Model prediction capacity of ephemeral gully evolution in conservation tillage systems

Ephemeral gully (EG) erosion has an important impact on agricultural soil losses and increases field surface hydrology connectivity and transport of pollutants to nearby water bodies. Watershed models including an EG component are scarce and not yet properly evaluated. The objective of this study is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth surface processes and landforms 2021-08, Vol.46 (10), p.1909-1925
Hauptverfasser: Luquin, Eduardo, Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A., Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael, Bingner, Ronald L., Cruse, Richard M., Momm, Henrique G., Wells, Robert R., Casalí, Javier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1925
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1909
container_title Earth surface processes and landforms
container_volume 46
creator Luquin, Eduardo
Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A.
Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael
Bingner, Ronald L.
Cruse, Richard M.
Momm, Henrique G.
Wells, Robert R.
Casalí, Javier
description Ephemeral gully (EG) erosion has an important impact on agricultural soil losses and increases field surface hydrology connectivity and transport of pollutants to nearby water bodies. Watershed models including an EG component are scarce and not yet properly evaluated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the capacity of one such tool, AnnAGNPS, to simulate the evolution of two EG formed in a conservation tillage system. The dataset for model testing included runoff measurements and EG morphological characteristics during 3 years. Model evaluation focused on EG evolution of volume, width, and length model outputs, and included calibration and testing phases and a global sensitivity analysis (GSA). While the model did not fully reproduce width and length, the model efficiency to simulate EG volume was satisfactory for both calibration and testing phases, supporting the watershed management objectives of the model. GSA revealed that the most sensitive factors were EG depth, critical shear stress, headcut detachment exponent coefficient b, and headcut detachment leading coefficient a. For EG outputs the model was additive, showing low sensitivity to interactions between the inputs. Prediction of EG spatial evolution on conservation tillage systems requires improved development of gully erosion components, since many of the processes were developed originally for traditional tillage practices or larger channel systems. Our results identify the need for future research when EG form within conservation tillage systems, in particular to study gully headcut, soil erodibility, and width functions specific to these practices. A complete evaluation of an ephemeral gully model (AnnAGNPS) was performed. The analysis included calibration and testing against observed volumes combined with a global sensitivity analysis to identify the factors and processes influencing ephemeral gully development in conservation agricultural systems. Overall, the model performance was satisfactory and the most sensitive input factors were channel depth, critical shear stress and headcut detachment parameters.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/esp.5134
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2561776257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2561776257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3504-8b2fe3f05b573233dc219eaac02759ac6e3afc74ebfd3c9b01615318efd4255b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLAzEUBeAgCtYq-BMCbtxMzWMymSyl-IKKgo9tyGRu6pS0GZOZyvx7p61bV5cLH-fAQeiSkhklhN1AameC8vwITShRRaZKLo_RhFAlM8W5PEVnKa0IoTQv1QR9PocaPG4j1I3tmrDB1rTGNt2Ag8PQfsEaovF42Xs_YNgG3-9VM8KwSRC3Zv93jfdmCTgNqYN1OkcnzvgEF393ij7u797nj9ni5eFpfrvIDBckz8qKOeCOiEpIzjivLaMKjLGESaGMLYAbZ2UOlau5VRWhBRWcluDqnAlR8Sm6OuS2MXz3kDq9Cn3cjJWaiYJKWbAxeYquD8rGkFIEp9vYrE0cNCV6t5oeV9O71UaaHehP42H41-m7t9e9_wU6wm9s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561776257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Model prediction capacity of ephemeral gully evolution in conservation tillage systems</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Luquin, Eduardo ; Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A. ; Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael ; Bingner, Ronald L. ; Cruse, Richard M. ; Momm, Henrique G. ; Wells, Robert R. ; Casalí, Javier</creator><creatorcontrib>Luquin, Eduardo ; Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A. ; Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael ; Bingner, Ronald L. ; Cruse, Richard M. ; Momm, Henrique G. ; Wells, Robert R. ; Casalí, Javier</creatorcontrib><description>Ephemeral gully (EG) erosion has an important impact on agricultural soil losses and increases field surface hydrology connectivity and transport of pollutants to nearby water bodies. Watershed models including an EG component are scarce and not yet properly evaluated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the capacity of one such tool, AnnAGNPS, to simulate the evolution of two EG formed in a conservation tillage system. The dataset for model testing included runoff measurements and EG morphological characteristics during 3 years. Model evaluation focused on EG evolution of volume, width, and length model outputs, and included calibration and testing phases and a global sensitivity analysis (GSA). While the model did not fully reproduce width and length, the model efficiency to simulate EG volume was satisfactory for both calibration and testing phases, supporting the watershed management objectives of the model. GSA revealed that the most sensitive factors were EG depth, critical shear stress, headcut detachment exponent coefficient b, and headcut detachment leading coefficient a. For EG outputs the model was additive, showing low sensitivity to interactions between the inputs. Prediction of EG spatial evolution on conservation tillage systems requires improved development of gully erosion components, since many of the processes were developed originally for traditional tillage practices or larger channel systems. Our results identify the need for future research when EG form within conservation tillage systems, in particular to study gully headcut, soil erodibility, and width functions specific to these practices. A complete evaluation of an ephemeral gully model (AnnAGNPS) was performed. The analysis included calibration and testing against observed volumes combined with a global sensitivity analysis to identify the factors and processes influencing ephemeral gully development in conservation agricultural systems. Overall, the model performance was satisfactory and the most sensitive input factors were channel depth, critical shear stress and headcut detachment parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-9337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/esp.5134</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Additives ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural practices ; AnnAGNPS ; Calibration ; Conservation ; Conservation tillage ; conservation tillage systems ; ephemeral gully ; erosion ; Evaluation ; Evolution ; Evolutionary conservation ; global sensitivity analysis ; Gullies ; Gully erosion ; headcut migration ; Hydrology ; Length ; Model testing ; modeling ; Physical characteristics ; Pollutants ; Pollution dispersion ; Pollution transport ; Runoff ; Sensitivity analysis ; Shear stress ; Soil ; Soil conservation ; Soil erodibility ; Soil erosion ; Soil loss ; Soil pollution ; Testing ; Tillage ; Water pollution ; Watershed management ; Width</subject><ispartof>Earth surface processes and landforms, 2021-08, Vol.46 (10), p.1909-1925</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3504-8b2fe3f05b573233dc219eaac02759ac6e3afc74ebfd3c9b01615318efd4255b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3504-8b2fe3f05b573233dc219eaac02759ac6e3afc74ebfd3c9b01615318efd4255b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3545-1763 ; 0000-0002-7188-147X ; 0000-0002-8995-3064 ; 0000-0003-3775-7958</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fesp.5134$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fesp.5134$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luquin, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingner, Ronald L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruse, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momm, Henrique G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Robert R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casalí, Javier</creatorcontrib><title>Model prediction capacity of ephemeral gully evolution in conservation tillage systems</title><title>Earth surface processes and landforms</title><description>Ephemeral gully (EG) erosion has an important impact on agricultural soil losses and increases field surface hydrology connectivity and transport of pollutants to nearby water bodies. Watershed models including an EG component are scarce and not yet properly evaluated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the capacity of one such tool, AnnAGNPS, to simulate the evolution of two EG formed in a conservation tillage system. The dataset for model testing included runoff measurements and EG morphological characteristics during 3 years. Model evaluation focused on EG evolution of volume, width, and length model outputs, and included calibration and testing phases and a global sensitivity analysis (GSA). While the model did not fully reproduce width and length, the model efficiency to simulate EG volume was satisfactory for both calibration and testing phases, supporting the watershed management objectives of the model. GSA revealed that the most sensitive factors were EG depth, critical shear stress, headcut detachment exponent coefficient b, and headcut detachment leading coefficient a. For EG outputs the model was additive, showing low sensitivity to interactions between the inputs. Prediction of EG spatial evolution on conservation tillage systems requires improved development of gully erosion components, since many of the processes were developed originally for traditional tillage practices or larger channel systems. Our results identify the need for future research when EG form within conservation tillage systems, in particular to study gully headcut, soil erodibility, and width functions specific to these practices. A complete evaluation of an ephemeral gully model (AnnAGNPS) was performed. The analysis included calibration and testing against observed volumes combined with a global sensitivity analysis to identify the factors and processes influencing ephemeral gully development in conservation agricultural systems. Overall, the model performance was satisfactory and the most sensitive input factors were channel depth, critical shear stress and headcut detachment parameters.</description><subject>Additives</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>AnnAGNPS</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation tillage</subject><subject>conservation tillage systems</subject><subject>ephemeral gully</subject><subject>erosion</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary conservation</subject><subject>global sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Gullies</subject><subject>Gully erosion</subject><subject>headcut migration</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Length</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>modeling</subject><subject>Physical characteristics</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution dispersion</subject><subject>Pollution transport</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>Soil erodibility</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil loss</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><subject>Width</subject><issn>0197-9337</issn><issn>1096-9837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EtLAzEUBeAgCtYq-BMCbtxMzWMymSyl-IKKgo9tyGRu6pS0GZOZyvx7p61bV5cLH-fAQeiSkhklhN1AameC8vwITShRRaZKLo_RhFAlM8W5PEVnKa0IoTQv1QR9PocaPG4j1I3tmrDB1rTGNt2Ag8PQfsEaovF42Xs_YNgG3-9VM8KwSRC3Zv93jfdmCTgNqYN1OkcnzvgEF393ij7u797nj9ni5eFpfrvIDBckz8qKOeCOiEpIzjivLaMKjLGESaGMLYAbZ2UOlau5VRWhBRWcluDqnAlR8Sm6OuS2MXz3kDq9Cn3cjJWaiYJKWbAxeYquD8rGkFIEp9vYrE0cNCV6t5oeV9O71UaaHehP42H41-m7t9e9_wU6wm9s</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Luquin, Eduardo</creator><creator>Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A.</creator><creator>Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael</creator><creator>Bingner, Ronald L.</creator><creator>Cruse, Richard M.</creator><creator>Momm, Henrique G.</creator><creator>Wells, Robert R.</creator><creator>Casalí, Javier</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3545-1763</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-147X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-3064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3775-7958</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Model prediction capacity of ephemeral gully evolution in conservation tillage systems</title><author>Luquin, Eduardo ; Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A. ; Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael ; Bingner, Ronald L. ; Cruse, Richard M. ; Momm, Henrique G. ; Wells, Robert R. ; Casalí, Javier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3504-8b2fe3f05b573233dc219eaac02759ac6e3afc74ebfd3c9b01615318efd4255b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Additives</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>AnnAGNPS</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation tillage</topic><topic>conservation tillage systems</topic><topic>ephemeral gully</topic><topic>erosion</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary conservation</topic><topic>global sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Gullies</topic><topic>Gully erosion</topic><topic>headcut migration</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Length</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>modeling</topic><topic>Physical characteristics</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution dispersion</topic><topic>Pollution transport</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>Soil erodibility</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil loss</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><topic>Width</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luquin, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingner, Ronald L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruse, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momm, Henrique G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Robert R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casalí, Javier</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luquin, Eduardo</au><au>Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A.</au><au>Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael</au><au>Bingner, Ronald L.</au><au>Cruse, Richard M.</au><au>Momm, Henrique G.</au><au>Wells, Robert R.</au><au>Casalí, Javier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Model prediction capacity of ephemeral gully evolution in conservation tillage systems</atitle><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1909</spage><epage>1925</epage><pages>1909-1925</pages><issn>0197-9337</issn><eissn>1096-9837</eissn><abstract>Ephemeral gully (EG) erosion has an important impact on agricultural soil losses and increases field surface hydrology connectivity and transport of pollutants to nearby water bodies. Watershed models including an EG component are scarce and not yet properly evaluated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the capacity of one such tool, AnnAGNPS, to simulate the evolution of two EG formed in a conservation tillage system. The dataset for model testing included runoff measurements and EG morphological characteristics during 3 years. Model evaluation focused on EG evolution of volume, width, and length model outputs, and included calibration and testing phases and a global sensitivity analysis (GSA). While the model did not fully reproduce width and length, the model efficiency to simulate EG volume was satisfactory for both calibration and testing phases, supporting the watershed management objectives of the model. GSA revealed that the most sensitive factors were EG depth, critical shear stress, headcut detachment exponent coefficient b, and headcut detachment leading coefficient a. For EG outputs the model was additive, showing low sensitivity to interactions between the inputs. Prediction of EG spatial evolution on conservation tillage systems requires improved development of gully erosion components, since many of the processes were developed originally for traditional tillage practices or larger channel systems. Our results identify the need for future research when EG form within conservation tillage systems, in particular to study gully headcut, soil erodibility, and width functions specific to these practices. A complete evaluation of an ephemeral gully model (AnnAGNPS) was performed. The analysis included calibration and testing against observed volumes combined with a global sensitivity analysis to identify the factors and processes influencing ephemeral gully development in conservation agricultural systems. Overall, the model performance was satisfactory and the most sensitive input factors were channel depth, critical shear stress and headcut detachment parameters.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/esp.5134</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3545-1763</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-147X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-3064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3775-7958</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-9337
ispartof Earth surface processes and landforms, 2021-08, Vol.46 (10), p.1909-1925
issn 0197-9337
1096-9837
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2561776257
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Additives
Agricultural land
Agricultural practices
AnnAGNPS
Calibration
Conservation
Conservation tillage
conservation tillage systems
ephemeral gully
erosion
Evaluation
Evolution
Evolutionary conservation
global sensitivity analysis
Gullies
Gully erosion
headcut migration
Hydrology
Length
Model testing
modeling
Physical characteristics
Pollutants
Pollution dispersion
Pollution transport
Runoff
Sensitivity analysis
Shear stress
Soil
Soil conservation
Soil erodibility
Soil erosion
Soil loss
Soil pollution
Testing
Tillage
Water pollution
Watershed management
Width
title Model prediction capacity of ephemeral gully evolution in conservation tillage systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T02%3A56%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Model%20prediction%20capacity%20of%20ephemeral%20gully%20evolution%20in%20conservation%20tillage%20systems&rft.jtitle=Earth%20surface%20processes%20and%20landforms&rft.au=Luquin,%20Eduardo&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1909&rft.epage=1925&rft.pages=1909-1925&rft.issn=0197-9337&rft.eissn=1096-9837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/esp.5134&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2561776257%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561776257&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true