Evaluating the impacts of shared automated mobility on-demand services: an activity-based accessibility approach

Autonomous vehicle (AV) technologies are under constant improvement with pilot programs now underway in several urban areas worldwide. Modeling and field-testing efforts are demonstrating that shared mobility coupled with AV technology for automated mobility on-demand (AMoD) service may significantl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation (Dordrecht) 2021-08, Vol.48 (4), p.1613-1638
Hauptverfasser: Nahmias-Biran, Bat-hen, Oke, Jimi B., Kumar, Nishant, Lima Azevedo, Carlos, Ben-Akiva, Moshe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1638
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1613
container_title Transportation (Dordrecht)
container_volume 48
creator Nahmias-Biran, Bat-hen
Oke, Jimi B.
Kumar, Nishant
Lima Azevedo, Carlos
Ben-Akiva, Moshe
description Autonomous vehicle (AV) technologies are under constant improvement with pilot programs now underway in several urban areas worldwide. Modeling and field-testing efforts are demonstrating that shared mobility coupled with AV technology for automated mobility on-demand (AMoD) service may significantly impact levels of service and environmental outcomes in future cities. Given these rapidly emerging developments, there is an urgent need for methods to adequately quantify the economic impacts of new vehicle technologies and future urban mobility policy. In this paper, we show how broader user-centric impacts can be captured by the activity-based accessibility (ABA) measure, which takes advantage of the rich data and outcomes of utility-maximization activity-based models and its interaction with mesoscale agent-based traffic simulation frameworks. Using the SimMobility simulator, we evaluate shared AMoD strategies applied to a Singapore micromodel city testbed. A near-future strategy of exclusive availability of AMoD service in the central business district (CBD), and a further-horizon strategy of the full operation of AMoD city-wide in the absence of other on-demand services, were tested and evaluated. Our results provide insights into the income and accessibility effects on the population under the implementation of shared and automated mobility policies. The outcomes indicate that the city-wide deployment of AMoD results in greater accessibility and network performance. Moreover, the accessibility of low-income individuals is improved relative to that of mid- and high-income individuals. The restriction of AMoD to the CBD along with the operation of other on-demand services, however, provides a certain level of disbenefit to segments of the population in two exceptional cases. The first is to high-income individuals who live in a suburban zone and rely heavily on on-demand services; the second is to mid-income residents that have excellent public transportation coverage with close proximity to the CBD. We further establish the efficacy of the ABA measure, as these findings motivate the need for measuring socioeconomic impacts at the individual level. The work presented here serves as a foundation for policy evaluation in real-world urban models for future mobility paradigms.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11116-020-10106-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2556561457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2556561457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-8f9532d3856ba2dc05ffde3ecc7359b672268da3338d7473bcfe57e4635d3c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_wFXAdTTvzLiTUh9QcNN9yCSZNqXzMJkpzL83dQR33s29cM53DxwA7gl-JBirp0TySIQpRgQTLNF0ARZEKIpKzsQlWGDMS8R5UVyDm5QOGGNBBFmAfn0yx9EMod3BYe9haHpjhwS7Gqa9id5BMw5dY4Z8NV0VjmGYYNci5xvTOph8PAXr0zM0LcxgOGUdVSadQZuFFH4Z0_exM3Z_C65qc0z-7ncvwfZ1vV29o83n28fqZYMsl3RARV0KRh0rhKwMdRaLunaeeWsVE2UlFaWycIYxVjjFFats7YXyXDLhmC3ZEjzMb3Pq1-jToA_dGNucqKkQUkjChcouOrts7FKKvtZ9DI2JkyZYn4vVc7E6F6t_itVThtgMpWxudz7-vf6H-gZtCn32</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2556561457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the impacts of shared automated mobility on-demand services: an activity-based accessibility approach</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Nahmias-Biran, Bat-hen ; Oke, Jimi B. ; Kumar, Nishant ; Lima Azevedo, Carlos ; Ben-Akiva, Moshe</creator><creatorcontrib>Nahmias-Biran, Bat-hen ; Oke, Jimi B. ; Kumar, Nishant ; Lima Azevedo, Carlos ; Ben-Akiva, Moshe</creatorcontrib><description>Autonomous vehicle (AV) technologies are under constant improvement with pilot programs now underway in several urban areas worldwide. Modeling and field-testing efforts are demonstrating that shared mobility coupled with AV technology for automated mobility on-demand (AMoD) service may significantly impact levels of service and environmental outcomes in future cities. Given these rapidly emerging developments, there is an urgent need for methods to adequately quantify the economic impacts of new vehicle technologies and future urban mobility policy. In this paper, we show how broader user-centric impacts can be captured by the activity-based accessibility (ABA) measure, which takes advantage of the rich data and outcomes of utility-maximization activity-based models and its interaction with mesoscale agent-based traffic simulation frameworks. Using the SimMobility simulator, we evaluate shared AMoD strategies applied to a Singapore micromodel city testbed. A near-future strategy of exclusive availability of AMoD service in the central business district (CBD), and a further-horizon strategy of the full operation of AMoD city-wide in the absence of other on-demand services, were tested and evaluated. Our results provide insights into the income and accessibility effects on the population under the implementation of shared and automated mobility policies. The outcomes indicate that the city-wide deployment of AMoD results in greater accessibility and network performance. Moreover, the accessibility of low-income individuals is improved relative to that of mid- and high-income individuals. The restriction of AMoD to the CBD along with the operation of other on-demand services, however, provides a certain level of disbenefit to segments of the population in two exceptional cases. The first is to high-income individuals who live in a suburban zone and rely heavily on on-demand services; the second is to mid-income residents that have excellent public transportation coverage with close proximity to the CBD. We further establish the efficacy of the ABA measure, as these findings motivate the need for measuring socioeconomic impacts at the individual level. The work presented here serves as a foundation for policy evaluation in real-world urban models for future mobility paradigms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-4488</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11116-020-10106-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Access ; Accessibility ; Automation ; Central business districts ; Cities ; Deployment ; Economic Geography ; Economic impact ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Efficacy ; Engineering Economics ; Income ; Innovation/Technology Management ; Logistics ; Marketing ; Mobility ; Organization ; Proximity ; Public transportation ; Regional/Spatial Science ; Simulation ; Socioeconomic factors ; Suburban areas ; Technology ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>Transportation (Dordrecht), 2021-08, Vol.48 (4), p.1613-1638</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-8f9532d3856ba2dc05ffde3ecc7359b672268da3338d7473bcfe57e4635d3c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-8f9532d3856ba2dc05ffde3ecc7359b672268da3338d7473bcfe57e4635d3c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11116-020-10106-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-020-10106-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nahmias-Biran, Bat-hen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oke, Jimi B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Nishant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima Azevedo, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Akiva, Moshe</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the impacts of shared automated mobility on-demand services: an activity-based accessibility approach</title><title>Transportation (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Transportation</addtitle><description>Autonomous vehicle (AV) technologies are under constant improvement with pilot programs now underway in several urban areas worldwide. Modeling and field-testing efforts are demonstrating that shared mobility coupled with AV technology for automated mobility on-demand (AMoD) service may significantly impact levels of service and environmental outcomes in future cities. Given these rapidly emerging developments, there is an urgent need for methods to adequately quantify the economic impacts of new vehicle technologies and future urban mobility policy. In this paper, we show how broader user-centric impacts can be captured by the activity-based accessibility (ABA) measure, which takes advantage of the rich data and outcomes of utility-maximization activity-based models and its interaction with mesoscale agent-based traffic simulation frameworks. Using the SimMobility simulator, we evaluate shared AMoD strategies applied to a Singapore micromodel city testbed. A near-future strategy of exclusive availability of AMoD service in the central business district (CBD), and a further-horizon strategy of the full operation of AMoD city-wide in the absence of other on-demand services, were tested and evaluated. Our results provide insights into the income and accessibility effects on the population under the implementation of shared and automated mobility policies. The outcomes indicate that the city-wide deployment of AMoD results in greater accessibility and network performance. Moreover, the accessibility of low-income individuals is improved relative to that of mid- and high-income individuals. The restriction of AMoD to the CBD along with the operation of other on-demand services, however, provides a certain level of disbenefit to segments of the population in two exceptional cases. The first is to high-income individuals who live in a suburban zone and rely heavily on on-demand services; the second is to mid-income residents that have excellent public transportation coverage with close proximity to the CBD. We further establish the efficacy of the ABA measure, as these findings motivate the need for measuring socioeconomic impacts at the individual level. The work presented here serves as a foundation for policy evaluation in real-world urban models for future mobility paradigms.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Accessibility</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Central business districts</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Deployment</subject><subject>Economic Geography</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Engineering Economics</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Innovation/Technology Management</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Organization</subject><subject>Proximity</subject><subject>Public transportation</subject><subject>Regional/Spatial Science</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Suburban areas</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0049-4488</issn><issn>1572-9435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_wFXAdTTvzLiTUh9QcNN9yCSZNqXzMJkpzL83dQR33s29cM53DxwA7gl-JBirp0TySIQpRgQTLNF0ARZEKIpKzsQlWGDMS8R5UVyDm5QOGGNBBFmAfn0yx9EMod3BYe9haHpjhwS7Gqa9id5BMw5dY4Z8NV0VjmGYYNci5xvTOph8PAXr0zM0LcxgOGUdVSadQZuFFH4Z0_exM3Z_C65qc0z-7ncvwfZ1vV29o83n28fqZYMsl3RARV0KRh0rhKwMdRaLunaeeWsVE2UlFaWycIYxVjjFFats7YXyXDLhmC3ZEjzMb3Pq1-jToA_dGNucqKkQUkjChcouOrts7FKKvtZ9DI2JkyZYn4vVc7E6F6t_itVThtgMpWxudz7-vf6H-gZtCn32</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Nahmias-Biran, Bat-hen</creator><creator>Oke, Jimi B.</creator><creator>Kumar, Nishant</creator><creator>Lima Azevedo, Carlos</creator><creator>Ben-Akiva, Moshe</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Evaluating the impacts of shared automated mobility on-demand services: an activity-based accessibility approach</title><author>Nahmias-Biran, Bat-hen ; Oke, Jimi B. ; Kumar, Nishant ; Lima Azevedo, Carlos ; Ben-Akiva, Moshe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-8f9532d3856ba2dc05ffde3ecc7359b672268da3338d7473bcfe57e4635d3c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Accessibility</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Central business districts</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Deployment</topic><topic>Economic Geography</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Engineering Economics</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Innovation/Technology Management</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Organization</topic><topic>Proximity</topic><topic>Public transportation</topic><topic>Regional/Spatial Science</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Suburban areas</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nahmias-Biran, Bat-hen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oke, Jimi B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Nishant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima Azevedo, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben-Akiva, Moshe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nahmias-Biran, Bat-hen</au><au>Oke, Jimi B.</au><au>Kumar, Nishant</au><au>Lima Azevedo, Carlos</au><au>Ben-Akiva, Moshe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the impacts of shared automated mobility on-demand services: an activity-based accessibility approach</atitle><jtitle>Transportation (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Transportation</stitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1613</spage><epage>1638</epage><pages>1613-1638</pages><issn>0049-4488</issn><eissn>1572-9435</eissn><abstract>Autonomous vehicle (AV) technologies are under constant improvement with pilot programs now underway in several urban areas worldwide. Modeling and field-testing efforts are demonstrating that shared mobility coupled with AV technology for automated mobility on-demand (AMoD) service may significantly impact levels of service and environmental outcomes in future cities. Given these rapidly emerging developments, there is an urgent need for methods to adequately quantify the economic impacts of new vehicle technologies and future urban mobility policy. In this paper, we show how broader user-centric impacts can be captured by the activity-based accessibility (ABA) measure, which takes advantage of the rich data and outcomes of utility-maximization activity-based models and its interaction with mesoscale agent-based traffic simulation frameworks. Using the SimMobility simulator, we evaluate shared AMoD strategies applied to a Singapore micromodel city testbed. A near-future strategy of exclusive availability of AMoD service in the central business district (CBD), and a further-horizon strategy of the full operation of AMoD city-wide in the absence of other on-demand services, were tested and evaluated. Our results provide insights into the income and accessibility effects on the population under the implementation of shared and automated mobility policies. The outcomes indicate that the city-wide deployment of AMoD results in greater accessibility and network performance. Moreover, the accessibility of low-income individuals is improved relative to that of mid- and high-income individuals. The restriction of AMoD to the CBD along with the operation of other on-demand services, however, provides a certain level of disbenefit to segments of the population in two exceptional cases. The first is to high-income individuals who live in a suburban zone and rely heavily on on-demand services; the second is to mid-income residents that have excellent public transportation coverage with close proximity to the CBD. We further establish the efficacy of the ABA measure, as these findings motivate the need for measuring socioeconomic impacts at the individual level. The work presented here serves as a foundation for policy evaluation in real-world urban models for future mobility paradigms.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11116-020-10106-y</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0049-4488
ispartof Transportation (Dordrecht), 2021-08, Vol.48 (4), p.1613-1638
issn 0049-4488
1572-9435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2556561457
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Access
Accessibility
Automation
Central business districts
Cities
Deployment
Economic Geography
Economic impact
Economics
Economics and Finance
Efficacy
Engineering Economics
Income
Innovation/Technology Management
Logistics
Marketing
Mobility
Organization
Proximity
Public transportation
Regional/Spatial Science
Simulation
Socioeconomic factors
Suburban areas
Technology
Urban areas
title Evaluating the impacts of shared automated mobility on-demand services: an activity-based accessibility approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T20%3A31%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20impacts%20of%20shared%20automated%20mobility%20on-demand%20services:%20an%20activity-based%20accessibility%20approach&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Nahmias-Biran,%20Bat-hen&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1613&rft.epage=1638&rft.pages=1613-1638&rft.issn=0049-4488&rft.eissn=1572-9435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11116-020-10106-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2556561457%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2556561457&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true