Cephalometric comparison between male and female using Tweed's analysis in solan population
Aim: The purpose of this study aimed to verify the mean values of cephalometric values of Tweed's facial triangle: Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA), Frankfort mandibular incisor angle (FMIA), and Incisal mandibular plane angle (IMPA) of Class II malocclusion patients in Solan population a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indian Journal of Oral Health and Research 2021, Vol.7 (1), p.36-39 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 39 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 36 |
container_title | Indian Journal of Oral Health and Research |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Bhullar, MandeepK Bhutia, SonamLhamu Mittal, Sanjay Aggarwal, Isha Palkit, Tanzin Goyal, Merry |
description | Aim: The purpose of this study aimed to verify the mean values of cephalometric values of Tweed's facial triangle: Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA), Frankfort mandibular incisor angle (FMIA), and Incisal mandibular plane angle (IMPA) of Class II malocclusion patients in Solan population and conduct comparison between male and female. Materials and Methods: Cephalometric radiographs of eighty patients having Class II malocclusion, taken from the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Baddi. Samples were divided on the basis of gender that is 40 males and 40 females. The following three angles formed in Tweed's triangle were measured for all the subjects: FMA, FMIA, and IMPA. Taking these angles, the mean of all the Tweed's parameters of male and female was depicted. Result: The mean value indicates that the people of Solan district show an average growth pattern. The FMA in males (23.625) was less than that of females (26.3), FMIA was slightly more in male (56.33) than female (55.8) and the IMPA was also more in males (100.1) than females (97.9). Conclusion: The study showed no significant difference in the values between male and female; therefore, it is not desirable to have separate norms for diagnosis and treatment planning for the treatment of Class II malocclusion in male and female. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/ijohr.ijohr_29_20 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2553415400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2553415400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c700-d857884f54b1fb3111fcf63eb160056aa05aefeea06b39ba00776a4e6dfc8ed93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkD9rwzAQxUVpoSHNB-gm6NDJ6cmybHksof8g0CVbB3G2T42CbbmSTcm3r5t06HL3jvc4Hj_GbgWsMwHywR38PqxP06SlSeGCLVKVyUSUhb6ctSxlovMyvWarGA8AkGo1n3LBPjY07LH1HY3B1bz23YDBRd_zisZvop532BLHvuGWTnKKrv_ku9lr7uNsYHuMLnLX8-hb7Pngh6nF0fn-hl1ZbCOt_vaS7Z6fdpvXZPv-8rZ53CZ1AZA0WhVaZ1ZllbCVFELY2uaSKpEDqBwRFJIlQsgrWVYIUBQ5ZpQ3ttbUlHLJ7s5vh-C_JoqjOfgpzL2iSZWSmVAZwJwS51QdfIyBrBmC6zAcjQDzS9Gc-f2jKH8AYQdqRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2553415400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cephalometric comparison between male and female using Tweed's analysis in solan population</title><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><creator>Bhullar, MandeepK ; Bhutia, SonamLhamu ; Mittal, Sanjay ; Aggarwal, Isha ; Palkit, Tanzin ; Goyal, Merry</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhullar, MandeepK ; Bhutia, SonamLhamu ; Mittal, Sanjay ; Aggarwal, Isha ; Palkit, Tanzin ; Goyal, Merry</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: The purpose of this study aimed to verify the mean values of cephalometric values of Tweed's facial triangle: Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA), Frankfort mandibular incisor angle (FMIA), and Incisal mandibular plane angle (IMPA) of Class II malocclusion patients in Solan population and conduct comparison between male and female. Materials and Methods: Cephalometric radiographs of eighty patients having Class II malocclusion, taken from the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Baddi. Samples were divided on the basis of gender that is 40 males and 40 females. The following three angles formed in Tweed's triangle were measured for all the subjects: FMA, FMIA, and IMPA. Taking these angles, the mean of all the Tweed's parameters of male and female was depicted. Result: The mean value indicates that the people of Solan district show an average growth pattern. The FMA in males (23.625) was less than that of females (26.3), FMIA was slightly more in male (56.33) than female (55.8) and the IMPA was also more in males (100.1) than females (97.9). Conclusion: The study showed no significant difference in the values between male and female; therefore, it is not desirable to have separate norms for diagnosis and treatment planning for the treatment of Class II malocclusion in male and female.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2393-8692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2543-1978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ijohr.ijohr_29_20</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mumbai: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Dental occlusion ; Females ; Growth patterns ; Males ; Mandible ; Orthodontics ; Patients ; Radiography</subject><ispartof>Indian Journal of Oral Health and Research, 2021, Vol.7 (1), p.36-39</ispartof><rights>2021. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhullar, MandeepK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhutia, SonamLhamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Isha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palkit, Tanzin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goyal, Merry</creatorcontrib><title>Cephalometric comparison between male and female using Tweed's analysis in solan population</title><title>Indian Journal of Oral Health and Research</title><description>Aim: The purpose of this study aimed to verify the mean values of cephalometric values of Tweed's facial triangle: Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA), Frankfort mandibular incisor angle (FMIA), and Incisal mandibular plane angle (IMPA) of Class II malocclusion patients in Solan population and conduct comparison between male and female. Materials and Methods: Cephalometric radiographs of eighty patients having Class II malocclusion, taken from the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Baddi. Samples were divided on the basis of gender that is 40 males and 40 females. The following three angles formed in Tweed's triangle were measured for all the subjects: FMA, FMIA, and IMPA. Taking these angles, the mean of all the Tweed's parameters of male and female was depicted. Result: The mean value indicates that the people of Solan district show an average growth pattern. The FMA in males (23.625) was less than that of females (26.3), FMIA was slightly more in male (56.33) than female (55.8) and the IMPA was also more in males (100.1) than females (97.9). Conclusion: The study showed no significant difference in the values between male and female; therefore, it is not desirable to have separate norms for diagnosis and treatment planning for the treatment of Class II malocclusion in male and female.</description><subject>Dental occlusion</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Growth patterns</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><issn>2393-8692</issn><issn>2543-1978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkD9rwzAQxUVpoSHNB-gm6NDJ6cmybHksof8g0CVbB3G2T42CbbmSTcm3r5t06HL3jvc4Hj_GbgWsMwHywR38PqxP06SlSeGCLVKVyUSUhb6ctSxlovMyvWarGA8AkGo1n3LBPjY07LH1HY3B1bz23YDBRd_zisZvop532BLHvuGWTnKKrv_ku9lr7uNsYHuMLnLX8-hb7Pngh6nF0fn-hl1ZbCOt_vaS7Z6fdpvXZPv-8rZ53CZ1AZA0WhVaZ1ZllbCVFELY2uaSKpEDqBwRFJIlQsgrWVYIUBQ5ZpQ3ttbUlHLJ7s5vh-C_JoqjOfgpzL2iSZWSmVAZwJwS51QdfIyBrBmC6zAcjQDzS9Gc-f2jKH8AYQdqRw</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Bhullar, MandeepK</creator><creator>Bhutia, SonamLhamu</creator><creator>Mittal, Sanjay</creator><creator>Aggarwal, Isha</creator><creator>Palkit, Tanzin</creator><creator>Goyal, Merry</creator><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Cephalometric comparison between male and female using Tweed's analysis in solan population</title><author>Bhullar, MandeepK ; Bhutia, SonamLhamu ; Mittal, Sanjay ; Aggarwal, Isha ; Palkit, Tanzin ; Goyal, Merry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c700-d857884f54b1fb3111fcf63eb160056aa05aefeea06b39ba00776a4e6dfc8ed93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Dental occlusion</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Growth patterns</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhullar, MandeepK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhutia, SonamLhamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Isha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palkit, Tanzin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goyal, Merry</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Indian Journal of Oral Health and Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhullar, MandeepK</au><au>Bhutia, SonamLhamu</au><au>Mittal, Sanjay</au><au>Aggarwal, Isha</au><au>Palkit, Tanzin</au><au>Goyal, Merry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cephalometric comparison between male and female using Tweed's analysis in solan population</atitle><jtitle>Indian Journal of Oral Health and Research</jtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>36-39</pages><issn>2393-8692</issn><eissn>2543-1978</eissn><abstract>Aim: The purpose of this study aimed to verify the mean values of cephalometric values of Tweed's facial triangle: Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA), Frankfort mandibular incisor angle (FMIA), and Incisal mandibular plane angle (IMPA) of Class II malocclusion patients in Solan population and conduct comparison between male and female. Materials and Methods: Cephalometric radiographs of eighty patients having Class II malocclusion, taken from the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Baddi. Samples were divided on the basis of gender that is 40 males and 40 females. The following three angles formed in Tweed's triangle were measured for all the subjects: FMA, FMIA, and IMPA. Taking these angles, the mean of all the Tweed's parameters of male and female was depicted. Result: The mean value indicates that the people of Solan district show an average growth pattern. The FMA in males (23.625) was less than that of females (26.3), FMIA was slightly more in male (56.33) than female (55.8) and the IMPA was also more in males (100.1) than females (97.9). Conclusion: The study showed no significant difference in the values between male and female; therefore, it is not desirable to have separate norms for diagnosis and treatment planning for the treatment of Class II malocclusion in male and female.</abstract><cop>Mumbai</cop><pub>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/ijohr.ijohr_29_20</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2393-8692 |
ispartof | Indian Journal of Oral Health and Research, 2021, Vol.7 (1), p.36-39 |
issn | 2393-8692 2543-1978 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2553415400 |
source | Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ) |
subjects | Dental occlusion Females Growth patterns Males Mandible Orthodontics Patients Radiography |
title | Cephalometric comparison between male and female using Tweed's analysis in solan population |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T04%3A26%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cephalometric%20comparison%20between%20male%20and%20female%20using%20Tweed's%20analysis%20in%20solan%20population&rft.jtitle=Indian%20Journal%20of%20Oral%20Health%20and%20Research&rft.au=Bhullar,%20MandeepK&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=36-39&rft.issn=2393-8692&rft.eissn=2543-1978&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ijohr.ijohr_29_20&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2553415400%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2553415400&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |