Preparation, characterisation and comparative toxicity of nanopermethrin against Anopheles stephensi and Culex pipiens
Objectives To assess the effectiveness of nanopermethrin as a potential new formulation for pest and vector control. Methods Permethrin nanoparticles were prepared by the ionic gelation method and its structure and the formulations were designed using Box–Behnken statistical technique. The effect of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Tropical medicine & international health 2021-08, Vol.26 (8), p.982-992 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 992 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 982 |
| container_title | Tropical medicine & international health |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Ebrahimnejad, Pedram Nikookar, Seyed Hassan Fazeli‐Dinan, Mahmoud Payman Ziapour, Seyed Farmoudeh, Ali Babaei, Amirhossein Enayati, Ahmadali |
| description | Objectives
To assess the effectiveness of nanopermethrin as a potential new formulation for pest and vector control.
Methods
Permethrin nanoparticles were prepared by the ionic gelation method and its structure and the formulations were designed using Box–Behnken statistical technique. The effect of independent variables (Chitosan/Permethrin ratio, tripolyphosphate quantity, sonication time) on the properties of nanoparticles was investigated to determine the optimal formulation.
Results
The size of the nanoparticles ranged from 135.27 ± 5.88 to 539.5 ± 24.01 nm and the insecticide entrapment efficiency per cent (EE%) ranged from 7.72 ± 1.36 to 63.59 ± 3.17%. Anopheles stephensi larvae were then bioassayed with the nanopermethrin and compared with the results of the bioassay with the mother molecule of permethrin using a standard WHO‐recommended mosquito larval bioassay kit. LC50 with permethrin and nanopermethrin on larvae of An. stephensi were 0.125 and 0.026 ppm showing a 4.8 times difference. The LC50 for permethrin and nanopermethrin on Culex pipiens were 0.003 and 0.00032 ppm, respectively, showing a 9.4‐fold difference.
Conclusion
Nanopermethrin is much more potent than its mother molecule against larvae of An. stephensi and Cx. pipiens. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/tmi.13587 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2559594678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2559594678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-9ae46fc63c3fcb53614ade1574f9ebab2ab18d2ff3e5c7d6d04f7b9fd2a38f533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAYhYMobk4v_AMS8EqwW9M0aXs5hh-DiV7M65Kmb1zG-mGSzu3fG9fpnbl5D4eHJ3AQuibhmPg3cZUeE8rS5AQNCeUsoITx00MOgyhK-ABdWLsOwzCOGT9HA0pTmvCIDNH2zUArjHC6qe-xXPkoHRhtDw0WdYllU_XEFrBrdlpqt8eNwrWomxZMBW5ltEc_hK6tw1PfrmADFlsHPtVWHzSzbgM73OpW--oSnSmxsXB1vCP0_viwnD0Hi9en-Wy6CCRlNAkyATFXklNJlSwY5SQWJRCWxCqDQhSRKEhaRkpRYDIpeRnGKikyVUaCpopROkK3vbc1zWcH1uXrpjO1_zKPGMtYFvMk9dRdT0nTWGtA5a3RlTD7nIT5z8K5Xzg_LOzZm6OxKyoo_8jfST0w6YEvvYH9_6Z8-TLvld8AE4kE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2559594678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preparation, characterisation and comparative toxicity of nanopermethrin against Anopheles stephensi and Culex pipiens</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Ebrahimnejad, Pedram ; Nikookar, Seyed Hassan ; Fazeli‐Dinan, Mahmoud ; Payman Ziapour, Seyed ; Farmoudeh, Ali ; Babaei, Amirhossein ; Enayati, Ahmadali</creator><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimnejad, Pedram ; Nikookar, Seyed Hassan ; Fazeli‐Dinan, Mahmoud ; Payman Ziapour, Seyed ; Farmoudeh, Ali ; Babaei, Amirhossein ; Enayati, Ahmadali</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To assess the effectiveness of nanopermethrin as a potential new formulation for pest and vector control.
Methods
Permethrin nanoparticles were prepared by the ionic gelation method and its structure and the formulations were designed using Box–Behnken statistical technique. The effect of independent variables (Chitosan/Permethrin ratio, tripolyphosphate quantity, sonication time) on the properties of nanoparticles was investigated to determine the optimal formulation.
Results
The size of the nanoparticles ranged from 135.27 ± 5.88 to 539.5 ± 24.01 nm and the insecticide entrapment efficiency per cent (EE%) ranged from 7.72 ± 1.36 to 63.59 ± 3.17%. Anopheles stephensi larvae were then bioassayed with the nanopermethrin and compared with the results of the bioassay with the mother molecule of permethrin using a standard WHO‐recommended mosquito larval bioassay kit. LC50 with permethrin and nanopermethrin on larvae of An. stephensi were 0.125 and 0.026 ppm showing a 4.8 times difference. The LC50 for permethrin and nanopermethrin on Culex pipiens were 0.003 and 0.00032 ppm, respectively, showing a 9.4‐fold difference.
Conclusion
Nanopermethrin is much more potent than its mother molecule against larvae of An. stephensi and Cx. pipiens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-2276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3156</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13587</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33837621</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anopheles stephensi ; Bioassays ; Chitosan ; Culex pipiens ; Entrapment ; Independent variables ; Insecticides ; Larvae ; Nanoparticles ; nanopermethrin ; Permethrin ; Pest control ; solvent evaporation ; Sonication ; Statistical analysis ; Toxicity ; Tripolyphosphate</subject><ispartof>Tropical medicine & international health, 2021-08, Vol.26 (8), p.982-992</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-9ae46fc63c3fcb53614ade1574f9ebab2ab18d2ff3e5c7d6d04f7b9fd2a38f533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-9ae46fc63c3fcb53614ade1574f9ebab2ab18d2ff3e5c7d6d04f7b9fd2a38f533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftmi.13587$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftmi.13587$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,1430,27913,27914,45563,45564,46398,46822</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33837621$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimnejad, Pedram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikookar, Seyed Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazeli‐Dinan, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payman Ziapour, Seyed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farmoudeh, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babaei, Amirhossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enayati, Ahmadali</creatorcontrib><title>Preparation, characterisation and comparative toxicity of nanopermethrin against Anopheles stephensi and Culex pipiens</title><title>Tropical medicine & international health</title><addtitle>Trop Med Int Health</addtitle><description>Objectives
To assess the effectiveness of nanopermethrin as a potential new formulation for pest and vector control.
Methods
Permethrin nanoparticles were prepared by the ionic gelation method and its structure and the formulations were designed using Box–Behnken statistical technique. The effect of independent variables (Chitosan/Permethrin ratio, tripolyphosphate quantity, sonication time) on the properties of nanoparticles was investigated to determine the optimal formulation.
Results
The size of the nanoparticles ranged from 135.27 ± 5.88 to 539.5 ± 24.01 nm and the insecticide entrapment efficiency per cent (EE%) ranged from 7.72 ± 1.36 to 63.59 ± 3.17%. Anopheles stephensi larvae were then bioassayed with the nanopermethrin and compared with the results of the bioassay with the mother molecule of permethrin using a standard WHO‐recommended mosquito larval bioassay kit. LC50 with permethrin and nanopermethrin on larvae of An. stephensi were 0.125 and 0.026 ppm showing a 4.8 times difference. The LC50 for permethrin and nanopermethrin on Culex pipiens were 0.003 and 0.00032 ppm, respectively, showing a 9.4‐fold difference.
Conclusion
Nanopermethrin is much more potent than its mother molecule against larvae of An. stephensi and Cx. pipiens.</description><subject>Anopheles stephensi</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Chitosan</subject><subject>Culex pipiens</subject><subject>Entrapment</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>nanopermethrin</subject><subject>Permethrin</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>solvent evaporation</subject><subject>Sonication</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Tripolyphosphate</subject><issn>1360-2276</issn><issn>1365-3156</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAYhYMobk4v_AMS8EqwW9M0aXs5hh-DiV7M65Kmb1zG-mGSzu3fG9fpnbl5D4eHJ3AQuibhmPg3cZUeE8rS5AQNCeUsoITx00MOgyhK-ABdWLsOwzCOGT9HA0pTmvCIDNH2zUArjHC6qe-xXPkoHRhtDw0WdYllU_XEFrBrdlpqt8eNwrWomxZMBW5ltEc_hK6tw1PfrmADFlsHPtVWHzSzbgM73OpW--oSnSmxsXB1vCP0_viwnD0Hi9en-Wy6CCRlNAkyATFXklNJlSwY5SQWJRCWxCqDQhSRKEhaRkpRYDIpeRnGKikyVUaCpopROkK3vbc1zWcH1uXrpjO1_zKPGMtYFvMk9dRdT0nTWGtA5a3RlTD7nIT5z8K5Xzg_LOzZm6OxKyoo_8jfST0w6YEvvYH9_6Z8-TLvld8AE4kE</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Ebrahimnejad, Pedram</creator><creator>Nikookar, Seyed Hassan</creator><creator>Fazeli‐Dinan, Mahmoud</creator><creator>Payman Ziapour, Seyed</creator><creator>Farmoudeh, Ali</creator><creator>Babaei, Amirhossein</creator><creator>Enayati, Ahmadali</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Preparation, characterisation and comparative toxicity of nanopermethrin against Anopheles stephensi and Culex pipiens</title><author>Ebrahimnejad, Pedram ; Nikookar, Seyed Hassan ; Fazeli‐Dinan, Mahmoud ; Payman Ziapour, Seyed ; Farmoudeh, Ali ; Babaei, Amirhossein ; Enayati, Ahmadali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-9ae46fc63c3fcb53614ade1574f9ebab2ab18d2ff3e5c7d6d04f7b9fd2a38f533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anopheles stephensi</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Chitosan</topic><topic>Culex pipiens</topic><topic>Entrapment</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>nanopermethrin</topic><topic>Permethrin</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>solvent evaporation</topic><topic>Sonication</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Tripolyphosphate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimnejad, Pedram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikookar, Seyed Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazeli‐Dinan, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payman Ziapour, Seyed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farmoudeh, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babaei, Amirhossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enayati, Ahmadali</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Tropical medicine & international health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ebrahimnejad, Pedram</au><au>Nikookar, Seyed Hassan</au><au>Fazeli‐Dinan, Mahmoud</au><au>Payman Ziapour, Seyed</au><au>Farmoudeh, Ali</au><au>Babaei, Amirhossein</au><au>Enayati, Ahmadali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preparation, characterisation and comparative toxicity of nanopermethrin against Anopheles stephensi and Culex pipiens</atitle><jtitle>Tropical medicine & international health</jtitle><addtitle>Trop Med Int Health</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>982</spage><epage>992</epage><pages>982-992</pages><issn>1360-2276</issn><eissn>1365-3156</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To assess the effectiveness of nanopermethrin as a potential new formulation for pest and vector control.
Methods
Permethrin nanoparticles were prepared by the ionic gelation method and its structure and the formulations were designed using Box–Behnken statistical technique. The effect of independent variables (Chitosan/Permethrin ratio, tripolyphosphate quantity, sonication time) on the properties of nanoparticles was investigated to determine the optimal formulation.
Results
The size of the nanoparticles ranged from 135.27 ± 5.88 to 539.5 ± 24.01 nm and the insecticide entrapment efficiency per cent (EE%) ranged from 7.72 ± 1.36 to 63.59 ± 3.17%. Anopheles stephensi larvae were then bioassayed with the nanopermethrin and compared with the results of the bioassay with the mother molecule of permethrin using a standard WHO‐recommended mosquito larval bioassay kit. LC50 with permethrin and nanopermethrin on larvae of An. stephensi were 0.125 and 0.026 ppm showing a 4.8 times difference. The LC50 for permethrin and nanopermethrin on Culex pipiens were 0.003 and 0.00032 ppm, respectively, showing a 9.4‐fold difference.
Conclusion
Nanopermethrin is much more potent than its mother molecule against larvae of An. stephensi and Cx. pipiens.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33837621</pmid><doi>10.1111/tmi.13587</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1360-2276 |
| ispartof | Tropical medicine & international health, 2021-08, Vol.26 (8), p.982-992 |
| issn | 1360-2276 1365-3156 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2559594678 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content |
| subjects | Anopheles stephensi Bioassays Chitosan Culex pipiens Entrapment Independent variables Insecticides Larvae Nanoparticles nanopermethrin Permethrin Pest control solvent evaporation Sonication Statistical analysis Toxicity Tripolyphosphate |
| title | Preparation, characterisation and comparative toxicity of nanopermethrin against Anopheles stephensi and Culex pipiens |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A24%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preparation,%20characterisation%20and%20comparative%20toxicity%20of%20nanopermethrin%20against%20Anopheles%20stephensi%20and%20Culex%20pipiens&rft.jtitle=Tropical%20medicine%20&%20international%20health&rft.au=Ebrahimnejad,%20Pedram&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=982&rft.epage=992&rft.pages=982-992&rft.issn=1360-2276&rft.eissn=1365-3156&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tmi.13587&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2559594678%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2559594678&rft_id=info:pmid/33837621&rfr_iscdi=true |