyrY1t-vXW0TzPqewqmqvBGkffbs_JiZatw4vDPSev93cvi8dg9fSwXOSrQEUg-iAN4wp5knEOUVryFFWcloiCIc8UcpnqUKiQM-7_DZmIWaIjAWkVg5IhlDyak6up786a98HnUGzMYDs_sgjjJISUM8g8BROl_HbOoi52ttlK-1EAK8b0iz_pe0908PiMbFPV-NP6f9cXr-eIKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2562184019</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of central electrode artefacts of ionisation chamber effect on dose calculation using advanced calculation algorithms AAA and Acuros XB</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Shaiju, V. S. ; Kumar, Rajesh ; Rajasekhar, K. V. ; Zacharia, George ; Phani, Debjani ; Bhasi, Saju ; Nair, Raghuram K</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaiju, V. S. ; Kumar, Rajesh ; Rajasekhar, K. V. ; Zacharia, George ; Phani, Debjani ; Bhasi, Saju ; Nair, Raghuram K</creatorcontrib><description>Aim:To investigate the central electrode artefact effect of different ion chambers in the verification phantom using the dose calculation algorithms Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB.Materials and methods:The dosimetric study was conducted using an in-house fabricated polymethyl methacrylate head phantom. The treatment planning system (TPS)-calculated doses in the phantom with detectors were compared against the dummy detector fillets using AAA and Acuros XB algorithm. The planned and measured doses were compared for the study.Results:The mean percentage variation in volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans using Acuros XB and the measurement in the head phantom are statistically significant (p-value = 0.001) for FC65 and CC13 chambers. In small volume chambers (A14SL and CC01), the measured and TPS-calculated dose shows a good agreement.Findings:The study confirmed the CT set of the phantom with detectors (FC65 and CC13) give more artefacts/heterogeneity caused a significant variation in dose calculation using Acuros XB. Therefore, the study suggests a method of using phantom CT set with the dummy detector for mean dose calculation for the Acuros XB algorithm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-3969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-1131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1460396920000448</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Detectors ; Dosimetry ; Electrodes ; Heterogeneity ; Ionization chambers ; Mathematical analysis ; Original Article ; Patients ; Polymethyl methacrylate ; Polymethylmethacrylate ; Quality control ; Sensors ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2021-09, Vol.20 (3), p.351-356</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-825de46944138b48ec58bee70e49ce4a8f27c2404969197506f3718d51ca21b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-825de46944138b48ec58bee70e49ce4a8f27c2404969197506f3718d51ca21b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6390-0669</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1460396920000448/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,27905,27906,55609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaiju, V. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajasekhar, K. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zacharia, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phani, Debjani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhasi, Saju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, Raghuram K</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of central electrode artefacts of ionisation chamber effect on dose calculation using advanced calculation algorithms AAA and Acuros XB</title><title>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</title><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><description>Aim:To investigate the central electrode artefact effect of different ion chambers in the verification phantom using the dose calculation algorithms Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB.Materials and methods:The dosimetric study was conducted using an in-house fabricated polymethyl methacrylate head phantom. The treatment planning system (TPS)-calculated doses in the phantom with detectors were compared against the dummy detector fillets using AAA and Acuros XB algorithm. The planned and measured doses were compared for the study.Results:The mean percentage variation in volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans using Acuros XB and the measurement in the head phantom are statistically significant (p-value = 0.001) for FC65 and CC13 chambers. In small volume chambers (A14SL and CC01), the measured and TPS-calculated dose shows a good agreement.Findings:The study confirmed the CT set of the phantom with detectors (FC65 and CC13) give more artefacts/heterogeneity caused a significant variation in dose calculation using Acuros XB. Therefore, the study suggests a method of using phantom CT set with the dummy detector for mean dose calculation for the Acuros XB algorithm.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Detectors</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Ionization chambers</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polymethyl methacrylate</subject><subject>Polymethylmethacrylate</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>1460-3969</issn><issn>1467-1131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9KxDAQxoMouK4-gLeA52qmTZv2WBf_LCx4UMFbSdNJt0u3WZN2wQfxfU3tgoiYS8J8v29m8hFyCewaGIibZ-AJi7IkC5k_nKdHZOZLIgCI4Pj7zYJRPyVnzm1GhDMxI5_Lbo-ub2rZN6ajRlOFXW9lS7FF1VtTIZW2Ry1V70bZU42bYLWW2xItRa09Sn2lMg6pkq0a2gkZXNPVVFZ72SmsfkmyrY1t-vXW0TzPqewqmqvBGkffbs_JiZatw4vDPSev93cvi8dg9fSwXOSrQEUg-iAN4wp5knEOUVryFFWcloiCIc8UcpnqUKiQM-7_DZmIWaIjAWkVg5IhlDyak6up786a98HnUGzMYDs_sgjjJISUM8g8BROl_HbOoi52ttlK-1EAK8b0iz_pe0908PiMbFPV-NP6f9cXr-eIKQ</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Shaiju, V. S.</creator><creator>Kumar, Rajesh</creator><creator>Rajasekhar, K. V.</creator><creator>Zacharia, George</creator><creator>Phani, Debjani</creator><creator>Bhasi, Saju</creator><creator>Nair, Raghuram K</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6390-0669</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Investigation of central electrode artefacts of ionisation chamber effect on dose calculation using advanced calculation algorithms AAA and Acuros XB</title><author>Shaiju, V. S. ; Kumar, Rajesh ; Rajasekhar, K. V. ; Zacharia, George ; Phani, Debjani ; Bhasi, Saju ; Nair, Raghuram K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-825de46944138b48ec58bee70e49ce4a8f27c2404969197506f3718d51ca21b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Detectors</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Ionization chambers</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polymethyl methacrylate</topic><topic>Polymethylmethacrylate</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaiju, V. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajasekhar, K. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zacharia, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phani, Debjani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhasi, Saju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, Raghuram K</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaiju, V. S.</au><au>Kumar, Rajesh</au><au>Rajasekhar, K. V.</au><au>Zacharia, George</au><au>Phani, Debjani</au><au>Bhasi, Saju</au><au>Nair, Raghuram K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of central electrode artefacts of ionisation chamber effect on dose calculation using advanced calculation algorithms AAA and Acuros XB</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>351-356</pages><issn>1460-3969</issn><eissn>1467-1131</eissn><abstract>Aim:To investigate the central electrode artefact effect of different ion chambers in the verification phantom using the dose calculation algorithms Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB.Materials and methods:The dosimetric study was conducted using an in-house fabricated polymethyl methacrylate head phantom. The treatment planning system (TPS)-calculated doses in the phantom with detectors were compared against the dummy detector fillets using AAA and Acuros XB algorithm. The planned and measured doses were compared for the study.Results:The mean percentage variation in volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans using Acuros XB and the measurement in the head phantom are statistically significant (p-value = 0.001) for FC65 and CC13 chambers. In small volume chambers (A14SL and CC01), the measured and TPS-calculated dose shows a good agreement.Findings:The study confirmed the CT set of the phantom with detectors (FC65 and CC13) give more artefacts/heterogeneity caused a significant variation in dose calculation using Acuros XB. Therefore, the study suggests a method of using phantom CT set with the dummy detector for mean dose calculation for the Acuros XB algorithm.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1460396920000448</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6390-0669</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1460-3969
ispartof Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2021-09, Vol.20 (3), p.351-356
issn 1460-3969
1467-1131
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2562184019
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Algorithms
Detectors
Dosimetry
Electrodes
Heterogeneity
Ionization chambers
Mathematical analysis
Original Article
Patients
Polymethyl methacrylate
Polymethylmethacrylate
Quality control
Sensors
Statistical analysis
title Investigation of central electrode artefacts of ionisation chamber effect on dose calculation using advanced calculation algorithms AAA and Acuros XB
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A13%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20central%20electrode%20artefacts%20of%20ionisation%20chamber%20effect%20on%20dose%20calculation%20using%20advanced%20calculation%20algorithms%20AAA%20and%20Acuros%20XB&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiotherapy%20in%20practice&rft.au=Shaiju,%20V.%20S.&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=351-356&rft.issn=1460-3969&rft.eissn=1467-1131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1460396920000448&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2562184019%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2562184019&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1460396920000448&rfr_iscdi=true