Evaluation of Long-Term Shortleaf Pine Progeny Tests in the Ouachita and Ozark National Forests, USA
Between the late 1970s and the early 1990s, the USDA Forest Service installed 155 shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) progeny tests in national forests across the Southern Region of the United States. Using control-pollinated crosses from the Mount Ida Seed Orchard, 84 of these progeny tests were...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forests 2021-07, Vol.12 (7), p.953 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 953 |
container_title | Forests |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Hossain, Shaik M. Bragg, Don C. McDaniel, Virginia L. Pike, Carolyn C. Crane, Barbara S. Nelson, C. Dana |
description | Between the late 1970s and the early 1990s, the USDA Forest Service installed 155 shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) progeny tests in national forests across the Southern Region of the United States. Using control-pollinated crosses from the Mount Ida Seed Orchard, 84 of these progeny tests were established in the Ouachita and Ozark-St. Francis National Forests in Arkansas and Oklahoma. Each of these 84 test locations had, on average, 33 full-sibling families representing three local geographic seed sources (East Ouachita, West Ouachita, and Ozark). Though largely abandoned years ago, the progeny tests that remain provided an opportunity to determine if significant genetic and genetic × environment variance exists for performance traits (d.b.h., tree height, and survival) decades after installation. In 2018 and 2019, we remeasured d.b.h. and height and determined survival in 15 fully stocked progeny tests. Family variances were significant (p < 0.01) for both d.b.h. and height but not for survival (p > 0.05). Seed sources differed significantly (p < 0.05) for d.b.h., with more pronounced latitudinal differences. Additionally, we determined that individual tree and full-sibling family mean heritabilities were moderate (0.15 and 0.72, respectively, for d.b.h and 0.09 and 0.41, for height), suggesting relatively high genetic to environmental variation and good potential for genetic improvement. We also found that shortleaf pine families were broadly adapted in this region since family-by-test variances were non-significant (p > 0.05). |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/f12070953 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2554516261</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2554516261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-99d10c328c49cf6710e8b2cc16105f6b7779aab804eb334883e27688e24f8fc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9LAzEUxIMoWGoPfoMHngRX8283ybGUVoViC23PSzZN2q3bTU12hfrp3VoR32Xe4cfMMAjdEvzImMJPjlAssErZBeoRpVTCFRaX__5rNIhxh7tLhVSU99B6_KmrVjelr8E7mPp6kyxt2MNi60NTWe1gXtYW5sFvbH2EpY1NhLKGZmth1mqzLRsNul7D7EuHd3j7sdIVTHw4oQ-wWgxv0JXTVbSDX-2j1WS8HL0k09nz62g4TQxNaZMotSbYMCoNV8ZlgmArC2oMyQhOXVYIIZTWhcTcFoxxKZmlIpPSUu6kM4z10d3Z9xD8R9vF5zvfhq5NzGma8pRkNCMddX-mTPAxBuvyQyj3OhxzgvPTjvnfjuwbfIRjGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2554516261</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Long-Term Shortleaf Pine Progeny Tests in the Ouachita and Ozark National Forests, USA</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hossain, Shaik M. ; Bragg, Don C. ; McDaniel, Virginia L. ; Pike, Carolyn C. ; Crane, Barbara S. ; Nelson, C. Dana</creator><creatorcontrib>Hossain, Shaik M. ; Bragg, Don C. ; McDaniel, Virginia L. ; Pike, Carolyn C. ; Crane, Barbara S. ; Nelson, C. Dana</creatorcontrib><description>Between the late 1970s and the early 1990s, the USDA Forest Service installed 155 shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) progeny tests in national forests across the Southern Region of the United States. Using control-pollinated crosses from the Mount Ida Seed Orchard, 84 of these progeny tests were established in the Ouachita and Ozark-St. Francis National Forests in Arkansas and Oklahoma. Each of these 84 test locations had, on average, 33 full-sibling families representing three local geographic seed sources (East Ouachita, West Ouachita, and Ozark). Though largely abandoned years ago, the progeny tests that remain provided an opportunity to determine if significant genetic and genetic × environment variance exists for performance traits (d.b.h., tree height, and survival) decades after installation. In 2018 and 2019, we remeasured d.b.h. and height and determined survival in 15 fully stocked progeny tests. Family variances were significant (p < 0.01) for both d.b.h. and height but not for survival (p > 0.05). Seed sources differed significantly (p < 0.05) for d.b.h., with more pronounced latitudinal differences. Additionally, we determined that individual tree and full-sibling family mean heritabilities were moderate (0.15 and 0.72, respectively, for d.b.h and 0.09 and 0.41, for height), suggesting relatively high genetic to environmental variation and good potential for genetic improvement. We also found that shortleaf pine families were broadly adapted in this region since family-by-test variances were non-significant (p > 0.05).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/f12070953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Forests ; Genetic crosses ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic improvement ; National forests ; Offspring ; Pine ; Pine trees ; Pinus echinata ; Precipitation ; Progeny ; Rain ; Reforestation ; Seed orchards ; Source studies ; Survival ; Timber ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Forests, 2021-07, Vol.12 (7), p.953</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-99d10c328c49cf6710e8b2cc16105f6b7779aab804eb334883e27688e24f8fc33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4450-9338</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hossain, Shaik M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bragg, Don C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDaniel, Virginia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pike, Carolyn C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Barbara S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, C. Dana</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Long-Term Shortleaf Pine Progeny Tests in the Ouachita and Ozark National Forests, USA</title><title>Forests</title><description>Between the late 1970s and the early 1990s, the USDA Forest Service installed 155 shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) progeny tests in national forests across the Southern Region of the United States. Using control-pollinated crosses from the Mount Ida Seed Orchard, 84 of these progeny tests were established in the Ouachita and Ozark-St. Francis National Forests in Arkansas and Oklahoma. Each of these 84 test locations had, on average, 33 full-sibling families representing three local geographic seed sources (East Ouachita, West Ouachita, and Ozark). Though largely abandoned years ago, the progeny tests that remain provided an opportunity to determine if significant genetic and genetic × environment variance exists for performance traits (d.b.h., tree height, and survival) decades after installation. In 2018 and 2019, we remeasured d.b.h. and height and determined survival in 15 fully stocked progeny tests. Family variances were significant (p < 0.01) for both d.b.h. and height but not for survival (p > 0.05). Seed sources differed significantly (p < 0.05) for d.b.h., with more pronounced latitudinal differences. Additionally, we determined that individual tree and full-sibling family mean heritabilities were moderate (0.15 and 0.72, respectively, for d.b.h and 0.09 and 0.41, for height), suggesting relatively high genetic to environmental variation and good potential for genetic improvement. We also found that shortleaf pine families were broadly adapted in this region since family-by-test variances were non-significant (p > 0.05).</description><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Genetic crosses</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic improvement</subject><subject>National forests</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Pine</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus echinata</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Progeny</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Reforestation</subject><subject>Seed orchards</subject><subject>Source studies</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>1999-4907</issn><issn>1999-4907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9LAzEUxIMoWGoPfoMHngRX8283ybGUVoViC23PSzZN2q3bTU12hfrp3VoR32Xe4cfMMAjdEvzImMJPjlAssErZBeoRpVTCFRaX__5rNIhxh7tLhVSU99B6_KmrVjelr8E7mPp6kyxt2MNi60NTWe1gXtYW5sFvbH2EpY1NhLKGZmth1mqzLRsNul7D7EuHd3j7sdIVTHw4oQ-wWgxv0JXTVbSDX-2j1WS8HL0k09nz62g4TQxNaZMotSbYMCoNV8ZlgmArC2oMyQhOXVYIIZTWhcTcFoxxKZmlIpPSUu6kM4z10d3Z9xD8R9vF5zvfhq5NzGma8pRkNCMddX-mTPAxBuvyQyj3OhxzgvPTjvnfjuwbfIRjGg</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Hossain, Shaik M.</creator><creator>Bragg, Don C.</creator><creator>McDaniel, Virginia L.</creator><creator>Pike, Carolyn C.</creator><creator>Crane, Barbara S.</creator><creator>Nelson, C. Dana</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4450-9338</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Long-Term Shortleaf Pine Progeny Tests in the Ouachita and Ozark National Forests, USA</title><author>Hossain, Shaik M. ; Bragg, Don C. ; McDaniel, Virginia L. ; Pike, Carolyn C. ; Crane, Barbara S. ; Nelson, C. Dana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-99d10c328c49cf6710e8b2cc16105f6b7779aab804eb334883e27688e24f8fc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Genetic crosses</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic improvement</topic><topic>National forests</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Pine</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus echinata</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Progeny</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Reforestation</topic><topic>Seed orchards</topic><topic>Source studies</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hossain, Shaik M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bragg, Don C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDaniel, Virginia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pike, Carolyn C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Barbara S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, C. Dana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Forests</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hossain, Shaik M.</au><au>Bragg, Don C.</au><au>McDaniel, Virginia L.</au><au>Pike, Carolyn C.</au><au>Crane, Barbara S.</au><au>Nelson, C. Dana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Long-Term Shortleaf Pine Progeny Tests in the Ouachita and Ozark National Forests, USA</atitle><jtitle>Forests</jtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>953</spage><pages>953-</pages><issn>1999-4907</issn><eissn>1999-4907</eissn><abstract>Between the late 1970s and the early 1990s, the USDA Forest Service installed 155 shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) progeny tests in national forests across the Southern Region of the United States. Using control-pollinated crosses from the Mount Ida Seed Orchard, 84 of these progeny tests were established in the Ouachita and Ozark-St. Francis National Forests in Arkansas and Oklahoma. Each of these 84 test locations had, on average, 33 full-sibling families representing three local geographic seed sources (East Ouachita, West Ouachita, and Ozark). Though largely abandoned years ago, the progeny tests that remain provided an opportunity to determine if significant genetic and genetic × environment variance exists for performance traits (d.b.h., tree height, and survival) decades after installation. In 2018 and 2019, we remeasured d.b.h. and height and determined survival in 15 fully stocked progeny tests. Family variances were significant (p < 0.01) for both d.b.h. and height but not for survival (p > 0.05). Seed sources differed significantly (p < 0.05) for d.b.h., with more pronounced latitudinal differences. Additionally, we determined that individual tree and full-sibling family mean heritabilities were moderate (0.15 and 0.72, respectively, for d.b.h and 0.09 and 0.41, for height), suggesting relatively high genetic to environmental variation and good potential for genetic improvement. We also found that shortleaf pine families were broadly adapted in this region since family-by-test variances were non-significant (p > 0.05).</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/f12070953</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4450-9338</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1999-4907 |
ispartof | Forests, 2021-07, Vol.12 (7), p.953 |
issn | 1999-4907 1999-4907 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2554516261 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Forests Genetic crosses Genetic diversity Genetic improvement National forests Offspring Pine Pine trees Pinus echinata Precipitation Progeny Rain Reforestation Seed orchards Source studies Survival Timber Trees |
title | Evaluation of Long-Term Shortleaf Pine Progeny Tests in the Ouachita and Ozark National Forests, USA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A19%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Long-Term%20Shortleaf%20Pine%20Progeny%20Tests%20in%20the%20Ouachita%20and%20Ozark%20National%20Forests,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Forests&rft.au=Hossain,%20Shaik%20M.&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=953&rft.pages=953-&rft.issn=1999-4907&rft.eissn=1999-4907&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/f12070953&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2554516261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2554516261&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |