On the Energy Concept Problem: Experiments and Interpretations
The principle of conservation of energy tells us that ‘energy can neither be created nor destroyed but only transformed’. The validity of the principle is without question. The problem is the concept. Contemporary physicists have asserted that we do not know what energy is. We find, however, 19th ce...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Foundations of science 2021-09, Vol.26 (3), p.607-624 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 624 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 607 |
container_title | Foundations of science |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Lopes Coelho, R. |
description | The principle of conservation of energy tells us that ‘energy can neither be created nor destroyed but only transformed’. The validity of the principle is without question. The problem is the concept. Contemporary physicists have asserted that we do not know what energy is. We find, however, 19th century physicists, contemporary physicists and historians of science who converge on the point: Mayer and Joule discovered energy. Therefore, we do not know what energy is, but we know these authors discovered it. What did they then discover? What can we learn from this with regard to the energy concept problem? To deal with this issue, I will distinguish between what the authors did experimentally and what they said about the phenomena. This method of analysis makes the difference in relation to historical works on the subject. In a second step, I will consider the introduction of the energy concept, which is from 1850s, and the reification of the energy in 1880s. Finally, I will address the energy conservation principle and the concept of energy conveyed by this principle in contemporary textbooks. As we shall see, the conservation of a magnitude that we call energy nowadays was discovered by Mayer and Joule; an indestructible and transformable entity was not. Adopting the original conservation principle would be enough to avoid the energy concept problem. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10699-020-09675-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2562077413</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2562077413</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-519cf2a0340550dca53e6671fd6f84bd5778ab617f28aa7859f687ea0a7727ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEUhIMoWKt_wNOC5-hLdpOX9SBIqVoo1IOeQ7qb1JY2uyYpaH-90RW8eZo5zMx7fIRcMrhmAHgTGci6psCBQi1R0MMRGTGBnKoK2XH2vCwpU5ydkrMYNwBQo5QjcrfwRXqzxdTbsPosJp1vbJ-K59Att3Z3W0w_ehvWO-tTLIxvi5lPNvTBJpPWnY_n5MSZbbQXvzomrw_Tl8kTnS8eZ5P7OW04QqKC1Y3jBsoKhIC2MaK0UiJzrXSqWrYCUZmlZOi4MgaVqJ1UaA0YRJ61HJOrYbcP3fvexqQ33T74fFJzITkgVqzMKT6kmtDFGKzTff7dhE_NQH9z0gMnnTnpH076kEvlUIo57Fc2_E3_0_oC6rtq4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2562077413</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Energy Concept Problem: Experiments and Interpretations</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lopes Coelho, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lopes Coelho, R.</creatorcontrib><description>The principle of conservation of energy tells us that ‘energy can neither be created nor destroyed but only transformed’. The validity of the principle is without question. The problem is the concept. Contemporary physicists have asserted that we do not know what energy is. We find, however, 19th century physicists, contemporary physicists and historians of science who converge on the point: Mayer and Joule discovered energy. Therefore, we do not know what energy is, but we know these authors discovered it. What did they then discover? What can we learn from this with regard to the energy concept problem? To deal with this issue, I will distinguish between what the authors did experimentally and what they said about the phenomena. This method of analysis makes the difference in relation to historical works on the subject. In a second step, I will consider the introduction of the energy concept, which is from 1850s, and the reification of the energy in 1880s. Finally, I will address the energy conservation principle and the concept of energy conveyed by this principle in contemporary textbooks. As we shall see, the conservation of a magnitude that we call energy nowadays was discovered by Mayer and Joule; an indestructible and transformable entity was not. Adopting the original conservation principle would be enough to avoid the energy concept problem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1233-1821</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8471</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10699-020-09675-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Conservation ; Education ; Energy ; Energy conservation ; Historians ; Mathematical Logic and Foundations ; Methodology of the Social Sciences ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Science ; Physicists ; Textbooks</subject><ispartof>Foundations of science, 2021-09, Vol.26 (3), p.607-624</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-519cf2a0340550dca53e6671fd6f84bd5778ab617f28aa7859f687ea0a7727ea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8422-3057</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10699-020-09675-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10699-020-09675-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lopes Coelho, R.</creatorcontrib><title>On the Energy Concept Problem: Experiments and Interpretations</title><title>Foundations of science</title><addtitle>Found Sci</addtitle><description>The principle of conservation of energy tells us that ‘energy can neither be created nor destroyed but only transformed’. The validity of the principle is without question. The problem is the concept. Contemporary physicists have asserted that we do not know what energy is. We find, however, 19th century physicists, contemporary physicists and historians of science who converge on the point: Mayer and Joule discovered energy. Therefore, we do not know what energy is, but we know these authors discovered it. What did they then discover? What can we learn from this with regard to the energy concept problem? To deal with this issue, I will distinguish between what the authors did experimentally and what they said about the phenomena. This method of analysis makes the difference in relation to historical works on the subject. In a second step, I will consider the introduction of the energy concept, which is from 1850s, and the reification of the energy in 1880s. Finally, I will address the energy conservation principle and the concept of energy conveyed by this principle in contemporary textbooks. As we shall see, the conservation of a magnitude that we call energy nowadays was discovered by Mayer and Joule; an indestructible and transformable entity was not. Adopting the original conservation principle would be enough to avoid the energy concept problem.</description><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Historians</subject><subject>Mathematical Logic and Foundations</subject><subject>Methodology of the Social Sciences</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Physicists</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><issn>1233-1821</issn><issn>1572-8471</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEUhIMoWKt_wNOC5-hLdpOX9SBIqVoo1IOeQ7qb1JY2uyYpaH-90RW8eZo5zMx7fIRcMrhmAHgTGci6psCBQi1R0MMRGTGBnKoK2XH2vCwpU5ydkrMYNwBQo5QjcrfwRXqzxdTbsPosJp1vbJ-K59Att3Z3W0w_ehvWO-tTLIxvi5lPNvTBJpPWnY_n5MSZbbQXvzomrw_Tl8kTnS8eZ5P7OW04QqKC1Y3jBsoKhIC2MaK0UiJzrXSqWrYCUZmlZOi4MgaVqJ1UaA0YRJ61HJOrYbcP3fvexqQ33T74fFJzITkgVqzMKT6kmtDFGKzTff7dhE_NQH9z0gMnnTnpH076kEvlUIo57Fc2_E3_0_oC6rtq4g</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Lopes Coelho, R.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8422-3057</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>On the Energy Concept Problem: Experiments and Interpretations</title><author>Lopes Coelho, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-519cf2a0340550dca53e6671fd6f84bd5778ab617f28aa7859f687ea0a7727ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Historians</topic><topic>Mathematical Logic and Foundations</topic><topic>Methodology of the Social Sciences</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Physicists</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lopes Coelho, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Foundations of science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lopes Coelho, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the Energy Concept Problem: Experiments and Interpretations</atitle><jtitle>Foundations of science</jtitle><stitle>Found Sci</stitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>624</epage><pages>607-624</pages><issn>1233-1821</issn><eissn>1572-8471</eissn><abstract>The principle of conservation of energy tells us that ‘energy can neither be created nor destroyed but only transformed’. The validity of the principle is without question. The problem is the concept. Contemporary physicists have asserted that we do not know what energy is. We find, however, 19th century physicists, contemporary physicists and historians of science who converge on the point: Mayer and Joule discovered energy. Therefore, we do not know what energy is, but we know these authors discovered it. What did they then discover? What can we learn from this with regard to the energy concept problem? To deal with this issue, I will distinguish between what the authors did experimentally and what they said about the phenomena. This method of analysis makes the difference in relation to historical works on the subject. In a second step, I will consider the introduction of the energy concept, which is from 1850s, and the reification of the energy in 1880s. Finally, I will address the energy conservation principle and the concept of energy conveyed by this principle in contemporary textbooks. As we shall see, the conservation of a magnitude that we call energy nowadays was discovered by Mayer and Joule; an indestructible and transformable entity was not. Adopting the original conservation principle would be enough to avoid the energy concept problem.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10699-020-09675-z</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8422-3057</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1233-1821 |
ispartof | Foundations of science, 2021-09, Vol.26 (3), p.607-624 |
issn | 1233-1821 1572-8471 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2562077413 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Conservation Education Energy Energy conservation Historians Mathematical Logic and Foundations Methodology of the Social Sciences Philosophy Philosophy of Science Physicists Textbooks |
title | On the Energy Concept Problem: Experiments and Interpretations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T22%3A35%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Energy%20Concept%20Problem:%20Experiments%20and%20Interpretations&rft.jtitle=Foundations%20of%20science&rft.au=Lopes%20Coelho,%20R.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=624&rft.pages=607-624&rft.issn=1233-1821&rft.eissn=1572-8471&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10699-020-09675-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2562077413%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2562077413&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |