Rawls and right-wing populism— A qualified defense of the former: A reply to Gila Stopler
Abstract This reply to Gila Stopler’s provocative piece on the possible complicity of political liberalism and right-wing populism welcomes Stopler’s strategy of identifying structural weaknesses in liberal theory. But it also presents three specific disagreements: first, it is argued that Rawls is...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of constitutional law 2021-04, Vol.19 (2), p.419-422 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 422 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 419 |
| container_title | International journal of constitutional law |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Müller, Jan-Werner |
| description | Abstract
This reply to Gila Stopler’s provocative piece on the possible complicity of political liberalism and right-wing populism welcomes Stopler’s strategy of identifying structural weaknesses in liberal theory. But it also presents three specific disagreements: first, it is argued that Rawls is much less of a defender of the status quo in really existing liberal democracies than Stopler makes him out to be; second, the argument is advanced that political liberalism has significant resources to counter right-wing populism; and, third and most important, it is claimed, following the work of philosophers such as Gina Schouten, that political liberalism can (and must) incorporate feminist concerns. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/icon/moab027 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2561964234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20210723050521</informt_id><oup_id>10.1093/icon/moab027</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2561964234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f5a4eddce402886834df937684f58cc08242494256e67c73e03d8947a0626c4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUhoMoWKs7H2DAhRtj55ZJ4q4UbYWC4GXlYhjn0k5JMulMQunOh_AJfRITUl26OofDd77D-aPoEsFbBHMysdJVk9KJD4jTo2iEaEpjzJL8-K-n8DQ6C2EDIcqTJBtF789iVwQgKgW8Xa2beGerFahd3RY2lN-fX2AKtq0orLFaAaWNroIGzoBmrYFxvtT-rkO8ros9aByY20KAl8bVhfbn0YkRRdAXhzqO3h7uX2eLePk0f5xNl7EkDDaxSQTVSklNIc4ylhGqTE5SllGTZFLCDFNMc4oTplkqU6IhUVlOUwEZZpIqMo6uBm_t3bbVoeEb1_qqO8m7JZQzigntqJuBkt6F4LXhtbel8HuOIO_j4318_BBfhy8G3Je24WJlQ93woIWXa26r_vNu7PyKK2d7AyGI_WIYYgRTTGACE4w61fWgcm39_9EfNV-KEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561964234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rawls and right-wing populism— A qualified defense of the former: A reply to Gila Stopler</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Müller, Jan-Werner</creator><creatorcontrib>Müller, Jan-Werner</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
This reply to Gila Stopler’s provocative piece on the possible complicity of political liberalism and right-wing populism welcomes Stopler’s strategy of identifying structural weaknesses in liberal theory. But it also presents three specific disagreements: first, it is argued that Rawls is much less of a defender of the status quo in really existing liberal democracies than Stopler makes him out to be; second, the argument is advanced that political liberalism has significant resources to counter right-wing populism; and, third and most important, it is claimed, following the work of philosophers such as Gina Schouten, that political liberalism can (and must) incorporate feminist concerns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1474-2640</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-2659</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/icon/moab027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Democracy ; Feminism ; Feminist theory ; Liberalism ; Philosophers ; Political science ; Populism ; Rawls, John (1921-2002) ; Right wing politics</subject><ispartof>International journal of constitutional law, 2021-04, Vol.19 (2), p.419-422</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Oxford University Press and New York University School of Law. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2021</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Apr 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f5a4eddce402886834df937684f58cc08242494256e67c73e03d8947a0626c4d3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-4627-2509</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Müller, Jan-Werner</creatorcontrib><title>Rawls and right-wing populism— A qualified defense of the former: A reply to Gila Stopler</title><title>International journal of constitutional law</title><description>Abstract
This reply to Gila Stopler’s provocative piece on the possible complicity of political liberalism and right-wing populism welcomes Stopler’s strategy of identifying structural weaknesses in liberal theory. But it also presents three specific disagreements: first, it is argued that Rawls is much less of a defender of the status quo in really existing liberal democracies than Stopler makes him out to be; second, the argument is advanced that political liberalism has significant resources to counter right-wing populism; and, third and most important, it is claimed, following the work of philosophers such as Gina Schouten, that political liberalism can (and must) incorporate feminist concerns.</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Feminist theory</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Rawls, John (1921-2002)</subject><subject>Right wing politics</subject><issn>1474-2640</issn><issn>1474-2659</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUhoMoWKs7H2DAhRtj55ZJ4q4UbYWC4GXlYhjn0k5JMulMQunOh_AJfRITUl26OofDd77D-aPoEsFbBHMysdJVk9KJD4jTo2iEaEpjzJL8-K-n8DQ6C2EDIcqTJBtF789iVwQgKgW8Xa2beGerFahd3RY2lN-fX2AKtq0orLFaAaWNroIGzoBmrYFxvtT-rkO8ros9aByY20KAl8bVhfbn0YkRRdAXhzqO3h7uX2eLePk0f5xNl7EkDDaxSQTVSklNIc4ylhGqTE5SllGTZFLCDFNMc4oTplkqU6IhUVlOUwEZZpIqMo6uBm_t3bbVoeEb1_qqO8m7JZQzigntqJuBkt6F4LXhtbel8HuOIO_j4318_BBfhy8G3Je24WJlQ93woIWXa26r_vNu7PyKK2d7AyGI_WIYYgRTTGACE4w61fWgcm39_9EfNV-KEw</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Müller, Jan-Werner</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4627-2509</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Rawls and right-wing populism— A qualified defense of the former: A reply to Gila Stopler</title><author>Müller, Jan-Werner</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f5a4eddce402886834df937684f58cc08242494256e67c73e03d8947a0626c4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Feminist theory</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Rawls, John (1921-2002)</topic><topic>Right wing politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Müller, Jan-Werner</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International journal of constitutional law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Müller, Jan-Werner</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rawls and right-wing populism— A qualified defense of the former: A reply to Gila Stopler</atitle><jtitle>International journal of constitutional law</jtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>422</epage><pages>419-422</pages><issn>1474-2640</issn><eissn>1474-2659</eissn><abstract>Abstract
This reply to Gila Stopler’s provocative piece on the possible complicity of political liberalism and right-wing populism welcomes Stopler’s strategy of identifying structural weaknesses in liberal theory. But it also presents three specific disagreements: first, it is argued that Rawls is much less of a defender of the status quo in really existing liberal democracies than Stopler makes him out to be; second, the argument is advanced that political liberalism has significant resources to counter right-wing populism; and, third and most important, it is claimed, following the work of philosophers such as Gina Schouten, that political liberalism can (and must) incorporate feminist concerns.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/icon/moab027</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4627-2509</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1474-2640 |
| ispartof | International journal of constitutional law, 2021-04, Vol.19 (2), p.419-422 |
| issn | 1474-2640 1474-2659 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2561964234 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Political Science Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
| subjects | Democracy Feminism Feminist theory Liberalism Philosophers Political science Populism Rawls, John (1921-2002) Right wing politics |
| title | Rawls and right-wing populism— A qualified defense of the former: A reply to Gila Stopler |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A46%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rawls%20and%20right-wing%20populism%E2%80%94%20A%20qualified%20defense%20of%20the%20former:%20A%20reply%20to%20Gila%20Stopler&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20constitutional%20law&rft.au=M%C3%BCller,%20Jan-Werner&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=422&rft.pages=419-422&rft.issn=1474-2640&rft.eissn=1474-2659&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/icon/moab027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2561964234%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561964234&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20210723050521&rft_oup_id=10.1093/icon/moab027&rfr_iscdi=true |