Teleseismic Attenuation, Temperature, and Melt of the Upper Mantle in the Alaska Subduction Zone
Seismic deployments in the Alaska subduction zone provide dense sampling of the seismic wavefield that constrains thermal structure and subduction geometry. We measure P and S attenuation from pairwise amplitude and phase spectral ratios for teleseismic body waves at 206 stations from regional and s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2021-07, Vol.126 (7), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Soto Castaneda, R. A. Abers, G. A. Eilon, Z. C. Christensen, D. H. |
description | Seismic deployments in the Alaska subduction zone provide dense sampling of the seismic wavefield that constrains thermal structure and subduction geometry. We measure P and S attenuation from pairwise amplitude and phase spectral ratios for teleseismic body waves at 206 stations from regional and short‐term arrays. Parallel teleseismic travel‐time measurements provide information on seismic velocities at the same scale. These data show consistently low attenuation over the forearc of subduction systems and high attenuation over the arc and backarc, similar to local‐earthquake attenuation studies but at 10× lower frequencies. The pattern is seen both across the area of normal Pacific subduction in Cook Inlet, and across the Wrangell Volcanic Field where subduction has been debated. These observations confirm subduction‐dominated thermal regime beneath the latter. Travel times show evidence for subducting lithosphere much deeper than seismicity, while attenuation measurements appear mostly reflective of mantle temperature less than 150 km deep, depths where the mantle is closest to its solidus and where subduction‐related melting may take place. Travel times show strong delays over thick sedimentary basins. Attenuation signals show no evidence of absorption by basins, although some basins show signals anomalously rich in high‐frequency energy, with consequent negative apparent attenuation. Outside of basins, these data are consistent with mantle attenuation in the upper 220 km that is quantitatively similar to observations from surface waves and local‐earthquake body waves. Differences between P and S attenuation suggest primarily shear‐modulus relaxation. Overall the attenuation measurements show consistent, coherent subduction‐related structure, complementary to travel times.
Plain Language Summary
Seismic waves lose more energy passing through hot and partly molten volumes than cold regions. As a result, measurements of variation in their amplitudes, or attenuation, provides a tool for mapping out the upper mantle, complementing more traditional measurements of their variation in travel time. New high‐quality arrays across southern Alaska, along with recent methodological developments, now allow this measurement to be made systematically across the entire region. They show consistently low attenuation where subducting plates are near the surface or along paths that follow the cold subducting plates. These regions are in southernmost Alaska. By contrast, |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2021JB021653 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2555979378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2555979378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3681-c7b4566ec17501982a136b3ee9e543f4631001fc0fb95dc4c44e3711bd1b13593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOwzAMhiMEEtPYjQeIxHWFuGna5rhNMJg2IcF24VLS1BUdXVuSVGhvT8YQ4oQP_i37k239hFwCuwYWypuQhbCY-hQLfkIGXmUguYhPf2vg52Rk7Zb5SH0LogF5XWONFiu7qzSdOIdNr1zVNmO6xl2HRrne4JiqpqArrB1tS-rekG46P6Mr1bgaadV89ya1su-KPvd50evDDvrSNnhBzkpVWxz96JBs7m7Xs_tg-Th_mE2WgeJxCoFO8kjEMWpIBAOZhgp4nHNEiSLiZRRzYAxKzcpcikJHOoqQJwB5ATlwIfmQXB33dqb96NG6bNv2pvEns1AIIRPJk9RT4yOlTWutwTLrTLVTZp8Byw42Zn9t9Dg_4p9Vjft_2Wwxf5oK_zvwLy5HcaU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2555979378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teleseismic Attenuation, Temperature, and Melt of the Upper Mantle in the Alaska Subduction Zone</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><creator>Soto Castaneda, R. A. ; Abers, G. A. ; Eilon, Z. C. ; Christensen, D. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Soto Castaneda, R. A. ; Abers, G. A. ; Eilon, Z. C. ; Christensen, D. H.</creatorcontrib><description>Seismic deployments in the Alaska subduction zone provide dense sampling of the seismic wavefield that constrains thermal structure and subduction geometry. We measure P and S attenuation from pairwise amplitude and phase spectral ratios for teleseismic body waves at 206 stations from regional and short‐term arrays. Parallel teleseismic travel‐time measurements provide information on seismic velocities at the same scale. These data show consistently low attenuation over the forearc of subduction systems and high attenuation over the arc and backarc, similar to local‐earthquake attenuation studies but at 10× lower frequencies. The pattern is seen both across the area of normal Pacific subduction in Cook Inlet, and across the Wrangell Volcanic Field where subduction has been debated. These observations confirm subduction‐dominated thermal regime beneath the latter. Travel times show evidence for subducting lithosphere much deeper than seismicity, while attenuation measurements appear mostly reflective of mantle temperature less than 150 km deep, depths where the mantle is closest to its solidus and where subduction‐related melting may take place. Travel times show strong delays over thick sedimentary basins. Attenuation signals show no evidence of absorption by basins, although some basins show signals anomalously rich in high‐frequency energy, with consequent negative apparent attenuation. Outside of basins, these data are consistent with mantle attenuation in the upper 220 km that is quantitatively similar to observations from surface waves and local‐earthquake body waves. Differences between P and S attenuation suggest primarily shear‐modulus relaxation. Overall the attenuation measurements show consistent, coherent subduction‐related structure, complementary to travel times.
Plain Language Summary
Seismic waves lose more energy passing through hot and partly molten volumes than cold regions. As a result, measurements of variation in their amplitudes, or attenuation, provides a tool for mapping out the upper mantle, complementing more traditional measurements of their variation in travel time. New high‐quality arrays across southern Alaska, along with recent methodological developments, now allow this measurement to be made systematically across the entire region. They show consistently low attenuation where subducting plates are near the surface or along paths that follow the cold subducting plates. These regions are in southernmost Alaska. By contrast, signals traveling beneath volcanic regions or north of them, where hot mantle flows toward subduction zones, show high attenuation. The attenuation patterns resemble those from travel time, but seem to show more sensitivity to the upper 150 km of the Earth while travel time delays more uniformly sample deeper. Sedimentary basins show confusing signals, with travel time delays as expected for low‐wavespeed sediments, but high amplitudes that are difficult to explain. These signals allow quantitative mapping of temperature and melt variations in the upper mantle, even in regions as complex as subduction zones where both properties vary rapidly over short distances.
Key Points
Body‐wave attenuation measurements reveal upper mantle structure, including subducting plates and the Alaskan sub‐/back‐arc
The Wrangell Volcanic Field is underlain by Yakutat subduction, but geometry is complex
Sedimentary basins unexpectedly produce negative apparent attenuation in body‐wave spectra</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021JB021653</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alaska ; Amplitudes ; Arrays ; Attenuation ; Body waves ; Cold regions ; Earth mantle ; Earthquakes ; Geophysics ; imaging ; Lithosphere ; Mapping ; P-waves ; Plates (tectonics) ; Sedimentary basins ; Sediments ; Seismic activity ; Seismic velocities ; Seismic waves ; Seismicity ; Solidus ; Subduction ; Subduction (geology) ; Subduction zones ; Surface waves ; Temperature ; Thermal structure ; Time measurement ; Timing ; Travel ; Travel time ; Upper mantle ; Variation ; Volcanic fields ; Wave attenuation</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2021-07, Vol.126 (7), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3681-c7b4566ec17501982a136b3ee9e543f4631001fc0fb95dc4c44e3711bd1b13593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3681-c7b4566ec17501982a136b3ee9e543f4631001fc0fb95dc4c44e3711bd1b13593</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0704-2097 ; 0000-0002-4373-646X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021JB021653$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021JB021653$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soto Castaneda, R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abers, G. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eilon, Z. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, D. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Teleseismic Attenuation, Temperature, and Melt of the Upper Mantle in the Alaska Subduction Zone</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><description>Seismic deployments in the Alaska subduction zone provide dense sampling of the seismic wavefield that constrains thermal structure and subduction geometry. We measure P and S attenuation from pairwise amplitude and phase spectral ratios for teleseismic body waves at 206 stations from regional and short‐term arrays. Parallel teleseismic travel‐time measurements provide information on seismic velocities at the same scale. These data show consistently low attenuation over the forearc of subduction systems and high attenuation over the arc and backarc, similar to local‐earthquake attenuation studies but at 10× lower frequencies. The pattern is seen both across the area of normal Pacific subduction in Cook Inlet, and across the Wrangell Volcanic Field where subduction has been debated. These observations confirm subduction‐dominated thermal regime beneath the latter. Travel times show evidence for subducting lithosphere much deeper than seismicity, while attenuation measurements appear mostly reflective of mantle temperature less than 150 km deep, depths where the mantle is closest to its solidus and where subduction‐related melting may take place. Travel times show strong delays over thick sedimentary basins. Attenuation signals show no evidence of absorption by basins, although some basins show signals anomalously rich in high‐frequency energy, with consequent negative apparent attenuation. Outside of basins, these data are consistent with mantle attenuation in the upper 220 km that is quantitatively similar to observations from surface waves and local‐earthquake body waves. Differences between P and S attenuation suggest primarily shear‐modulus relaxation. Overall the attenuation measurements show consistent, coherent subduction‐related structure, complementary to travel times.
Plain Language Summary
Seismic waves lose more energy passing through hot and partly molten volumes than cold regions. As a result, measurements of variation in their amplitudes, or attenuation, provides a tool for mapping out the upper mantle, complementing more traditional measurements of their variation in travel time. New high‐quality arrays across southern Alaska, along with recent methodological developments, now allow this measurement to be made systematically across the entire region. They show consistently low attenuation where subducting plates are near the surface or along paths that follow the cold subducting plates. These regions are in southernmost Alaska. By contrast, signals traveling beneath volcanic regions or north of them, where hot mantle flows toward subduction zones, show high attenuation. The attenuation patterns resemble those from travel time, but seem to show more sensitivity to the upper 150 km of the Earth while travel time delays more uniformly sample deeper. Sedimentary basins show confusing signals, with travel time delays as expected for low‐wavespeed sediments, but high amplitudes that are difficult to explain. These signals allow quantitative mapping of temperature and melt variations in the upper mantle, even in regions as complex as subduction zones where both properties vary rapidly over short distances.
Key Points
Body‐wave attenuation measurements reveal upper mantle structure, including subducting plates and the Alaskan sub‐/back‐arc
The Wrangell Volcanic Field is underlain by Yakutat subduction, but geometry is complex
Sedimentary basins unexpectedly produce negative apparent attenuation in body‐wave spectra</description><subject>Alaska</subject><subject>Amplitudes</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Attenuation</subject><subject>Body waves</subject><subject>Cold regions</subject><subject>Earth mantle</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>imaging</subject><subject>Lithosphere</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>P-waves</subject><subject>Plates (tectonics)</subject><subject>Sedimentary basins</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic velocities</subject><subject>Seismic waves</subject><subject>Seismicity</subject><subject>Solidus</subject><subject>Subduction</subject><subject>Subduction (geology)</subject><subject>Subduction zones</subject><subject>Surface waves</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Thermal structure</subject><subject>Time measurement</subject><subject>Timing</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Travel time</subject><subject>Upper mantle</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>Volcanic fields</subject><subject>Wave attenuation</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFOwzAMhiMEEtPYjQeIxHWFuGna5rhNMJg2IcF24VLS1BUdXVuSVGhvT8YQ4oQP_i37k239hFwCuwYWypuQhbCY-hQLfkIGXmUguYhPf2vg52Rk7Zb5SH0LogF5XWONFiu7qzSdOIdNr1zVNmO6xl2HRrne4JiqpqArrB1tS-rekG46P6Mr1bgaadV89ya1su-KPvd50evDDvrSNnhBzkpVWxz96JBs7m7Xs_tg-Th_mE2WgeJxCoFO8kjEMWpIBAOZhgp4nHNEiSLiZRRzYAxKzcpcikJHOoqQJwB5ATlwIfmQXB33dqb96NG6bNv2pvEns1AIIRPJk9RT4yOlTWutwTLrTLVTZp8Byw42Zn9t9Dg_4p9Vjft_2Wwxf5oK_zvwLy5HcaU</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Soto Castaneda, R. A.</creator><creator>Abers, G. A.</creator><creator>Eilon, Z. C.</creator><creator>Christensen, D. H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0704-2097</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4373-646X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Teleseismic Attenuation, Temperature, and Melt of the Upper Mantle in the Alaska Subduction Zone</title><author>Soto Castaneda, R. A. ; Abers, G. A. ; Eilon, Z. C. ; Christensen, D. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3681-c7b4566ec17501982a136b3ee9e543f4631001fc0fb95dc4c44e3711bd1b13593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alaska</topic><topic>Amplitudes</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Attenuation</topic><topic>Body waves</topic><topic>Cold regions</topic><topic>Earth mantle</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>imaging</topic><topic>Lithosphere</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>P-waves</topic><topic>Plates (tectonics)</topic><topic>Sedimentary basins</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic velocities</topic><topic>Seismic waves</topic><topic>Seismicity</topic><topic>Solidus</topic><topic>Subduction</topic><topic>Subduction (geology)</topic><topic>Subduction zones</topic><topic>Surface waves</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Thermal structure</topic><topic>Time measurement</topic><topic>Timing</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Travel time</topic><topic>Upper mantle</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>Volcanic fields</topic><topic>Wave attenuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soto Castaneda, R. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abers, G. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eilon, Z. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, D. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soto Castaneda, R. A.</au><au>Abers, G. A.</au><au>Eilon, Z. C.</au><au>Christensen, D. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Teleseismic Attenuation, Temperature, and Melt of the Upper Mantle in the Alaska Subduction Zone</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>7</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>Seismic deployments in the Alaska subduction zone provide dense sampling of the seismic wavefield that constrains thermal structure and subduction geometry. We measure P and S attenuation from pairwise amplitude and phase spectral ratios for teleseismic body waves at 206 stations from regional and short‐term arrays. Parallel teleseismic travel‐time measurements provide information on seismic velocities at the same scale. These data show consistently low attenuation over the forearc of subduction systems and high attenuation over the arc and backarc, similar to local‐earthquake attenuation studies but at 10× lower frequencies. The pattern is seen both across the area of normal Pacific subduction in Cook Inlet, and across the Wrangell Volcanic Field where subduction has been debated. These observations confirm subduction‐dominated thermal regime beneath the latter. Travel times show evidence for subducting lithosphere much deeper than seismicity, while attenuation measurements appear mostly reflective of mantle temperature less than 150 km deep, depths where the mantle is closest to its solidus and where subduction‐related melting may take place. Travel times show strong delays over thick sedimentary basins. Attenuation signals show no evidence of absorption by basins, although some basins show signals anomalously rich in high‐frequency energy, with consequent negative apparent attenuation. Outside of basins, these data are consistent with mantle attenuation in the upper 220 km that is quantitatively similar to observations from surface waves and local‐earthquake body waves. Differences between P and S attenuation suggest primarily shear‐modulus relaxation. Overall the attenuation measurements show consistent, coherent subduction‐related structure, complementary to travel times.
Plain Language Summary
Seismic waves lose more energy passing through hot and partly molten volumes than cold regions. As a result, measurements of variation in their amplitudes, or attenuation, provides a tool for mapping out the upper mantle, complementing more traditional measurements of their variation in travel time. New high‐quality arrays across southern Alaska, along with recent methodological developments, now allow this measurement to be made systematically across the entire region. They show consistently low attenuation where subducting plates are near the surface or along paths that follow the cold subducting plates. These regions are in southernmost Alaska. By contrast, signals traveling beneath volcanic regions or north of them, where hot mantle flows toward subduction zones, show high attenuation. The attenuation patterns resemble those from travel time, but seem to show more sensitivity to the upper 150 km of the Earth while travel time delays more uniformly sample deeper. Sedimentary basins show confusing signals, with travel time delays as expected for low‐wavespeed sediments, but high amplitudes that are difficult to explain. These signals allow quantitative mapping of temperature and melt variations in the upper mantle, even in regions as complex as subduction zones where both properties vary rapidly over short distances.
Key Points
Body‐wave attenuation measurements reveal upper mantle structure, including subducting plates and the Alaskan sub‐/back‐arc
The Wrangell Volcanic Field is underlain by Yakutat subduction, but geometry is complex
Sedimentary basins unexpectedly produce negative apparent attenuation in body‐wave spectra</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2021JB021653</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0704-2097</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4373-646X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9313 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2021-07, Vol.126 (7), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-9313 2169-9356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2555979378 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content |
subjects | Alaska Amplitudes Arrays Attenuation Body waves Cold regions Earth mantle Earthquakes Geophysics imaging Lithosphere Mapping P-waves Plates (tectonics) Sedimentary basins Sediments Seismic activity Seismic velocities Seismic waves Seismicity Solidus Subduction Subduction (geology) Subduction zones Surface waves Temperature Thermal structure Time measurement Timing Travel Travel time Upper mantle Variation Volcanic fields Wave attenuation |
title | Teleseismic Attenuation, Temperature, and Melt of the Upper Mantle in the Alaska Subduction Zone |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A06%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teleseismic%20Attenuation,%20Temperature,%20and%20Melt%20of%20the%20Upper%20Mantle%20in%20the%20Alaska%20Subduction%20Zone&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Soto%20Castaneda,%20R.%20A.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=7&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021JB021653&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2555979378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2555979378&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |