Model prediction capacity of ephemeral gully evolution in conservation tillage systems
Ephemeral gully (EG) erosion has an important impact on agricultural soil losses and increases field surface hydrology connectivity and transport of pollutants to nearby water bodies. Watershed models including an EG component are scarce and not yet properly evaluated. The objective of this study is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earth surface processes and landforms 2021-08, Vol.46 (10), p.1909-1925 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1925 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1909 |
container_title | Earth surface processes and landforms |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Luquin, Eduardo Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A. Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael Bingner, Ronald L. Cruse, Richard M. Momm, Henrique G. Wells, Robert R. Casalí, Javier |
description | Ephemeral gully (EG) erosion has an important impact on agricultural soil losses and increases field surface hydrology connectivity and transport of pollutants to nearby water bodies. Watershed models including an EG component are scarce and not yet properly evaluated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the capacity of one such tool, AnnAGNPS, to simulate the evolution of two EG formed in a conservation tillage system. The dataset for model testing included runoff measurements and EG morphological characteristics during 3 years. Model evaluation focused on EG evolution of volume, width, and length model outputs, and included calibration and testing phases and a global sensitivity analysis (GSA). While the model did not fully reproduce width and length, the model efficiency to simulate EG volume was satisfactory for both calibration and testing phases, supporting the watershed management objectives of the model. GSA revealed that the most sensitive factors were EG depth, critical shear stress, headcut detachment exponent coefficient b, and headcut detachment leading coefficient a. For EG outputs the model was additive, showing low sensitivity to interactions between the inputs. Prediction of EG spatial evolution on conservation tillage systems requires improved development of gully erosion components, since many of the processes were developed originally for traditional tillage practices or larger channel systems. Our results identify the need for future research when EG form within conservation tillage systems, in particular to study gully headcut, soil erodibility, and width functions specific to these practices.
A complete evaluation of an ephemeral gully model (AnnAGNPS) was performed. The analysis included calibration and testing against observed volumes combined with a global sensitivity analysis to identify the factors and processes influencing ephemeral gully development in conservation agricultural systems. Overall, the model performance was satisfactory and the most sensitive input factors were channel depth, critical shear stress and headcut detachment parameters. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/esp.5134 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2561776257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2561776257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3504-8b2fe3f05b573233dc219eaac02759ac6e3afc74ebfd3c9b01615318efd4255b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLAzEUBeAgCtYq-BMCbtxMzWMymSyl-IKKgo9tyGRu6pS0GZOZyvx7p61bV5cLH-fAQeiSkhklhN1AameC8vwITShRRaZKLo_RhFAlM8W5PEVnKa0IoTQv1QR9PocaPG4j1I3tmrDB1rTGNt2Ag8PQfsEaovF42Xs_YNgG3-9VM8KwSRC3Zv93jfdmCTgNqYN1OkcnzvgEF393ij7u797nj9ni5eFpfrvIDBckz8qKOeCOiEpIzjivLaMKjLGESaGMLYAbZ2UOlau5VRWhBRWcluDqnAlR8Sm6OuS2MXz3kDq9Cn3cjJWaiYJKWbAxeYquD8rGkFIEp9vYrE0cNCV6t5oeV9O71UaaHehP42H41-m7t9e9_wU6wm9s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561776257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Model prediction capacity of ephemeral gully evolution in conservation tillage systems</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Luquin, Eduardo ; Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A. ; Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael ; Bingner, Ronald L. ; Cruse, Richard M. ; Momm, Henrique G. ; Wells, Robert R. ; Casalí, Javier</creator><creatorcontrib>Luquin, Eduardo ; Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A. ; Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael ; Bingner, Ronald L. ; Cruse, Richard M. ; Momm, Henrique G. ; Wells, Robert R. ; Casalí, Javier</creatorcontrib><description>Ephemeral gully (EG) erosion has an important impact on agricultural soil losses and increases field surface hydrology connectivity and transport of pollutants to nearby water bodies. Watershed models including an EG component are scarce and not yet properly evaluated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the capacity of one such tool, AnnAGNPS, to simulate the evolution of two EG formed in a conservation tillage system. The dataset for model testing included runoff measurements and EG morphological characteristics during 3 years. Model evaluation focused on EG evolution of volume, width, and length model outputs, and included calibration and testing phases and a global sensitivity analysis (GSA). While the model did not fully reproduce width and length, the model efficiency to simulate EG volume was satisfactory for both calibration and testing phases, supporting the watershed management objectives of the model. GSA revealed that the most sensitive factors were EG depth, critical shear stress, headcut detachment exponent coefficient b, and headcut detachment leading coefficient a. For EG outputs the model was additive, showing low sensitivity to interactions between the inputs. Prediction of EG spatial evolution on conservation tillage systems requires improved development of gully erosion components, since many of the processes were developed originally for traditional tillage practices or larger channel systems. Our results identify the need for future research when EG form within conservation tillage systems, in particular to study gully headcut, soil erodibility, and width functions specific to these practices.
A complete evaluation of an ephemeral gully model (AnnAGNPS) was performed. The analysis included calibration and testing against observed volumes combined with a global sensitivity analysis to identify the factors and processes influencing ephemeral gully development in conservation agricultural systems. Overall, the model performance was satisfactory and the most sensitive input factors were channel depth, critical shear stress and headcut detachment parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-9337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/esp.5134</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Additives ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural practices ; AnnAGNPS ; Calibration ; Conservation ; Conservation tillage ; conservation tillage systems ; ephemeral gully ; erosion ; Evaluation ; Evolution ; Evolutionary conservation ; global sensitivity analysis ; Gullies ; Gully erosion ; headcut migration ; Hydrology ; Length ; Model testing ; modeling ; Physical characteristics ; Pollutants ; Pollution dispersion ; Pollution transport ; Runoff ; Sensitivity analysis ; Shear stress ; Soil ; Soil conservation ; Soil erodibility ; Soil erosion ; Soil loss ; Soil pollution ; Testing ; Tillage ; Water pollution ; Watershed management ; Width</subject><ispartof>Earth surface processes and landforms, 2021-08, Vol.46 (10), p.1909-1925</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3504-8b2fe3f05b573233dc219eaac02759ac6e3afc74ebfd3c9b01615318efd4255b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3504-8b2fe3f05b573233dc219eaac02759ac6e3afc74ebfd3c9b01615318efd4255b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3545-1763 ; 0000-0002-7188-147X ; 0000-0002-8995-3064 ; 0000-0003-3775-7958</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fesp.5134$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fesp.5134$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luquin, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingner, Ronald L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruse, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momm, Henrique G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Robert R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casalí, Javier</creatorcontrib><title>Model prediction capacity of ephemeral gully evolution in conservation tillage systems</title><title>Earth surface processes and landforms</title><description>Ephemeral gully (EG) erosion has an important impact on agricultural soil losses and increases field surface hydrology connectivity and transport of pollutants to nearby water bodies. Watershed models including an EG component are scarce and not yet properly evaluated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the capacity of one such tool, AnnAGNPS, to simulate the evolution of two EG formed in a conservation tillage system. The dataset for model testing included runoff measurements and EG morphological characteristics during 3 years. Model evaluation focused on EG evolution of volume, width, and length model outputs, and included calibration and testing phases and a global sensitivity analysis (GSA). While the model did not fully reproduce width and length, the model efficiency to simulate EG volume was satisfactory for both calibration and testing phases, supporting the watershed management objectives of the model. GSA revealed that the most sensitive factors were EG depth, critical shear stress, headcut detachment exponent coefficient b, and headcut detachment leading coefficient a. For EG outputs the model was additive, showing low sensitivity to interactions between the inputs. Prediction of EG spatial evolution on conservation tillage systems requires improved development of gully erosion components, since many of the processes were developed originally for traditional tillage practices or larger channel systems. Our results identify the need for future research when EG form within conservation tillage systems, in particular to study gully headcut, soil erodibility, and width functions specific to these practices.
A complete evaluation of an ephemeral gully model (AnnAGNPS) was performed. The analysis included calibration and testing against observed volumes combined with a global sensitivity analysis to identify the factors and processes influencing ephemeral gully development in conservation agricultural systems. Overall, the model performance was satisfactory and the most sensitive input factors were channel depth, critical shear stress and headcut detachment parameters.</description><subject>Additives</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>AnnAGNPS</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation tillage</subject><subject>conservation tillage systems</subject><subject>ephemeral gully</subject><subject>erosion</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary conservation</subject><subject>global sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Gullies</subject><subject>Gully erosion</subject><subject>headcut migration</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Length</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>modeling</subject><subject>Physical characteristics</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution dispersion</subject><subject>Pollution transport</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>Soil erodibility</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil loss</subject><subject>Soil pollution</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><subject>Width</subject><issn>0197-9337</issn><issn>1096-9837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EtLAzEUBeAgCtYq-BMCbtxMzWMymSyl-IKKgo9tyGRu6pS0GZOZyvx7p61bV5cLH-fAQeiSkhklhN1AameC8vwITShRRaZKLo_RhFAlM8W5PEVnKa0IoTQv1QR9PocaPG4j1I3tmrDB1rTGNt2Ag8PQfsEaovF42Xs_YNgG3-9VM8KwSRC3Zv93jfdmCTgNqYN1OkcnzvgEF393ij7u797nj9ni5eFpfrvIDBckz8qKOeCOiEpIzjivLaMKjLGESaGMLYAbZ2UOlau5VRWhBRWcluDqnAlR8Sm6OuS2MXz3kDq9Cn3cjJWaiYJKWbAxeYquD8rGkFIEp9vYrE0cNCV6t5oeV9O71UaaHehP42H41-m7t9e9_wU6wm9s</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Luquin, Eduardo</creator><creator>Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A.</creator><creator>Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael</creator><creator>Bingner, Ronald L.</creator><creator>Cruse, Richard M.</creator><creator>Momm, Henrique G.</creator><creator>Wells, Robert R.</creator><creator>Casalí, Javier</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3545-1763</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-147X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-3064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3775-7958</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Model prediction capacity of ephemeral gully evolution in conservation tillage systems</title><author>Luquin, Eduardo ; Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A. ; Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael ; Bingner, Ronald L. ; Cruse, Richard M. ; Momm, Henrique G. ; Wells, Robert R. ; Casalí, Javier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3504-8b2fe3f05b573233dc219eaac02759ac6e3afc74ebfd3c9b01615318efd4255b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Additives</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>AnnAGNPS</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation tillage</topic><topic>conservation tillage systems</topic><topic>ephemeral gully</topic><topic>erosion</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary conservation</topic><topic>global sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Gullies</topic><topic>Gully erosion</topic><topic>headcut migration</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Length</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>modeling</topic><topic>Physical characteristics</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution dispersion</topic><topic>Pollution transport</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>Soil erodibility</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil loss</topic><topic>Soil pollution</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><topic>Width</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luquin, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingner, Ronald L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruse, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momm, Henrique G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Robert R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casalí, Javier</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luquin, Eduardo</au><au>Campo‐Bescós, Miguel A.</au><au>Muñoz‐Carpena, Rafael</au><au>Bingner, Ronald L.</au><au>Cruse, Richard M.</au><au>Momm, Henrique G.</au><au>Wells, Robert R.</au><au>Casalí, Javier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Model prediction capacity of ephemeral gully evolution in conservation tillage systems</atitle><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1909</spage><epage>1925</epage><pages>1909-1925</pages><issn>0197-9337</issn><eissn>1096-9837</eissn><abstract>Ephemeral gully (EG) erosion has an important impact on agricultural soil losses and increases field surface hydrology connectivity and transport of pollutants to nearby water bodies. Watershed models including an EG component are scarce and not yet properly evaluated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the capacity of one such tool, AnnAGNPS, to simulate the evolution of two EG formed in a conservation tillage system. The dataset for model testing included runoff measurements and EG morphological characteristics during 3 years. Model evaluation focused on EG evolution of volume, width, and length model outputs, and included calibration and testing phases and a global sensitivity analysis (GSA). While the model did not fully reproduce width and length, the model efficiency to simulate EG volume was satisfactory for both calibration and testing phases, supporting the watershed management objectives of the model. GSA revealed that the most sensitive factors were EG depth, critical shear stress, headcut detachment exponent coefficient b, and headcut detachment leading coefficient a. For EG outputs the model was additive, showing low sensitivity to interactions between the inputs. Prediction of EG spatial evolution on conservation tillage systems requires improved development of gully erosion components, since many of the processes were developed originally for traditional tillage practices or larger channel systems. Our results identify the need for future research when EG form within conservation tillage systems, in particular to study gully headcut, soil erodibility, and width functions specific to these practices.
A complete evaluation of an ephemeral gully model (AnnAGNPS) was performed. The analysis included calibration and testing against observed volumes combined with a global sensitivity analysis to identify the factors and processes influencing ephemeral gully development in conservation agricultural systems. Overall, the model performance was satisfactory and the most sensitive input factors were channel depth, critical shear stress and headcut detachment parameters.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/esp.5134</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3545-1763</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-147X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-3064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3775-7958</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0197-9337 |
ispartof | Earth surface processes and landforms, 2021-08, Vol.46 (10), p.1909-1925 |
issn | 0197-9337 1096-9837 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2561776257 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Additives Agricultural land Agricultural practices AnnAGNPS Calibration Conservation Conservation tillage conservation tillage systems ephemeral gully erosion Evaluation Evolution Evolutionary conservation global sensitivity analysis Gullies Gully erosion headcut migration Hydrology Length Model testing modeling Physical characteristics Pollutants Pollution dispersion Pollution transport Runoff Sensitivity analysis Shear stress Soil Soil conservation Soil erodibility Soil erosion Soil loss Soil pollution Testing Tillage Water pollution Watershed management Width |
title | Model prediction capacity of ephemeral gully evolution in conservation tillage systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T02%3A56%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Model%20prediction%20capacity%20of%20ephemeral%20gully%20evolution%20in%20conservation%20tillage%20systems&rft.jtitle=Earth%20surface%20processes%20and%20landforms&rft.au=Luquin,%20Eduardo&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1909&rft.epage=1925&rft.pages=1909-1925&rft.issn=0197-9337&rft.eissn=1096-9837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/esp.5134&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2561776257%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561776257&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |