Writing intervention with elementary students struggling with writing: examining approach profiles to the teacher feedback on writing quality and motivational variables
Many young students experience difficulties mastering writing, and are designated as students struggling with writing. Teacher feedback on writing is an educational tool suited to address this challenge, playing a pivotal role in promoting student proficiency in writing. The current study tests a wr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Reading & writing 2021-09, Vol.34 (7), p.1681-1710 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1710 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1681 |
container_title | Reading & writing |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Högemann, Julia Cunha, Jennifer Núñez, José Carlos Vallejo, Guillermo Rodríguez, Celestino Rosário, Pedro |
description | Many young students experience difficulties mastering writing, and are designated as students struggling with writing. Teacher feedback on writing is an educational tool suited to address this challenge, playing a pivotal role in promoting student proficiency in writing. The current study tests a writing intervention plus teacher feedback, over the course of 12 weeks. A quasi-experimental design with repeated measures was designed to test it. Aims were twofold: (a) identify emerging approach profiles of students struggling with writing to teacher feedback (i.e., perception and reported use of the feedback provided by a teacher), and (b) examine the extent to which different emerging feedback approach profiles are related to the writing quality of students’ compositions and motivational variables (i.e., self-regulation in writing and attitude towards writing). Forty-five students in Grade 3, identified as students struggling with writing, participated in this study. Using a cluster analysis, three profiles were identified as follows: low, medium and high feedback approach profile. Findings showed that the majority of students were able to use the feedback provided by their teacher, perceiving it as useful in improving their writing compositions. Independent of the feedback approach profile, all students evidenced enhanced writing quality during the intervention. Regarding self-regulation in writing and attitude towards writing, no statistically significant differences were found over the intervention. Implications of teacher feedback on writing of students struggling with writing are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11145-021-10159-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2556550037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1306481</ericid><sourcerecordid>2556550037</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-5631df5e957ae5d619c1b2e8ea4afa499f3aa9e2ad9bf2a66e6445bb597f0f533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uc1u1DAQthBILIUXQEKyxDl0bMfOmhuqChRV4gLiaE2S8a5LNtnazpa-EY-J01Rw4zTj-X5m5I-x1wLeCYDmPAkhal2BFJUAoW0FT9hG6EZVYEE_ZRuwUlZ10zTP2YuUbgBAbmu1Yb9_xJDDuONhzBRPNOYwjfwu5D2ngQ7ljfGepzz3pU2lifNuNyyCB87dqn7P6RcewrjM8XiME3Z7XooPAyWeJ573xDOVKUXuifoWu598WfS4_XbGIeR7jmPPD1MOJ1zuwIGfMAZsi8tL9szjkOjVYz1j3z9efrv4XF1__XR18eG66pQxudJGid5rsrpB0r0RthOtpC1hjR5ra71CtCSxt62XaAyZutZtq23jwWulztjb1becfztTyu5mmmM5JTmptdEaQDWFJVdWF6eUInl3jOFQvsoJcEsibk3ElUTcQyIOiujNKqIYur-Cyy9Cgam3ouBqxVPBxh3Ff6v_4_oHCSqd-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2556550037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Writing intervention with elementary students struggling with writing: examining approach profiles to the teacher feedback on writing quality and motivational variables</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Högemann, Julia ; Cunha, Jennifer ; Núñez, José Carlos ; Vallejo, Guillermo ; Rodríguez, Celestino ; Rosário, Pedro</creator><creatorcontrib>Högemann, Julia ; Cunha, Jennifer ; Núñez, José Carlos ; Vallejo, Guillermo ; Rodríguez, Celestino ; Rosário, Pedro</creatorcontrib><description>Many young students experience difficulties mastering writing, and are designated as students struggling with writing. Teacher feedback on writing is an educational tool suited to address this challenge, playing a pivotal role in promoting student proficiency in writing. The current study tests a writing intervention plus teacher feedback, over the course of 12 weeks. A quasi-experimental design with repeated measures was designed to test it. Aims were twofold: (a) identify emerging approach profiles of students struggling with writing to teacher feedback (i.e., perception and reported use of the feedback provided by a teacher), and (b) examine the extent to which different emerging feedback approach profiles are related to the writing quality of students’ compositions and motivational variables (i.e., self-regulation in writing and attitude towards writing). Forty-five students in Grade 3, identified as students struggling with writing, participated in this study. Using a cluster analysis, three profiles were identified as follows: low, medium and high feedback approach profile. Findings showed that the majority of students were able to use the feedback provided by their teacher, perceiving it as useful in improving their writing compositions. Independent of the feedback approach profile, all students evidenced enhanced writing quality during the intervention. Regarding self-regulation in writing and attitude towards writing, no statistically significant differences were found over the intervention. Implications of teacher feedback on writing of students struggling with writing are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-4777</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11145-021-10159-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Cluster analysis ; Education ; Elementary School Students ; Elementary school teachers ; Feedback ; Feedback (Response) ; Grade 3 ; Intervention ; Language and Literature ; Linguistics ; Literacy ; Motivation ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neurology ; Profiles ; Psycholinguistics ; Quasiexperimental Design ; Research design ; Social Sciences ; Student attitudes ; Student Motivation ; Students ; Teachers ; Writing ; Writing (Composition) ; Writing Attitudes ; Writing Difficulties ; Writing Instruction</subject><ispartof>Reading & writing, 2021-09, Vol.34 (7), p.1681-1710</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-5631df5e957ae5d619c1b2e8ea4afa499f3aa9e2ad9bf2a66e6445bb597f0f533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-5631df5e957ae5d619c1b2e8ea4afa499f3aa9e2ad9bf2a66e6445bb597f0f533</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3221-1916</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11145-021-10159-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11145-021-10159-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1306481$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Högemann, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunha, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Núñez, José Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallejo, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Celestino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosário, Pedro</creatorcontrib><title>Writing intervention with elementary students struggling with writing: examining approach profiles to the teacher feedback on writing quality and motivational variables</title><title>Reading & writing</title><addtitle>Read Writ</addtitle><description>Many young students experience difficulties mastering writing, and are designated as students struggling with writing. Teacher feedback on writing is an educational tool suited to address this challenge, playing a pivotal role in promoting student proficiency in writing. The current study tests a writing intervention plus teacher feedback, over the course of 12 weeks. A quasi-experimental design with repeated measures was designed to test it. Aims were twofold: (a) identify emerging approach profiles of students struggling with writing to teacher feedback (i.e., perception and reported use of the feedback provided by a teacher), and (b) examine the extent to which different emerging feedback approach profiles are related to the writing quality of students’ compositions and motivational variables (i.e., self-regulation in writing and attitude towards writing). Forty-five students in Grade 3, identified as students struggling with writing, participated in this study. Using a cluster analysis, three profiles were identified as follows: low, medium and high feedback approach profile. Findings showed that the majority of students were able to use the feedback provided by their teacher, perceiving it as useful in improving their writing compositions. Independent of the feedback approach profile, all students evidenced enhanced writing quality during the intervention. Regarding self-regulation in writing and attitude towards writing, no statistically significant differences were found over the intervention. Implications of teacher feedback on writing of students struggling with writing are discussed.</description><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Elementary school teachers</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Grade 3</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Language and Literature</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Quasiexperimental Design</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>Writing (Composition)</subject><subject>Writing Attitudes</subject><subject>Writing Difficulties</subject><subject>Writing Instruction</subject><issn>0922-4777</issn><issn>1573-0905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uc1u1DAQthBILIUXQEKyxDl0bMfOmhuqChRV4gLiaE2S8a5LNtnazpa-EY-J01Rw4zTj-X5m5I-x1wLeCYDmPAkhal2BFJUAoW0FT9hG6EZVYEE_ZRuwUlZ10zTP2YuUbgBAbmu1Yb9_xJDDuONhzBRPNOYwjfwu5D2ngQ7ljfGepzz3pU2lifNuNyyCB87dqn7P6RcewrjM8XiME3Z7XooPAyWeJ573xDOVKUXuifoWu598WfS4_XbGIeR7jmPPD1MOJ1zuwIGfMAZsi8tL9szjkOjVYz1j3z9efrv4XF1__XR18eG66pQxudJGid5rsrpB0r0RthOtpC1hjR5ra71CtCSxt62XaAyZutZtq23jwWulztjb1becfztTyu5mmmM5JTmptdEaQDWFJVdWF6eUInl3jOFQvsoJcEsibk3ElUTcQyIOiujNKqIYur-Cyy9Cgam3ouBqxVPBxh3Ff6v_4_oHCSqd-A</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Högemann, Julia</creator><creator>Cunha, Jennifer</creator><creator>Núñez, José Carlos</creator><creator>Vallejo, Guillermo</creator><creator>Rodríguez, Celestino</creator><creator>Rosário, Pedro</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3221-1916</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Writing intervention with elementary students struggling with writing: examining approach profiles to the teacher feedback on writing quality and motivational variables</title><author>Högemann, Julia ; Cunha, Jennifer ; Núñez, José Carlos ; Vallejo, Guillermo ; Rodríguez, Celestino ; Rosário, Pedro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-5631df5e957ae5d619c1b2e8ea4afa499f3aa9e2ad9bf2a66e6445bb597f0f533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Elementary school teachers</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Grade 3</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Language and Literature</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Quasiexperimental Design</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>Writing (Composition)</topic><topic>Writing Attitudes</topic><topic>Writing Difficulties</topic><topic>Writing Instruction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Högemann, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunha, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Núñez, José Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallejo, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Celestino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosário, Pedro</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Reading & writing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Högemann, Julia</au><au>Cunha, Jennifer</au><au>Núñez, José Carlos</au><au>Vallejo, Guillermo</au><au>Rodríguez, Celestino</au><au>Rosário, Pedro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1306481</ericid><atitle>Writing intervention with elementary students struggling with writing: examining approach profiles to the teacher feedback on writing quality and motivational variables</atitle><jtitle>Reading & writing</jtitle><stitle>Read Writ</stitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1681</spage><epage>1710</epage><pages>1681-1710</pages><issn>0922-4777</issn><eissn>1573-0905</eissn><abstract>Many young students experience difficulties mastering writing, and are designated as students struggling with writing. Teacher feedback on writing is an educational tool suited to address this challenge, playing a pivotal role in promoting student proficiency in writing. The current study tests a writing intervention plus teacher feedback, over the course of 12 weeks. A quasi-experimental design with repeated measures was designed to test it. Aims were twofold: (a) identify emerging approach profiles of students struggling with writing to teacher feedback (i.e., perception and reported use of the feedback provided by a teacher), and (b) examine the extent to which different emerging feedback approach profiles are related to the writing quality of students’ compositions and motivational variables (i.e., self-regulation in writing and attitude towards writing). Forty-five students in Grade 3, identified as students struggling with writing, participated in this study. Using a cluster analysis, three profiles were identified as follows: low, medium and high feedback approach profile. Findings showed that the majority of students were able to use the feedback provided by their teacher, perceiving it as useful in improving their writing compositions. Independent of the feedback approach profile, all students evidenced enhanced writing quality during the intervention. Regarding self-regulation in writing and attitude towards writing, no statistically significant differences were found over the intervention. Implications of teacher feedback on writing of students struggling with writing are discussed.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11145-021-10159-0</doi><tpages>30</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3221-1916</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0922-4777 |
ispartof | Reading & writing, 2021-09, Vol.34 (7), p.1681-1710 |
issn | 0922-4777 1573-0905 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2556550037 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Cluster analysis Education Elementary School Students Elementary school teachers Feedback Feedback (Response) Grade 3 Intervention Language and Literature Linguistics Literacy Motivation Multivariate Analysis Neurology Profiles Psycholinguistics Quasiexperimental Design Research design Social Sciences Student attitudes Student Motivation Students Teachers Writing Writing (Composition) Writing Attitudes Writing Difficulties Writing Instruction |
title | Writing intervention with elementary students struggling with writing: examining approach profiles to the teacher feedback on writing quality and motivational variables |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A46%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Writing%20intervention%20with%20elementary%20students%20struggling%20with%20writing:%20examining%20approach%20profiles%20to%20the%20teacher%20feedback%20on%20writing%20quality%20and%20motivational%20variables&rft.jtitle=Reading%20&%20writing&rft.au=H%C3%B6gemann,%20Julia&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1681&rft.epage=1710&rft.pages=1681-1710&rft.issn=0922-4777&rft.eissn=1573-0905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11145-021-10159-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2556550037%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2556550037&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1306481&rfr_iscdi=true |