Investigation of combustion characteristics in a hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustor
The combustion characteristics of a hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustor were investigated experimentally and numerically. One nonreacting case (case 1), and two different equivalence ratio (ER) reacting cases (cases 2 and 3) were compared. The combustion process of each reacting case was divided into...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta astronautica 2021-09, Vol.186, p.486-495 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 495 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 486 |
container_title | Acta astronautica |
container_volume | 186 |
creator | Tian, Ye Shi, Wen Guo, Mingming Liu, Yuan Zhang, Chenlin Le, Jialing |
description | The combustion characteristics of a hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustor were investigated experimentally and numerically. One nonreacting case (case 1), and two different equivalence ratio (ER) reacting cases (cases 2 and 3) were compared. The combustion process of each reacting case was divided into three phases. In the first phase, the monitor pressure in case 2 (ER = 0.1) reached a higher level due to the fuel injected before the hydrogen was ignited, whereas the change in case 3 (ER = 0.3) was the opposite, being less than that in the nonreacting flow. Almost all of the hydrogen in case 2 was in the front of the cavity, and that in case 3 was both throughout the whole cavity and near the top wall behind the cavity. In the second phase, the ignition times were about 0.010 s in case 2 and about 0.022 in case 3; a larger ER of hydrogen might be difficult to ignite. Finally, in the last phase, the hydrogen combustion was stable. The shock train in case 3 was pushed into the isolator, and the disturbing distance was about 0.08 m, in accordance with the wall pressure distribution. The higher static temperature in case 2 was mainly in the back of the cavity and that in case 3 was in the cavity shear layer, in line with the hydroxyl planner laser-induced fluorescence (OH-PLIF) results. The combustion mode in case 2 was supersonic combustion and that in case 3 was subsonic combustion.
•Combustion characteristics were investigated in a supersonic combustor.•The whole combustion process could be divided into three parts.•Various measurements are used for better understanding combustion characteristics.•The ignition time for different ER reacting cases was measured. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.06.021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2559476868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0094576521003180</els_id><sourcerecordid>2559476868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-74a94a7501d3cf92383349d9a323adf202806c6321b4dfe7d44afddba7626d5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtKAzEADKJgrX6DC553zWuTzbEUtYWCB_Ucsnm0WdpNTXYL_XtTq149DQPzYAaAewQrBBF77CqlB6XSEEOFIUYVZFWGCzBBDRclhgReggmEgpY1Z_U1uEmpgxBy3IgJeFv2B5sGv1aDD30RXKHDrh3TN9MbFXO4jT5znQrfF6rYHE0Ma9uXbrRba4qko9p1dvg1hngLrpzaJnv3g1Pw8fz0Pl-Uq9eX5Xy2KjWhZCg5VYIqXkNkiHYCk4YQKoxQBBNlXN7SQKYZwailxlluKFXOmFZxhpmpWzIFD-fcfQyfY14huzDGPldKXNeCctawJqv4WaVjSClaJ_fR71Q8SgTl6UHZyb8H5elBCZnMkJ2zs9PmEQdvo0za215b46PVgzTB_5vxBRj-f6c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2559476868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of combustion characteristics in a hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustor</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Tian, Ye ; Shi, Wen ; Guo, Mingming ; Liu, Yuan ; Zhang, Chenlin ; Le, Jialing</creator><creatorcontrib>Tian, Ye ; Shi, Wen ; Guo, Mingming ; Liu, Yuan ; Zhang, Chenlin ; Le, Jialing</creatorcontrib><description>The combustion characteristics of a hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustor were investigated experimentally and numerically. One nonreacting case (case 1), and two different equivalence ratio (ER) reacting cases (cases 2 and 3) were compared. The combustion process of each reacting case was divided into three phases. In the first phase, the monitor pressure in case 2 (ER = 0.1) reached a higher level due to the fuel injected before the hydrogen was ignited, whereas the change in case 3 (ER = 0.3) was the opposite, being less than that in the nonreacting flow. Almost all of the hydrogen in case 2 was in the front of the cavity, and that in case 3 was both throughout the whole cavity and near the top wall behind the cavity. In the second phase, the ignition times were about 0.010 s in case 2 and about 0.022 in case 3; a larger ER of hydrogen might be difficult to ignite. Finally, in the last phase, the hydrogen combustion was stable. The shock train in case 3 was pushed into the isolator, and the disturbing distance was about 0.08 m, in accordance with the wall pressure distribution. The higher static temperature in case 2 was mainly in the back of the cavity and that in case 3 was in the cavity shear layer, in line with the hydroxyl planner laser-induced fluorescence (OH-PLIF) results. The combustion mode in case 2 was supersonic combustion and that in case 3 was subsonic combustion.
•Combustion characteristics were investigated in a supersonic combustor.•The whole combustion process could be divided into three parts.•Various measurements are used for better understanding combustion characteristics.•The ignition time for different ER reacting cases was measured.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-5765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.06.021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elmsford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Combustion ; Combustion chambers ; Combustion characteristics ; Equivalence ratio ; Fluorescence ; Hydrogen ; Hydrogen combustion ; Ignition ; Laser induced fluorescence ; Pressure distribution ; Scramjet ; Shear layers ; Stress concentration ; Subsonic combustion ; Supersonic combustion ; Supersonic combustion ramjet engines ; Supersonic combustor ; Wall pressure</subject><ispartof>Acta astronautica, 2021-09, Vol.186, p.486-495</ispartof><rights>2021 IAA</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Sep 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-74a94a7501d3cf92383349d9a323adf202806c6321b4dfe7d44afddba7626d5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-74a94a7501d3cf92383349d9a323adf202806c6321b4dfe7d44afddba7626d5b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9955-3438</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.06.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tian, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Mingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chenlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, Jialing</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of combustion characteristics in a hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustor</title><title>Acta astronautica</title><description>The combustion characteristics of a hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustor were investigated experimentally and numerically. One nonreacting case (case 1), and two different equivalence ratio (ER) reacting cases (cases 2 and 3) were compared. The combustion process of each reacting case was divided into three phases. In the first phase, the monitor pressure in case 2 (ER = 0.1) reached a higher level due to the fuel injected before the hydrogen was ignited, whereas the change in case 3 (ER = 0.3) was the opposite, being less than that in the nonreacting flow. Almost all of the hydrogen in case 2 was in the front of the cavity, and that in case 3 was both throughout the whole cavity and near the top wall behind the cavity. In the second phase, the ignition times were about 0.010 s in case 2 and about 0.022 in case 3; a larger ER of hydrogen might be difficult to ignite. Finally, in the last phase, the hydrogen combustion was stable. The shock train in case 3 was pushed into the isolator, and the disturbing distance was about 0.08 m, in accordance with the wall pressure distribution. The higher static temperature in case 2 was mainly in the back of the cavity and that in case 3 was in the cavity shear layer, in line with the hydroxyl planner laser-induced fluorescence (OH-PLIF) results. The combustion mode in case 2 was supersonic combustion and that in case 3 was subsonic combustion.
•Combustion characteristics were investigated in a supersonic combustor.•The whole combustion process could be divided into three parts.•Various measurements are used for better understanding combustion characteristics.•The ignition time for different ER reacting cases was measured.</description><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Combustion chambers</subject><subject>Combustion characteristics</subject><subject>Equivalence ratio</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Hydrogen</subject><subject>Hydrogen combustion</subject><subject>Ignition</subject><subject>Laser induced fluorescence</subject><subject>Pressure distribution</subject><subject>Scramjet</subject><subject>Shear layers</subject><subject>Stress concentration</subject><subject>Subsonic combustion</subject><subject>Supersonic combustion</subject><subject>Supersonic combustion ramjet engines</subject><subject>Supersonic combustor</subject><subject>Wall pressure</subject><issn>0094-5765</issn><issn>1879-2030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtKAzEADKJgrX6DC553zWuTzbEUtYWCB_Ucsnm0WdpNTXYL_XtTq149DQPzYAaAewQrBBF77CqlB6XSEEOFIUYVZFWGCzBBDRclhgReggmEgpY1Z_U1uEmpgxBy3IgJeFv2B5sGv1aDD30RXKHDrh3TN9MbFXO4jT5znQrfF6rYHE0Ma9uXbrRba4qko9p1dvg1hngLrpzaJnv3g1Pw8fz0Pl-Uq9eX5Xy2KjWhZCg5VYIqXkNkiHYCk4YQKoxQBBNlXN7SQKYZwailxlluKFXOmFZxhpmpWzIFD-fcfQyfY14huzDGPldKXNeCctawJqv4WaVjSClaJ_fR71Q8SgTl6UHZyb8H5elBCZnMkJ2zs9PmEQdvo0za215b46PVgzTB_5vxBRj-f6c</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Tian, Ye</creator><creator>Shi, Wen</creator><creator>Guo, Mingming</creator><creator>Liu, Yuan</creator><creator>Zhang, Chenlin</creator><creator>Le, Jialing</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9955-3438</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Investigation of combustion characteristics in a hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustor</title><author>Tian, Ye ; Shi, Wen ; Guo, Mingming ; Liu, Yuan ; Zhang, Chenlin ; Le, Jialing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-74a94a7501d3cf92383349d9a323adf202806c6321b4dfe7d44afddba7626d5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Combustion chambers</topic><topic>Combustion characteristics</topic><topic>Equivalence ratio</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Hydrogen</topic><topic>Hydrogen combustion</topic><topic>Ignition</topic><topic>Laser induced fluorescence</topic><topic>Pressure distribution</topic><topic>Scramjet</topic><topic>Shear layers</topic><topic>Stress concentration</topic><topic>Subsonic combustion</topic><topic>Supersonic combustion</topic><topic>Supersonic combustion ramjet engines</topic><topic>Supersonic combustor</topic><topic>Wall pressure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tian, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Mingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chenlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, Jialing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Acta astronautica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tian, Ye</au><au>Shi, Wen</au><au>Guo, Mingming</au><au>Liu, Yuan</au><au>Zhang, Chenlin</au><au>Le, Jialing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of combustion characteristics in a hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustor</atitle><jtitle>Acta astronautica</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>186</volume><spage>486</spage><epage>495</epage><pages>486-495</pages><issn>0094-5765</issn><eissn>1879-2030</eissn><abstract>The combustion characteristics of a hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustor were investigated experimentally and numerically. One nonreacting case (case 1), and two different equivalence ratio (ER) reacting cases (cases 2 and 3) were compared. The combustion process of each reacting case was divided into three phases. In the first phase, the monitor pressure in case 2 (ER = 0.1) reached a higher level due to the fuel injected before the hydrogen was ignited, whereas the change in case 3 (ER = 0.3) was the opposite, being less than that in the nonreacting flow. Almost all of the hydrogen in case 2 was in the front of the cavity, and that in case 3 was both throughout the whole cavity and near the top wall behind the cavity. In the second phase, the ignition times were about 0.010 s in case 2 and about 0.022 in case 3; a larger ER of hydrogen might be difficult to ignite. Finally, in the last phase, the hydrogen combustion was stable. The shock train in case 3 was pushed into the isolator, and the disturbing distance was about 0.08 m, in accordance with the wall pressure distribution. The higher static temperature in case 2 was mainly in the back of the cavity and that in case 3 was in the cavity shear layer, in line with the hydroxyl planner laser-induced fluorescence (OH-PLIF) results. The combustion mode in case 2 was supersonic combustion and that in case 3 was subsonic combustion.
•Combustion characteristics were investigated in a supersonic combustor.•The whole combustion process could be divided into three parts.•Various measurements are used for better understanding combustion characteristics.•The ignition time for different ER reacting cases was measured.</abstract><cop>Elmsford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.06.021</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9955-3438</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-5765 |
ispartof | Acta astronautica, 2021-09, Vol.186, p.486-495 |
issn | 0094-5765 1879-2030 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2559476868 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Combustion Combustion chambers Combustion characteristics Equivalence ratio Fluorescence Hydrogen Hydrogen combustion Ignition Laser induced fluorescence Pressure distribution Scramjet Shear layers Stress concentration Subsonic combustion Supersonic combustion Supersonic combustion ramjet engines Supersonic combustor Wall pressure |
title | Investigation of combustion characteristics in a hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustor |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T00%3A10%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20combustion%20characteristics%20in%20a%20hydrogen-fueled%20scramjet%20combustor&rft.jtitle=Acta%20astronautica&rft.au=Tian,%20Ye&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=186&rft.spage=486&rft.epage=495&rft.pages=486-495&rft.issn=0094-5765&rft.eissn=1879-2030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.06.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2559476868%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2559476868&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0094576521003180&rfr_iscdi=true |