Missing in Action: The Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol and the WTO
This article addresses the question of how the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol (Global Strategy) and its Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) have been used in the context of discussions about alcohol and tobacco measures, respectively,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of risk regulation 2021-06, Vol.12 (2), p.477-498 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 498 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 477 |
container_title | European journal of risk regulation |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | O’BRIEN, Paula |
description | This article addresses the question of how the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol (Global Strategy) and its Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) have been used in the context of discussions about alcohol and tobacco measures, respectively, in the World Trade Organization (WTO) Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade. The article finds considerable differences not only in the extent to which the FCTC is used compared to the Global Strategy , but also in the ways in which the two global health instruments have been used in the WTO context. The article proffers three key reasons for these differences: the legal status of the instrument; the content of the instrument in terms of whether it contains guidance as to the use of detailed, evidence-based measures; and the role and legitimacy that the instrument accords to the relevant industry interests. The article considers how the insights from the research can inform the developments in global governance of alcohol that are underway in WHO policy. It also positions its findings in terms of the wider international law debates about hard law versus soft law, and whether different types of international regulatory instruments and the legal status of these instruments impact their effectiveness in supporting domestic public health measures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/err.2020.67 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2562173971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_err_2020_67</cupid><sourcerecordid>2562173971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-d6ca0513e8ae73129dbcdbf39090bceba4dbc12a276f63461a38db8d3bacfc1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtrAjEUhUNpoWJd9Q8Euixj8xiTSXcirRYsQqvYXchrdGSc2GRm4b9vrEI3vZsL93ycezgA3GM0xAjzJxfCkCCChoxfgR7BAmUFycU16OGC8YwI8XULBjHuUJpcoKJAPbB-r2Ksmg2sGjg2beWbZ7jcOjitvVY1_GyDat3mCFsPP5ztjINtUmcq7MuuhqvooC_huDZ-62uoGvsrr5eLO3BTqjq6wWX3wer1ZTmZZfPF9G0ynmcm5Wkzy4xCI0xdoRynmAirjdUlFUggbZxWeTpgoghnJaM5w4oWVheWamVKgw3tg4ez7yH4787FVu58F5r0UpIRI5hTwXGiHs-UCT7G4Ep5CNVehaPESJ7Kk6k8eSpPMp7o7EKrvQ6V3bg_0__4H379cIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2562173971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Missing in Action: The Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol and the WTO</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>O’BRIEN, Paula</creator><creatorcontrib>O’BRIEN, Paula</creatorcontrib><description>This article addresses the question of how the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol (Global Strategy) and its Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) have been used in the context of discussions about alcohol and tobacco measures, respectively, in the World Trade Organization (WTO) Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade. The article finds considerable differences not only in the extent to which the FCTC is used compared to the Global Strategy , but also in the ways in which the two global health instruments have been used in the WTO context. The article proffers three key reasons for these differences: the legal status of the instrument; the content of the instrument in terms of whether it contains guidance as to the use of detailed, evidence-based measures; and the role and legitimacy that the instrument accords to the relevant industry interests. The article considers how the insights from the research can inform the developments in global governance of alcohol that are underway in WHO policy. It also positions its findings in terms of the wider international law debates about hard law versus soft law, and whether different types of international regulatory instruments and the legal status of these instruments impact their effectiveness in supporting domestic public health measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1867-299X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-8249</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/err.2020.67</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Alcohol use ; Governance ; International ; International law ; Legal status ; Legitimacy ; Public health ; Tobacco ; Trade barriers ; Treaties</subject><ispartof>European journal of risk regulation, 2021-06, Vol.12 (2), p.477-498</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-d6ca0513e8ae73129dbcdbf39090bceba4dbc12a276f63461a38db8d3bacfc1c3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-6879-0489</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1867299X20000677/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O’BRIEN, Paula</creatorcontrib><title>Missing in Action: The Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol and the WTO</title><title>European journal of risk regulation</title><addtitle>Eur. j. risk regul</addtitle><description>This article addresses the question of how the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol (Global Strategy) and its Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) have been used in the context of discussions about alcohol and tobacco measures, respectively, in the World Trade Organization (WTO) Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade. The article finds considerable differences not only in the extent to which the FCTC is used compared to the Global Strategy , but also in the ways in which the two global health instruments have been used in the WTO context. The article proffers three key reasons for these differences: the legal status of the instrument; the content of the instrument in terms of whether it contains guidance as to the use of detailed, evidence-based measures; and the role and legitimacy that the instrument accords to the relevant industry interests. The article considers how the insights from the research can inform the developments in global governance of alcohol that are underway in WHO policy. It also positions its findings in terms of the wider international law debates about hard law versus soft law, and whether different types of international regulatory instruments and the legal status of these instruments impact their effectiveness in supporting domestic public health measures.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Alcohol use</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>International</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Legal status</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Trade barriers</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><issn>1867-299X</issn><issn>2190-8249</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEtrAjEUhUNpoWJd9Q8Euixj8xiTSXcirRYsQqvYXchrdGSc2GRm4b9vrEI3vZsL93ycezgA3GM0xAjzJxfCkCCChoxfgR7BAmUFycU16OGC8YwI8XULBjHuUJpcoKJAPbB-r2Ksmg2sGjg2beWbZ7jcOjitvVY1_GyDat3mCFsPP5ztjINtUmcq7MuuhqvooC_huDZ-62uoGvsrr5eLO3BTqjq6wWX3wer1ZTmZZfPF9G0ynmcm5Wkzy4xCI0xdoRynmAirjdUlFUggbZxWeTpgoghnJaM5w4oWVheWamVKgw3tg4ez7yH4787FVu58F5r0UpIRI5hTwXGiHs-UCT7G4Ep5CNVehaPESJ7Kk6k8eSpPMp7o7EKrvQ6V3bg_0__4H379cIQ</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>O’BRIEN, Paula</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6879-0489</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Missing in Action: The Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol and the WTO</title><author>O’BRIEN, Paula</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-d6ca0513e8ae73129dbcdbf39090bceba4dbc12a276f63461a38db8d3bacfc1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Alcohol use</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>International</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Legal status</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Trade barriers</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O’BRIEN, Paula</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European journal of risk regulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O’BRIEN, Paula</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Missing in Action: The Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol and the WTO</atitle><jtitle>European journal of risk regulation</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. j. risk regul</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>477</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>477-498</pages><issn>1867-299X</issn><eissn>2190-8249</eissn><abstract>This article addresses the question of how the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol (Global Strategy) and its Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) have been used in the context of discussions about alcohol and tobacco measures, respectively, in the World Trade Organization (WTO) Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade. The article finds considerable differences not only in the extent to which the FCTC is used compared to the Global Strategy , but also in the ways in which the two global health instruments have been used in the WTO context. The article proffers three key reasons for these differences: the legal status of the instrument; the content of the instrument in terms of whether it contains guidance as to the use of detailed, evidence-based measures; and the role and legitimacy that the instrument accords to the relevant industry interests. The article considers how the insights from the research can inform the developments in global governance of alcohol that are underway in WHO policy. It also positions its findings in terms of the wider international law debates about hard law versus soft law, and whether different types of international regulatory instruments and the legal status of these instruments impact their effectiveness in supporting domestic public health measures.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/err.2020.67</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6879-0489</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1867-299X |
ispartof | European journal of risk regulation, 2021-06, Vol.12 (2), p.477-498 |
issn | 1867-299X 2190-8249 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2562173971 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Agreements Alcohol use Governance International International law Legal status Legitimacy Public health Tobacco Trade barriers Treaties |
title | Missing in Action: The Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol and the WTO |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T14%3A31%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Missing%20in%20Action:%20The%20Global%20Strategy%20to%20Reduce%20the%20Harmful%20Use%20of%20Alcohol%20and%20the%20WTO&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20risk%20regulation&rft.au=O%E2%80%99BRIEN,%20Paula&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=477&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=477-498&rft.issn=1867-299X&rft.eissn=2190-8249&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/err.2020.67&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2562173971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2562173971&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_err_2020_67&rfr_iscdi=true |