Comparison of entry age normal and projected unit credit method for funding of defined benefit pension plan

In this modern age, the quality of life of a person is always improving. This leads to longer lifespans, hence resulting in a longer pension period for that individual. Pension programs are therefore needed more than ever so that a person can receive a benefit after they retire and maintain the same...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Angkasa, A. P., Lestari, D., Devila, S.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 2374
creator Angkasa, A. P.
Lestari, D.
Devila, S.
description In this modern age, the quality of life of a person is always improving. This leads to longer lifespans, hence resulting in a longer pension period for that individual. Pension programs are therefore needed more than ever so that a person can receive a benefit after they retire and maintain the same quality of life they had before they retired. The topic of this paper is comparing the entry age normal and projected unit credit method for funding of a defined benefit pension plan. The entry age normal method uses the concept of projecting the benefit that will be earned at the end of an employee’s career. The projected unit credit method uses the concept of benefits accrued to the date of normal cost determination. From the data simulation it can be concluded that the projected unit credit method results in a smaller normal cost compared to the entry age normal method and the projected unit credit method results in a greater actuarial liability compared to the entry age normal method.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0059248
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2554481707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2554481707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p133t-8e9d42303ac30b9714ff9fafa294d252258980c4dc10a33d4e6fac1ea43aed313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LAzEURYMoWKsL_0HAnTA1nzOTpRStQsGNgrvhdfJSp3aSMZNZ9N-b0q7uWxzOu1xC7jlbcFbKJ71gTBuh6gsy41rzoip5eUlmjBlVCCW_r8nNOO4YE6aq6hn5XYZ-gNiNwdPgKPoUDxS2SH2IPewpeEuHGHbYJrR08l2ibUSbo8f0Eyx1IVI3edv57VFg0XU-kxv0-Up0QD922T3swd-SKwf7Ee_OOSdfry-fy7di_bF6Xz6vi4FLmYoajVVCMgmtZBtTceWcceBAGGWFFkLXpmatsi1nIKVVWDpoOYKSgFZyOScPJ28u_jfhmJpdmKLPLxuhtVI1r1iVqccTNbZdgpRLNkPseoiHhrPmOGajm_OY8h-iFmeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2554481707</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparison of entry age normal and projected unit credit method for funding of defined benefit pension plan</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Angkasa, A. P. ; Lestari, D. ; Devila, S.</creator><contributor>Lee, Youngil ; Alias, Yatimah Binti ; Ivandini, Tribidasari A ; Margules, Chris ; Churchill, David G</contributor><creatorcontrib>Angkasa, A. P. ; Lestari, D. ; Devila, S. ; Lee, Youngil ; Alias, Yatimah Binti ; Ivandini, Tribidasari A ; Margules, Chris ; Churchill, David G</creatorcontrib><description>In this modern age, the quality of life of a person is always improving. This leads to longer lifespans, hence resulting in a longer pension period for that individual. Pension programs are therefore needed more than ever so that a person can receive a benefit after they retire and maintain the same quality of life they had before they retired. The topic of this paper is comparing the entry age normal and projected unit credit method for funding of a defined benefit pension plan. The entry age normal method uses the concept of projecting the benefit that will be earned at the end of an employee’s career. The projected unit credit method uses the concept of benefits accrued to the date of normal cost determination. From the data simulation it can be concluded that the projected unit credit method results in a smaller normal cost compared to the entry age normal method and the projected unit credit method results in a greater actuarial liability compared to the entry age normal method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0059248</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Age ; Data simulation ; Funding ; Liability ; Pension plans ; Quality of life</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2021, Vol.2374 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2021 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0059248$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,790,4498,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,76127</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Lee, Youngil</contributor><contributor>Alias, Yatimah Binti</contributor><contributor>Ivandini, Tribidasari A</contributor><contributor>Margules, Chris</contributor><contributor>Churchill, David G</contributor><creatorcontrib>Angkasa, A. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lestari, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devila, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of entry age normal and projected unit credit method for funding of defined benefit pension plan</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>In this modern age, the quality of life of a person is always improving. This leads to longer lifespans, hence resulting in a longer pension period for that individual. Pension programs are therefore needed more than ever so that a person can receive a benefit after they retire and maintain the same quality of life they had before they retired. The topic of this paper is comparing the entry age normal and projected unit credit method for funding of a defined benefit pension plan. The entry age normal method uses the concept of projecting the benefit that will be earned at the end of an employee’s career. The projected unit credit method uses the concept of benefits accrued to the date of normal cost determination. From the data simulation it can be concluded that the projected unit credit method results in a smaller normal cost compared to the entry age normal method and the projected unit credit method results in a greater actuarial liability compared to the entry age normal method.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Data simulation</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Pension plans</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1LAzEURYMoWKsL_0HAnTA1nzOTpRStQsGNgrvhdfJSp3aSMZNZ9N-b0q7uWxzOu1xC7jlbcFbKJ71gTBuh6gsy41rzoip5eUlmjBlVCCW_r8nNOO4YE6aq6hn5XYZ-gNiNwdPgKPoUDxS2SH2IPewpeEuHGHbYJrR08l2ibUSbo8f0Eyx1IVI3edv57VFg0XU-kxv0-Up0QD922T3swd-SKwf7Ee_OOSdfry-fy7di_bF6Xz6vi4FLmYoajVVCMgmtZBtTceWcceBAGGWFFkLXpmatsi1nIKVVWDpoOYKSgFZyOScPJ28u_jfhmJpdmKLPLxuhtVI1r1iVqccTNbZdgpRLNkPseoiHhrPmOGajm_OY8h-iFmeQ</recordid><startdate>20210723</startdate><enddate>20210723</enddate><creator>Angkasa, A. P.</creator><creator>Lestari, D.</creator><creator>Devila, S.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210723</creationdate><title>Comparison of entry age normal and projected unit credit method for funding of defined benefit pension plan</title><author>Angkasa, A. P. ; Lestari, D. ; Devila, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p133t-8e9d42303ac30b9714ff9fafa294d252258980c4dc10a33d4e6fac1ea43aed313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Data simulation</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Pension plans</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Angkasa, A. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lestari, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devila, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Angkasa, A. P.</au><au>Lestari, D.</au><au>Devila, S.</au><au>Lee, Youngil</au><au>Alias, Yatimah Binti</au><au>Ivandini, Tribidasari A</au><au>Margules, Chris</au><au>Churchill, David G</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparison of entry age normal and projected unit credit method for funding of defined benefit pension plan</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2021-07-23</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>2374</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>In this modern age, the quality of life of a person is always improving. This leads to longer lifespans, hence resulting in a longer pension period for that individual. Pension programs are therefore needed more than ever so that a person can receive a benefit after they retire and maintain the same quality of life they had before they retired. The topic of this paper is comparing the entry age normal and projected unit credit method for funding of a defined benefit pension plan. The entry age normal method uses the concept of projecting the benefit that will be earned at the end of an employee’s career. The projected unit credit method uses the concept of benefits accrued to the date of normal cost determination. From the data simulation it can be concluded that the projected unit credit method results in a smaller normal cost compared to the entry age normal method and the projected unit credit method results in a greater actuarial liability compared to the entry age normal method.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0059248</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP conference proceedings, 2021, Vol.2374 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2554481707
source AIP Journals Complete
subjects Age
Data simulation
Funding
Liability
Pension plans
Quality of life
title Comparison of entry age normal and projected unit credit method for funding of defined benefit pension plan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A17%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20entry%20age%20normal%20and%20projected%20unit%20credit%20method%20for%20funding%20of%20defined%20benefit%20pension%20plan&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Angkasa,%20A.%20P.&rft.date=2021-07-23&rft.volume=2374&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0059248&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2554481707%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2554481707&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true