Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Myofascial Pain of the Head, Neck, and Shoulders
Background and ObjectivesThis study examined the effectiveness of sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) for myofascial pain syndrome of the head, neck, and shoulders using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study design with comparison to an internal standard consisting of trigger point in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 1998-01, Vol.23 (1), p.30-36 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 36 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 30 |
container_title | Regional anesthesia and pain medicine |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Ferrante, F Michael Kaufman, Andrew G Dunbar, Stuart A Cain, Charles F Cherukuri, Suma |
description | Background and ObjectivesThis study examined the effectiveness of sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) for myofascial pain syndrome of the head, neck, and shoulders using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study design with comparison to an internal standard consisting of trigger point injections (TPI).MethodsPatients (n = 23) were randomly assigned to receive either: (1) SPGB with 4% lidocaine, then TPI with 1% lidocaine, and finally SPGB with saline placebo or (2) SPGB with saline placebo, then TPI with 1% lidocaine, and finally SPGB with 4% lidocaine. Each respective treatment within each protocol was given sequentially at 1-week intervals for both groups. Prior to the first treatment, all patients assessed their average intensity of pain and pain at that particular moment using a visual analog pain scale. Pain intensity and pain relief were reassessed 30 minutes after each treatment and at 6 hours, 24 hours and 1 week using visual analog pain and pain relief scales. Pain intensity and pain relief data were transformed into natural logarithm units, and the statistical significance of SPGB with 4% lidocaine versus SPGB with placebo, SPGB with 4% lidocaine versus TPI, and TPI versus SPGB with placebo were tested by mixed-model analysis of variance. The magnitude of the differences in pain intensity and pain relief ratings were also compared via computation of 95% confidence intervals.ResultsThe analgesic effect of SPGB with 4% lidocaine was no better than placebo. Mixed-model analysis of variance revealed improved analgesia with administration of TPIs as compared to SPGB with 4% lidocaine and placebo over the entire week of observations (pain relief scores).ConclusionsThis study suggests that SPGB with 4% lidocaine is no more efficacious than placebo and less efficacious than administration of standard trigger point injections in the treatment of myofascial pain of the head, neck, and shoulders. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/rapm-00115550-199823010-00008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2553073877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2553073877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25530738773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNikFOwzAQRS0EEqVwh5EQuxrsGMfOFgTtBlSp3VejZELSunawnQW3J5E4AKv_9d5j7EGKRylV-RRxOHMhpNRaCy6ryhZKSDEhIewFW0itCm5LLS-nLyrLjVLVNbtJ6TgX5rlcsHo3dOTDgA5z7wnW6L9cHzy8uFCfoA0Rckewj4T5TD5DaOHjJ7SY6h4dbLH3M5qbDWGzgk-qTytA38CuC6NrKKZbdtWiS3T3t0t2__62f93wIYbvkVI-HMMY_aQOhdZKGGWNUf-rfgGIGU5Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2553073877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Myofascial Pain of the Head, Neck, and Shoulders</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ferrante, F Michael ; Kaufman, Andrew G ; Dunbar, Stuart A ; Cain, Charles F ; Cherukuri, Suma</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferrante, F Michael ; Kaufman, Andrew G ; Dunbar, Stuart A ; Cain, Charles F ; Cherukuri, Suma</creatorcontrib><description>Background and ObjectivesThis study examined the effectiveness of sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) for myofascial pain syndrome of the head, neck, and shoulders using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study design with comparison to an internal standard consisting of trigger point injections (TPI).MethodsPatients (n = 23) were randomly assigned to receive either: (1) SPGB with 4% lidocaine, then TPI with 1% lidocaine, and finally SPGB with saline placebo or (2) SPGB with saline placebo, then TPI with 1% lidocaine, and finally SPGB with 4% lidocaine. Each respective treatment within each protocol was given sequentially at 1-week intervals for both groups. Prior to the first treatment, all patients assessed their average intensity of pain and pain at that particular moment using a visual analog pain scale. Pain intensity and pain relief were reassessed 30 minutes after each treatment and at 6 hours, 24 hours and 1 week using visual analog pain and pain relief scales. Pain intensity and pain relief data were transformed into natural logarithm units, and the statistical significance of SPGB with 4% lidocaine versus SPGB with placebo, SPGB with 4% lidocaine versus TPI, and TPI versus SPGB with placebo were tested by mixed-model analysis of variance. The magnitude of the differences in pain intensity and pain relief ratings were also compared via computation of 95% confidence intervals.ResultsThe analgesic effect of SPGB with 4% lidocaine was no better than placebo. Mixed-model analysis of variance revealed improved analgesia with administration of TPIs as compared to SPGB with 4% lidocaine and placebo over the entire week of observations (pain relief scores).ConclusionsThis study suggests that SPGB with 4% lidocaine is no more efficacious than placebo and less efficacious than administration of standard trigger point injections in the treatment of myofascial pain of the head, neck, and shoulders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-7339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8651</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/rapm-00115550-199823010-00008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Secaucus: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Pain ; Regional anesthesia ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 1998-01, Vol.23 (1), p.30-36</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia (ASRA). Printed in the U.S.A. All rights reserved.1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferrante, F Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Andrew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunbar, Stuart A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cain, Charles F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherukuri, Suma</creatorcontrib><title>Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Myofascial Pain of the Head, Neck, and Shoulders</title><title>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</title><description>Background and ObjectivesThis study examined the effectiveness of sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) for myofascial pain syndrome of the head, neck, and shoulders using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study design with comparison to an internal standard consisting of trigger point injections (TPI).MethodsPatients (n = 23) were randomly assigned to receive either: (1) SPGB with 4% lidocaine, then TPI with 1% lidocaine, and finally SPGB with saline placebo or (2) SPGB with saline placebo, then TPI with 1% lidocaine, and finally SPGB with 4% lidocaine. Each respective treatment within each protocol was given sequentially at 1-week intervals for both groups. Prior to the first treatment, all patients assessed their average intensity of pain and pain at that particular moment using a visual analog pain scale. Pain intensity and pain relief were reassessed 30 minutes after each treatment and at 6 hours, 24 hours and 1 week using visual analog pain and pain relief scales. Pain intensity and pain relief data were transformed into natural logarithm units, and the statistical significance of SPGB with 4% lidocaine versus SPGB with placebo, SPGB with 4% lidocaine versus TPI, and TPI versus SPGB with placebo were tested by mixed-model analysis of variance. The magnitude of the differences in pain intensity and pain relief ratings were also compared via computation of 95% confidence intervals.ResultsThe analgesic effect of SPGB with 4% lidocaine was no better than placebo. Mixed-model analysis of variance revealed improved analgesia with administration of TPIs as compared to SPGB with 4% lidocaine and placebo over the entire week of observations (pain relief scores).ConclusionsThis study suggests that SPGB with 4% lidocaine is no more efficacious than placebo and less efficacious than administration of standard trigger point injections in the treatment of myofascial pain of the head, neck, and shoulders.</description><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Regional anesthesia</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>1098-7339</issn><issn>1532-8651</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNikFOwzAQRS0EEqVwh5EQuxrsGMfOFgTtBlSp3VejZELSunawnQW3J5E4AKv_9d5j7EGKRylV-RRxOHMhpNRaCy6ryhZKSDEhIewFW0itCm5LLS-nLyrLjVLVNbtJ6TgX5rlcsHo3dOTDgA5z7wnW6L9cHzy8uFCfoA0Rckewj4T5TD5DaOHjJ7SY6h4dbLH3M5qbDWGzgk-qTytA38CuC6NrKKZbdtWiS3T3t0t2__62f93wIYbvkVI-HMMY_aQOhdZKGGWNUf-rfgGIGU5Y</recordid><startdate>19980101</startdate><enddate>19980101</enddate><creator>Ferrante, F Michael</creator><creator>Kaufman, Andrew G</creator><creator>Dunbar, Stuart A</creator><creator>Cain, Charles F</creator><creator>Cherukuri, Suma</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980101</creationdate><title>Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Myofascial Pain of the Head, Neck, and Shoulders</title><author>Ferrante, F Michael ; Kaufman, Andrew G ; Dunbar, Stuart A ; Cain, Charles F ; Cherukuri, Suma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25530738773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Regional anesthesia</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferrante, F Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Andrew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunbar, Stuart A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cain, Charles F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherukuri, Suma</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferrante, F Michael</au><au>Kaufman, Andrew G</au><au>Dunbar, Stuart A</au><au>Cain, Charles F</au><au>Cherukuri, Suma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Myofascial Pain of the Head, Neck, and Shoulders</atitle><jtitle>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</jtitle><date>1998-01-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>30-36</pages><issn>1098-7339</issn><eissn>1532-8651</eissn><abstract>Background and ObjectivesThis study examined the effectiveness of sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) for myofascial pain syndrome of the head, neck, and shoulders using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study design with comparison to an internal standard consisting of trigger point injections (TPI).MethodsPatients (n = 23) were randomly assigned to receive either: (1) SPGB with 4% lidocaine, then TPI with 1% lidocaine, and finally SPGB with saline placebo or (2) SPGB with saline placebo, then TPI with 1% lidocaine, and finally SPGB with 4% lidocaine. Each respective treatment within each protocol was given sequentially at 1-week intervals for both groups. Prior to the first treatment, all patients assessed their average intensity of pain and pain at that particular moment using a visual analog pain scale. Pain intensity and pain relief were reassessed 30 minutes after each treatment and at 6 hours, 24 hours and 1 week using visual analog pain and pain relief scales. Pain intensity and pain relief data were transformed into natural logarithm units, and the statistical significance of SPGB with 4% lidocaine versus SPGB with placebo, SPGB with 4% lidocaine versus TPI, and TPI versus SPGB with placebo were tested by mixed-model analysis of variance. The magnitude of the differences in pain intensity and pain relief ratings were also compared via computation of 95% confidence intervals.ResultsThe analgesic effect of SPGB with 4% lidocaine was no better than placebo. Mixed-model analysis of variance revealed improved analgesia with administration of TPIs as compared to SPGB with 4% lidocaine and placebo over the entire week of observations (pain relief scores).ConclusionsThis study suggests that SPGB with 4% lidocaine is no more efficacious than placebo and less efficacious than administration of standard trigger point injections in the treatment of myofascial pain of the head, neck, and shoulders.</abstract><cop>Secaucus</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/rapm-00115550-199823010-00008</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1098-7339 |
ispartof | Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 1998-01, Vol.23 (1), p.30-36 |
issn | 1098-7339 1532-8651 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2553073877 |
source | Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Pain Regional anesthesia Variance analysis |
title | Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Myofascial Pain of the Head, Neck, and Shoulders |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T10%3A08%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sphenopalatine%20Ganglion%20Block%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Myofascial%20Pain%20of%20the%20Head,%20Neck,%20and%20Shoulders&rft.jtitle=Regional%20anesthesia%20and%20pain%20medicine&rft.au=Ferrante,%20F%20Michael&rft.date=1998-01-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=30-36&rft.issn=1098-7339&rft.eissn=1532-8651&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/rapm-00115550-199823010-00008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2553073877%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2553073877&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |