Micropollutant-loaded powdered activated carbon released from waste water treatment plants: a risk for sediment-dwelling organisms?

Background In order to protect aquatic environments and to reduce the presence of micropollutants in the global water cycle, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) often implement an additional treatment step. One of the most effective measures is the use of powdered activated carbon (PAC) as an adsorb...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental sciences Europe 2021-12, Vol.33 (1), Article 89
Hauptverfasser: Woermann, Marion, Kontchou, Julios Armand, Sures, Bernd
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Environmental sciences Europe
container_volume 33
creator Woermann, Marion
Kontchou, Julios Armand
Sures, Bernd
description Background In order to protect aquatic environments and to reduce the presence of micropollutants in the global water cycle, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) often implement an additional treatment step. One of the most effective measures is the use of powdered activated carbon (PAC) as an adsorbent for micropollutants. This method provides sufficient elimination rates for several micropollutants and has been successfully employed in many WWTPs. Despite this success, there might be a drawback as the retention of the PAC in the WWTP can be challenging and losses of micropollutant-loaded PAC into the aquatic environment may occur. Upon emission, micropollutant-loaded PAC is expected to settle to the benthic zone of receiving waters, where sediment-dwelling organisms may ingest these particles. Therefore, the present study investigated possible adverse effects of micropollutant-loaded PAC from a WWTP as compared to unloaded (native) and diclofenac-loaded PAC on the sediment-dwelling annelid Lumbriculus variegatus . Results Native PAC induced the strongest effects on growth (measured as biomass) and reproduction of the annelids. The corresponding medium effective concentrations (EC 50 ) were 1.7 g/kg and 1.8 g/kg, respectively. Diclofenac-loaded PAC showed lower effects with an EC 50 of 2.5 g/kg for growth and EC 50 of 3.0 g/kg for reproduction. Although tested at the same concentrations, the micropollutant-loaded PAC from the WWTP did not lead to obvious negative effects on the endpoints investigated for L. variegatus and only a slight trend of a reduced growth was detected. Conclusion We did not detect harmful effects on L. variegatus caused by the presence of MP-loaded PAC from a WWTP which gives an auspicious perspective for PAC as an advanced treatment option.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12302-021-00531-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2558849197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2558849197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-4512603eb0fd2e396a4976caf6c1e87520f67dd867985c0c70aa4bee2176293c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYsoOIzzB1wFXEfzaJLWjcjgC0bc6Dpk0tuhY9vUJGNx7R83Y0V3ZpGccM85F74sO6XknNJCXgTKOGGYMIoJEZzi8SCbMVoSnCsqDn81UcfZIoQtSUewQuViln0-Nta7wbXtLpo-4taZCio0uLECn4SxsXk3MSlr_Nr1yEMLJqR_7V2HRhMipDuCR9GDiR30EQ1tqgqXyCDfhFdUO49SotnPcDVC2zb9Bjm_MX0TunB1kh3Vpg2w-Hnn2cvtzfPyHq-e7h6W1ytsueQR54IySTisSV0x4KU0eamkNbW0FAolGKmlqqpCqrIQllhFjMnXAIwqyUpu-Tw7m3oH7952EKLeup3v00rNhCiKvKSlSi42uRKXEDzUevBNZ_yHpkTveeuJt0689TdvPaYQn0IhmfsN-L_qf1JflqyF_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2558849197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Micropollutant-loaded powdered activated carbon released from waste water treatment plants: a risk for sediment-dwelling organisms?</title><source>Springer Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Journals</source><creator>Woermann, Marion ; Kontchou, Julios Armand ; Sures, Bernd</creator><creatorcontrib>Woermann, Marion ; Kontchou, Julios Armand ; Sures, Bernd</creatorcontrib><description>Background In order to protect aquatic environments and to reduce the presence of micropollutants in the global water cycle, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) often implement an additional treatment step. One of the most effective measures is the use of powdered activated carbon (PAC) as an adsorbent for micropollutants. This method provides sufficient elimination rates for several micropollutants and has been successfully employed in many WWTPs. Despite this success, there might be a drawback as the retention of the PAC in the WWTP can be challenging and losses of micropollutant-loaded PAC into the aquatic environment may occur. Upon emission, micropollutant-loaded PAC is expected to settle to the benthic zone of receiving waters, where sediment-dwelling organisms may ingest these particles. Therefore, the present study investigated possible adverse effects of micropollutant-loaded PAC from a WWTP as compared to unloaded (native) and diclofenac-loaded PAC on the sediment-dwelling annelid Lumbriculus variegatus . Results Native PAC induced the strongest effects on growth (measured as biomass) and reproduction of the annelids. The corresponding medium effective concentrations (EC 50 ) were 1.7 g/kg and 1.8 g/kg, respectively. Diclofenac-loaded PAC showed lower effects with an EC 50 of 2.5 g/kg for growth and EC 50 of 3.0 g/kg for reproduction. Although tested at the same concentrations, the micropollutant-loaded PAC from the WWTP did not lead to obvious negative effects on the endpoints investigated for L. variegatus and only a slight trend of a reduced growth was detected. Conclusion We did not detect harmful effects on L. variegatus caused by the presence of MP-loaded PAC from a WWTP which gives an auspicious perspective for PAC as an advanced treatment option.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2190-4707</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-4715</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12302-021-00531-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Activated carbon ; Aquatic environment ; Diclofenac ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Hydrologic cycle ; Micropollutants ; Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ; Pollution ; Receiving waters ; Reproduction ; Sediments ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewater treatment plants ; Water treatment ; Water treatment plants</subject><ispartof>Environmental sciences Europe, 2021-12, Vol.33 (1), Article 89</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-4512603eb0fd2e396a4976caf6c1e87520f67dd867985c0c70aa4bee2176293c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-4512603eb0fd2e396a4976caf6c1e87520f67dd867985c0c70aa4bee2176293c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6865-6186</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-021-00531-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12302-021-00531-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902,41096,41464,42165,42533,51294,51551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woermann, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kontchou, Julios Armand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sures, Bernd</creatorcontrib><title>Micropollutant-loaded powdered activated carbon released from waste water treatment plants: a risk for sediment-dwelling organisms?</title><title>Environmental sciences Europe</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Eur</addtitle><description>Background In order to protect aquatic environments and to reduce the presence of micropollutants in the global water cycle, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) often implement an additional treatment step. One of the most effective measures is the use of powdered activated carbon (PAC) as an adsorbent for micropollutants. This method provides sufficient elimination rates for several micropollutants and has been successfully employed in many WWTPs. Despite this success, there might be a drawback as the retention of the PAC in the WWTP can be challenging and losses of micropollutant-loaded PAC into the aquatic environment may occur. Upon emission, micropollutant-loaded PAC is expected to settle to the benthic zone of receiving waters, where sediment-dwelling organisms may ingest these particles. Therefore, the present study investigated possible adverse effects of micropollutant-loaded PAC from a WWTP as compared to unloaded (native) and diclofenac-loaded PAC on the sediment-dwelling annelid Lumbriculus variegatus . Results Native PAC induced the strongest effects on growth (measured as biomass) and reproduction of the annelids. The corresponding medium effective concentrations (EC 50 ) were 1.7 g/kg and 1.8 g/kg, respectively. Diclofenac-loaded PAC showed lower effects with an EC 50 of 2.5 g/kg for growth and EC 50 of 3.0 g/kg for reproduction. Although tested at the same concentrations, the micropollutant-loaded PAC from the WWTP did not lead to obvious negative effects on the endpoints investigated for L. variegatus and only a slight trend of a reduced growth was detected. Conclusion We did not detect harmful effects on L. variegatus caused by the presence of MP-loaded PAC from a WWTP which gives an auspicious perspective for PAC as an advanced treatment option.</description><subject>Activated carbon</subject><subject>Aquatic environment</subject><subject>Diclofenac</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Hydrologic cycle</subject><subject>Micropollutants</subject><subject>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Receiving waters</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><issn>2190-4707</issn><issn>2190-4715</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYsoOIzzB1wFXEfzaJLWjcjgC0bc6Dpk0tuhY9vUJGNx7R83Y0V3ZpGccM85F74sO6XknNJCXgTKOGGYMIoJEZzi8SCbMVoSnCsqDn81UcfZIoQtSUewQuViln0-Nta7wbXtLpo-4taZCio0uLECn4SxsXk3MSlr_Nr1yEMLJqR_7V2HRhMipDuCR9GDiR30EQ1tqgqXyCDfhFdUO49SotnPcDVC2zb9Bjm_MX0TunB1kh3Vpg2w-Hnn2cvtzfPyHq-e7h6W1ytsueQR54IySTisSV0x4KU0eamkNbW0FAolGKmlqqpCqrIQllhFjMnXAIwqyUpu-Tw7m3oH7952EKLeup3v00rNhCiKvKSlSi42uRKXEDzUevBNZ_yHpkTveeuJt0689TdvPaYQn0IhmfsN-L_qf1JflqyF_g</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Woermann, Marion</creator><creator>Kontchou, Julios Armand</creator><creator>Sures, Bernd</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6865-6186</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Micropollutant-loaded powdered activated carbon released from waste water treatment plants: a risk for sediment-dwelling organisms?</title><author>Woermann, Marion ; Kontchou, Julios Armand ; Sures, Bernd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-4512603eb0fd2e396a4976caf6c1e87520f67dd867985c0c70aa4bee2176293c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Activated carbon</topic><topic>Aquatic environment</topic><topic>Diclofenac</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Hydrologic cycle</topic><topic>Micropollutants</topic><topic>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Receiving waters</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woermann, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kontchou, Julios Armand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sures, Bernd</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Environmental sciences Europe</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woermann, Marion</au><au>Kontchou, Julios Armand</au><au>Sures, Bernd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Micropollutant-loaded powdered activated carbon released from waste water treatment plants: a risk for sediment-dwelling organisms?</atitle><jtitle>Environmental sciences Europe</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Eur</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><artnum>89</artnum><issn>2190-4707</issn><eissn>2190-4715</eissn><abstract>Background In order to protect aquatic environments and to reduce the presence of micropollutants in the global water cycle, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) often implement an additional treatment step. One of the most effective measures is the use of powdered activated carbon (PAC) as an adsorbent for micropollutants. This method provides sufficient elimination rates for several micropollutants and has been successfully employed in many WWTPs. Despite this success, there might be a drawback as the retention of the PAC in the WWTP can be challenging and losses of micropollutant-loaded PAC into the aquatic environment may occur. Upon emission, micropollutant-loaded PAC is expected to settle to the benthic zone of receiving waters, where sediment-dwelling organisms may ingest these particles. Therefore, the present study investigated possible adverse effects of micropollutant-loaded PAC from a WWTP as compared to unloaded (native) and diclofenac-loaded PAC on the sediment-dwelling annelid Lumbriculus variegatus . Results Native PAC induced the strongest effects on growth (measured as biomass) and reproduction of the annelids. The corresponding medium effective concentrations (EC 50 ) were 1.7 g/kg and 1.8 g/kg, respectively. Diclofenac-loaded PAC showed lower effects with an EC 50 of 2.5 g/kg for growth and EC 50 of 3.0 g/kg for reproduction. Although tested at the same concentrations, the micropollutant-loaded PAC from the WWTP did not lead to obvious negative effects on the endpoints investigated for L. variegatus and only a slight trend of a reduced growth was detected. Conclusion We did not detect harmful effects on L. variegatus caused by the presence of MP-loaded PAC from a WWTP which gives an auspicious perspective for PAC as an advanced treatment option.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1186/s12302-021-00531-w</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6865-6186</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2190-4707
ispartof Environmental sciences Europe, 2021-12, Vol.33 (1), Article 89
issn 2190-4707
2190-4715
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2558849197
source Springer Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Journals
subjects Activated carbon
Aquatic environment
Diclofenac
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecotoxicology
Environment
Hydrologic cycle
Micropollutants
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Pollution
Receiving waters
Reproduction
Sediments
Wastewater treatment
Wastewater treatment plants
Water treatment
Water treatment plants
title Micropollutant-loaded powdered activated carbon released from waste water treatment plants: a risk for sediment-dwelling organisms?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T19%3A58%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Micropollutant-loaded%20powdered%20activated%20carbon%20released%20from%20waste%20water%20treatment%20plants:%20a%20risk%20for%20sediment-dwelling%20organisms?&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20sciences%20Europe&rft.au=Woermann,%20Marion&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.artnum=89&rft.issn=2190-4707&rft.eissn=2190-4715&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12302-021-00531-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2558849197%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2558849197&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true