Methodological Choices and Data Quality Issues for Official Poverty Measures: Evidences from Italy
The plurality of the official poverty estimates in Italy covers both absolute and relative approaches, ranges from consumption to income-based measures, follows different methodologies and uses several data sources. We can therefore expect that each measure gives a somewhat different picture of pove...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social indicators research 2019-01, Vol.141 (1), p.299-330 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 330 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 299 |
container_title | Social indicators research |
container_volume | 141 |
creator | Lemmi, Achille Grassi, Donatella Masi, Alessandra Pannuzi, Nicoletta Regoli, Andrea |
description | The plurality of the official poverty estimates in Italy covers both absolute and relative approaches, ranges from consumption to income-based measures, follows different methodologies and uses several data sources. We can therefore expect that each measure gives a somewhat different picture of poverty, in its level as well as in its change across subgroups of the population. This paper investigates the effect of methodological choices together with the effect of different data quality aspects on the official poverty estimates. Usually, methodological issues attract much attention both in literature and empirical studies. However, the results of the sensitivity analysis suggest that more specific attention should be paid to data quality issues and to the definition of the variables. Our main conclusion is that an improvement in the quality as well as the inclusion of some items in the definition of the variable may result in large changes in poverty indicators. This finding signals that the data quality aspects have a higher impact on poverty estimates than some methodological issues. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11205-018-1841-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2558847933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48704552</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48704552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-ff979ca3699c1145d2166695505c6066fca6a428d0474be055ef0123ba402e7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wIUw4Dp6855ZSn0VWqqg65BmknbK2NRkRui_N2VEd64u3Pudcy4HoUsCNwRA3SZCKAgMpMSk5ASzIzQiQjEMFSXHaAQMGC4ZwCk6S2kDAIILPkKzuevWoQ5tWDXWtMVkHRrrUmG2dXFvOlO89qZtun0xTanPex9isfC-sU2GX8KXi_k2dyb10aVzdOJNm9zFzxyj98eHt8kzni2eppO7GbZMkQ57X6nKGiaryhLCRU2JlLISAoSVIKW3RhpOyxq44ksHQjgPhLKl4UCdsmyMrgffXQyf-atOb0IftzlSUyHKkquKsUyRgbIxpBSd17vYfJi41wT0oTQ9lKZzafpQmj5o6KBJmd2uXPxz_k90NYg2qQvxN4WXCrgQlH0DITV3Ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2558847933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methodological Choices and Data Quality Issues for Official Poverty Measures: Evidences from Italy</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Lemmi, Achille ; Grassi, Donatella ; Masi, Alessandra ; Pannuzi, Nicoletta ; Regoli, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>Lemmi, Achille ; Grassi, Donatella ; Masi, Alessandra ; Pannuzi, Nicoletta ; Regoli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>The plurality of the official poverty estimates in Italy covers both absolute and relative approaches, ranges from consumption to income-based measures, follows different methodologies and uses several data sources. We can therefore expect that each measure gives a somewhat different picture of poverty, in its level as well as in its change across subgroups of the population. This paper investigates the effect of methodological choices together with the effect of different data quality aspects on the official poverty estimates. Usually, methodological issues attract much attention both in literature and empirical studies. However, the results of the sensitivity analysis suggest that more specific attention should be paid to data quality issues and to the definition of the variables. Our main conclusion is that an improvement in the quality as well as the inclusion of some items in the definition of the variable may result in large changes in poverty indicators. This finding signals that the data quality aspects have a higher impact on poverty estimates than some methodological issues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-8300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11205-018-1841-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Attention ; Consumption ; Data quality ; Expenditures ; Households ; Human Geography ; Methodological problems ; Microeconomics ; ORIGINAL RESEARCH ; Poverty ; Public Health ; Quality of Life Research ; Research methodology ; Sensitivity analysis ; Social Sciences ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Social indicators research, 2019-01, Vol.141 (1), p.299-330</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-ff979ca3699c1145d2166695505c6066fca6a428d0474be055ef0123ba402e7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-ff979ca3699c1145d2166695505c6066fca6a428d0474be055ef0123ba402e7c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8227-1212</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48704552$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48704552$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27321,27901,27902,33751,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lemmi, Achille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grassi, Donatella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masi, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pannuzi, Nicoletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regoli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><title>Methodological Choices and Data Quality Issues for Official Poverty Measures: Evidences from Italy</title><title>Social indicators research</title><addtitle>Soc Indic Res</addtitle><description>The plurality of the official poverty estimates in Italy covers both absolute and relative approaches, ranges from consumption to income-based measures, follows different methodologies and uses several data sources. We can therefore expect that each measure gives a somewhat different picture of poverty, in its level as well as in its change across subgroups of the population. This paper investigates the effect of methodological choices together with the effect of different data quality aspects on the official poverty estimates. Usually, methodological issues attract much attention both in literature and empirical studies. However, the results of the sensitivity analysis suggest that more specific attention should be paid to data quality issues and to the definition of the variables. Our main conclusion is that an improvement in the quality as well as the inclusion of some items in the definition of the variable may result in large changes in poverty indicators. This finding signals that the data quality aspects have a higher impact on poverty estimates than some methodological issues.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Data quality</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Human Geography</subject><subject>Methodological problems</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>ORIGINAL RESEARCH</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>0303-8300</issn><issn>1573-0921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wIUw4Dp6855ZSn0VWqqg65BmknbK2NRkRui_N2VEd64u3Pudcy4HoUsCNwRA3SZCKAgMpMSk5ASzIzQiQjEMFSXHaAQMGC4ZwCk6S2kDAIILPkKzuevWoQ5tWDXWtMVkHRrrUmG2dXFvOlO89qZtun0xTanPex9isfC-sU2GX8KXi_k2dyb10aVzdOJNm9zFzxyj98eHt8kzni2eppO7GbZMkQ57X6nKGiaryhLCRU2JlLISAoSVIKW3RhpOyxq44ksHQjgPhLKl4UCdsmyMrgffXQyf-atOb0IftzlSUyHKkquKsUyRgbIxpBSd17vYfJi41wT0oTQ9lKZzafpQmj5o6KBJmd2uXPxz_k90NYg2qQvxN4WXCrgQlH0DITV3Ng</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Lemmi, Achille</creator><creator>Grassi, Donatella</creator><creator>Masi, Alessandra</creator><creator>Pannuzi, Nicoletta</creator><creator>Regoli, Andrea</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8227-1212</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Methodological Choices and Data Quality Issues for Official Poverty Measures</title><author>Lemmi, Achille ; Grassi, Donatella ; Masi, Alessandra ; Pannuzi, Nicoletta ; Regoli, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-ff979ca3699c1145d2166695505c6066fca6a428d0474be055ef0123ba402e7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Data quality</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Human Geography</topic><topic>Methodological problems</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>ORIGINAL RESEARCH</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lemmi, Achille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grassi, Donatella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masi, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pannuzi, Nicoletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regoli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lemmi, Achille</au><au>Grassi, Donatella</au><au>Masi, Alessandra</au><au>Pannuzi, Nicoletta</au><au>Regoli, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methodological Choices and Data Quality Issues for Official Poverty Measures: Evidences from Italy</atitle><jtitle>Social indicators research</jtitle><stitle>Soc Indic Res</stitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>299-330</pages><issn>0303-8300</issn><eissn>1573-0921</eissn><abstract>The plurality of the official poverty estimates in Italy covers both absolute and relative approaches, ranges from consumption to income-based measures, follows different methodologies and uses several data sources. We can therefore expect that each measure gives a somewhat different picture of poverty, in its level as well as in its change across subgroups of the population. This paper investigates the effect of methodological choices together with the effect of different data quality aspects on the official poverty estimates. Usually, methodological issues attract much attention both in literature and empirical studies. However, the results of the sensitivity analysis suggest that more specific attention should be paid to data quality issues and to the definition of the variables. Our main conclusion is that an improvement in the quality as well as the inclusion of some items in the definition of the variable may result in large changes in poverty indicators. This finding signals that the data quality aspects have a higher impact on poverty estimates than some methodological issues.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s11205-018-1841-3</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8227-1212</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0303-8300 |
ispartof | Social indicators research, 2019-01, Vol.141 (1), p.299-330 |
issn | 0303-8300 1573-0921 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2558847933 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Attention Consumption Data quality Expenditures Households Human Geography Methodological problems Microeconomics ORIGINAL RESEARCH Poverty Public Health Quality of Life Research Research methodology Sensitivity analysis Social Sciences Sociology |
title | Methodological Choices and Data Quality Issues for Official Poverty Measures: Evidences from Italy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T22%3A07%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methodological%20Choices%20and%20Data%20Quality%20Issues%20for%20Official%20Poverty%20Measures:%20Evidences%20from%20Italy&rft.jtitle=Social%20indicators%20research&rft.au=Lemmi,%20Achille&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=299-330&rft.issn=0303-8300&rft.eissn=1573-0921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11205-018-1841-3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48704552%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2558847933&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48704552&rfr_iscdi=true |