Oppy on Thomistic cosmological arguments
Graham Oppy has criticized several Thomistic versions of the cosmological argument in a series of publications over the years, most recently in a Religious Studies article responding to my book Five Proofs of the Existence of God. Here I reply to his criticisms, arguing that while Oppy raises import...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Religious studies 2021-09, Vol.57 (3), p.503-522 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 522 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 503 |
| container_title | Religious studies |
| container_volume | 57 |
| creator | FESER, EDWARD |
| description | Graham Oppy has criticized several Thomistic versions of the cosmological argument in a series of publications over the years, most recently in a Religious Studies article responding to my book Five Proofs of the Existence of God. Here I reply to his criticisms, arguing that while Oppy raises important issues, a besetting weakness of his approach is a failure adequately to grapple with the metaphysical underpinnings of the arguments. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0034412520000384 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2558460927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0034412520000384</cupid><sourcerecordid>2558460927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b65f572779c85138d79c237191d28b77b34c7952a13b8de0ce97c89f08882b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHcFN26quXk0yVIGXzAwC7twV5I0rR3apibtYv69LTPgQrybe-Gc71w4CN0CfgAM4vEDY8oYEE7wPFSyM7QClqlUYfg8R6tFThf9El3FuMcYKDC2Qve7YTgkvk_yL981cWxsYn3sfOvrxuo20aGeOteP8RpdVLqN7ua01yh_ec43b-l29_q-edqmloIYU5PxigsihLKSA5XlfBAqQEFJpBHCUGaF4kQDNbJ02DolrFQVllISI-ga3R1jh-C_JxfHYu-n0M8fC8K5ZBlWZHHB0WWDjzG4qhhC0-lwKAAXSx_Fnz5mhp4Y3ZnQlLX7jf6f-gF7V19d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2558460927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oppy on Thomistic cosmological arguments</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>FESER, EDWARD</creator><creatorcontrib>FESER, EDWARD</creatorcontrib><description>Graham Oppy has criticized several Thomistic versions of the cosmological argument in a series of publications over the years, most recently in a Religious Studies article responding to my book Five Proofs of the Existence of God. Here I reply to his criticisms, arguing that while Oppy raises important issues, a besetting weakness of his approach is a failure adequately to grapple with the metaphysical underpinnings of the arguments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-4125</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-901X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0034412520000384</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Causality ; Original Article ; Philosophers ; Religious studies</subject><ispartof>Religious studies, 2021-09, Vol.57 (3), p.503-522</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b65f572779c85138d79c237191d28b77b34c7952a13b8de0ce97c89f08882b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b65f572779c85138d79c237191d28b77b34c7952a13b8de0ce97c89f08882b73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8625-1163</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0034412520000384/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,315,781,785,27929,27930,55633</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>FESER, EDWARD</creatorcontrib><title>Oppy on Thomistic cosmological arguments</title><title>Religious studies</title><addtitle>Rel. Stud</addtitle><description>Graham Oppy has criticized several Thomistic versions of the cosmological argument in a series of publications over the years, most recently in a Religious Studies article responding to my book Five Proofs of the Existence of God. Here I reply to his criticisms, arguing that while Oppy raises important issues, a besetting weakness of his approach is a failure adequately to grapple with the metaphysical underpinnings of the arguments.</description><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Religious studies</subject><issn>0034-4125</issn><issn>1469-901X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHcFN26quXk0yVIGXzAwC7twV5I0rR3apibtYv69LTPgQrybe-Gc71w4CN0CfgAM4vEDY8oYEE7wPFSyM7QClqlUYfg8R6tFThf9El3FuMcYKDC2Qve7YTgkvk_yL981cWxsYn3sfOvrxuo20aGeOteP8RpdVLqN7ua01yh_ec43b-l29_q-edqmloIYU5PxigsihLKSA5XlfBAqQEFJpBHCUGaF4kQDNbJ02DolrFQVllISI-ga3R1jh-C_JxfHYu-n0M8fC8K5ZBlWZHHB0WWDjzG4qhhC0-lwKAAXSx_Fnz5mhp4Y3ZnQlLX7jf6f-gF7V19d</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>FESER, EDWARD</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8625-1163</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Oppy on Thomistic cosmological arguments</title><author>FESER, EDWARD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-b65f572779c85138d79c237191d28b77b34c7952a13b8de0ce97c89f08882b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Religious studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FESER, EDWARD</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Access via Art, Design & Architecture Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Religious studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FESER, EDWARD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oppy on Thomistic cosmological arguments</atitle><jtitle>Religious studies</jtitle><addtitle>Rel. Stud</addtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>503-522</pages><issn>0034-4125</issn><eissn>1469-901X</eissn><abstract>Graham Oppy has criticized several Thomistic versions of the cosmological argument in a series of publications over the years, most recently in a Religious Studies article responding to my book Five Proofs of the Existence of God. Here I reply to his criticisms, arguing that while Oppy raises important issues, a besetting weakness of his approach is a failure adequately to grapple with the metaphysical underpinnings of the arguments.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0034412520000384</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8625-1163</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0034-4125 |
| ispartof | Religious studies, 2021-09, Vol.57 (3), p.503-522 |
| issn | 0034-4125 1469-901X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2558460927 |
| source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Causality Original Article Philosophers Religious studies |
| title | Oppy on Thomistic cosmological arguments |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T12%3A30%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oppy%20on%20Thomistic%20cosmological%20arguments&rft.jtitle=Religious%20studies&rft.au=FESER,%20EDWARD&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=503-522&rft.issn=0034-4125&rft.eissn=1469-901X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0034412520000384&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2558460927%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2558460927&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0034412520000384&rfr_iscdi=true |