Mothers’ Movements: Shifts in Calving Area Selection by Partially Migratory Elk

Loss of migratory behavior or shifts in migratory ranges are growing concerns to wildlife managers. How ungulates prioritize safety from predators at the expense of high-quality foraging opportunities during calving may be key to understanding these shifts and long-term reproductive success. We comp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2021-09, Vol.85 (7), p.1476-1489
Hauptverfasser: BERG, JODI E., REIMER, JODY, SMOLKO, PETER, BOHM, HOLGER, HEBBLEWHITE, MARK, MERRILL, EVELYN H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1489
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1476
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 85
creator BERG, JODI E.
REIMER, JODY
SMOLKO, PETER
BOHM, HOLGER
HEBBLEWHITE, MARK
MERRILL, EVELYN H.
description Loss of migratory behavior or shifts in migratory ranges are growing concerns to wildlife managers. How ungulates prioritize safety from predators at the expense of high-quality foraging opportunities during calving may be key to understanding these shifts and long-term reproductive success. We compared trade-offs in selection for forage and predation risk by elk (Cervus canadensis) following 3 migratory tactics (western and eastern migration and resident) during 2 time periods in a declining (by almost 70% from 2002–2016), partially migratory elk population adjacent to Banff National Park in Alberta, Canada. We hypothesized that regardless of migratory tactic, maternal elk would show stronger trade-offs between high-quality foraging associated with higher predation risk and forage resources of lower-quality yet lower risk on calving ranges than on ranges used during summer because of vulnerability of their offspring. Additionally, we hypothesized these trade-offs would occur at high (2002–2006) and low (2013–2016) elk population sizes. We used a machine-learning algorithm to predict dates of parturition based on global positioning system (GPS) movements of elk equipped with vaginal implants (n = 60) and predictions were within 1.43±0.85 (SE) days of the known date. We applied the model to an additional 58 GPS-collared elk without vaginal implants. Based on changes in localized movements, we defined calving areas as the 26 days post-parturition and compared habitat characteristics of calving areas to 10 similar-sized areas centered on random locations during summer for the same individual in a latent selection framework. Across the 2 time periods, parturition occurred from 8 May–11 July with median parturition dates differing among migratory tactics and residents shifting towards an earlier parturition date in the later period. All elk, regardless of migratory tactic and time period, selected calving areas with greater forage resources than were available on areas used during summer, with no evidence for greater selection of areas that reduced predation risk at the expense of higher-quality foraging. Calving season selection for areas with abundant forage exposed western migrants to high risk of bear (Ursus spp.) predation, residents to high risk of wolf (Canis lupus) predation, and eastern migrants to low risk of bear and wolf predation. Patterns in exposure to predation risk during calving between migratory tactics were consistent with the recent decline
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jwmg.22099
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2559690901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27087805</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27087805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3239-8467e3a47aa85d6d64abf4490b4ed103262e8af632a17f668e527b18d751de33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j01Lw0AQQBdRMFYv4lUQvAmpM_u9RylalRYvBb0tm2ajDU1Td1NLb_4N_56_xNSoR09zmPdmeIQcI_QRgF6W6-q5TykYs0MSNEylVKPaJUm7pKng-LRPDmIsARiilgk5GdfNiw_x8_3jbFy_-covmnhI9go3j_7oZ_bI5OZ6MrhNRw_Du8HVKJ0yykyquVSeOa6c0yKXueQuKzg3kHGfIzAqqdeukIw6VIWU2guqMtS5Eph7xnrkvDu7DPXrysfGlvUqLNqPlgphpAED2FIXHTUNdYzBF3YZZpULG4tgt9F2G22_o1sYO3g9m_vNP6S9fxwPf53TziljU4c_hyrQSoNgX24GYbc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2559690901</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mothers’ Movements: Shifts in Calving Area Selection by Partially Migratory Elk</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>BERG, JODI E. ; REIMER, JODY ; SMOLKO, PETER ; BOHM, HOLGER ; HEBBLEWHITE, MARK ; MERRILL, EVELYN H.</creator><creatorcontrib>BERG, JODI E. ; REIMER, JODY ; SMOLKO, PETER ; BOHM, HOLGER ; HEBBLEWHITE, MARK ; MERRILL, EVELYN H.</creatorcontrib><description>Loss of migratory behavior or shifts in migratory ranges are growing concerns to wildlife managers. How ungulates prioritize safety from predators at the expense of high-quality foraging opportunities during calving may be key to understanding these shifts and long-term reproductive success. We compared trade-offs in selection for forage and predation risk by elk (Cervus canadensis) following 3 migratory tactics (western and eastern migration and resident) during 2 time periods in a declining (by almost 70% from 2002–2016), partially migratory elk population adjacent to Banff National Park in Alberta, Canada. We hypothesized that regardless of migratory tactic, maternal elk would show stronger trade-offs between high-quality foraging associated with higher predation risk and forage resources of lower-quality yet lower risk on calving ranges than on ranges used during summer because of vulnerability of their offspring. Additionally, we hypothesized these trade-offs would occur at high (2002–2006) and low (2013–2016) elk population sizes. We used a machine-learning algorithm to predict dates of parturition based on global positioning system (GPS) movements of elk equipped with vaginal implants (n = 60) and predictions were within 1.43±0.85 (SE) days of the known date. We applied the model to an additional 58 GPS-collared elk without vaginal implants. Based on changes in localized movements, we defined calving areas as the 26 days post-parturition and compared habitat characteristics of calving areas to 10 similar-sized areas centered on random locations during summer for the same individual in a latent selection framework. Across the 2 time periods, parturition occurred from 8 May–11 July with median parturition dates differing among migratory tactics and residents shifting towards an earlier parturition date in the later period. All elk, regardless of migratory tactic and time period, selected calving areas with greater forage resources than were available on areas used during summer, with no evidence for greater selection of areas that reduced predation risk at the expense of higher-quality foraging. Calving season selection for areas with abundant forage exposed western migrants to high risk of bear (Ursus spp.) predation, residents to high risk of wolf (Canis lupus) predation, and eastern migrants to low risk of bear and wolf predation. Patterns in exposure to predation risk during calving between migratory tactics were consistent with the recent decline in western migrants and increase in eastern migrants, implying that conditions on calving areas contributed to observed changes in the number of elk following these tactics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Wiley</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Animal behavior ; Animal migration ; Bears ; Breeding success ; calving ; Canis lupus ; Cervus canadensis ; Costs ; Elk ; Forage ; Foraging habitats ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Habitat Relations ; habitat selection ; Implants ; Learning algorithms ; Machine learning ; Migrants ; Migratory species ; National parks ; Offspring ; partial migration ; Parturition ; Predation ; Predators ; random forest ; Reproduction ; Risk ; Summer ; Tactics ; Ungulates ; Ursus ; Vagina ; Wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2021-09, Vol.85 (7), p.1476-1489</ispartof><rights>2021 The Wildlife Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3239-8467e3a47aa85d6d64abf4490b4ed103262e8af632a17f668e527b18d751de33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3239-8467e3a47aa85d6d64abf4490b4ed103262e8af632a17f668e527b18d751de33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5382-1361 ; 0000-0003-0678-8137</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27087805$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27087805$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BERG, JODI E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REIMER, JODY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMOLKO, PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOHM, HOLGER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEBBLEWHITE, MARK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MERRILL, EVELYN H.</creatorcontrib><title>Mothers’ Movements: Shifts in Calving Area Selection by Partially Migratory Elk</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Loss of migratory behavior or shifts in migratory ranges are growing concerns to wildlife managers. How ungulates prioritize safety from predators at the expense of high-quality foraging opportunities during calving may be key to understanding these shifts and long-term reproductive success. We compared trade-offs in selection for forage and predation risk by elk (Cervus canadensis) following 3 migratory tactics (western and eastern migration and resident) during 2 time periods in a declining (by almost 70% from 2002–2016), partially migratory elk population adjacent to Banff National Park in Alberta, Canada. We hypothesized that regardless of migratory tactic, maternal elk would show stronger trade-offs between high-quality foraging associated with higher predation risk and forage resources of lower-quality yet lower risk on calving ranges than on ranges used during summer because of vulnerability of their offspring. Additionally, we hypothesized these trade-offs would occur at high (2002–2006) and low (2013–2016) elk population sizes. We used a machine-learning algorithm to predict dates of parturition based on global positioning system (GPS) movements of elk equipped with vaginal implants (n = 60) and predictions were within 1.43±0.85 (SE) days of the known date. We applied the model to an additional 58 GPS-collared elk without vaginal implants. Based on changes in localized movements, we defined calving areas as the 26 days post-parturition and compared habitat characteristics of calving areas to 10 similar-sized areas centered on random locations during summer for the same individual in a latent selection framework. Across the 2 time periods, parturition occurred from 8 May–11 July with median parturition dates differing among migratory tactics and residents shifting towards an earlier parturition date in the later period. All elk, regardless of migratory tactic and time period, selected calving areas with greater forage resources than were available on areas used during summer, with no evidence for greater selection of areas that reduced predation risk at the expense of higher-quality foraging. Calving season selection for areas with abundant forage exposed western migrants to high risk of bear (Ursus spp.) predation, residents to high risk of wolf (Canis lupus) predation, and eastern migrants to low risk of bear and wolf predation. Patterns in exposure to predation risk during calving between migratory tactics were consistent with the recent decline in western migrants and increase in eastern migrants, implying that conditions on calving areas contributed to observed changes in the number of elk following these tactics.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal migration</subject><subject>Bears</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>calving</subject><subject>Canis lupus</subject><subject>Cervus canadensis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Elk</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Foraging habitats</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Habitat Relations</subject><subject>habitat selection</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Migratory species</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>partial migration</subject><subject>Parturition</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>random forest</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Tactics</subject><subject>Ungulates</subject><subject>Ursus</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j01Lw0AQQBdRMFYv4lUQvAmpM_u9RylalRYvBb0tm2ajDU1Td1NLb_4N_56_xNSoR09zmPdmeIQcI_QRgF6W6-q5TykYs0MSNEylVKPaJUm7pKng-LRPDmIsARiilgk5GdfNiw_x8_3jbFy_-covmnhI9go3j_7oZ_bI5OZ6MrhNRw_Du8HVKJ0yykyquVSeOa6c0yKXueQuKzg3kHGfIzAqqdeukIw6VIWU2guqMtS5Eph7xnrkvDu7DPXrysfGlvUqLNqPlgphpAED2FIXHTUNdYzBF3YZZpULG4tgt9F2G22_o1sYO3g9m_vNP6S9fxwPf53TziljU4c_hyrQSoNgX24GYbc</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>BERG, JODI E.</creator><creator>REIMER, JODY</creator><creator>SMOLKO, PETER</creator><creator>BOHM, HOLGER</creator><creator>HEBBLEWHITE, MARK</creator><creator>MERRILL, EVELYN H.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5382-1361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0678-8137</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Mothers’ Movements</title><author>BERG, JODI E. ; REIMER, JODY ; SMOLKO, PETER ; BOHM, HOLGER ; HEBBLEWHITE, MARK ; MERRILL, EVELYN H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3239-8467e3a47aa85d6d64abf4490b4ed103262e8af632a17f668e527b18d751de33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal migration</topic><topic>Bears</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>calving</topic><topic>Canis lupus</topic><topic>Cervus canadensis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Elk</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Foraging habitats</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Habitat Relations</topic><topic>habitat selection</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Migratory species</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>partial migration</topic><topic>Parturition</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>random forest</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Tactics</topic><topic>Ungulates</topic><topic>Ursus</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BERG, JODI E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REIMER, JODY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMOLKO, PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOHM, HOLGER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEBBLEWHITE, MARK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MERRILL, EVELYN H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BERG, JODI E.</au><au>REIMER, JODY</au><au>SMOLKO, PETER</au><au>BOHM, HOLGER</au><au>HEBBLEWHITE, MARK</au><au>MERRILL, EVELYN H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mothers’ Movements: Shifts in Calving Area Selection by Partially Migratory Elk</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1476</spage><epage>1489</epage><pages>1476-1489</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Loss of migratory behavior or shifts in migratory ranges are growing concerns to wildlife managers. How ungulates prioritize safety from predators at the expense of high-quality foraging opportunities during calving may be key to understanding these shifts and long-term reproductive success. We compared trade-offs in selection for forage and predation risk by elk (Cervus canadensis) following 3 migratory tactics (western and eastern migration and resident) during 2 time periods in a declining (by almost 70% from 2002–2016), partially migratory elk population adjacent to Banff National Park in Alberta, Canada. We hypothesized that regardless of migratory tactic, maternal elk would show stronger trade-offs between high-quality foraging associated with higher predation risk and forage resources of lower-quality yet lower risk on calving ranges than on ranges used during summer because of vulnerability of their offspring. Additionally, we hypothesized these trade-offs would occur at high (2002–2006) and low (2013–2016) elk population sizes. We used a machine-learning algorithm to predict dates of parturition based on global positioning system (GPS) movements of elk equipped with vaginal implants (n = 60) and predictions were within 1.43±0.85 (SE) days of the known date. We applied the model to an additional 58 GPS-collared elk without vaginal implants. Based on changes in localized movements, we defined calving areas as the 26 days post-parturition and compared habitat characteristics of calving areas to 10 similar-sized areas centered on random locations during summer for the same individual in a latent selection framework. Across the 2 time periods, parturition occurred from 8 May–11 July with median parturition dates differing among migratory tactics and residents shifting towards an earlier parturition date in the later period. All elk, regardless of migratory tactic and time period, selected calving areas with greater forage resources than were available on areas used during summer, with no evidence for greater selection of areas that reduced predation risk at the expense of higher-quality foraging. Calving season selection for areas with abundant forage exposed western migrants to high risk of bear (Ursus spp.) predation, residents to high risk of wolf (Canis lupus) predation, and eastern migrants to low risk of bear and wolf predation. Patterns in exposure to predation risk during calving between migratory tactics were consistent with the recent decline in western migrants and increase in eastern migrants, implying that conditions on calving areas contributed to observed changes in the number of elk following these tactics.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.22099</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5382-1361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0678-8137</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2021-09, Vol.85 (7), p.1476-1489
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2559690901
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Algorithms
Animal behavior
Animal migration
Bears
Breeding success
calving
Canis lupus
Cervus canadensis
Costs
Elk
Forage
Foraging habitats
Global positioning systems
GPS
Habitat Relations
habitat selection
Implants
Learning algorithms
Machine learning
Migrants
Migratory species
National parks
Offspring
partial migration
Parturition
Predation
Predators
random forest
Reproduction
Risk
Summer
Tactics
Ungulates
Ursus
Vagina
Wildlife habitats
Wildlife management
title Mothers’ Movements: Shifts in Calving Area Selection by Partially Migratory Elk
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A37%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mothers%E2%80%99%20Movements:%20Shifts%20in%20Calving%20Area%20Selection%20by%20Partially%20Migratory%20Elk&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=BERG,%20JODI%20E.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1476&rft.epage=1489&rft.pages=1476-1489&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.22099&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27087805%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2559690901&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27087805&rfr_iscdi=true