Conceptualising valuation quality in practice: a valuer perspective

Valuation quality is a complex, multifaceted construct deeply embedded within curriculum and the standards documents of property valuation professional practice, yet explicit discussion of how the concept is currently understood and approached within the valuation process is lacking in literature. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of property research 2021-07, Vol.38 (3), p.213-237
Hauptverfasser: Amidu, Abdul-Rasheed, Levy, Deborah, Bolomope, Muhammed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 237
container_issue 3
container_start_page 213
container_title Journal of property research
container_volume 38
creator Amidu, Abdul-Rasheed
Levy, Deborah
Bolomope, Muhammed
description Valuation quality is a complex, multifaceted construct deeply embedded within curriculum and the standards documents of property valuation professional practice, yet explicit discussion of how the concept is currently understood and approached within the valuation process is lacking in literature. The aim of this study is to contribute to the interpretation of valuation quality by exploring how it is conceptualised from the perspective of valuers in practice. Drawing on 19 semi-structured, in-depth interviews, the study explores the experiences of practising valuers, active in the cities of Auckland and Wellington, New Zealand. The findings provide insights into four important quality indicators: professionalism; effective and customised communication; reporting accuracy; and compliance obligations, which accommodate the practical meaning of valuation quality and enable a nuanced understanding of the various behaviours or acts (e.g., production of readable report and telling a clear story of process) and objects (e.g., aesthetic, collaborations and standards) that firms and individuals create and rely on to produce quality in practice. These insights can provide the basis for a robust description of valuers' expectation and the development of a framework for valuation quality to enhance valuer training and professional development. Future research should focused on how these quality indicators match up to the client's expectations.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09599916.2021.1930108
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2557315481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2557315481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-fd8bf3ddefe0a7db2e25470f2810aa0fb89e58de9e33e6a98fc78dee65fc49533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNFKwzAUhoMoOKePIBS87kyapE28UopTYeCNXocsPZGMLumSdrK3t3Xz1qvD-fn-c-BD6JbgBcEC32PJpZSkXBS4IAsiKR7jMzQjrCxzxjg9R7OJySfoEl2ltMEjyRieoboO3kDXD7p1yfmvbK_bQfcu-Gw3Zf0hcz7roja9M_CQ6V8AYtZBTB2M6R6u0YXVbYKb05yjz-XzR_2ar95f3uqnVW5oRfrcNmJtadOABayrZl1AwVmFbSEI1hrbtZDARQMSKIVSS2FNNa5QcmuY5JTO0d3xbhfDboDUq00Yoh9fqoLzihLOBBkpfqRMDClFsKqLbqvjQRGsJl_qz5eafKmTr7H3eOw5b0Pc6u8Q20b1-tCGaKP2xiVF_z_xA_FHcx8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557315481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conceptualising valuation quality in practice: a valuer perspective</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Amidu, Abdul-Rasheed ; Levy, Deborah ; Bolomope, Muhammed</creator><creatorcontrib>Amidu, Abdul-Rasheed ; Levy, Deborah ; Bolomope, Muhammed</creatorcontrib><description>Valuation quality is a complex, multifaceted construct deeply embedded within curriculum and the standards documents of property valuation professional practice, yet explicit discussion of how the concept is currently understood and approached within the valuation process is lacking in literature. The aim of this study is to contribute to the interpretation of valuation quality by exploring how it is conceptualised from the perspective of valuers in practice. Drawing on 19 semi-structured, in-depth interviews, the study explores the experiences of practising valuers, active in the cities of Auckland and Wellington, New Zealand. The findings provide insights into four important quality indicators: professionalism; effective and customised communication; reporting accuracy; and compliance obligations, which accommodate the practical meaning of valuation quality and enable a nuanced understanding of the various behaviours or acts (e.g., production of readable report and telling a clear story of process) and objects (e.g., aesthetic, collaborations and standards) that firms and individuals create and rely on to produce quality in practice. These insights can provide the basis for a robust description of valuers' expectation and the development of a framework for valuation quality to enhance valuer training and professional development. Future research should focused on how these quality indicators match up to the client's expectations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-9916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4453</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09599916.2021.1930108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Curricula ; Indicators ; Professional development ; Professional practice ; qualitative analysis ; Valuation ; valuation engagement ; Valuation quality ; valuer</subject><ispartof>Journal of property research, 2021-07, Vol.38 (3), p.213-237</ispartof><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2021</rights><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-fd8bf3ddefe0a7db2e25470f2810aa0fb89e58de9e33e6a98fc78dee65fc49533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-fd8bf3ddefe0a7db2e25470f2810aa0fb89e58de9e33e6a98fc78dee65fc49533</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8928-8730 ; 0000-0003-0742-0318</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amidu, Abdul-Rasheed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolomope, Muhammed</creatorcontrib><title>Conceptualising valuation quality in practice: a valuer perspective</title><title>Journal of property research</title><description>Valuation quality is a complex, multifaceted construct deeply embedded within curriculum and the standards documents of property valuation professional practice, yet explicit discussion of how the concept is currently understood and approached within the valuation process is lacking in literature. The aim of this study is to contribute to the interpretation of valuation quality by exploring how it is conceptualised from the perspective of valuers in practice. Drawing on 19 semi-structured, in-depth interviews, the study explores the experiences of practising valuers, active in the cities of Auckland and Wellington, New Zealand. The findings provide insights into four important quality indicators: professionalism; effective and customised communication; reporting accuracy; and compliance obligations, which accommodate the practical meaning of valuation quality and enable a nuanced understanding of the various behaviours or acts (e.g., production of readable report and telling a clear story of process) and objects (e.g., aesthetic, collaborations and standards) that firms and individuals create and rely on to produce quality in practice. These insights can provide the basis for a robust description of valuers' expectation and the development of a framework for valuation quality to enhance valuer training and professional development. Future research should focused on how these quality indicators match up to the client's expectations.</description><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>valuation engagement</subject><subject>Valuation quality</subject><subject>valuer</subject><issn>0959-9916</issn><issn>1466-4453</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNFKwzAUhoMoOKePIBS87kyapE28UopTYeCNXocsPZGMLumSdrK3t3Xz1qvD-fn-c-BD6JbgBcEC32PJpZSkXBS4IAsiKR7jMzQjrCxzxjg9R7OJySfoEl2ltMEjyRieoboO3kDXD7p1yfmvbK_bQfcu-Gw3Zf0hcz7roja9M_CQ6V8AYtZBTB2M6R6u0YXVbYKb05yjz-XzR_2ar95f3uqnVW5oRfrcNmJtadOABayrZl1AwVmFbSEI1hrbtZDARQMSKIVSS2FNNa5QcmuY5JTO0d3xbhfDboDUq00Yoh9fqoLzihLOBBkpfqRMDClFsKqLbqvjQRGsJl_qz5eafKmTr7H3eOw5b0Pc6u8Q20b1-tCGaKP2xiVF_z_xA_FHcx8</recordid><startdate>20210703</startdate><enddate>20210703</enddate><creator>Amidu, Abdul-Rasheed</creator><creator>Levy, Deborah</creator><creator>Bolomope, Muhammed</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8928-8730</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0742-0318</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210703</creationdate><title>Conceptualising valuation quality in practice: a valuer perspective</title><author>Amidu, Abdul-Rasheed ; Levy, Deborah ; Bolomope, Muhammed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-fd8bf3ddefe0a7db2e25470f2810aa0fb89e58de9e33e6a98fc78dee65fc49533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>valuation engagement</topic><topic>Valuation quality</topic><topic>valuer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amidu, Abdul-Rasheed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolomope, Muhammed</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of property research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amidu, Abdul-Rasheed</au><au>Levy, Deborah</au><au>Bolomope, Muhammed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conceptualising valuation quality in practice: a valuer perspective</atitle><jtitle>Journal of property research</jtitle><date>2021-07-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>213-237</pages><issn>0959-9916</issn><eissn>1466-4453</eissn><abstract>Valuation quality is a complex, multifaceted construct deeply embedded within curriculum and the standards documents of property valuation professional practice, yet explicit discussion of how the concept is currently understood and approached within the valuation process is lacking in literature. The aim of this study is to contribute to the interpretation of valuation quality by exploring how it is conceptualised from the perspective of valuers in practice. Drawing on 19 semi-structured, in-depth interviews, the study explores the experiences of practising valuers, active in the cities of Auckland and Wellington, New Zealand. The findings provide insights into four important quality indicators: professionalism; effective and customised communication; reporting accuracy; and compliance obligations, which accommodate the practical meaning of valuation quality and enable a nuanced understanding of the various behaviours or acts (e.g., production of readable report and telling a clear story of process) and objects (e.g., aesthetic, collaborations and standards) that firms and individuals create and rely on to produce quality in practice. These insights can provide the basis for a robust description of valuers' expectation and the development of a framework for valuation quality to enhance valuer training and professional development. Future research should focused on how these quality indicators match up to the client's expectations.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09599916.2021.1930108</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8928-8730</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0742-0318</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-9916
ispartof Journal of property research, 2021-07, Vol.38 (3), p.213-237
issn 0959-9916
1466-4453
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2557315481
source Business Source Complete
subjects Curricula
Indicators
Professional development
Professional practice
qualitative analysis
Valuation
valuation engagement
Valuation quality
valuer
title Conceptualising valuation quality in practice: a valuer perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A48%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conceptualising%20valuation%20quality%20in%20practice:%20a%20valuer%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20property%20research&rft.au=Amidu,%20Abdul-Rasheed&rft.date=2021-07-03&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=213-237&rft.issn=0959-9916&rft.eissn=1466-4453&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09599916.2021.1930108&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2557315481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557315481&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true