Assessment of sociocultural acceptability of biogas from faecal waste as an alternative energy source in selected areas of Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria
The use of wastes for biogas production has been restricted to few feedstock like cattle manure and food waste. Increasing the feedstock base for biogas production is capable of increasing the sustainability of feedstock availability. This study seeks to assess sociocultural and acceptability issues...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environment, development and sustainability development and sustainability, 2021-09, Vol.23 (9), p.13182-13199 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 13199 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 13182 |
| container_title | Environment, development and sustainability |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Ajieh, Mike U. Isagba, Ebuwa S. Ihoeghian, Newton Edosa, Valerie I. O. Amenaghawon, Andrew Oshoma, Cyprian E. Erhunmwunse, Nosakhare Obuekwe, Ifeyinwa S. Tongo, Isioma Emokaro, Christopher Ezemonye, Lawrence I. N. |
| description | The use of wastes for biogas production has been restricted to few feedstock like cattle manure and food waste. Increasing the feedstock base for biogas production is capable of increasing the sustainability of feedstock availability. This study seeks to assess sociocultural and acceptability issues associated with the use of faecal waste (human excreta, cattle manure, etc.) as a source of energy in selected stakeholder areas in Benin City, Nigeria. Qualitative research methods were used for data collection as data were generated through survey questionnaire. Field responses were mined and analysed using Factor analysis and cluster plots generated from Factor plots were analysis using Statistical Program for Social Sciences to rank the variables in order of hierarchical means. Analyses from this study have shown that faecal waste is a dependable feedstock for biogas production while adding value to food production through digestate utilization. Furthermore, high factor loading of 0.759 for acceptance to the fact that biogas from faecal waste has the potential to improve environmental sanitation in Benin City. However, there exist considerable knowledge gap as shown in the analyses which suggest a need for continuous awareness creation, policy formulation and orientation on the importance of biogas production from a range of feedstock in tackling energy security and sustainability in line with SDGs 2, 6 and 7. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10668-020-01205-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2556545560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2556545560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f8ee7e23630053d77062db9800c72b4efb25a9002aa2dfb8bc2e80606006be4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1KxDAQhYsoqKsv4FXAW6vTdNOfS138A9ELFbwL03SyZOm2a5JV-ii-rbOu4J0EkjD5zkkmJ0lOMjjPAMqLkEFRVClISCGToNJxJznIVJmnsi7VLu_zqkxVpd72k8MQFsBkLYuD5OsyBAphSX0UgxVhMG4w6y6uPXYCjaFVxMZ1Lo6b48YNcwzC-mEpLJJh5hNDJMFF7AV2kXyP0X2QoJ78fGTDtTckXC8CdWQitQI9Mc5uV9RzfcbeZ-K6HcRzxEhn4tHNyTs8SvYsdoGOf9dJ8npz_TK7Sx-ebu9nlw-pybM6prYiKknmRQ6g8rYsoZBtU1cAppTNlGwjFdbcL6JsbVM1RlIFBQ8oGprafJKcbn1XfnhfU4h6wW_u-UotlSrUlCdgSm4p44cQPFm98m6JftQZ6E0EehuB5o_VPxHokUX5VhQY7rmrP-t_VN_HzYw5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2556545560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of sociocultural acceptability of biogas from faecal waste as an alternative energy source in selected areas of Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ajieh, Mike U. ; Isagba, Ebuwa S. ; Ihoeghian, Newton ; Edosa, Valerie I. O. ; Amenaghawon, Andrew ; Oshoma, Cyprian E. ; Erhunmwunse, Nosakhare ; Obuekwe, Ifeyinwa S. ; Tongo, Isioma ; Emokaro, Christopher ; Ezemonye, Lawrence I. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ajieh, Mike U. ; Isagba, Ebuwa S. ; Ihoeghian, Newton ; Edosa, Valerie I. O. ; Amenaghawon, Andrew ; Oshoma, Cyprian E. ; Erhunmwunse, Nosakhare ; Obuekwe, Ifeyinwa S. ; Tongo, Isioma ; Emokaro, Christopher ; Ezemonye, Lawrence I. N.</creatorcontrib><description>The use of wastes for biogas production has been restricted to few feedstock like cattle manure and food waste. Increasing the feedstock base for biogas production is capable of increasing the sustainability of feedstock availability. This study seeks to assess sociocultural and acceptability issues associated with the use of faecal waste (human excreta, cattle manure, etc.) as a source of energy in selected stakeholder areas in Benin City, Nigeria. Qualitative research methods were used for data collection as data were generated through survey questionnaire. Field responses were mined and analysed using Factor analysis and cluster plots generated from Factor plots were analysis using Statistical Program for Social Sciences to rank the variables in order of hierarchical means. Analyses from this study have shown that faecal waste is a dependable feedstock for biogas production while adding value to food production through digestate utilization. Furthermore, high factor loading of 0.759 for acceptance to the fact that biogas from faecal waste has the potential to improve environmental sanitation in Benin City. However, there exist considerable knowledge gap as shown in the analyses which suggest a need for continuous awareness creation, policy formulation and orientation on the importance of biogas production from a range of feedstock in tackling energy security and sustainability in line with SDGs 2, 6 and 7.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-585X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-01205-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Alternative energy sources ; Animal wastes ; Biogas ; Cattle ; Cattle manure ; Cities ; Data collection ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Economic Geology ; Economic Growth ; Energy ; Energy policy ; Energy security ; Environment ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental Management ; Factor analysis ; Food ; Food production ; Food waste ; Human wastes ; Manures ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative research ; Raw materials ; Research methodology ; Research methods ; Sanitation ; Social sciences ; Sociocultural factors ; Sustainability ; Sustainable Development</subject><ispartof>Environment, development and sustainability, 2021-09, Vol.23 (9), p.13182-13199</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f8ee7e23630053d77062db9800c72b4efb25a9002aa2dfb8bc2e80606006be4f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f8ee7e23630053d77062db9800c72b4efb25a9002aa2dfb8bc2e80606006be4f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9547-0122</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10668-020-01205-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-020-01205-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ajieh, Mike U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isagba, Ebuwa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihoeghian, Newton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edosa, Valerie I. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amenaghawon, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oshoma, Cyprian E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erhunmwunse, Nosakhare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obuekwe, Ifeyinwa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tongo, Isioma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emokaro, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezemonye, Lawrence I. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of sociocultural acceptability of biogas from faecal waste as an alternative energy source in selected areas of Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria</title><title>Environment, development and sustainability</title><addtitle>Environ Dev Sustain</addtitle><description>The use of wastes for biogas production has been restricted to few feedstock like cattle manure and food waste. Increasing the feedstock base for biogas production is capable of increasing the sustainability of feedstock availability. This study seeks to assess sociocultural and acceptability issues associated with the use of faecal waste (human excreta, cattle manure, etc.) as a source of energy in selected stakeholder areas in Benin City, Nigeria. Qualitative research methods were used for data collection as data were generated through survey questionnaire. Field responses were mined and analysed using Factor analysis and cluster plots generated from Factor plots were analysis using Statistical Program for Social Sciences to rank the variables in order of hierarchical means. Analyses from this study have shown that faecal waste is a dependable feedstock for biogas production while adding value to food production through digestate utilization. Furthermore, high factor loading of 0.759 for acceptance to the fact that biogas from faecal waste has the potential to improve environmental sanitation in Benin City. However, there exist considerable knowledge gap as shown in the analyses which suggest a need for continuous awareness creation, policy formulation and orientation on the importance of biogas production from a range of feedstock in tackling energy security and sustainability in line with SDGs 2, 6 and 7.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Animal wastes</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle manure</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic Geology</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy security</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food production</subject><subject>Food waste</subject><subject>Human wastes</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Sanitation</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Sociocultural factors</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><issn>1387-585X</issn><issn>1573-2975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1KxDAQhYsoqKsv4FXAW6vTdNOfS138A9ELFbwL03SyZOm2a5JV-ii-rbOu4J0EkjD5zkkmJ0lOMjjPAMqLkEFRVClISCGToNJxJznIVJmnsi7VLu_zqkxVpd72k8MQFsBkLYuD5OsyBAphSX0UgxVhMG4w6y6uPXYCjaFVxMZ1Lo6b48YNcwzC-mEpLJJh5hNDJMFF7AV2kXyP0X2QoJ78fGTDtTckXC8CdWQitQI9Mc5uV9RzfcbeZ-K6HcRzxEhn4tHNyTs8SvYsdoGOf9dJ8npz_TK7Sx-ebu9nlw-pybM6prYiKknmRQ6g8rYsoZBtU1cAppTNlGwjFdbcL6JsbVM1RlIFBQ8oGprafJKcbn1XfnhfU4h6wW_u-UotlSrUlCdgSm4p44cQPFm98m6JftQZ6E0EehuB5o_VPxHokUX5VhQY7rmrP-t_VN_HzYw5</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Ajieh, Mike U.</creator><creator>Isagba, Ebuwa S.</creator><creator>Ihoeghian, Newton</creator><creator>Edosa, Valerie I. O.</creator><creator>Amenaghawon, Andrew</creator><creator>Oshoma, Cyprian E.</creator><creator>Erhunmwunse, Nosakhare</creator><creator>Obuekwe, Ifeyinwa S.</creator><creator>Tongo, Isioma</creator><creator>Emokaro, Christopher</creator><creator>Ezemonye, Lawrence I. N.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9547-0122</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Assessment of sociocultural acceptability of biogas from faecal waste as an alternative energy source in selected areas of Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria</title><author>Ajieh, Mike U. ; Isagba, Ebuwa S. ; Ihoeghian, Newton ; Edosa, Valerie I. O. ; Amenaghawon, Andrew ; Oshoma, Cyprian E. ; Erhunmwunse, Nosakhare ; Obuekwe, Ifeyinwa S. ; Tongo, Isioma ; Emokaro, Christopher ; Ezemonye, Lawrence I. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f8ee7e23630053d77062db9800c72b4efb25a9002aa2dfb8bc2e80606006be4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Animal wastes</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle manure</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic Geology</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy security</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food production</topic><topic>Food waste</topic><topic>Human wastes</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Sanitation</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Sociocultural factors</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ajieh, Mike U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isagba, Ebuwa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihoeghian, Newton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edosa, Valerie I. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amenaghawon, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oshoma, Cyprian E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erhunmwunse, Nosakhare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obuekwe, Ifeyinwa S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tongo, Isioma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emokaro, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezemonye, Lawrence I. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ajieh, Mike U.</au><au>Isagba, Ebuwa S.</au><au>Ihoeghian, Newton</au><au>Edosa, Valerie I. O.</au><au>Amenaghawon, Andrew</au><au>Oshoma, Cyprian E.</au><au>Erhunmwunse, Nosakhare</au><au>Obuekwe, Ifeyinwa S.</au><au>Tongo, Isioma</au><au>Emokaro, Christopher</au><au>Ezemonye, Lawrence I. N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of sociocultural acceptability of biogas from faecal waste as an alternative energy source in selected areas of Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria</atitle><jtitle>Environment, development and sustainability</jtitle><stitle>Environ Dev Sustain</stitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>13182</spage><epage>13199</epage><pages>13182-13199</pages><issn>1387-585X</issn><eissn>1573-2975</eissn><abstract>The use of wastes for biogas production has been restricted to few feedstock like cattle manure and food waste. Increasing the feedstock base for biogas production is capable of increasing the sustainability of feedstock availability. This study seeks to assess sociocultural and acceptability issues associated with the use of faecal waste (human excreta, cattle manure, etc.) as a source of energy in selected stakeholder areas in Benin City, Nigeria. Qualitative research methods were used for data collection as data were generated through survey questionnaire. Field responses were mined and analysed using Factor analysis and cluster plots generated from Factor plots were analysis using Statistical Program for Social Sciences to rank the variables in order of hierarchical means. Analyses from this study have shown that faecal waste is a dependable feedstock for biogas production while adding value to food production through digestate utilization. Furthermore, high factor loading of 0.759 for acceptance to the fact that biogas from faecal waste has the potential to improve environmental sanitation in Benin City. However, there exist considerable knowledge gap as shown in the analyses which suggest a need for continuous awareness creation, policy formulation and orientation on the importance of biogas production from a range of feedstock in tackling energy security and sustainability in line with SDGs 2, 6 and 7.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10668-020-01205-y</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9547-0122</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1387-585X |
| ispartof | Environment, development and sustainability, 2021-09, Vol.23 (9), p.13182-13199 |
| issn | 1387-585X 1573-2975 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2556545560 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Acceptability Alternative energy sources Animal wastes Biogas Cattle Cattle manure Cities Data collection Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Economic Geology Economic Growth Energy Energy policy Energy security Environment Environmental Economics Environmental Management Factor analysis Food Food production Food waste Human wastes Manures Qualitative analysis Qualitative research Raw materials Research methodology Research methods Sanitation Social sciences Sociocultural factors Sustainability Sustainable Development |
| title | Assessment of sociocultural acceptability of biogas from faecal waste as an alternative energy source in selected areas of Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A29%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20sociocultural%20acceptability%20of%20biogas%20from%20faecal%20waste%20as%20an%20alternative%20energy%20source%20in%20selected%20areas%20of%20Benin%20City,%20Edo%20State,%20Nigeria&rft.jtitle=Environment,%20development%20and%20sustainability&rft.au=Ajieh,%20Mike%20U.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=13182&rft.epage=13199&rft.pages=13182-13199&rft.issn=1387-585X&rft.eissn=1573-2975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10668-020-01205-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2556545560%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2556545560&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |