Impact of iron formulations on topramezone injury to bermudagrass

Goosegrass control options in bermudagrass are limited. Topramezone is one option that offers excellent control of mature goosegrass, but application to bermudagrass results in unacceptable symptoms of bleaching and necrosis typical of hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors. Previous research...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed technology 2021-06, Vol.35 (3), p.509-514
Hauptverfasser: Boyd, Adam P., McElroy, J. Scott, Han, David Y., Guertal, Elizabeth A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 514
container_issue 3
container_start_page 509
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 35
creator Boyd, Adam P.
McElroy, J. Scott
Han, David Y.
Guertal, Elizabeth A.
description Goosegrass control options in bermudagrass are limited. Topramezone is one option that offers excellent control of mature goosegrass, but application to bermudagrass results in unacceptable symptoms of bleaching and necrosis typical of hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors. Previous research has shown that adding chelated iron reduced the phytotoxicity of topramezone without reducing the efficacy of the herbicide, resulting in safening when applied to bermudagrass. Our objective was to examine additional iron sources to determine whether similar safening effects occur with other sources. Field trials were conducted in the summers of 2016 to 2018 (Auburn University). Mixtures of topramezone and methylated seed oil were combined with six different commercial iron sources, including sodium ferric ethylenediamine di-o-hydroxyphenyl-acetate (FeEDDHA), ferrous diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (FeDTPA), iron citrate, FeSO4, and a combination of iron oxide/sucrate/sulfate, some of which contained nitrogen. Bermudagrass necrosis and bleaching symptoms were visually rated on a 0% to 100% scale. Reflectance (normalized difference vegetation index) and clipping yield measurements were also collected. Application of FeDTPA and FeSO4 reduced symptoms of bleaching and necrosis when applied with topramezone. Other treatments that contained nitrogen did not reduce injury but did reduce bermudagrass recovery time following the appearance of necrosis. Inclusion of small amounts of nitrogen often negated the safening effects of FeSO4. The iron oxide/sucrate/sulfate product had no effect on bleaching or necrosis. Data suggest that the iron source had a differential effect on bleaching and necrosis reduction when applied in combination with topramezone to bermudagrass. Overall, FeSO4 and FeDTPA safened topramezone the most on bermudagrass. Nomenclature: Topramezone; goosegrass; Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.; bermudagrass; Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/wet.2020.128
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2553822506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27289527</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27289527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-501da9a464016c3167276b6941b0d305986004b545e25b9a817133789f418bdd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFLwzAUh4MoOKc3r0LBm9j58tI06XGMqYOBFwVvIVlTaVmbmrTI_OvNqHj09Hjvffx-8BFyTWFBgYqHLzssEDBuKE_IjHIOKYoMTskMZAEpMPF-Ti5CaABojggzsty0vd4NiauS2rsuqZxvx70eateFJO6D671u7bfrbFJ3zegP8ZQYG6lSf3gdwiU5q_Q-2KvfOSdvj-vX1XO6fXnarJbb1DCEIeVAS13oLM9i9Y7RXKDITV5k1EDJgBcyB8gMz7hFbgotqaCMCVlUGZWmLNmc3E65vXefow2Datzou1ipkHMmETnkkbqfqJ13IXhbqd7XrfYHRUEdJakoSR0lqSgp4jcT3oTB-T8WBcqCo4j_u-lvahcV_B_2AyDXb98</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2553822506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of iron formulations on topramezone injury to bermudagrass</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Boyd, Adam P. ; McElroy, J. Scott ; Han, David Y. ; Guertal, Elizabeth A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Adam P. ; McElroy, J. Scott ; Han, David Y. ; Guertal, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><description>Goosegrass control options in bermudagrass are limited. Topramezone is one option that offers excellent control of mature goosegrass, but application to bermudagrass results in unacceptable symptoms of bleaching and necrosis typical of hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors. Previous research has shown that adding chelated iron reduced the phytotoxicity of topramezone without reducing the efficacy of the herbicide, resulting in safening when applied to bermudagrass. Our objective was to examine additional iron sources to determine whether similar safening effects occur with other sources. Field trials were conducted in the summers of 2016 to 2018 (Auburn University). Mixtures of topramezone and methylated seed oil were combined with six different commercial iron sources, including sodium ferric ethylenediamine di-o-hydroxyphenyl-acetate (FeEDDHA), ferrous diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (FeDTPA), iron citrate, FeSO4, and a combination of iron oxide/sucrate/sulfate, some of which contained nitrogen. Bermudagrass necrosis and bleaching symptoms were visually rated on a 0% to 100% scale. Reflectance (normalized difference vegetation index) and clipping yield measurements were also collected. Application of FeDTPA and FeSO4 reduced symptoms of bleaching and necrosis when applied with topramezone. Other treatments that contained nitrogen did not reduce injury but did reduce bermudagrass recovery time following the appearance of necrosis. Inclusion of small amounts of nitrogen often negated the safening effects of FeSO4. The iron oxide/sucrate/sulfate product had no effect on bleaching or necrosis. Data suggest that the iron source had a differential effect on bleaching and necrosis reduction when applied in combination with topramezone to bermudagrass. Overall, FeSO4 and FeDTPA safened topramezone the most on bermudagrass. Nomenclature: Topramezone; goosegrass; Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.; bermudagrass; Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wet.2020.128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Acetic acid ; Acids ; Aesthetics ; Bleaching ; Citric acid ; Diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid ; DTPA ; EDDHA ; Ethylenediamine ; ferrous sulfate ; Formulations ; Herbicides ; Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase ; Injury prevention ; Iron ; Iron oxides ; Iron sulfates ; Leaves ; Necrosis ; Nitrogen ; Normalized difference vegetative index ; Oils &amp; fats ; Phytotoxicity ; Recovery time ; Research Article ; safener ; Seeds ; Sulfates ; turfgrass ; Turfgrasses</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2021-06, Vol.35 (3), p.509-514</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America.</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-501da9a464016c3167276b6941b0d305986004b545e25b9a817133789f418bdd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-501da9a464016c3167276b6941b0d305986004b545e25b9a817133789f418bdd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5192-3532</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Adam P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElroy, J. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, David Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guertal, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of iron formulations on topramezone injury to bermudagrass</title><title>Weed technology</title><addtitle>Weed Technol</addtitle><description>Goosegrass control options in bermudagrass are limited. Topramezone is one option that offers excellent control of mature goosegrass, but application to bermudagrass results in unacceptable symptoms of bleaching and necrosis typical of hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors. Previous research has shown that adding chelated iron reduced the phytotoxicity of topramezone without reducing the efficacy of the herbicide, resulting in safening when applied to bermudagrass. Our objective was to examine additional iron sources to determine whether similar safening effects occur with other sources. Field trials were conducted in the summers of 2016 to 2018 (Auburn University). Mixtures of topramezone and methylated seed oil were combined with six different commercial iron sources, including sodium ferric ethylenediamine di-o-hydroxyphenyl-acetate (FeEDDHA), ferrous diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (FeDTPA), iron citrate, FeSO4, and a combination of iron oxide/sucrate/sulfate, some of which contained nitrogen. Bermudagrass necrosis and bleaching symptoms were visually rated on a 0% to 100% scale. Reflectance (normalized difference vegetation index) and clipping yield measurements were also collected. Application of FeDTPA and FeSO4 reduced symptoms of bleaching and necrosis when applied with topramezone. Other treatments that contained nitrogen did not reduce injury but did reduce bermudagrass recovery time following the appearance of necrosis. Inclusion of small amounts of nitrogen often negated the safening effects of FeSO4. The iron oxide/sucrate/sulfate product had no effect on bleaching or necrosis. Data suggest that the iron source had a differential effect on bleaching and necrosis reduction when applied in combination with topramezone to bermudagrass. Overall, FeSO4 and FeDTPA safened topramezone the most on bermudagrass. Nomenclature: Topramezone; goosegrass; Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.; bermudagrass; Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.</description><subject>Acetic acid</subject><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Bleaching</subject><subject>Citric acid</subject><subject>Diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid</subject><subject>DTPA</subject><subject>EDDHA</subject><subject>Ethylenediamine</subject><subject>ferrous sulfate</subject><subject>Formulations</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Iron oxides</subject><subject>Iron sulfates</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Necrosis</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Normalized difference vegetative index</subject><subject>Oils &amp; fats</subject><subject>Phytotoxicity</subject><subject>Recovery time</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>safener</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>turfgrass</subject><subject>Turfgrasses</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFLwzAUh4MoOKc3r0LBm9j58tI06XGMqYOBFwVvIVlTaVmbmrTI_OvNqHj09Hjvffx-8BFyTWFBgYqHLzssEDBuKE_IjHIOKYoMTskMZAEpMPF-Ti5CaABojggzsty0vd4NiauS2rsuqZxvx70eateFJO6D671u7bfrbFJ3zegP8ZQYG6lSf3gdwiU5q_Q-2KvfOSdvj-vX1XO6fXnarJbb1DCEIeVAS13oLM9i9Y7RXKDITV5k1EDJgBcyB8gMz7hFbgotqaCMCVlUGZWmLNmc3E65vXefow2Datzou1ipkHMmETnkkbqfqJ13IXhbqd7XrfYHRUEdJakoSR0lqSgp4jcT3oTB-T8WBcqCo4j_u-lvahcV_B_2AyDXb98</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Boyd, Adam P.</creator><creator>McElroy, J. Scott</creator><creator>Han, David Y.</creator><creator>Guertal, Elizabeth A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5192-3532</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Impact of iron formulations on topramezone injury to bermudagrass</title><author>Boyd, Adam P. ; McElroy, J. Scott ; Han, David Y. ; Guertal, Elizabeth A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-501da9a464016c3167276b6941b0d305986004b545e25b9a817133789f418bdd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acetic acid</topic><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Bleaching</topic><topic>Citric acid</topic><topic>Diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid</topic><topic>DTPA</topic><topic>EDDHA</topic><topic>Ethylenediamine</topic><topic>ferrous sulfate</topic><topic>Formulations</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Iron oxides</topic><topic>Iron sulfates</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Necrosis</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Normalized difference vegetative index</topic><topic>Oils &amp; fats</topic><topic>Phytotoxicity</topic><topic>Recovery time</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>safener</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>turfgrass</topic><topic>Turfgrasses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Adam P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElroy, J. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, David Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guertal, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boyd, Adam P.</au><au>McElroy, J. Scott</au><au>Han, David Y.</au><au>Guertal, Elizabeth A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of iron formulations on topramezone injury to bermudagrass</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><stitle>Weed Technol</stitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>514</epage><pages>509-514</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Goosegrass control options in bermudagrass are limited. Topramezone is one option that offers excellent control of mature goosegrass, but application to bermudagrass results in unacceptable symptoms of bleaching and necrosis typical of hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors. Previous research has shown that adding chelated iron reduced the phytotoxicity of topramezone without reducing the efficacy of the herbicide, resulting in safening when applied to bermudagrass. Our objective was to examine additional iron sources to determine whether similar safening effects occur with other sources. Field trials were conducted in the summers of 2016 to 2018 (Auburn University). Mixtures of topramezone and methylated seed oil were combined with six different commercial iron sources, including sodium ferric ethylenediamine di-o-hydroxyphenyl-acetate (FeEDDHA), ferrous diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (FeDTPA), iron citrate, FeSO4, and a combination of iron oxide/sucrate/sulfate, some of which contained nitrogen. Bermudagrass necrosis and bleaching symptoms were visually rated on a 0% to 100% scale. Reflectance (normalized difference vegetation index) and clipping yield measurements were also collected. Application of FeDTPA and FeSO4 reduced symptoms of bleaching and necrosis when applied with topramezone. Other treatments that contained nitrogen did not reduce injury but did reduce bermudagrass recovery time following the appearance of necrosis. Inclusion of small amounts of nitrogen often negated the safening effects of FeSO4. The iron oxide/sucrate/sulfate product had no effect on bleaching or necrosis. Data suggest that the iron source had a differential effect on bleaching and necrosis reduction when applied in combination with topramezone to bermudagrass. Overall, FeSO4 and FeDTPA safened topramezone the most on bermudagrass. Nomenclature: Topramezone; goosegrass; Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.; bermudagrass; Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wet.2020.128</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5192-3532</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 2021-06, Vol.35 (3), p.509-514
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2553822506
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Acetic acid
Acids
Aesthetics
Bleaching
Citric acid
Diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid
DTPA
EDDHA
Ethylenediamine
ferrous sulfate
Formulations
Herbicides
Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase
Injury prevention
Iron
Iron oxides
Iron sulfates
Leaves
Necrosis
Nitrogen
Normalized difference vegetative index
Oils & fats
Phytotoxicity
Recovery time
Research Article
safener
Seeds
Sulfates
turfgrass
Turfgrasses
title Impact of iron formulations on topramezone injury to bermudagrass
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A23%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20iron%20formulations%20on%20topramezone%20injury%20to%20bermudagrass&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Boyd,%20Adam%20P.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=514&rft.pages=509-514&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wet.2020.128&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27289527%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2553822506&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27289527&rfr_iscdi=true