Building agroecology with people. Challenges of participatory methods to deepen on the agroecological transition in different contexts
•The diversity of stakeholders involved will determine the role of the research team and the results of the action – research process.•Rural and urban contexts differ in terms of actors, challenges involved, design requirements and results.•Farmers are usually disconsidered in urban or desagrarized...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of rural studies 2021-04, Vol.83, p.257-267 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 267 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 257 |
container_title | Journal of rural studies |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | López-García, Daniel Cuéllar-Padilla, Mamen de Azevedo Olival, Alexandre Laranjeira, Nina Paula Méndez, V. Ernesto Peredo y Parada, Santiago Barbosa, César Adriano Barrera Salas, Claudia Caswell, Martha Cohen, Roseann Correro-Humanes, Ana García-García, Verónica Gliessman, Stephen R. Pomar-León, Ariadna Sastre-Morató, Annaïs Tendero-Acín, Guillem |
description | •The diversity of stakeholders involved will determine the role of the research team and the results of the action – research process.•Rural and urban contexts differ in terms of actors, challenges involved, design requirements and results.•Farmers are usually disconsidered in urban or desagrarized contexts and require specific power management strategies.•Public policies stakeholders are involved in more complex processes, in terms of stakeholders involved and type of results.•The dialogue between academia and farmers is a challenge when building horizontal processes, whatever the context is. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2553853237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0743016721000486</els_id><sourcerecordid>2553853237</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-90cf045d3ea0741926e71610737fab7d348f5d59c61a825f25f9433411e001643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1KJDEUhYOMYI_6ChJwXWV-qipVO51mZhQEN7oOMbnpTlEmZZIa7RfwuY20wuyEC3dxzzmX8yF0RklNCe0uxnqMS0x5MTUjjNaE1YTwA7SiveAV5QP7gVZENLwqanGEfqY0EkIFGdgKvf1a3GSc32C1iQF0mMJmh19c3uIZwjxBjddbNU3gN5BwsHhWMTvtZpVD3OEnyNtgEs4BG4AZPA4e5y38l-a0mnCOyieXXbk6j42zFiL4jHXwGV5zOkGHVk0JTj_3MXr48_t-fV3d3v29WV_dVpr3fa4Goi1pWsNBlUJ0YB0I2lEiuLDqURje9LY17aA7qnrW2jJDw3lDKZTGXcOP0fk-d47heYGU5RiW6MtLydqW9y1nXBRVt1fpGFKKYOUc3ZOKO0mJ_GAuR_nFXH4wl4TJwrwYL_dGKB3-OYgyaQdeg3ERdJYmuO8i3gGzupCG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2553853237</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Building agroecology with people. Challenges of participatory methods to deepen on the agroecological transition in different contexts</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>López-García, Daniel ; Cuéllar-Padilla, Mamen ; de Azevedo Olival, Alexandre ; Laranjeira, Nina Paula ; Méndez, V. Ernesto ; Peredo y Parada, Santiago ; Barbosa, César Adriano ; Barrera Salas, Claudia ; Caswell, Martha ; Cohen, Roseann ; Correro-Humanes, Ana ; García-García, Verónica ; Gliessman, Stephen R. ; Pomar-León, Ariadna ; Sastre-Morató, Annaïs ; Tendero-Acín, Guillem</creator><creatorcontrib>López-García, Daniel ; Cuéllar-Padilla, Mamen ; de Azevedo Olival, Alexandre ; Laranjeira, Nina Paula ; Méndez, V. Ernesto ; Peredo y Parada, Santiago ; Barbosa, César Adriano ; Barrera Salas, Claudia ; Caswell, Martha ; Cohen, Roseann ; Correro-Humanes, Ana ; García-García, Verónica ; Gliessman, Stephen R. ; Pomar-León, Ariadna ; Sastre-Morató, Annaïs ; Tendero-Acín, Guillem</creatorcontrib><description>•The diversity of stakeholders involved will determine the role of the research team and the results of the action – research process.•Rural and urban contexts differ in terms of actors, challenges involved, design requirements and results.•Farmers are usually disconsidered in urban or desagrarized contexts and require specific power management strategies.•Public policies stakeholders are involved in more complex processes, in terms of stakeholders involved and type of results.•The dialogue between academia and farmers is a challenge when building horizontal processes, whatever the context is.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0743-0167</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1392</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elmsford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Action research ; Agroecology ; Case studies ; Collective action ; Complexity ; Empirical analysis ; Empowerment ; Epistemology ; Ethical dilemmas ; Food ; Interest groups ; Justification ; Local communities ; Local knowledge ; Measures ; Methodological approaches ; Monopolies ; Participatory action research ; Participatory research ; Popular education ; Power structure ; Research methodology ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Rural development ; Scientific knowledge ; Social change ; Social interactions ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Transformation ; Truth</subject><ispartof>Journal of rural studies, 2021-04, Vol.83, p.257-267</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-90cf045d3ea0741926e71610737fab7d348f5d59c61a825f25f9433411e001643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-90cf045d3ea0741926e71610737fab7d348f5d59c61a825f25f9433411e001643</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9238-996X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27866,27924,27925,33774,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>López-García, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuéllar-Padilla, Mamen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Azevedo Olival, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laranjeira, Nina Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méndez, V. Ernesto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peredo y Parada, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, César Adriano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrera Salas, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caswell, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Roseann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correro-Humanes, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-García, Verónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gliessman, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomar-León, Ariadna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sastre-Morató, Annaïs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tendero-Acín, Guillem</creatorcontrib><title>Building agroecology with people. Challenges of participatory methods to deepen on the agroecological transition in different contexts</title><title>Journal of rural studies</title><description>•The diversity of stakeholders involved will determine the role of the research team and the results of the action – research process.•Rural and urban contexts differ in terms of actors, challenges involved, design requirements and results.•Farmers are usually disconsidered in urban or desagrarized contexts and require specific power management strategies.•Public policies stakeholders are involved in more complex processes, in terms of stakeholders involved and type of results.•The dialogue between academia and farmers is a challenge when building horizontal processes, whatever the context is.</description><subject>Action research</subject><subject>Agroecology</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Collective action</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethical dilemmas</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Justification</subject><subject>Local communities</subject><subject>Local knowledge</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Methodological approaches</subject><subject>Monopolies</subject><subject>Participatory action research</subject><subject>Participatory research</subject><subject>Popular education</subject><subject>Power structure</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural development</subject><subject>Scientific knowledge</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><subject>Truth</subject><issn>0743-0167</issn><issn>1873-1392</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1KJDEUhYOMYI_6ChJwXWV-qipVO51mZhQEN7oOMbnpTlEmZZIa7RfwuY20wuyEC3dxzzmX8yF0RklNCe0uxnqMS0x5MTUjjNaE1YTwA7SiveAV5QP7gVZENLwqanGEfqY0EkIFGdgKvf1a3GSc32C1iQF0mMJmh19c3uIZwjxBjddbNU3gN5BwsHhWMTvtZpVD3OEnyNtgEs4BG4AZPA4e5y38l-a0mnCOyieXXbk6j42zFiL4jHXwGV5zOkGHVk0JTj_3MXr48_t-fV3d3v29WV_dVpr3fa4Goi1pWsNBlUJ0YB0I2lEiuLDqURje9LY17aA7qnrW2jJDw3lDKZTGXcOP0fk-d47heYGU5RiW6MtLydqW9y1nXBRVt1fpGFKKYOUc3ZOKO0mJ_GAuR_nFXH4wl4TJwrwYL_dGKB3-OYgyaQdeg3ERdJYmuO8i3gGzupCG</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>López-García, Daniel</creator><creator>Cuéllar-Padilla, Mamen</creator><creator>de Azevedo Olival, Alexandre</creator><creator>Laranjeira, Nina Paula</creator><creator>Méndez, V. Ernesto</creator><creator>Peredo y Parada, Santiago</creator><creator>Barbosa, César Adriano</creator><creator>Barrera Salas, Claudia</creator><creator>Caswell, Martha</creator><creator>Cohen, Roseann</creator><creator>Correro-Humanes, Ana</creator><creator>García-García, Verónica</creator><creator>Gliessman, Stephen R.</creator><creator>Pomar-León, Ariadna</creator><creator>Sastre-Morató, Annaïs</creator><creator>Tendero-Acín, Guillem</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9238-996X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Building agroecology with people. Challenges of participatory methods to deepen on the agroecological transition in different contexts</title><author>López-García, Daniel ; Cuéllar-Padilla, Mamen ; de Azevedo Olival, Alexandre ; Laranjeira, Nina Paula ; Méndez, V. Ernesto ; Peredo y Parada, Santiago ; Barbosa, César Adriano ; Barrera Salas, Claudia ; Caswell, Martha ; Cohen, Roseann ; Correro-Humanes, Ana ; García-García, Verónica ; Gliessman, Stephen R. ; Pomar-León, Ariadna ; Sastre-Morató, Annaïs ; Tendero-Acín, Guillem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-90cf045d3ea0741926e71610737fab7d348f5d59c61a825f25f9433411e001643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Action research</topic><topic>Agroecology</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Collective action</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethical dilemmas</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Justification</topic><topic>Local communities</topic><topic>Local knowledge</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Methodological approaches</topic><topic>Monopolies</topic><topic>Participatory action research</topic><topic>Participatory research</topic><topic>Popular education</topic><topic>Power structure</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural development</topic><topic>Scientific knowledge</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><topic>Truth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>López-García, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuéllar-Padilla, Mamen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Azevedo Olival, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laranjeira, Nina Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méndez, V. Ernesto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peredo y Parada, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, César Adriano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrera Salas, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caswell, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Roseann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correro-Humanes, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-García, Verónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gliessman, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pomar-León, Ariadna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sastre-Morató, Annaïs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tendero-Acín, Guillem</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of rural studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>López-García, Daniel</au><au>Cuéllar-Padilla, Mamen</au><au>de Azevedo Olival, Alexandre</au><au>Laranjeira, Nina Paula</au><au>Méndez, V. Ernesto</au><au>Peredo y Parada, Santiago</au><au>Barbosa, César Adriano</au><au>Barrera Salas, Claudia</au><au>Caswell, Martha</au><au>Cohen, Roseann</au><au>Correro-Humanes, Ana</au><au>García-García, Verónica</au><au>Gliessman, Stephen R.</au><au>Pomar-León, Ariadna</au><au>Sastre-Morató, Annaïs</au><au>Tendero-Acín, Guillem</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Building agroecology with people. Challenges of participatory methods to deepen on the agroecological transition in different contexts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of rural studies</jtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>83</volume><spage>257</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>257-267</pages><issn>0743-0167</issn><eissn>1873-1392</eissn><abstract>•The diversity of stakeholders involved will determine the role of the research team and the results of the action – research process.•Rural and urban contexts differ in terms of actors, challenges involved, design requirements and results.•Farmers are usually disconsidered in urban or desagrarized contexts and require specific power management strategies.•Public policies stakeholders are involved in more complex processes, in terms of stakeholders involved and type of results.•The dialogue between academia and farmers is a challenge when building horizontal processes, whatever the context is.</abstract><cop>Elmsford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.003</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9238-996X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0743-0167 |
ispartof | Journal of rural studies, 2021-04, Vol.83, p.257-267 |
issn | 0743-0167 1873-1392 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2553853237 |
source | PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Action research Agroecology Case studies Collective action Complexity Empirical analysis Empowerment Epistemology Ethical dilemmas Food Interest groups Justification Local communities Local knowledge Measures Methodological approaches Monopolies Participatory action research Participatory research Popular education Power structure Research methodology Rural areas Rural communities Rural development Scientific knowledge Social change Social interactions Sustainability Sustainable development Transformation Truth |
title | Building agroecology with people. Challenges of participatory methods to deepen on the agroecological transition in different contexts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T18%3A50%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Building%20agroecology%20with%20people.%20Challenges%20of%20participatory%20methods%20to%20deepen%20on%20the%20agroecological%20transition%20in%20different%20contexts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20rural%20studies&rft.au=L%C3%B3pez-Garc%C3%ADa,%20Daniel&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=83&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=257-267&rft.issn=0743-0167&rft.eissn=1873-1392&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2553853237%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2553853237&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0743016721000486&rfr_iscdi=true |