In vitro antibacterial response of ZnO‐MgO nanocomposites at various compositions

ZnO‐MgO nanocomposites were prepared by a co‐precipitation method and afterward compared with pristine ZnO and MgO accordingly. XRD and EDX spectra were used to confirm the crystal structure and crystallite size of these materials. X‐ray diffraction analysis shows that antibacterial activity of ZnO:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of applied ceramic technology 2021-09, Vol.18 (5), p.1417-1429
Hauptverfasser: Amir, Aqsa, Bibi, Saira, Nawaz, Ahmad, Ibrahim, Ather, Ashiq, Muhammad Naeem, Saeed, Muhammad Qamar, Hamza, Mashhood, Rasheed, Hafiz Muhammad Zubair, Islam, Bilal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1429
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1417
container_title International journal of applied ceramic technology
container_volume 18
creator Amir, Aqsa
Bibi, Saira
Nawaz, Ahmad
Ibrahim, Ather
Ashiq, Muhammad Naeem
Saeed, Muhammad Qamar
Hamza, Mashhood
Rasheed, Hafiz Muhammad Zubair
Islam, Bilal
description ZnO‐MgO nanocomposites were prepared by a co‐precipitation method and afterward compared with pristine ZnO and MgO accordingly. XRD and EDX spectra were used to confirm the crystal structure and crystallite size of these materials. X‐ray diffraction analysis shows that antibacterial activity of ZnO:MgO composite enhances with crystallite size reduction ~1.34 times in comparison to pristine ZnO or MgO specimens, accompanied by domination of defect generation over defect annihilation activity. Besides, average particle sizes also reduce to ~2 times at 1:3 MgO/ZnO composite in comparison to MgO. The particle size of ZnO was substantially higher due to rod‐like morphology. Moreover, the minimum inhibitory concentration outcomes also show that ZnO‐MgO composites are more effective against gram‐negative pathogens in appropriate ratios (ZnO:MgO) of 1:3 and 3:1 with the concentration of 15,000 µg/ml. Similarly, gram‐positive pathogens were In contrast, ZnO and MgO separately or in 1:1 composite ratio does not prove considerably effective on all the five microbes (required higher >25,000 µg/ml) MIC to counter gram‐negative pathogens. Additionally, lower doses of 3ZnO:1MgO and 1ZnO:3MgO ~5000 µg/ml composite nanoparticles are effective on gram‐positive pathogens. Similarly, 3ZnO:1MgO composition proved highly productive at a much lower concentration, that is, 12500 ≤ X ≤ 15000 to counter gram‐negative pathogens. Besides, 1ZnO:3MgO is effective against gram‐negativepathogens at MIC ranging from 12500 ≤ X ≤ 15000 µg/ml.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ijac.13734
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2558430216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2558430216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3014-a908de1342d6a9ecf4586a5e5c43016372631e7b9ff52d9c64d6eed0d9205d0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQxoMoWKsXnyDgTdia_9s9lqK1UulBBfES0iQrKW2yJttKbz6Cz-iTmLp6dS4zzPy-b-AD4ByjAc515ZZKDzAtKTsAPVwyVpQMkcM8cyYKzsjzMThJaYkQZZSKHniYerh1bQxQ-dYtlG5tdGoFo01N8MnCUMMXP__6-Lx_nUOvfNBh3YTkWpugauFWRRc2Cf5tXRadgqNarZI9--198HRz_Ti-LWbzyXQ8mhWaIswKVaGhsZgyYoSqrK4ZHwrFLdcs3wUtiaDYlouqrjkxlRbMCGsNMhVB3CBN--Ci821ieNvY1Mpl2ESfX0rC-TC7kGzTB5cdpWNIKdpaNtGtVdxJjOQ-NLkPTf6ElmHcwe9uZXf_kHJ6Nxp3mm9bi3BW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2558430216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro antibacterial response of ZnO‐MgO nanocomposites at various compositions</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Amir, Aqsa ; Bibi, Saira ; Nawaz, Ahmad ; Ibrahim, Ather ; Ashiq, Muhammad Naeem ; Saeed, Muhammad Qamar ; Hamza, Mashhood ; Rasheed, Hafiz Muhammad Zubair ; Islam, Bilal</creator><creatorcontrib>Amir, Aqsa ; Bibi, Saira ; Nawaz, Ahmad ; Ibrahim, Ather ; Ashiq, Muhammad Naeem ; Saeed, Muhammad Qamar ; Hamza, Mashhood ; Rasheed, Hafiz Muhammad Zubair ; Islam, Bilal</creatorcontrib><description>ZnO‐MgO nanocomposites were prepared by a co‐precipitation method and afterward compared with pristine ZnO and MgO accordingly. XRD and EDX spectra were used to confirm the crystal structure and crystallite size of these materials. X‐ray diffraction analysis shows that antibacterial activity of ZnO:MgO composite enhances with crystallite size reduction ~1.34 times in comparison to pristine ZnO or MgO specimens, accompanied by domination of defect generation over defect annihilation activity. Besides, average particle sizes also reduce to ~2 times at 1:3 MgO/ZnO composite in comparison to MgO. The particle size of ZnO was substantially higher due to rod‐like morphology. Moreover, the minimum inhibitory concentration outcomes also show that ZnO‐MgO composites are more effective against gram‐negative pathogens in appropriate ratios (ZnO:MgO) of 1:3 and 3:1 with the concentration of 15,000 µg/ml. Similarly, gram‐positive pathogens were In contrast, ZnO and MgO separately or in 1:1 composite ratio does not prove considerably effective on all the five microbes (required higher &gt;25,000 µg/ml) MIC to counter gram‐negative pathogens. Additionally, lower doses of 3ZnO:1MgO and 1ZnO:3MgO ~5000 µg/ml composite nanoparticles are effective on gram‐positive pathogens. Similarly, 3ZnO:1MgO composition proved highly productive at a much lower concentration, that is, 12500 ≤ X ≤ 15000 to counter gram‐negative pathogens. Besides, 1ZnO:3MgO is effective against gram‐negativepathogens at MIC ranging from 12500 ≤ X ≤ 15000 µg/ml.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1546-542X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-7402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijac.13734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>antibacterial activity ; biological application ; Composition ; co‐precipitation ; Crystal structure ; Crystallites ; Magnesium oxide ; Morphology ; Nanocomposites ; Nanoparticles ; Pathogens ; Size reduction ; X‐ray diffraction ; Zinc oxide</subject><ispartof>International journal of applied ceramic technology, 2021-09, Vol.18 (5), p.1417-1429</ispartof><rights>2021 The American Ceramic Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American Ceramic Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3014-a908de1342d6a9ecf4586a5e5c43016372631e7b9ff52d9c64d6eed0d9205d0c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3014-a908de1342d6a9ecf4586a5e5c43016372631e7b9ff52d9c64d6eed0d9205d0c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3956-3690 ; 0000-0002-9640-1727</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijac.13734$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijac.13734$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amir, Aqsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bibi, Saira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawaz, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Ather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashiq, Muhammad Naeem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Muhammad Qamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamza, Mashhood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasheed, Hafiz Muhammad Zubair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, Bilal</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro antibacterial response of ZnO‐MgO nanocomposites at various compositions</title><title>International journal of applied ceramic technology</title><description>ZnO‐MgO nanocomposites were prepared by a co‐precipitation method and afterward compared with pristine ZnO and MgO accordingly. XRD and EDX spectra were used to confirm the crystal structure and crystallite size of these materials. X‐ray diffraction analysis shows that antibacterial activity of ZnO:MgO composite enhances with crystallite size reduction ~1.34 times in comparison to pristine ZnO or MgO specimens, accompanied by domination of defect generation over defect annihilation activity. Besides, average particle sizes also reduce to ~2 times at 1:3 MgO/ZnO composite in comparison to MgO. The particle size of ZnO was substantially higher due to rod‐like morphology. Moreover, the minimum inhibitory concentration outcomes also show that ZnO‐MgO composites are more effective against gram‐negative pathogens in appropriate ratios (ZnO:MgO) of 1:3 and 3:1 with the concentration of 15,000 µg/ml. Similarly, gram‐positive pathogens were In contrast, ZnO and MgO separately or in 1:1 composite ratio does not prove considerably effective on all the five microbes (required higher &gt;25,000 µg/ml) MIC to counter gram‐negative pathogens. Additionally, lower doses of 3ZnO:1MgO and 1ZnO:3MgO ~5000 µg/ml composite nanoparticles are effective on gram‐positive pathogens. Similarly, 3ZnO:1MgO composition proved highly productive at a much lower concentration, that is, 12500 ≤ X ≤ 15000 to counter gram‐negative pathogens. Besides, 1ZnO:3MgO is effective against gram‐negativepathogens at MIC ranging from 12500 ≤ X ≤ 15000 µg/ml.</description><subject>antibacterial activity</subject><subject>biological application</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>co‐precipitation</subject><subject>Crystal structure</subject><subject>Crystallites</subject><subject>Magnesium oxide</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Nanocomposites</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Size reduction</subject><subject>X‐ray diffraction</subject><subject>Zinc oxide</subject><issn>1546-542X</issn><issn>1744-7402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQxoMoWKsXnyDgTdia_9s9lqK1UulBBfES0iQrKW2yJttKbz6Cz-iTmLp6dS4zzPy-b-AD4ByjAc515ZZKDzAtKTsAPVwyVpQMkcM8cyYKzsjzMThJaYkQZZSKHniYerh1bQxQ-dYtlG5tdGoFo01N8MnCUMMXP__6-Lx_nUOvfNBh3YTkWpugauFWRRc2Cf5tXRadgqNarZI9--198HRz_Ti-LWbzyXQ8mhWaIswKVaGhsZgyYoSqrK4ZHwrFLdcs3wUtiaDYlouqrjkxlRbMCGsNMhVB3CBN--Ci821ieNvY1Mpl2ESfX0rC-TC7kGzTB5cdpWNIKdpaNtGtVdxJjOQ-NLkPTf6ElmHcwe9uZXf_kHJ6Nxp3mm9bi3BW</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Amir, Aqsa</creator><creator>Bibi, Saira</creator><creator>Nawaz, Ahmad</creator><creator>Ibrahim, Ather</creator><creator>Ashiq, Muhammad Naeem</creator><creator>Saeed, Muhammad Qamar</creator><creator>Hamza, Mashhood</creator><creator>Rasheed, Hafiz Muhammad Zubair</creator><creator>Islam, Bilal</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3956-3690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9640-1727</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>In vitro antibacterial response of ZnO‐MgO nanocomposites at various compositions</title><author>Amir, Aqsa ; Bibi, Saira ; Nawaz, Ahmad ; Ibrahim, Ather ; Ashiq, Muhammad Naeem ; Saeed, Muhammad Qamar ; Hamza, Mashhood ; Rasheed, Hafiz Muhammad Zubair ; Islam, Bilal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3014-a908de1342d6a9ecf4586a5e5c43016372631e7b9ff52d9c64d6eed0d9205d0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>antibacterial activity</topic><topic>biological application</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>co‐precipitation</topic><topic>Crystal structure</topic><topic>Crystallites</topic><topic>Magnesium oxide</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Nanocomposites</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Size reduction</topic><topic>X‐ray diffraction</topic><topic>Zinc oxide</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amir, Aqsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bibi, Saira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawaz, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Ather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashiq, Muhammad Naeem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Muhammad Qamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamza, Mashhood</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasheed, Hafiz Muhammad Zubair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, Bilal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>International journal of applied ceramic technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amir, Aqsa</au><au>Bibi, Saira</au><au>Nawaz, Ahmad</au><au>Ibrahim, Ather</au><au>Ashiq, Muhammad Naeem</au><au>Saeed, Muhammad Qamar</au><au>Hamza, Mashhood</au><au>Rasheed, Hafiz Muhammad Zubair</au><au>Islam, Bilal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro antibacterial response of ZnO‐MgO nanocomposites at various compositions</atitle><jtitle>International journal of applied ceramic technology</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1417</spage><epage>1429</epage><pages>1417-1429</pages><issn>1546-542X</issn><eissn>1744-7402</eissn><abstract>ZnO‐MgO nanocomposites were prepared by a co‐precipitation method and afterward compared with pristine ZnO and MgO accordingly. XRD and EDX spectra were used to confirm the crystal structure and crystallite size of these materials. X‐ray diffraction analysis shows that antibacterial activity of ZnO:MgO composite enhances with crystallite size reduction ~1.34 times in comparison to pristine ZnO or MgO specimens, accompanied by domination of defect generation over defect annihilation activity. Besides, average particle sizes also reduce to ~2 times at 1:3 MgO/ZnO composite in comparison to MgO. The particle size of ZnO was substantially higher due to rod‐like morphology. Moreover, the minimum inhibitory concentration outcomes also show that ZnO‐MgO composites are more effective against gram‐negative pathogens in appropriate ratios (ZnO:MgO) of 1:3 and 3:1 with the concentration of 15,000 µg/ml. Similarly, gram‐positive pathogens were In contrast, ZnO and MgO separately or in 1:1 composite ratio does not prove considerably effective on all the five microbes (required higher &gt;25,000 µg/ml) MIC to counter gram‐negative pathogens. Additionally, lower doses of 3ZnO:1MgO and 1ZnO:3MgO ~5000 µg/ml composite nanoparticles are effective on gram‐positive pathogens. Similarly, 3ZnO:1MgO composition proved highly productive at a much lower concentration, that is, 12500 ≤ X ≤ 15000 to counter gram‐negative pathogens. Besides, 1ZnO:3MgO is effective against gram‐negativepathogens at MIC ranging from 12500 ≤ X ≤ 15000 µg/ml.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ijac.13734</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3956-3690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9640-1727</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1546-542X
ispartof International journal of applied ceramic technology, 2021-09, Vol.18 (5), p.1417-1429
issn 1546-542X
1744-7402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2558430216
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects antibacterial activity
biological application
Composition
co‐precipitation
Crystal structure
Crystallites
Magnesium oxide
Morphology
Nanocomposites
Nanoparticles
Pathogens
Size reduction
X‐ray diffraction
Zinc oxide
title In vitro antibacterial response of ZnO‐MgO nanocomposites at various compositions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T01%3A57%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20antibacterial%20response%20of%20ZnO%E2%80%90MgO%20nanocomposites%20at%20various%20compositions&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20applied%20ceramic%20technology&rft.au=Amir,%20Aqsa&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1417&rft.epage=1429&rft.pages=1417-1429&rft.issn=1546-542X&rft.eissn=1744-7402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijac.13734&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2558430216%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2558430216&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true