Investigation of central electrode artefacts of ionisation chamber effect on dose calculation using advanced calculation algorithms AAA and Acuros XB
Aim:To investigate the central electrode artefact effect of different ion chambers in the verification phantom using the dose calculation algorithms Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB.Materials and methods:The dosimetric study was conducted using an in-house fabricated polymethyl m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of radiotherapy in practice 2021-09, Vol.20 (3), p.351-356 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 356 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 351 |
container_title | Journal of radiotherapy in practice |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Shaiju, V. S. Kumar, Rajesh Rajasekhar, K. V. Zacharia, George Phani, Debjani Bhasi, Saju Nair, Raghuram K |
description | Aim:To investigate the central electrode artefact effect of different ion chambers in the verification phantom using the dose calculation algorithms Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB.Materials and methods:The dosimetric study was conducted using an in-house fabricated polymethyl methacrylate head phantom. The treatment planning system (TPS)-calculated doses in the phantom with detectors were compared against the dummy detector fillets using AAA and Acuros XB algorithm. The planned and measured doses were compared for the study.Results:The mean percentage variation in volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans using Acuros XB and the measurement in the head phantom are statistically significant (p-value = 0.001) for FC65 and CC13 chambers. In small volume chambers (A14SL and CC01), the measured and TPS-calculated dose shows a good agreement.Findings:The study confirmed the CT set of the phantom with detectors (FC65 and CC13) give more artefacts/heterogeneity caused a significant variation in dose calculation using Acuros XB. Therefore, the study suggests a method of using phantom CT set with the dummy detector for mean dose calculation for the Acuros XB algorithm. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1460396920000448 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2562184019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1460396920000448</cupid><sourcerecordid>2562184019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-825de46944138b48ec58bee70e49ce4a8f27c2404969197506f3718d51ca21b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9KxDAQxoMouK4-gLeA52qmTZv2WBf_LCx4UMFbSdNJt0u3WZN2wQfxfU3tgoiYS8J8v29m8hFyCewaGIibZ-AJi7IkC5k_nKdHZOZLIgCI4Pj7zYJRPyVnzm1GhDMxI5_Lbo-ub2rZN6ajRlOFXW9lS7FF1VtTIZW2Ry1V70bZU42bYLWW2xItRa09Sn2lMg6pkq0a2gkZXNPVVFZ72SmsfkmyrY1t-vXW0TzPqewqmqvBGkffbs_JiZatw4vDPSev93cvi8dg9fSwXOSrQEUg-iAN4wp5knEOUVryFFWcloiCIc8UcpnqUKiQM-7_DZmIWaIjAWkVg5IhlDyak6up786a98HnUGzMYDs_sgjjJISUM8g8BROl_HbOoi52ttlK-1EAK8b0iz_pe0908PiMbFPV-NP6f9cXr-eIKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2562184019</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of central electrode artefacts of ionisation chamber effect on dose calculation using advanced calculation algorithms AAA and Acuros XB</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Shaiju, V. S. ; Kumar, Rajesh ; Rajasekhar, K. V. ; Zacharia, George ; Phani, Debjani ; Bhasi, Saju ; Nair, Raghuram K</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaiju, V. S. ; Kumar, Rajesh ; Rajasekhar, K. V. ; Zacharia, George ; Phani, Debjani ; Bhasi, Saju ; Nair, Raghuram K</creatorcontrib><description>Aim:To investigate the central electrode artefact effect of different ion chambers in the verification phantom using the dose calculation algorithms Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB.Materials and methods:The dosimetric study was conducted using an in-house fabricated polymethyl methacrylate head phantom. The treatment planning system (TPS)-calculated doses in the phantom with detectors were compared against the dummy detector fillets using AAA and Acuros XB algorithm. The planned and measured doses were compared for the study.Results:The mean percentage variation in volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans using Acuros XB and the measurement in the head phantom are statistically significant (p-value = 0.001) for FC65 and CC13 chambers. In small volume chambers (A14SL and CC01), the measured and TPS-calculated dose shows a good agreement.Findings:The study confirmed the CT set of the phantom with detectors (FC65 and CC13) give more artefacts/heterogeneity caused a significant variation in dose calculation using Acuros XB. Therefore, the study suggests a method of using phantom CT set with the dummy detector for mean dose calculation for the Acuros XB algorithm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-3969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-1131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1460396920000448</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Detectors ; Dosimetry ; Electrodes ; Heterogeneity ; Ionization chambers ; Mathematical analysis ; Original Article ; Patients ; Polymethyl methacrylate ; Polymethylmethacrylate ; Quality control ; Sensors ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2021-09, Vol.20 (3), p.351-356</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-825de46944138b48ec58bee70e49ce4a8f27c2404969197506f3718d51ca21b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-825de46944138b48ec58bee70e49ce4a8f27c2404969197506f3718d51ca21b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6390-0669</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1460396920000448/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,27905,27906,55609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaiju, V. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajasekhar, K. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zacharia, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phani, Debjani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhasi, Saju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, Raghuram K</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of central electrode artefacts of ionisation chamber effect on dose calculation using advanced calculation algorithms AAA and Acuros XB</title><title>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</title><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><description>Aim:To investigate the central electrode artefact effect of different ion chambers in the verification phantom using the dose calculation algorithms Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB.Materials and methods:The dosimetric study was conducted using an in-house fabricated polymethyl methacrylate head phantom. The treatment planning system (TPS)-calculated doses in the phantom with detectors were compared against the dummy detector fillets using AAA and Acuros XB algorithm. The planned and measured doses were compared for the study.Results:The mean percentage variation in volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans using Acuros XB and the measurement in the head phantom are statistically significant (p-value = 0.001) for FC65 and CC13 chambers. In small volume chambers (A14SL and CC01), the measured and TPS-calculated dose shows a good agreement.Findings:The study confirmed the CT set of the phantom with detectors (FC65 and CC13) give more artefacts/heterogeneity caused a significant variation in dose calculation using Acuros XB. Therefore, the study suggests a method of using phantom CT set with the dummy detector for mean dose calculation for the Acuros XB algorithm.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Detectors</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Ionization chambers</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polymethyl methacrylate</subject><subject>Polymethylmethacrylate</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>1460-3969</issn><issn>1467-1131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9KxDAQxoMouK4-gLeA52qmTZv2WBf_LCx4UMFbSdNJt0u3WZN2wQfxfU3tgoiYS8J8v29m8hFyCewaGIibZ-AJi7IkC5k_nKdHZOZLIgCI4Pj7zYJRPyVnzm1GhDMxI5_Lbo-ub2rZN6ajRlOFXW9lS7FF1VtTIZW2Ry1V70bZU42bYLWW2xItRa09Sn2lMg6pkq0a2gkZXNPVVFZ72SmsfkmyrY1t-vXW0TzPqewqmqvBGkffbs_JiZatw4vDPSev93cvi8dg9fSwXOSrQEUg-iAN4wp5knEOUVryFFWcloiCIc8UcpnqUKiQM-7_DZmIWaIjAWkVg5IhlDyak6up786a98HnUGzMYDs_sgjjJISUM8g8BROl_HbOoi52ttlK-1EAK8b0iz_pe0908PiMbFPV-NP6f9cXr-eIKQ</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Shaiju, V. S.</creator><creator>Kumar, Rajesh</creator><creator>Rajasekhar, K. V.</creator><creator>Zacharia, George</creator><creator>Phani, Debjani</creator><creator>Bhasi, Saju</creator><creator>Nair, Raghuram K</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6390-0669</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Investigation of central electrode artefacts of ionisation chamber effect on dose calculation using advanced calculation algorithms AAA and Acuros XB</title><author>Shaiju, V. S. ; Kumar, Rajesh ; Rajasekhar, K. V. ; Zacharia, George ; Phani, Debjani ; Bhasi, Saju ; Nair, Raghuram K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-825de46944138b48ec58bee70e49ce4a8f27c2404969197506f3718d51ca21b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Detectors</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Ionization chambers</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polymethyl methacrylate</topic><topic>Polymethylmethacrylate</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaiju, V. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajasekhar, K. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zacharia, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phani, Debjani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhasi, Saju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, Raghuram K</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaiju, V. S.</au><au>Kumar, Rajesh</au><au>Rajasekhar, K. V.</au><au>Zacharia, George</au><au>Phani, Debjani</au><au>Bhasi, Saju</au><au>Nair, Raghuram K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of central electrode artefacts of ionisation chamber effect on dose calculation using advanced calculation algorithms AAA and Acuros XB</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>351-356</pages><issn>1460-3969</issn><eissn>1467-1131</eissn><abstract>Aim:To investigate the central electrode artefact effect of different ion chambers in the verification phantom using the dose calculation algorithms Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB.Materials and methods:The dosimetric study was conducted using an in-house fabricated polymethyl methacrylate head phantom. The treatment planning system (TPS)-calculated doses in the phantom with detectors were compared against the dummy detector fillets using AAA and Acuros XB algorithm. The planned and measured doses were compared for the study.Results:The mean percentage variation in volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans using Acuros XB and the measurement in the head phantom are statistically significant (p-value = 0.001) for FC65 and CC13 chambers. In small volume chambers (A14SL and CC01), the measured and TPS-calculated dose shows a good agreement.Findings:The study confirmed the CT set of the phantom with detectors (FC65 and CC13) give more artefacts/heterogeneity caused a significant variation in dose calculation using Acuros XB. Therefore, the study suggests a method of using phantom CT set with the dummy detector for mean dose calculation for the Acuros XB algorithm.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1460396920000448</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6390-0669</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1460-3969 |
ispartof | Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2021-09, Vol.20 (3), p.351-356 |
issn | 1460-3969 1467-1131 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2562184019 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Algorithms Detectors Dosimetry Electrodes Heterogeneity Ionization chambers Mathematical analysis Original Article Patients Polymethyl methacrylate Polymethylmethacrylate Quality control Sensors Statistical analysis |
title | Investigation of central electrode artefacts of ionisation chamber effect on dose calculation using advanced calculation algorithms AAA and Acuros XB |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A13%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20central%20electrode%20artefacts%20of%20ionisation%20chamber%20effect%20on%20dose%20calculation%20using%20advanced%20calculation%20algorithms%20AAA%20and%20Acuros%20XB&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiotherapy%20in%20practice&rft.au=Shaiju,%20V.%20S.&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=351-356&rft.issn=1460-3969&rft.eissn=1467-1131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1460396920000448&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2562184019%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2562184019&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1460396920000448&rfr_iscdi=true |