Partially protected areas as a management tool on inshore reefs
Partially Protected Areas (PPAs) are a widely-used management tool, yet comparatively little is known about their effectiveness compared to more commonly studied No-Take Marine Reserves (NTMRs). Here, we examine the efficacy of two kinds of PPAs (with and without spearfishing) within the Great Barri...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Reviews in fish biology and fisheries 2021-09, Vol.31 (3), p.631-651 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 651 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 631 |
| container_title | Reviews in fish biology and fisheries |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Hall, April E. Cameron, Darren S. Kingsford, Michael J. |
| description | Partially Protected Areas (PPAs) are a widely-used management tool, yet comparatively little is known about their effectiveness compared to more commonly studied No-Take Marine Reserves (NTMRs). Here, we examine the efficacy of two kinds of PPAs (with and without spearfishing) within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP) that are subject to a range of fishing limitations, and assess their utility as a marine park zoning and fisheries management tool. Fish abundance, size, and habitat composition were compared inside PPAs and NTMRs on inshore reefs of the central GBR. Fish abundances were lower inside PPAs relative to adjacent NTMRs for primary fishing targets, with no detectable effects for secondary targets and non-targets, or for species richness. Fish assemblages differed amongst zones, but these variations were minor compared to regional variations in species composition. Partially Protected Areas supported 46%–69% of the relative abundance of total primary targets compared to adjacent NTMRs, with no evident increase in abundance in zones where spearfishing was prohibited. There were no reductions in the size of two key target species: coral trout (
Plectropomus
spp.) and stripey snapper (
Lutjanus carponotatus
) inside PPAs, and only stripey snapper had significant reductions in abundance inside PPAs compared to NTMRS. Habitat and biophysical characteristics (especially topographic complexity) were strong drivers of fish abundance, but the relative influence of zone was greater for target species compared to non-targets. This study provides novel data on PPAs and highlights their utility as a spatial management tool in contributing to conservation and fisheries management goals. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11160-021-09654-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2554675090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2554675090</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7660908592eca21c8a1f63dc1d9fc741696ad89422afcb4b6f6db6b479e694a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4CngOZrZTSabk0jRKhT0oOeQzSa1Zbtbk-1h397UFbwJgYHwf_8MHyHXwG-Bc3WXAAA54wUwrlEKNp6QGUhVMgmVOCWz_MtZCYjn5CKlLecZkzgj9282DhvbtiPdx37wbvANtdHbRI-P7mxn137nu4EOfd_SvqObLn320dPofUiX5CzYNvmr3zknH0-P74tntnpdviweVsyVoAemELnmldSFd7YAV1kIWDYOGh2cEoAabVNpURQ2uFrUGLCpsRZKe9TCqnJObqbefOXXwafBbPtD7PJKU0gpUMncn1PFlHKxTyn6YPZxs7NxNMDNUZSZRJksyvyIMmOGyglKOdytffyr_of6BptKa1Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2554675090</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Partially protected areas as a management tool on inshore reefs</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Hall, April E. ; Cameron, Darren S. ; Kingsford, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hall, April E. ; Cameron, Darren S. ; Kingsford, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>Partially Protected Areas (PPAs) are a widely-used management tool, yet comparatively little is known about their effectiveness compared to more commonly studied No-Take Marine Reserves (NTMRs). Here, we examine the efficacy of two kinds of PPAs (with and without spearfishing) within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP) that are subject to a range of fishing limitations, and assess their utility as a marine park zoning and fisheries management tool. Fish abundance, size, and habitat composition were compared inside PPAs and NTMRs on inshore reefs of the central GBR. Fish abundances were lower inside PPAs relative to adjacent NTMRs for primary fishing targets, with no detectable effects for secondary targets and non-targets, or for species richness. Fish assemblages differed amongst zones, but these variations were minor compared to regional variations in species composition. Partially Protected Areas supported 46%–69% of the relative abundance of total primary targets compared to adjacent NTMRs, with no evident increase in abundance in zones where spearfishing was prohibited. There were no reductions in the size of two key target species: coral trout (
Plectropomus
spp.) and stripey snapper (
Lutjanus carponotatus
) inside PPAs, and only stripey snapper had significant reductions in abundance inside PPAs compared to NTMRS. Habitat and biophysical characteristics (especially topographic complexity) were strong drivers of fish abundance, but the relative influence of zone was greater for target species compared to non-targets. This study provides novel data on PPAs and highlights their utility as a spatial management tool in contributing to conservation and fisheries management goals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3166</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11160-021-09654-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Barrier reefs ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Community composition ; Composition ; Fish ; Fisheries ; Fisheries management ; Fishery management ; Fishing ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Freshwater fishes ; Habitats ; Life Sciences ; Lutjanus carponotatus ; Marine fisheries ; Marine fishes ; Marine invertebrates ; Marine parks ; Moratoria ; Original Research ; Plectropomus ; Protected areas ; Protected species ; Reefs ; Regional variations ; Relative abundance ; Spear fishing ; Species composition ; Species richness ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Reviews in fish biology and fisheries, 2021-09, Vol.31 (3), p.631-651</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7660908592eca21c8a1f63dc1d9fc741696ad89422afcb4b6f6db6b479e694a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7660908592eca21c8a1f63dc1d9fc741696ad89422afcb4b6f6db6b479e694a73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3672-2761</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11160-021-09654-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11160-021-09654-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hall, April E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Darren S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsford, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>Partially protected areas as a management tool on inshore reefs</title><title>Reviews in fish biology and fisheries</title><addtitle>Rev Fish Biol Fisheries</addtitle><description>Partially Protected Areas (PPAs) are a widely-used management tool, yet comparatively little is known about their effectiveness compared to more commonly studied No-Take Marine Reserves (NTMRs). Here, we examine the efficacy of two kinds of PPAs (with and without spearfishing) within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP) that are subject to a range of fishing limitations, and assess their utility as a marine park zoning and fisheries management tool. Fish abundance, size, and habitat composition were compared inside PPAs and NTMRs on inshore reefs of the central GBR. Fish abundances were lower inside PPAs relative to adjacent NTMRs for primary fishing targets, with no detectable effects for secondary targets and non-targets, or for species richness. Fish assemblages differed amongst zones, but these variations were minor compared to regional variations in species composition. Partially Protected Areas supported 46%–69% of the relative abundance of total primary targets compared to adjacent NTMRs, with no evident increase in abundance in zones where spearfishing was prohibited. There were no reductions in the size of two key target species: coral trout (
Plectropomus
spp.) and stripey snapper (
Lutjanus carponotatus
) inside PPAs, and only stripey snapper had significant reductions in abundance inside PPAs compared to NTMRS. Habitat and biophysical characteristics (especially topographic complexity) were strong drivers of fish abundance, but the relative influence of zone was greater for target species compared to non-targets. This study provides novel data on PPAs and highlights their utility as a spatial management tool in contributing to conservation and fisheries management goals.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Barrier reefs</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Fishery management</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lutjanus carponotatus</subject><subject>Marine fisheries</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Marine invertebrates</subject><subject>Marine parks</subject><subject>Moratoria</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Plectropomus</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Protected species</subject><subject>Reefs</subject><subject>Regional variations</subject><subject>Relative abundance</subject><subject>Spear fishing</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0960-3166</issn><issn>1573-5184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4CngOZrZTSabk0jRKhT0oOeQzSa1Zbtbk-1h397UFbwJgYHwf_8MHyHXwG-Bc3WXAAA54wUwrlEKNp6QGUhVMgmVOCWz_MtZCYjn5CKlLecZkzgj9282DhvbtiPdx37wbvANtdHbRI-P7mxn137nu4EOfd_SvqObLn320dPofUiX5CzYNvmr3zknH0-P74tntnpdviweVsyVoAemELnmldSFd7YAV1kIWDYOGh2cEoAabVNpURQ2uFrUGLCpsRZKe9TCqnJObqbefOXXwafBbPtD7PJKU0gpUMncn1PFlHKxTyn6YPZxs7NxNMDNUZSZRJksyvyIMmOGyglKOdytffyr_of6BptKa1Y</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Hall, April E.</creator><creator>Cameron, Darren S.</creator><creator>Kingsford, Michael J.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3672-2761</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Partially protected areas as a management tool on inshore reefs</title><author>Hall, April E. ; Cameron, Darren S. ; Kingsford, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-7660908592eca21c8a1f63dc1d9fc741696ad89422afcb4b6f6db6b479e694a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Barrier reefs</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Fishery management</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lutjanus carponotatus</topic><topic>Marine fisheries</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Marine invertebrates</topic><topic>Marine parks</topic><topic>Moratoria</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Plectropomus</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Protected species</topic><topic>Reefs</topic><topic>Regional variations</topic><topic>Relative abundance</topic><topic>Spear fishing</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hall, April E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Darren S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsford, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Reviews in fish biology and fisheries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hall, April E.</au><au>Cameron, Darren S.</au><au>Kingsford, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Partially protected areas as a management tool on inshore reefs</atitle><jtitle>Reviews in fish biology and fisheries</jtitle><stitle>Rev Fish Biol Fisheries</stitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>631</spage><epage>651</epage><pages>631-651</pages><issn>0960-3166</issn><eissn>1573-5184</eissn><abstract>Partially Protected Areas (PPAs) are a widely-used management tool, yet comparatively little is known about their effectiveness compared to more commonly studied No-Take Marine Reserves (NTMRs). Here, we examine the efficacy of two kinds of PPAs (with and without spearfishing) within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP) that are subject to a range of fishing limitations, and assess their utility as a marine park zoning and fisheries management tool. Fish abundance, size, and habitat composition were compared inside PPAs and NTMRs on inshore reefs of the central GBR. Fish abundances were lower inside PPAs relative to adjacent NTMRs for primary fishing targets, with no detectable effects for secondary targets and non-targets, or for species richness. Fish assemblages differed amongst zones, but these variations were minor compared to regional variations in species composition. Partially Protected Areas supported 46%–69% of the relative abundance of total primary targets compared to adjacent NTMRs, with no evident increase in abundance in zones where spearfishing was prohibited. There were no reductions in the size of two key target species: coral trout (
Plectropomus
spp.) and stripey snapper (
Lutjanus carponotatus
) inside PPAs, and only stripey snapper had significant reductions in abundance inside PPAs compared to NTMRS. Habitat and biophysical characteristics (especially topographic complexity) were strong drivers of fish abundance, but the relative influence of zone was greater for target species compared to non-targets. This study provides novel data on PPAs and highlights their utility as a spatial management tool in contributing to conservation and fisheries management goals.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11160-021-09654-y</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3672-2761</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0960-3166 |
| ispartof | Reviews in fish biology and fisheries, 2021-09, Vol.31 (3), p.631-651 |
| issn | 0960-3166 1573-5184 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2554675090 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Abundance Barrier reefs Biomedical and Life Sciences Community composition Composition Fish Fisheries Fisheries management Fishery management Fishing Freshwater & Marine Ecology Freshwater fishes Habitats Life Sciences Lutjanus carponotatus Marine fisheries Marine fishes Marine invertebrates Marine parks Moratoria Original Research Plectropomus Protected areas Protected species Reefs Regional variations Relative abundance Spear fishing Species composition Species richness Zoology |
| title | Partially protected areas as a management tool on inshore reefs |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A40%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Partially%20protected%20areas%20as%20a%20management%20tool%20on%20inshore%20reefs&rft.jtitle=Reviews%20in%20fish%20biology%20and%20fisheries&rft.au=Hall,%20April%20E.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=631&rft.epage=651&rft.pages=631-651&rft.issn=0960-3166&rft.eissn=1573-5184&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11160-021-09654-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2554675090%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2554675090&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |