Ergodic and non-ergodic variogram uncertainty in Agbabu bitumen field porosity data
A recent investigation estimated and modeled the variogram of the porosity attribute of the bitumen field located at Agbabu, south-west Nigeria. In spite of methodological interventions made during the estimation, the variogram estimates obtained are still uncertain due to preferential and limited s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering 2019-11, Vol.640 (1), p.12120 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 12120 |
container_title | IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering |
container_volume | 640 |
creator | Mosobalaje, O O Ajia, M V Orodu, O D Ogbe, D O |
description | A recent investigation estimated and modeled the variogram of the porosity attribute of the bitumen field located at Agbabu, south-west Nigeria. In spite of methodological interventions made during the estimation, the variogram estimates obtained are still uncertain due to preferential and limited sample data. This current research therefore assesses the uncertainty in the ergodic and non-ergodic variogram estimates. Multiple samples required for ergodic and non-ergodic variogram estimates have been drawn from simulated realizations of the porosity random field. Variogram estimates have been obtained (using a recently-formulated lag-cluster technique and conventional technique) for each sample. The sampling distributions of these estimates have been examined with histograms and Normal Q-Q plots. The estimates exhibit approximately Normal distributions. The uncertainty in the ergodic variogram increases from 1.4×10−7 at lag 16.7 m to 4.6×10−7 at lag 4601.4 m; thereafter, it appears to flatten out. For most lag distances, the uncertainty in the non-ergodic variogram is constant at about 1.8×10−7; it fluctuates at large lag distances. The uncertainty in non-ergodic estimates is observed to be lower than the uncertainty in ergodic estimates. Consequently, that the current well spacing and distribution in Agbabu field is deemed adequate in the context of variogram estimation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1757-899X/640/1/012120 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2561322017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2561322017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3120-d186b4aa62ca3890037b2a5f6b2a8fc6e4ec0931d809d470f8648790ae928da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKf_ggS8eKl7Sbs0PY4xf8DEw3bwFl6bdGRsSU1bYf-9GR2KIHjJS3if983jQ8gtgwcGUk5YPs0TWRTvE5HBhE2AccbhjIy-G-ffd8kuyVXbbgFEnmUwIqtF2HhtK4pOU-ddYk7vTwzWbwLuae8qEzq0rjtQ6-hsU2LZ09J2_d44Wluz07Txwbc2Aho7vCYXNe5ac3OqY7J-XKznz8ny7ellPlsmVRoXTDSToswQBa8wlQVAmpccp7WIp6wrYTJTQZEyLaHQWQ61FJnMC0BTcKkxHZO7IbYJ_qM3bae2vg8u_qj4VLCUc2B5pMRAVXHDNphaNcHuMRwUA3X0p45q1FGTiv4UU4O_OHg_DFrf_CS_rha_MNXoOqL8D_Sf_C9XKn88</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561322017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ergodic and non-ergodic variogram uncertainty in Agbabu bitumen field porosity data</title><source>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</source><source>Institute of Physics IOPscience extra</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Mosobalaje, O O ; Ajia, M V ; Orodu, O D ; Ogbe, D O</creator><creatorcontrib>Mosobalaje, O O ; Ajia, M V ; Orodu, O D ; Ogbe, D O</creatorcontrib><description>A recent investigation estimated and modeled the variogram of the porosity attribute of the bitumen field located at Agbabu, south-west Nigeria. In spite of methodological interventions made during the estimation, the variogram estimates obtained are still uncertain due to preferential and limited sample data. This current research therefore assesses the uncertainty in the ergodic and non-ergodic variogram estimates. Multiple samples required for ergodic and non-ergodic variogram estimates have been drawn from simulated realizations of the porosity random field. Variogram estimates have been obtained (using a recently-formulated lag-cluster technique and conventional technique) for each sample. The sampling distributions of these estimates have been examined with histograms and Normal Q-Q plots. The estimates exhibit approximately Normal distributions. The uncertainty in the ergodic variogram increases from 1.4×10−7 at lag 16.7 m to 4.6×10−7 at lag 4601.4 m; thereafter, it appears to flatten out. For most lag distances, the uncertainty in the non-ergodic variogram is constant at about 1.8×10−7; it fluctuates at large lag distances. The uncertainty in non-ergodic estimates is observed to be lower than the uncertainty in ergodic estimates. Consequently, that the current well spacing and distribution in Agbabu field is deemed adequate in the context of variogram estimation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-8981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-899X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/640/1/012120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Agbabu field ; Bitumens ; Ergodic ; Ergodic processes ; Estimates ; Fields (mathematics) ; Heavy oil and bitumen ; Histograms ; Nigeria ; Non-ergodic ; Porosity ; Uncertainty ; Variogram</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2019-11, Vol.640 (1), p.12120</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3120-d186b4aa62ca3890037b2a5f6b2a8fc6e4ec0931d809d470f8648790ae928da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/640/1/012120/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38868,38890,53840,53867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mosobalaje, O O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajia, M V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orodu, O D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogbe, D O</creatorcontrib><title>Ergodic and non-ergodic variogram uncertainty in Agbabu bitumen field porosity data</title><title>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</title><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><description>A recent investigation estimated and modeled the variogram of the porosity attribute of the bitumen field located at Agbabu, south-west Nigeria. In spite of methodological interventions made during the estimation, the variogram estimates obtained are still uncertain due to preferential and limited sample data. This current research therefore assesses the uncertainty in the ergodic and non-ergodic variogram estimates. Multiple samples required for ergodic and non-ergodic variogram estimates have been drawn from simulated realizations of the porosity random field. Variogram estimates have been obtained (using a recently-formulated lag-cluster technique and conventional technique) for each sample. The sampling distributions of these estimates have been examined with histograms and Normal Q-Q plots. The estimates exhibit approximately Normal distributions. The uncertainty in the ergodic variogram increases from 1.4×10−7 at lag 16.7 m to 4.6×10−7 at lag 4601.4 m; thereafter, it appears to flatten out. For most lag distances, the uncertainty in the non-ergodic variogram is constant at about 1.8×10−7; it fluctuates at large lag distances. The uncertainty in non-ergodic estimates is observed to be lower than the uncertainty in ergodic estimates. Consequently, that the current well spacing and distribution in Agbabu field is deemed adequate in the context of variogram estimation.</description><subject>Agbabu field</subject><subject>Bitumens</subject><subject>Ergodic</subject><subject>Ergodic processes</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Fields (mathematics)</subject><subject>Heavy oil and bitumen</subject><subject>Histograms</subject><subject>Nigeria</subject><subject>Non-ergodic</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Variogram</subject><issn>1757-8981</issn><issn>1757-899X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKf_ggS8eKl7Sbs0PY4xf8DEw3bwFl6bdGRsSU1bYf-9GR2KIHjJS3if983jQ8gtgwcGUk5YPs0TWRTvE5HBhE2AccbhjIy-G-ffd8kuyVXbbgFEnmUwIqtF2HhtK4pOU-ddYk7vTwzWbwLuae8qEzq0rjtQ6-hsU2LZ09J2_d44Wluz07Txwbc2Aho7vCYXNe5ac3OqY7J-XKznz8ny7ellPlsmVRoXTDSToswQBa8wlQVAmpccp7WIp6wrYTJTQZEyLaHQWQ61FJnMC0BTcKkxHZO7IbYJ_qM3bae2vg8u_qj4VLCUc2B5pMRAVXHDNphaNcHuMRwUA3X0p45q1FGTiv4UU4O_OHg_DFrf_CS_rha_MNXoOqL8D_Sf_C9XKn88</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Mosobalaje, O O</creator><creator>Ajia, M V</creator><creator>Orodu, O D</creator><creator>Ogbe, D O</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Ergodic and non-ergodic variogram uncertainty in Agbabu bitumen field porosity data</title><author>Mosobalaje, O O ; Ajia, M V ; Orodu, O D ; Ogbe, D O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3120-d186b4aa62ca3890037b2a5f6b2a8fc6e4ec0931d809d470f8648790ae928da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agbabu field</topic><topic>Bitumens</topic><topic>Ergodic</topic><topic>Ergodic processes</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Fields (mathematics)</topic><topic>Heavy oil and bitumen</topic><topic>Histograms</topic><topic>Nigeria</topic><topic>Non-ergodic</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Variogram</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mosobalaje, O O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajia, M V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orodu, O D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogbe, D O</creatorcontrib><collection>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mosobalaje, O O</au><au>Ajia, M V</au><au>Orodu, O D</au><au>Ogbe, D O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ergodic and non-ergodic variogram uncertainty in Agbabu bitumen field porosity data</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</jtitle><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>640</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12120</spage><pages>12120-</pages><issn>1757-8981</issn><eissn>1757-899X</eissn><abstract>A recent investigation estimated and modeled the variogram of the porosity attribute of the bitumen field located at Agbabu, south-west Nigeria. In spite of methodological interventions made during the estimation, the variogram estimates obtained are still uncertain due to preferential and limited sample data. This current research therefore assesses the uncertainty in the ergodic and non-ergodic variogram estimates. Multiple samples required for ergodic and non-ergodic variogram estimates have been drawn from simulated realizations of the porosity random field. Variogram estimates have been obtained (using a recently-formulated lag-cluster technique and conventional technique) for each sample. The sampling distributions of these estimates have been examined with histograms and Normal Q-Q plots. The estimates exhibit approximately Normal distributions. The uncertainty in the ergodic variogram increases from 1.4×10−7 at lag 16.7 m to 4.6×10−7 at lag 4601.4 m; thereafter, it appears to flatten out. For most lag distances, the uncertainty in the non-ergodic variogram is constant at about 1.8×10−7; it fluctuates at large lag distances. The uncertainty in non-ergodic estimates is observed to be lower than the uncertainty in ergodic estimates. Consequently, that the current well spacing and distribution in Agbabu field is deemed adequate in the context of variogram estimation.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1757-899X/640/1/012120</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1757-8981 |
ispartof | IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2019-11, Vol.640 (1), p.12120 |
issn | 1757-8981 1757-899X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2561322017 |
source | Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles; Institute of Physics IOPscience extra; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Agbabu field Bitumens Ergodic Ergodic processes Estimates Fields (mathematics) Heavy oil and bitumen Histograms Nigeria Non-ergodic Porosity Uncertainty Variogram |
title | Ergodic and non-ergodic variogram uncertainty in Agbabu bitumen field porosity data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T01%3A38%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ergodic%20and%20non-ergodic%20variogram%20uncertainty%20in%20Agbabu%20bitumen%20field%20porosity%20data&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Materials%20Science%20and%20Engineering&rft.au=Mosobalaje,%20O%20O&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=640&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12120&rft.pages=12120-&rft.issn=1757-8981&rft.eissn=1757-899X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1757-899X/640/1/012120&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2561322017%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561322017&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |