Data securitisation: the challenges of data sovereignty in India

The rules employed to govern cross-border data flows are in dispute, the outcome of which will certainly affect digitalisation policies in the so-called Global South. Against this backdrop, data localisation has become one of the most prominent and disputed policy measures for states seeking to regu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Third world quarterly 2021-07, Vol.42 (8), p.1733-1750
1. Verfasser: Vila Seoane, Maximiliano Facundo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1750
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1733
container_title Third world quarterly
container_volume 42
creator Vila Seoane, Maximiliano Facundo
description The rules employed to govern cross-border data flows are in dispute, the outcome of which will certainly affect digitalisation policies in the so-called Global South. Against this backdrop, data localisation has become one of the most prominent and disputed policy measures for states seeking to regulate cross-border data flows. This article argues that data localisation can be understood as the product of a new type of resource securitisation, namely data securitisation. This process is shaped by a range of state-specific political and economic issues, and by the outcome of the pressure exerted by national and foreign interest groups. Specifically, the article examines the case of India, where a set of policy measures and initiatives introduced in 2018 began a set of strict data securitisation moves; however, their results were ambivalent. On the one hand, economically driven data localisation requirements have been softened by the stark lobby of foreign governments and transnational corporations, in tandem with local actors, illustrating the structural limits faced by Global South states' sovereign digitalisation policies. On the other hand, a geopolitically driven data securitisation move against Chinese firms has been successful. The article concludes by outlining what lessons Global South actors can draw from this case.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01436597.2021.1915122
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2556553035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2556553035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e1cadf6dca9e4499b7105a13e1f4543a261599933509ee3bc374e417cecdb8683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OAjEYRRujiYg-gskkrgf79WeYusLgHwmJG103pfMNlAwttkXD28uIbl3dzbn3JoeQa6AjoDW9pSB4JdV4xCiDESiQwNgJGQCvaMmYgFMy6Jmyh87JRUprSmkl6npAJg8mmyKh3UWXXTLZBX9X5BUWdmW6Dv0SUxHaovnBwidGdEuf94Xzxcw3zlySs9Z0Ca9-c0jenx7fpi_l_PV5Nr2fl5bzOpcI1jRt1VijUAilFmOg0gBHaIUU3LAKpFKKc0kVIl9YPhYoYGzRNou6qvmQ3Bx3tzF87DBlvQ676A-XmklZSckplwdKHikbQ0oRW72NbmPiXgPVvSz9J0v3svSvrENvcuw534a4MV8hdo3OZt-F2EbjrUua_z_xDR9Db5U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2556553035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Data securitisation: the challenges of data sovereignty in India</title><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Vila Seoane, Maximiliano Facundo</creator><creatorcontrib>Vila Seoane, Maximiliano Facundo</creatorcontrib><description>The rules employed to govern cross-border data flows are in dispute, the outcome of which will certainly affect digitalisation policies in the so-called Global South. Against this backdrop, data localisation has become one of the most prominent and disputed policy measures for states seeking to regulate cross-border data flows. This article argues that data localisation can be understood as the product of a new type of resource securitisation, namely data securitisation. This process is shaped by a range of state-specific political and economic issues, and by the outcome of the pressure exerted by national and foreign interest groups. Specifically, the article examines the case of India, where a set of policy measures and initiatives introduced in 2018 began a set of strict data securitisation moves; however, their results were ambivalent. On the one hand, economically driven data localisation requirements have been softened by the stark lobby of foreign governments and transnational corporations, in tandem with local actors, illustrating the structural limits faced by Global South states' sovereign digitalisation policies. On the other hand, a geopolitically driven data securitisation move against Chinese firms has been successful. The article concludes by outlining what lessons Global South actors can draw from this case.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-6597</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-2241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2021.1915122</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>Ambivalence ; Borders ; Companies ; Data ; data localisation ; data politics ; data securitisation ; data sovereignty ; India ; Interest groups ; Localization ; Multinational corporations ; Securitization ; Sovereignty</subject><ispartof>Third world quarterly, 2021-07, Vol.42 (8), p.1733-1750</ispartof><rights>2021 Global South Ltd 2021</rights><rights>2021 Global South Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e1cadf6dca9e4499b7105a13e1f4543a261599933509ee3bc374e417cecdb8683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e1cadf6dca9e4499b7105a13e1f4543a261599933509ee3bc374e417cecdb8683</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0134-7714</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vila Seoane, Maximiliano Facundo</creatorcontrib><title>Data securitisation: the challenges of data sovereignty in India</title><title>Third world quarterly</title><description>The rules employed to govern cross-border data flows are in dispute, the outcome of which will certainly affect digitalisation policies in the so-called Global South. Against this backdrop, data localisation has become one of the most prominent and disputed policy measures for states seeking to regulate cross-border data flows. This article argues that data localisation can be understood as the product of a new type of resource securitisation, namely data securitisation. This process is shaped by a range of state-specific political and economic issues, and by the outcome of the pressure exerted by national and foreign interest groups. Specifically, the article examines the case of India, where a set of policy measures and initiatives introduced in 2018 began a set of strict data securitisation moves; however, their results were ambivalent. On the one hand, economically driven data localisation requirements have been softened by the stark lobby of foreign governments and transnational corporations, in tandem with local actors, illustrating the structural limits faced by Global South states' sovereign digitalisation policies. On the other hand, a geopolitically driven data securitisation move against Chinese firms has been successful. The article concludes by outlining what lessons Global South actors can draw from this case.</description><subject>Ambivalence</subject><subject>Borders</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>data localisation</subject><subject>data politics</subject><subject>data securitisation</subject><subject>data sovereignty</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Multinational corporations</subject><subject>Securitization</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><issn>0143-6597</issn><issn>1360-2241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OAjEYRRujiYg-gskkrgf79WeYusLgHwmJG103pfMNlAwttkXD28uIbl3dzbn3JoeQa6AjoDW9pSB4JdV4xCiDESiQwNgJGQCvaMmYgFMy6Jmyh87JRUprSmkl6npAJg8mmyKh3UWXXTLZBX9X5BUWdmW6Dv0SUxHaovnBwidGdEuf94Xzxcw3zlySs9Z0Ca9-c0jenx7fpi_l_PV5Nr2fl5bzOpcI1jRt1VijUAilFmOg0gBHaIUU3LAKpFKKc0kVIl9YPhYoYGzRNou6qvmQ3Bx3tzF87DBlvQ676A-XmklZSckplwdKHikbQ0oRW72NbmPiXgPVvSz9J0v3svSvrENvcuw534a4MV8hdo3OZt-F2EbjrUua_z_xDR9Db5U</recordid><startdate>20210722</startdate><enddate>20210722</enddate><creator>Vila Seoane, Maximiliano Facundo</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0134-7714</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210722</creationdate><title>Data securitisation: the challenges of data sovereignty in India</title><author>Vila Seoane, Maximiliano Facundo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-e1cadf6dca9e4499b7105a13e1f4543a261599933509ee3bc374e417cecdb8683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ambivalence</topic><topic>Borders</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>data localisation</topic><topic>data politics</topic><topic>data securitisation</topic><topic>data sovereignty</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Multinational corporations</topic><topic>Securitization</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vila Seoane, Maximiliano Facundo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Third world quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vila Seoane, Maximiliano Facundo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Data securitisation: the challenges of data sovereignty in India</atitle><jtitle>Third world quarterly</jtitle><date>2021-07-22</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1733</spage><epage>1750</epage><pages>1733-1750</pages><issn>0143-6597</issn><eissn>1360-2241</eissn><abstract>The rules employed to govern cross-border data flows are in dispute, the outcome of which will certainly affect digitalisation policies in the so-called Global South. Against this backdrop, data localisation has become one of the most prominent and disputed policy measures for states seeking to regulate cross-border data flows. This article argues that data localisation can be understood as the product of a new type of resource securitisation, namely data securitisation. This process is shaped by a range of state-specific political and economic issues, and by the outcome of the pressure exerted by national and foreign interest groups. Specifically, the article examines the case of India, where a set of policy measures and initiatives introduced in 2018 began a set of strict data securitisation moves; however, their results were ambivalent. On the one hand, economically driven data localisation requirements have been softened by the stark lobby of foreign governments and transnational corporations, in tandem with local actors, illustrating the structural limits faced by Global South states' sovereign digitalisation policies. On the other hand, a geopolitically driven data securitisation move against Chinese firms has been successful. The article concludes by outlining what lessons Global South actors can draw from this case.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/01436597.2021.1915122</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0134-7714</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-6597
ispartof Third world quarterly, 2021-07, Vol.42 (8), p.1733-1750
issn 0143-6597
1360-2241
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2556553035
source EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Ambivalence
Borders
Companies
Data
data localisation
data politics
data securitisation
data sovereignty
India
Interest groups
Localization
Multinational corporations
Securitization
Sovereignty
title Data securitisation: the challenges of data sovereignty in India
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T13%3A53%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Data%20securitisation:%20the%20challenges%20of%20data%20sovereignty%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=Third%20world%20quarterly&rft.au=Vila%20Seoane,%20Maximiliano%20Facundo&rft.date=2021-07-22&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1733&rft.epage=1750&rft.pages=1733-1750&rft.issn=0143-6597&rft.eissn=1360-2241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01436597.2021.1915122&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2556553035%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2556553035&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true