Enhancing Social Sustainability Through the Planning of Third Places: A Theory-Based Framework

With constantly changing societal needs, along with population growth and increasing urbanisation pressures, open public spaces are constantly competing against other land-uses to accommodate the increasing urban pressures. Societies and cities call for an approach to reclaim public space for public...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social indicators research 2020-08, Vol.150 (3), p.835-866
Hauptverfasser: Goosen, Z., Cilliers, E. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 866
container_issue 3
container_start_page 835
container_title Social indicators research
container_volume 150
creator Goosen, Z.
Cilliers, E. J.
description With constantly changing societal needs, along with population growth and increasing urbanisation pressures, open public spaces are constantly competing against other land-uses to accommodate the increasing urban pressures. Societies and cities call for an approach to reclaim public space for public use, to provide opportunities for people to meet and interact, and to develop a sense of belonging to a place. It is for this reason that social sustainability is becoming a crucial consideration within the urban context, seeking balance between economic developments, environmental challenges and the demands and preferences of modern societies. This article includes various theories and literature, reflecting on the importance of social sustainability in the urban context and the role of the Third Place in facilitating social sustainability. The concept of Third Places is considered as any space other than our homes (First Place) or work (Second Place), manifesting as a component of well-defined public places designed to enhance civic identity, quality of life, social capital and community revitalisation, whilst improving economic development. The Third Place concept is thus introduced in this article as an umbrella concept combining the physical realm and design of the social space and is considered from the perspective of the place-making approach, the lively planning approach and the green urbanism approach. These approaches were collectively employed as part of a qualitative enquiry to inform a theory-based framework to enhance social sustainability through the planning of Third Places. Although social sustainability has become increasingly influential in the urban planning context, limited research to guide urban planning approaches towards enhanced social sustainability exist, especially within the South African context. The lack of practical application of existing planning theories has resulted in the widening of the theory–practice gap and alternative approaches should be considered to enhance social sustainability. The proposed theory-based framework, based on the theory and literature of this article, will finally aim to inform the study of Third Place consideration for enhanced social sustainability within the South African planning context.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11205-020-02350-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2561653919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2561653919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-ec908411d9199d94b1102fec2d3aa13080900da659f2f230c2932e590fafa4cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_wNOC5-gk2XQbb7W0KhQUWq-GNJt0t26Tmuwi_femruDNwzDM47038CF0TeCWABR3kRAKHAOFNIwDLk7QgPCCYRCUnKIBMGB4zADO0UWMWwDgOc8H6H3mKuV07TbZ0utaNdmyi62qnVrXTd0eslUVfLepsrYy2WujnDtavU16Hcqjok28zybpNj4c8IOKpszmQe3Mlw8fl-jMqiaaq989RG_z2Wr6hBcvj8_TyQJrxmmLjRYwzgkpBRGiFPmaEKDWaFoypQiDMQiAUo24sNRSBpoKRg0XYJVVubZsiG763n3wn52Jrdz6Lrj0UlI-IiPOUnNy0d6lg48xGCv3od6pcJAE5JGj7DnKxFH-cJRFCrE-FJPZbUz4q_4n9Q04y3TB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561653919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing Social Sustainability Through the Planning of Third Places: A Theory-Based Framework</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Goosen, Z. ; Cilliers, E. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goosen, Z. ; Cilliers, E. J.</creatorcontrib><description>With constantly changing societal needs, along with population growth and increasing urbanisation pressures, open public spaces are constantly competing against other land-uses to accommodate the increasing urban pressures. Societies and cities call for an approach to reclaim public space for public use, to provide opportunities for people to meet and interact, and to develop a sense of belonging to a place. It is for this reason that social sustainability is becoming a crucial consideration within the urban context, seeking balance between economic developments, environmental challenges and the demands and preferences of modern societies. This article includes various theories and literature, reflecting on the importance of social sustainability in the urban context and the role of the Third Place in facilitating social sustainability. The concept of Third Places is considered as any space other than our homes (First Place) or work (Second Place), manifesting as a component of well-defined public places designed to enhance civic identity, quality of life, social capital and community revitalisation, whilst improving economic development. The Third Place concept is thus introduced in this article as an umbrella concept combining the physical realm and design of the social space and is considered from the perspective of the place-making approach, the lively planning approach and the green urbanism approach. These approaches were collectively employed as part of a qualitative enquiry to inform a theory-based framework to enhance social sustainability through the planning of Third Places. Although social sustainability has become increasingly influential in the urban planning context, limited research to guide urban planning approaches towards enhanced social sustainability exist, especially within the South African context. The lack of practical application of existing planning theories has resulted in the widening of the theory–practice gap and alternative approaches should be considered to enhance social sustainability. The proposed theory-based framework, based on the theory and literature of this article, will finally aim to inform the study of Third Place consideration for enhanced social sustainability within the South African planning context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-8300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11205-020-02350-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Alternative approaches ; Awards &amp; honors ; Belonging ; Community life ; Conceptual development ; Economic development ; Economics ; Human Geography ; Land use ; Microeconomics ; Modern society ; Original Research ; Population growth ; Public Health ; Public lands ; Public spaces ; Public use ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life Research ; Social capital ; Social Sciences ; Social space ; Social sustainability ; Sociology ; Sustainability ; Theory ; Urban areas ; Urban planning ; Urbanism ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Social indicators research, 2020-08, Vol.150 (3), p.835-866</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-ec908411d9199d94b1102fec2d3aa13080900da659f2f230c2932e590fafa4cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-ec908411d9199d94b1102fec2d3aa13080900da659f2f230c2932e590fafa4cf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4795-1802 ; 0000-0002-8581-6302</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11205-020-02350-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-020-02350-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27323,27845,27903,27904,33753,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goosen, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cilliers, E. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing Social Sustainability Through the Planning of Third Places: A Theory-Based Framework</title><title>Social indicators research</title><addtitle>Soc Indic Res</addtitle><description>With constantly changing societal needs, along with population growth and increasing urbanisation pressures, open public spaces are constantly competing against other land-uses to accommodate the increasing urban pressures. Societies and cities call for an approach to reclaim public space for public use, to provide opportunities for people to meet and interact, and to develop a sense of belonging to a place. It is for this reason that social sustainability is becoming a crucial consideration within the urban context, seeking balance between economic developments, environmental challenges and the demands and preferences of modern societies. This article includes various theories and literature, reflecting on the importance of social sustainability in the urban context and the role of the Third Place in facilitating social sustainability. The concept of Third Places is considered as any space other than our homes (First Place) or work (Second Place), manifesting as a component of well-defined public places designed to enhance civic identity, quality of life, social capital and community revitalisation, whilst improving economic development. The Third Place concept is thus introduced in this article as an umbrella concept combining the physical realm and design of the social space and is considered from the perspective of the place-making approach, the lively planning approach and the green urbanism approach. These approaches were collectively employed as part of a qualitative enquiry to inform a theory-based framework to enhance social sustainability through the planning of Third Places. Although social sustainability has become increasingly influential in the urban planning context, limited research to guide urban planning approaches towards enhanced social sustainability exist, especially within the South African context. The lack of practical application of existing planning theories has resulted in the widening of the theory–practice gap and alternative approaches should be considered to enhance social sustainability. The proposed theory-based framework, based on the theory and literature of this article, will finally aim to inform the study of Third Place consideration for enhanced social sustainability within the South African planning context.</description><subject>Alternative approaches</subject><subject>Awards &amp; honors</subject><subject>Belonging</subject><subject>Community life</subject><subject>Conceptual development</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Human Geography</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Modern society</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public lands</subject><subject>Public spaces</subject><subject>Public use</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Social capital</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social space</subject><subject>Social sustainability</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>Urbanism</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>0303-8300</issn><issn>1573-0921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_wNOC5-gk2XQbb7W0KhQUWq-GNJt0t26Tmuwi_femruDNwzDM47038CF0TeCWABR3kRAKHAOFNIwDLk7QgPCCYRCUnKIBMGB4zADO0UWMWwDgOc8H6H3mKuV07TbZ0utaNdmyi62qnVrXTd0eslUVfLepsrYy2WujnDtavU16Hcqjok28zybpNj4c8IOKpszmQe3Mlw8fl-jMqiaaq989RG_z2Wr6hBcvj8_TyQJrxmmLjRYwzgkpBRGiFPmaEKDWaFoypQiDMQiAUo24sNRSBpoKRg0XYJVVubZsiG763n3wn52Jrdz6Lrj0UlI-IiPOUnNy0d6lg48xGCv3od6pcJAE5JGj7DnKxFH-cJRFCrE-FJPZbUz4q_4n9Q04y3TB</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Goosen, Z.</creator><creator>Cilliers, E. J.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4795-1802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8581-6302</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Enhancing Social Sustainability Through the Planning of Third Places: A Theory-Based Framework</title><author>Goosen, Z. ; Cilliers, E. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-ec908411d9199d94b1102fec2d3aa13080900da659f2f230c2932e590fafa4cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Alternative approaches</topic><topic>Awards &amp; honors</topic><topic>Belonging</topic><topic>Community life</topic><topic>Conceptual development</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Human Geography</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Modern society</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public lands</topic><topic>Public spaces</topic><topic>Public use</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Social capital</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social space</topic><topic>Social sustainability</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>Urbanism</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goosen, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cilliers, E. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goosen, Z.</au><au>Cilliers, E. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing Social Sustainability Through the Planning of Third Places: A Theory-Based Framework</atitle><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle><stitle>Soc Indic Res</stitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>150</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>835</spage><epage>866</epage><pages>835-866</pages><issn>0303-8300</issn><eissn>1573-0921</eissn><abstract>With constantly changing societal needs, along with population growth and increasing urbanisation pressures, open public spaces are constantly competing against other land-uses to accommodate the increasing urban pressures. Societies and cities call for an approach to reclaim public space for public use, to provide opportunities for people to meet and interact, and to develop a sense of belonging to a place. It is for this reason that social sustainability is becoming a crucial consideration within the urban context, seeking balance between economic developments, environmental challenges and the demands and preferences of modern societies. This article includes various theories and literature, reflecting on the importance of social sustainability in the urban context and the role of the Third Place in facilitating social sustainability. The concept of Third Places is considered as any space other than our homes (First Place) or work (Second Place), manifesting as a component of well-defined public places designed to enhance civic identity, quality of life, social capital and community revitalisation, whilst improving economic development. The Third Place concept is thus introduced in this article as an umbrella concept combining the physical realm and design of the social space and is considered from the perspective of the place-making approach, the lively planning approach and the green urbanism approach. These approaches were collectively employed as part of a qualitative enquiry to inform a theory-based framework to enhance social sustainability through the planning of Third Places. Although social sustainability has become increasingly influential in the urban planning context, limited research to guide urban planning approaches towards enhanced social sustainability exist, especially within the South African context. The lack of practical application of existing planning theories has resulted in the widening of the theory–practice gap and alternative approaches should be considered to enhance social sustainability. The proposed theory-based framework, based on the theory and literature of this article, will finally aim to inform the study of Third Place consideration for enhanced social sustainability within the South African planning context.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11205-020-02350-7</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4795-1802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8581-6302</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0303-8300
ispartof Social indicators research, 2020-08, Vol.150 (3), p.835-866
issn 0303-8300
1573-0921
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2561653919
source Jstor Complete Legacy; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Alternative approaches
Awards & honors
Belonging
Community life
Conceptual development
Economic development
Economics
Human Geography
Land use
Microeconomics
Modern society
Original Research
Population growth
Public Health
Public lands
Public spaces
Public use
Quality of life
Quality of Life Research
Social capital
Social Sciences
Social space
Social sustainability
Sociology
Sustainability
Theory
Urban areas
Urban planning
Urbanism
Urbanization
title Enhancing Social Sustainability Through the Planning of Third Places: A Theory-Based Framework
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T05%3A35%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20Social%20Sustainability%20Through%20the%20Planning%20of%20Third%20Places:%20A%20Theory-Based%20Framework&rft.jtitle=Social%20indicators%20research&rft.au=Goosen,%20Z.&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=835&rft.epage=866&rft.pages=835-866&rft.issn=0303-8300&rft.eissn=1573-0921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11205-020-02350-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2561653919%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561653919&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true