Phenotypic characterization and Molecular detection of Inducible and Constitutive Clindamycin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Background: Staphylococcus aureus is Gram positive cocci. The pyogenic bacteria which is responsible for a variety of diseases that ranges in severity from mild skin and soft tissue infections to life-threatening conditions such as endocarditis, pneumonia, and sepsis. There is a scenario of increasi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research journal of pharmacy and technology 2021-07, Vol.14 (7), p.3799-3804
Hauptverfasser: Mahalakshmi, G, Neelusree, P, Kalyani, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3804
container_issue 7
container_start_page 3799
container_title Research journal of pharmacy and technology
container_volume 14
creator Mahalakshmi, G
Neelusree, P
Kalyani, M
description Background: Staphylococcus aureus is Gram positive cocci. The pyogenic bacteria which is responsible for a variety of diseases that ranges in severity from mild skin and soft tissue infections to life-threatening conditions such as endocarditis, pneumonia, and sepsis. There is a scenario of increasing Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) group of antibiotics they have different structure with same mechanism of action which serves as one good alternative. There is a frequency of increasing Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and their change in antimicrobial resistance pattern. There is a concern about use of this antibiotic in the presence of Erythromycin resistance because of the possibility of inducible resistance among the members of Macrolide, lincosamide, Strepto-gramin B (MLSB) group. The invitro resistance exhibited by Staphylococcus aureus to erythromycin, Clindamycin, and other drugs of MLSB groups is due to the expression of ribosomal methylases(erm) genes. The detection of inducible Clindamycin resistance can limit the effectiveness of these drugs. Objective of the study: To isolate of Staphylococcus aureus from various clinical samples to differentiate between Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) by conventional methods. To detect inducible and constitutive Clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates by D test. To detect ermA gene responsible for resistance by PCR. Methodology: This cross sectional study was done for a period of six months. Totally 106 Staphylococcus aureus isolates was obtained various clinical samples were processed using standard guidelines. Result: From the 106 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus 67(63.3%) were MSSA and 39(36.7%) were MRSA. D-test was positive in n=9 of the n=21 MRSA and n=17 of the n=85 MSSA, which denotes inducible Clindamycin resistance. N- 9 of MRSA and n=13(22%) of MSSA showed Constitutional Clindamycin resistance. The statistics show that there is a significant Difference in constitutive resistance between MRSA and MSSA. In India ermA gene is most prevalent, out of 22 d-test positive n=13 ermA gene were detected (n=3-MRSA and n=10-MSSA) by using conventional PCR. Conclusion: The MLSB family of antibiotics is one such alternative and CD is preferred. Clinical microbiology laboratories should report inducible Clindamycin resi
doi_str_mv 10.52711/0974-360X202100658
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2556035001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2556035001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25560350013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjUFLAzEUhIMoWLS_wMsDz9Vkt5uu50WpB0Gwh97KM_tqU9JkTV6E9R_5Lw1V785lhpkPRogrJW-aaqHUrbxbzGe1lutKVkpK3bQnYvJTSr0-_ctatedimtJeFum2qebtRHw978gHHgdrwOwwomGK9hPZBg_oe3gKjkx2GKEnJnPswxYefZ-NfXV0hLrgE1vObD8IOmd9j4fRWA-Rkk2M3hTuEPwbvDAOu9EFE4zJCTBHKmZTcMhUQjmFFUW2GEfoMBIsQxoso7sUZ1t0iaa_fiGuH-5X3XI2xPCeKfFmH3L0ZdpUTaNl3Uip6v9R3xUSaTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2556035001</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phenotypic characterization and Molecular detection of Inducible and Constitutive Clindamycin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Mahalakshmi, G ; Neelusree, P ; Kalyani, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahalakshmi, G ; Neelusree, P ; Kalyani, M</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Staphylococcus aureus is Gram positive cocci. The pyogenic bacteria which is responsible for a variety of diseases that ranges in severity from mild skin and soft tissue infections to life-threatening conditions such as endocarditis, pneumonia, and sepsis. There is a scenario of increasing Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) group of antibiotics they have different structure with same mechanism of action which serves as one good alternative. There is a frequency of increasing Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and their change in antimicrobial resistance pattern. There is a concern about use of this antibiotic in the presence of Erythromycin resistance because of the possibility of inducible resistance among the members of Macrolide, lincosamide, Strepto-gramin B (MLSB) group. The invitro resistance exhibited by Staphylococcus aureus to erythromycin, Clindamycin, and other drugs of MLSB groups is due to the expression of ribosomal methylases(erm) genes. The detection of inducible Clindamycin resistance can limit the effectiveness of these drugs. Objective of the study: To isolate of Staphylococcus aureus from various clinical samples to differentiate between Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) by conventional methods. To detect inducible and constitutive Clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates by D test. To detect ermA gene responsible for resistance by PCR. Methodology: This cross sectional study was done for a period of six months. Totally 106 Staphylococcus aureus isolates was obtained various clinical samples were processed using standard guidelines. Result: From the 106 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus 67(63.3%) were MSSA and 39(36.7%) were MRSA. D-test was positive in n=9 of the n=21 MRSA and n=17 of the n=85 MSSA, which denotes inducible Clindamycin resistance. N- 9 of MRSA and n=13(22%) of MSSA showed Constitutional Clindamycin resistance. The statistics show that there is a significant Difference in constitutive resistance between MRSA and MSSA. In India ermA gene is most prevalent, out of 22 d-test positive n=13 ermA gene were detected (n=3-MRSA and n=10-MSSA) by using conventional PCR. Conclusion: The MLSB family of antibiotics is one such alternative and CD is preferred. Clinical microbiology laboratories should report inducible Clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and D-test can be used as a simple, auxiliary and reliable method to Delineate inducible and constitutive Clindamycin resistance in routine clinical laboratories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0974-3618</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-306X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X202100658</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Raipur: A&amp;V Publications</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial agents ; Approximation ; Bacteria ; Binding sites ; Drug dosages ; Drug resistance ; Endocarditis ; Enzymes ; Genes ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Laboratories ; Pneumonia ; Sepsis ; Staphylococcus infections ; Vagina</subject><ispartof>Research journal of pharmacy and technology, 2021-07, Vol.14 (7), p.3799-3804</ispartof><rights>Copyright A&amp;V Publications Jul 2021</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahalakshmi, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neelusree, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalyani, M</creatorcontrib><title>Phenotypic characterization and Molecular detection of Inducible and Constitutive Clindamycin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital</title><title>Research journal of pharmacy and technology</title><description>Background: Staphylococcus aureus is Gram positive cocci. The pyogenic bacteria which is responsible for a variety of diseases that ranges in severity from mild skin and soft tissue infections to life-threatening conditions such as endocarditis, pneumonia, and sepsis. There is a scenario of increasing Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) group of antibiotics they have different structure with same mechanism of action which serves as one good alternative. There is a frequency of increasing Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and their change in antimicrobial resistance pattern. There is a concern about use of this antibiotic in the presence of Erythromycin resistance because of the possibility of inducible resistance among the members of Macrolide, lincosamide, Strepto-gramin B (MLSB) group. The invitro resistance exhibited by Staphylococcus aureus to erythromycin, Clindamycin, and other drugs of MLSB groups is due to the expression of ribosomal methylases(erm) genes. The detection of inducible Clindamycin resistance can limit the effectiveness of these drugs. Objective of the study: To isolate of Staphylococcus aureus from various clinical samples to differentiate between Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) by conventional methods. To detect inducible and constitutive Clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates by D test. To detect ermA gene responsible for resistance by PCR. Methodology: This cross sectional study was done for a period of six months. Totally 106 Staphylococcus aureus isolates was obtained various clinical samples were processed using standard guidelines. Result: From the 106 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus 67(63.3%) were MSSA and 39(36.7%) were MRSA. D-test was positive in n=9 of the n=21 MRSA and n=17 of the n=85 MSSA, which denotes inducible Clindamycin resistance. N- 9 of MRSA and n=13(22%) of MSSA showed Constitutional Clindamycin resistance. The statistics show that there is a significant Difference in constitutive resistance between MRSA and MSSA. In India ermA gene is most prevalent, out of 22 d-test positive n=13 ermA gene were detected (n=3-MRSA and n=10-MSSA) by using conventional PCR. Conclusion: The MLSB family of antibiotics is one such alternative and CD is preferred. Clinical microbiology laboratories should report inducible Clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and D-test can be used as a simple, auxiliary and reliable method to Delineate inducible and constitutive Clindamycin resistance in routine clinical laboratories.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Binding sites</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Endocarditis</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><issn>0974-3618</issn><issn>0974-306X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjUFLAzEUhIMoWLS_wMsDz9Vkt5uu50WpB0Gwh97KM_tqU9JkTV6E9R_5Lw1V785lhpkPRogrJW-aaqHUrbxbzGe1lutKVkpK3bQnYvJTSr0-_ctatedimtJeFum2qebtRHw978gHHgdrwOwwomGK9hPZBg_oe3gKjkx2GKEnJnPswxYefZ-NfXV0hLrgE1vObD8IOmd9j4fRWA-Rkk2M3hTuEPwbvDAOu9EFE4zJCTBHKmZTcMhUQjmFFUW2GEfoMBIsQxoso7sUZ1t0iaa_fiGuH-5X3XI2xPCeKfFmH3L0ZdpUTaNl3Uip6v9R3xUSaTg</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Mahalakshmi, G</creator><creator>Neelusree, P</creator><creator>Kalyani, M</creator><general>A&amp;V Publications</general><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04S</scope><scope>04W</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Phenotypic characterization and Molecular detection of Inducible and Constitutive Clindamycin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital</title><author>Mahalakshmi, G ; Neelusree, P ; Kalyani, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25560350013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Binding sites</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Endocarditis</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahalakshmi, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neelusree, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalyani, M</creatorcontrib><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Business</collection><collection>India Database: Science &amp; Technology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Research journal of pharmacy and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahalakshmi, G</au><au>Neelusree, P</au><au>Kalyani, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phenotypic characterization and Molecular detection of Inducible and Constitutive Clindamycin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital</atitle><jtitle>Research journal of pharmacy and technology</jtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3799</spage><epage>3804</epage><pages>3799-3804</pages><issn>0974-3618</issn><eissn>0974-306X</eissn><abstract>Background: Staphylococcus aureus is Gram positive cocci. The pyogenic bacteria which is responsible for a variety of diseases that ranges in severity from mild skin and soft tissue infections to life-threatening conditions such as endocarditis, pneumonia, and sepsis. There is a scenario of increasing Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) group of antibiotics they have different structure with same mechanism of action which serves as one good alternative. There is a frequency of increasing Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and their change in antimicrobial resistance pattern. There is a concern about use of this antibiotic in the presence of Erythromycin resistance because of the possibility of inducible resistance among the members of Macrolide, lincosamide, Strepto-gramin B (MLSB) group. The invitro resistance exhibited by Staphylococcus aureus to erythromycin, Clindamycin, and other drugs of MLSB groups is due to the expression of ribosomal methylases(erm) genes. The detection of inducible Clindamycin resistance can limit the effectiveness of these drugs. Objective of the study: To isolate of Staphylococcus aureus from various clinical samples to differentiate between Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) by conventional methods. To detect inducible and constitutive Clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates by D test. To detect ermA gene responsible for resistance by PCR. Methodology: This cross sectional study was done for a period of six months. Totally 106 Staphylococcus aureus isolates was obtained various clinical samples were processed using standard guidelines. Result: From the 106 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus 67(63.3%) were MSSA and 39(36.7%) were MRSA. D-test was positive in n=9 of the n=21 MRSA and n=17 of the n=85 MSSA, which denotes inducible Clindamycin resistance. N- 9 of MRSA and n=13(22%) of MSSA showed Constitutional Clindamycin resistance. The statistics show that there is a significant Difference in constitutive resistance between MRSA and MSSA. In India ermA gene is most prevalent, out of 22 d-test positive n=13 ermA gene were detected (n=3-MRSA and n=10-MSSA) by using conventional PCR. Conclusion: The MLSB family of antibiotics is one such alternative and CD is preferred. Clinical microbiology laboratories should report inducible Clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and D-test can be used as a simple, auxiliary and reliable method to Delineate inducible and constitutive Clindamycin resistance in routine clinical laboratories.</abstract><cop>Raipur</cop><pub>A&amp;V Publications</pub><doi>10.52711/0974-360X202100658</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0974-3618
ispartof Research journal of pharmacy and technology, 2021-07, Vol.14 (7), p.3799-3804
issn 0974-3618
0974-306X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2556035001
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Antibiotics
Antimicrobial agents
Approximation
Bacteria
Binding sites
Drug dosages
Drug resistance
Endocarditis
Enzymes
Genes
Genotype & phenotype
Laboratories
Pneumonia
Sepsis
Staphylococcus infections
Vagina
title Phenotypic characterization and Molecular detection of Inducible and Constitutive Clindamycin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T19%3A41%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phenotypic%20characterization%20and%20Molecular%20detection%20of%20Inducible%20and%20Constitutive%20Clindamycin%20resistance%20among%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20isolates%20in%20a%20Tertiary%20Care%20Hospital&rft.jtitle=Research%20journal%20of%20pharmacy%20and%20technology&rft.au=Mahalakshmi,%20G&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3799&rft.epage=3804&rft.pages=3799-3804&rft.issn=0974-3618&rft.eissn=0974-306X&rft_id=info:doi/10.52711/0974-360X202100658&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2556035001%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2556035001&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true