Self-organizing map estimator for the crop water stress index

•SOM based model is developed for predicting the CWSI using environmental variables.•Predicted CWSI correlated well with the observed CWSI for common field moisture conditions.•SOM model performance is impacted by significant proportion of zero CWSI values in the dataset. Crop water stress index (CW...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computers and electronics in agriculture 2021-08, Vol.187, p.106232, Article 106232
Hauptverfasser: Kumar, Navsal, Rustum, Rabee, Shankar, Vijay, Adeloye, Adebayo J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106232
container_title Computers and electronics in agriculture
container_volume 187
creator Kumar, Navsal
Rustum, Rabee
Shankar, Vijay
Adeloye, Adebayo J.
description •SOM based model is developed for predicting the CWSI using environmental variables.•Predicted CWSI correlated well with the observed CWSI for common field moisture conditions.•SOM model performance is impacted by significant proportion of zero CWSI values in the dataset. Crop water stress index (CWSI) is a reliable, economic and non-destructive method of monitoring the onset of water stress for irrigation scheduling purposes. Its application, however, is limited due to the need of obtaining the baseline canopy temperatures. This study developed a self-organizing map (SOM) based model to predict the CWSI using microclimatic variables, namely air temperature, canopy temperature and relative humidity. The canopy temperature measurements were made from Indian mustard crop grown in a humid sub-tropical agro-climate during the 2017 and 2018 cropping seasons. Eight levels of irrigation treatments (I1 – I8) based on maximum allowable depletion of available soil water were considered in the study. The CWSI for treatments I2 – I7 was computed using the empirical approach based on the experimentally measured baseline canopy temperatures from treatments I1 and I8. The number of data points used was 1260 and 1350 for model training and testing, respectively. The developed SOM model was evaluated using the error indices Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), bias error (BE), absolute error (AE), and coefficient of determination (R2). The SOM predicted CWSI presented a good agreement with the baseline computed CWSI values during model training (R2 = 0.98, NSE = 0.97, AE = 0.018, BE = 0.0004) and testing (R2 = 0.98, NSE = 0.98, AE = 0.018, BE = 0.002). Treatment specific analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of SOM predicted CWSI for different irrigation levels. Results indicated that the presence of zero CWSI values in a significant proportion in the dataset impacted the model prediction performance at low CWSI (
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106232
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2561963605</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168169921002490</els_id><sourcerecordid>2561963605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-a2502c54ef72a37d71fa231d745e6171bac87c4730d147f725e6324cf845bb1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIfcLDEOcHrR5wcQEIVL6kSB-Bsuc6mOGqTYKe8vh5X4cxhtdrRzOzuEHIOLAcGxWWbu3472HXOGYcEFVzwAzKDUvNMA9OHZJZoZQZFVR2Tkxhbluaq1DNy9YybJuvD2nb-x3drurUDxTj6rR37QJtU4xtSF_qBftoRA41jwBip72r8OiVHjd1EPPvrc_J6d_uyeMiWT_ePi5tl5kSpxsxyxbhTEhvNrdC1hsZyAbWWCgvQsLKu1E5qwWqQOpESLLh0TSnVagW1mJOLyXcI_fsunWfafhe6tNJwVUBViIKpxJITK10bY8DGDCH9Eb4NMLMPyrRmCsrsgzJTUEl2PckwffDhMZjoPHYOax_Qjabu_f8Gv7CVce0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561963605</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self-organizing map estimator for the crop water stress index</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kumar, Navsal ; Rustum, Rabee ; Shankar, Vijay ; Adeloye, Adebayo J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Navsal ; Rustum, Rabee ; Shankar, Vijay ; Adeloye, Adebayo J.</creatorcontrib><description>•SOM based model is developed for predicting the CWSI using environmental variables.•Predicted CWSI correlated well with the observed CWSI for common field moisture conditions.•SOM model performance is impacted by significant proportion of zero CWSI values in the dataset. Crop water stress index (CWSI) is a reliable, economic and non-destructive method of monitoring the onset of water stress for irrigation scheduling purposes. Its application, however, is limited due to the need of obtaining the baseline canopy temperatures. This study developed a self-organizing map (SOM) based model to predict the CWSI using microclimatic variables, namely air temperature, canopy temperature and relative humidity. The canopy temperature measurements were made from Indian mustard crop grown in a humid sub-tropical agro-climate during the 2017 and 2018 cropping seasons. Eight levels of irrigation treatments (I1 – I8) based on maximum allowable depletion of available soil water were considered in the study. The CWSI for treatments I2 – I7 was computed using the empirical approach based on the experimentally measured baseline canopy temperatures from treatments I1 and I8. The number of data points used was 1260 and 1350 for model training and testing, respectively. The developed SOM model was evaluated using the error indices Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), bias error (BE), absolute error (AE), and coefficient of determination (R2). The SOM predicted CWSI presented a good agreement with the baseline computed CWSI values during model training (R2 = 0.98, NSE = 0.97, AE = 0.018, BE = 0.0004) and testing (R2 = 0.98, NSE = 0.98, AE = 0.018, BE = 0.002). Treatment specific analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of SOM predicted CWSI for different irrigation levels. Results indicated that the presence of zero CWSI values in a significant proportion in the dataset impacted the model prediction performance at low CWSI (&lt;0.1) values, with an R2 of 0.71 during testing. Nonetheless, the model performed exceptionally well in predicting CWSI values between 0.1 and 0.6 (R2 = 0.93–0.98, NSE = 0.92–0.98, AE = 0.013–0.015, BE = −0.002–0.004), which is the commonly observed CWSI range for irrigation scheduling in field crops. For better understanding, the developed SOM model was also analysed through the component planes, U-matrix, clusters and high-low bar planes in the cluster features.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1699</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106232</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Air temperature ; Canopies ; Computation ; Crop Water Stress Index ; Data points ; Depletion ; Empirical analysis ; Indian mustard ; Irrigation ; Irrigation scheduling ; Model testing ; Mustard ; Neural network ; Nondestructive testing ; Performance evaluation ; Performance prediction ; Relative humidity ; Self organizing maps ; Self-organizing map ; Soil water ; Temperature ; Training ; Unsupervised learning</subject><ispartof>Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2021-08, Vol.187, p.106232, Article 106232</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-a2502c54ef72a37d71fa231d745e6171bac87c4730d147f725e6324cf845bb1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-a2502c54ef72a37d71fa231d745e6171bac87c4730d147f725e6324cf845bb1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169921002490$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Navsal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rustum, Rabee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankar, Vijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adeloye, Adebayo J.</creatorcontrib><title>Self-organizing map estimator for the crop water stress index</title><title>Computers and electronics in agriculture</title><description>•SOM based model is developed for predicting the CWSI using environmental variables.•Predicted CWSI correlated well with the observed CWSI for common field moisture conditions.•SOM model performance is impacted by significant proportion of zero CWSI values in the dataset. Crop water stress index (CWSI) is a reliable, economic and non-destructive method of monitoring the onset of water stress for irrigation scheduling purposes. Its application, however, is limited due to the need of obtaining the baseline canopy temperatures. This study developed a self-organizing map (SOM) based model to predict the CWSI using microclimatic variables, namely air temperature, canopy temperature and relative humidity. The canopy temperature measurements were made from Indian mustard crop grown in a humid sub-tropical agro-climate during the 2017 and 2018 cropping seasons. Eight levels of irrigation treatments (I1 – I8) based on maximum allowable depletion of available soil water were considered in the study. The CWSI for treatments I2 – I7 was computed using the empirical approach based on the experimentally measured baseline canopy temperatures from treatments I1 and I8. The number of data points used was 1260 and 1350 for model training and testing, respectively. The developed SOM model was evaluated using the error indices Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), bias error (BE), absolute error (AE), and coefficient of determination (R2). The SOM predicted CWSI presented a good agreement with the baseline computed CWSI values during model training (R2 = 0.98, NSE = 0.97, AE = 0.018, BE = 0.0004) and testing (R2 = 0.98, NSE = 0.98, AE = 0.018, BE = 0.002). Treatment specific analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of SOM predicted CWSI for different irrigation levels. Results indicated that the presence of zero CWSI values in a significant proportion in the dataset impacted the model prediction performance at low CWSI (&lt;0.1) values, with an R2 of 0.71 during testing. Nonetheless, the model performed exceptionally well in predicting CWSI values between 0.1 and 0.6 (R2 = 0.93–0.98, NSE = 0.92–0.98, AE = 0.013–0.015, BE = −0.002–0.004), which is the commonly observed CWSI range for irrigation scheduling in field crops. For better understanding, the developed SOM model was also analysed through the component planes, U-matrix, clusters and high-low bar planes in the cluster features.</description><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Crop Water Stress Index</subject><subject>Data points</subject><subject>Depletion</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Indian mustard</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Irrigation scheduling</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>Mustard</subject><subject>Neural network</subject><subject>Nondestructive testing</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Relative humidity</subject><subject>Self organizing maps</subject><subject>Self-organizing map</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Unsupervised learning</subject><issn>0168-1699</issn><issn>1872-7107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIfcLDEOcHrR5wcQEIVL6kSB-Bsuc6mOGqTYKe8vh5X4cxhtdrRzOzuEHIOLAcGxWWbu3472HXOGYcEFVzwAzKDUvNMA9OHZJZoZQZFVR2Tkxhbluaq1DNy9YybJuvD2nb-x3drurUDxTj6rR37QJtU4xtSF_qBftoRA41jwBip72r8OiVHjd1EPPvrc_J6d_uyeMiWT_ePi5tl5kSpxsxyxbhTEhvNrdC1hsZyAbWWCgvQsLKu1E5qwWqQOpESLLh0TSnVagW1mJOLyXcI_fsunWfafhe6tNJwVUBViIKpxJITK10bY8DGDCH9Eb4NMLMPyrRmCsrsgzJTUEl2PckwffDhMZjoPHYOax_Qjabu_f8Gv7CVce0</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Kumar, Navsal</creator><creator>Rustum, Rabee</creator><creator>Shankar, Vijay</creator><creator>Adeloye, Adebayo J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Self-organizing map estimator for the crop water stress index</title><author>Kumar, Navsal ; Rustum, Rabee ; Shankar, Vijay ; Adeloye, Adebayo J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-a2502c54ef72a37d71fa231d745e6171bac87c4730d147f725e6324cf845bb1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Crop Water Stress Index</topic><topic>Data points</topic><topic>Depletion</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Indian mustard</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Irrigation scheduling</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>Mustard</topic><topic>Neural network</topic><topic>Nondestructive testing</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Relative humidity</topic><topic>Self organizing maps</topic><topic>Self-organizing map</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Unsupervised learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Navsal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rustum, Rabee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankar, Vijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adeloye, Adebayo J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers and electronics in agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, Navsal</au><au>Rustum, Rabee</au><au>Shankar, Vijay</au><au>Adeloye, Adebayo J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self-organizing map estimator for the crop water stress index</atitle><jtitle>Computers and electronics in agriculture</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>187</volume><spage>106232</spage><pages>106232-</pages><artnum>106232</artnum><issn>0168-1699</issn><eissn>1872-7107</eissn><abstract>•SOM based model is developed for predicting the CWSI using environmental variables.•Predicted CWSI correlated well with the observed CWSI for common field moisture conditions.•SOM model performance is impacted by significant proportion of zero CWSI values in the dataset. Crop water stress index (CWSI) is a reliable, economic and non-destructive method of monitoring the onset of water stress for irrigation scheduling purposes. Its application, however, is limited due to the need of obtaining the baseline canopy temperatures. This study developed a self-organizing map (SOM) based model to predict the CWSI using microclimatic variables, namely air temperature, canopy temperature and relative humidity. The canopy temperature measurements were made from Indian mustard crop grown in a humid sub-tropical agro-climate during the 2017 and 2018 cropping seasons. Eight levels of irrigation treatments (I1 – I8) based on maximum allowable depletion of available soil water were considered in the study. The CWSI for treatments I2 – I7 was computed using the empirical approach based on the experimentally measured baseline canopy temperatures from treatments I1 and I8. The number of data points used was 1260 and 1350 for model training and testing, respectively. The developed SOM model was evaluated using the error indices Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), bias error (BE), absolute error (AE), and coefficient of determination (R2). The SOM predicted CWSI presented a good agreement with the baseline computed CWSI values during model training (R2 = 0.98, NSE = 0.97, AE = 0.018, BE = 0.0004) and testing (R2 = 0.98, NSE = 0.98, AE = 0.018, BE = 0.002). Treatment specific analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of SOM predicted CWSI for different irrigation levels. Results indicated that the presence of zero CWSI values in a significant proportion in the dataset impacted the model prediction performance at low CWSI (&lt;0.1) values, with an R2 of 0.71 during testing. Nonetheless, the model performed exceptionally well in predicting CWSI values between 0.1 and 0.6 (R2 = 0.93–0.98, NSE = 0.92–0.98, AE = 0.013–0.015, BE = −0.002–0.004), which is the commonly observed CWSI range for irrigation scheduling in field crops. For better understanding, the developed SOM model was also analysed through the component planes, U-matrix, clusters and high-low bar planes in the cluster features.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.compag.2021.106232</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-1699
ispartof Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2021-08, Vol.187, p.106232, Article 106232
issn 0168-1699
1872-7107
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2561963605
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Air temperature
Canopies
Computation
Crop Water Stress Index
Data points
Depletion
Empirical analysis
Indian mustard
Irrigation
Irrigation scheduling
Model testing
Mustard
Neural network
Nondestructive testing
Performance evaluation
Performance prediction
Relative humidity
Self organizing maps
Self-organizing map
Soil water
Temperature
Training
Unsupervised learning
title Self-organizing map estimator for the crop water stress index
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T03%3A25%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self-organizing%20map%20estimator%20for%20the%20crop%20water%20stress%20index&rft.jtitle=Computers%20and%20electronics%20in%20agriculture&rft.au=Kumar,%20Navsal&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=187&rft.spage=106232&rft.pages=106232-&rft.artnum=106232&rft.issn=0168-1699&rft.eissn=1872-7107&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106232&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2561963605%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561963605&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0168169921002490&rfr_iscdi=true