4CPS-397 Assessment of pharmaceutical interventions in an intensive care unit after computerised physician order entry system implementation

Background and importanceCritical care pharmacists have demonstrated their contribution to the management of drug therapy and impact on patient and medication safety. Traditionally, the functions of the clinical pharmacist in the intensive care unit (ICU) of our hospital were based on pharmaceutical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice 2021-03, Vol.28 (Suppl 1), p.A111-A112
Hauptverfasser: M Valera Rubio, MB Fuentes Ibañez, M Gonzalez Padilla
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A112
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A111
container_title European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice
container_volume 28
creator M Valera Rubio
MB Fuentes Ibañez
M Gonzalez Padilla
description Background and importanceCritical care pharmacists have demonstrated their contribution to the management of drug therapy and impact on patient and medication safety. Traditionally, the functions of the clinical pharmacist in the intensive care unit (ICU) of our hospital were based on pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) concerning parenteral nutrition (PN). Currently, a computerised physician order entry (CPOE) system has been implemented. This system reduces the incidence of medication errors and allows pharmaceutical validation.Aim and objectivesTo analyse the evolution in the number of PIs before and after implementation of the CPOE; to describe the type of PIs carried out by clinical pharmacists after CPOE implementation; and to assess the degree of acceptance by ICU physicians.Material and methodsA 2 month descriptive and prospective study was conducted between 1 January and 28 February 2020 in an 18 bed ICU of a tertiary teaching hospital, 3 months after CPOE implementation. Every type of PI and degree of acceptance were recorded. Total PIs recorded were compared with those recorded in the same period of time before implementation of the CPOE (between 1 July and 31 August 2020).ResultsDuring the current study period, 227 patients were admitted to the ICU, and 366 PIs were recorded. PIs increased by 173% compared with the previous study period before the implementation of CPOE (232 patients, 134 PIs). Regarding the number of PIs during the current study period, 25.4% were related to PN prescriptions, 8.4% were related to antimicrobial stewardship programme, 5.7% were related to optimising drug therapy, 3.3% were related to route of administration, 4.6% were related to incorrect drug based on the indication, 2.7% were related to therapeutic drug monitoring and 46.4% were related to fluid therapy. 91% of PIs were accepted by the ICU staff.Conclusion and relevanceCPOE in the ICU promoted the pharmacist’s participation in improving the safety of medical prescriptions by increasing the number of accepted PIs. The high number of interventions related to fluid therapy was highlighted. We consider it necessary to start corrective measures regarding this aspect, such as the preparation of prescription protocols, training talks, etc.References and/or acknowledgementsConflict of interestNo conflict of interest
doi_str_mv 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-eahpconf.229
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2552771521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2552771521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p809-dee503f56d770795a0ad9eaff5c18e61f6e318157a57389dded39f65fe98a0c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j01LAzEQhoMoWGr_Q9Bzaj42m82xFL-goGDvJSYTmtLNrpvdwt68ePVH-ktMq3iad-adeV4GoWtG54yJ8hZ223ZruppwyhkBs21tE_2cc32GJpwWimhdFuf_WpaXaJZSeKNSiEoXQk_QV7F8eSVCq--Pz0VKkFINsceNxye0sTD0wZo9DrGH7pC90MSUO2ziaRZTOAC2pgM8xNBj4_Metk3dDlmEBC6TxhRsyAdN57KZId2I05h6qHGo2z0cM82RfIUuvNknmP3VKVrf362Xj2T1_PC0XKxIW1FNHICkwsvSKUWVloYap8F4Ly2roGS-BMEqJpWRKj_qHDihfSk96MpQy8UU3fxi2655HyD1m10zdDEnbriUXCkmORM_wAxwRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552771521</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>4CPS-397 Assessment of pharmaceutical interventions in an intensive care unit after computerised physician order entry system implementation</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>M Valera Rubio ; MB Fuentes Ibañez ; M Gonzalez Padilla</creator><creatorcontrib>M Valera Rubio ; MB Fuentes Ibañez ; M Gonzalez Padilla</creatorcontrib><description>Background and importanceCritical care pharmacists have demonstrated their contribution to the management of drug therapy and impact on patient and medication safety. Traditionally, the functions of the clinical pharmacist in the intensive care unit (ICU) of our hospital were based on pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) concerning parenteral nutrition (PN). Currently, a computerised physician order entry (CPOE) system has been implemented. This system reduces the incidence of medication errors and allows pharmaceutical validation.Aim and objectivesTo analyse the evolution in the number of PIs before and after implementation of the CPOE; to describe the type of PIs carried out by clinical pharmacists after CPOE implementation; and to assess the degree of acceptance by ICU physicians.Material and methodsA 2 month descriptive and prospective study was conducted between 1 January and 28 February 2020 in an 18 bed ICU of a tertiary teaching hospital, 3 months after CPOE implementation. Every type of PI and degree of acceptance were recorded. Total PIs recorded were compared with those recorded in the same period of time before implementation of the CPOE (between 1 July and 31 August 2020).ResultsDuring the current study period, 227 patients were admitted to the ICU, and 366 PIs were recorded. PIs increased by 173% compared with the previous study period before the implementation of CPOE (232 patients, 134 PIs). Regarding the number of PIs during the current study period, 25.4% were related to PN prescriptions, 8.4% were related to antimicrobial stewardship programme, 5.7% were related to optimising drug therapy, 3.3% were related to route of administration, 4.6% were related to incorrect drug based on the indication, 2.7% were related to therapeutic drug monitoring and 46.4% were related to fluid therapy. 91% of PIs were accepted by the ICU staff.Conclusion and relevanceCPOE in the ICU promoted the pharmacist’s participation in improving the safety of medical prescriptions by increasing the number of accepted PIs. The high number of interventions related to fluid therapy was highlighted. We consider it necessary to start corrective measures regarding this aspect, such as the preparation of prescription protocols, training talks, etc.References and/or acknowledgementsConflict of interestNo conflict of interest</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-9956</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-9964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-eahpconf.229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Conflicts of interest ; Drug therapy ; Intensive care ; Order entry ; Pharmaceuticals</subject><ispartof>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2021-03, Vol.28 (Suppl 1), p.A111-A112</ispartof><rights>2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>M Valera Rubio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MB Fuentes Ibañez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M Gonzalez Padilla</creatorcontrib><title>4CPS-397 Assessment of pharmaceutical interventions in an intensive care unit after computerised physician order entry system implementation</title><title>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</title><description>Background and importanceCritical care pharmacists have demonstrated their contribution to the management of drug therapy and impact on patient and medication safety. Traditionally, the functions of the clinical pharmacist in the intensive care unit (ICU) of our hospital were based on pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) concerning parenteral nutrition (PN). Currently, a computerised physician order entry (CPOE) system has been implemented. This system reduces the incidence of medication errors and allows pharmaceutical validation.Aim and objectivesTo analyse the evolution in the number of PIs before and after implementation of the CPOE; to describe the type of PIs carried out by clinical pharmacists after CPOE implementation; and to assess the degree of acceptance by ICU physicians.Material and methodsA 2 month descriptive and prospective study was conducted between 1 January and 28 February 2020 in an 18 bed ICU of a tertiary teaching hospital, 3 months after CPOE implementation. Every type of PI and degree of acceptance were recorded. Total PIs recorded were compared with those recorded in the same period of time before implementation of the CPOE (between 1 July and 31 August 2020).ResultsDuring the current study period, 227 patients were admitted to the ICU, and 366 PIs were recorded. PIs increased by 173% compared with the previous study period before the implementation of CPOE (232 patients, 134 PIs). Regarding the number of PIs during the current study period, 25.4% were related to PN prescriptions, 8.4% were related to antimicrobial stewardship programme, 5.7% were related to optimising drug therapy, 3.3% were related to route of administration, 4.6% were related to incorrect drug based on the indication, 2.7% were related to therapeutic drug monitoring and 46.4% were related to fluid therapy. 91% of PIs were accepted by the ICU staff.Conclusion and relevanceCPOE in the ICU promoted the pharmacist’s participation in improving the safety of medical prescriptions by increasing the number of accepted PIs. The high number of interventions related to fluid therapy was highlighted. We consider it necessary to start corrective measures regarding this aspect, such as the preparation of prescription protocols, training talks, etc.References and/or acknowledgementsConflict of interestNo conflict of interest</description><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Order entry</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><issn>2047-9956</issn><issn>2047-9964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo9j01LAzEQhoMoWGr_Q9Bzaj42m82xFL-goGDvJSYTmtLNrpvdwt68ePVH-ktMq3iad-adeV4GoWtG54yJ8hZ223ZruppwyhkBs21tE_2cc32GJpwWimhdFuf_WpaXaJZSeKNSiEoXQk_QV7F8eSVCq--Pz0VKkFINsceNxye0sTD0wZo9DrGH7pC90MSUO2ziaRZTOAC2pgM8xNBj4_Metk3dDlmEBC6TxhRsyAdN57KZId2I05h6qHGo2z0cM82RfIUuvNknmP3VKVrf362Xj2T1_PC0XKxIW1FNHICkwsvSKUWVloYap8F4Ly2roGS-BMEqJpWRKj_qHDihfSk96MpQy8UU3fxi2655HyD1m10zdDEnbriUXCkmORM_wAxwRg</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>M Valera Rubio</creator><creator>MB Fuentes Ibañez</creator><creator>M Gonzalez Padilla</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>4CPS-397 Assessment of pharmaceutical interventions in an intensive care unit after computerised physician order entry system implementation</title><author>M Valera Rubio ; MB Fuentes Ibañez ; M Gonzalez Padilla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p809-dee503f56d770795a0ad9eaff5c18e61f6e318157a57389dded39f65fe98a0c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Order entry</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>M Valera Rubio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MB Fuentes Ibañez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M Gonzalez Padilla</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>M Valera Rubio</au><au>MB Fuentes Ibañez</au><au>M Gonzalez Padilla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>4CPS-397 Assessment of pharmaceutical interventions in an intensive care unit after computerised physician order entry system implementation</atitle><jtitle>European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice</jtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A111</spage><epage>A112</epage><pages>A111-A112</pages><issn>2047-9956</issn><eissn>2047-9964</eissn><abstract>Background and importanceCritical care pharmacists have demonstrated their contribution to the management of drug therapy and impact on patient and medication safety. Traditionally, the functions of the clinical pharmacist in the intensive care unit (ICU) of our hospital were based on pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) concerning parenteral nutrition (PN). Currently, a computerised physician order entry (CPOE) system has been implemented. This system reduces the incidence of medication errors and allows pharmaceutical validation.Aim and objectivesTo analyse the evolution in the number of PIs before and after implementation of the CPOE; to describe the type of PIs carried out by clinical pharmacists after CPOE implementation; and to assess the degree of acceptance by ICU physicians.Material and methodsA 2 month descriptive and prospective study was conducted between 1 January and 28 February 2020 in an 18 bed ICU of a tertiary teaching hospital, 3 months after CPOE implementation. Every type of PI and degree of acceptance were recorded. Total PIs recorded were compared with those recorded in the same period of time before implementation of the CPOE (between 1 July and 31 August 2020).ResultsDuring the current study period, 227 patients were admitted to the ICU, and 366 PIs were recorded. PIs increased by 173% compared with the previous study period before the implementation of CPOE (232 patients, 134 PIs). Regarding the number of PIs during the current study period, 25.4% were related to PN prescriptions, 8.4% were related to antimicrobial stewardship programme, 5.7% were related to optimising drug therapy, 3.3% were related to route of administration, 4.6% were related to incorrect drug based on the indication, 2.7% were related to therapeutic drug monitoring and 46.4% were related to fluid therapy. 91% of PIs were accepted by the ICU staff.Conclusion and relevanceCPOE in the ICU promoted the pharmacist’s participation in improving the safety of medical prescriptions by increasing the number of accepted PIs. The high number of interventions related to fluid therapy was highlighted. We consider it necessary to start corrective measures regarding this aspect, such as the preparation of prescription protocols, training talks, etc.References and/or acknowledgementsConflict of interestNo conflict of interest</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-eahpconf.229</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2047-9956
ispartof European journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice, 2021-03, Vol.28 (Suppl 1), p.A111-A112
issn 2047-9956
2047-9964
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2552771521
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Conflicts of interest
Drug therapy
Intensive care
Order entry
Pharmaceuticals
title 4CPS-397 Assessment of pharmaceutical interventions in an intensive care unit after computerised physician order entry system implementation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T04%3A50%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=4CPS-397%E2%80%85Assessment%20of%20pharmaceutical%20interventions%20in%20an%20intensive%20care%20unit%20after%20computerised%20physician%20order%20entry%20system%20implementation&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20hospital%20pharmacy.%20Science%20and%20practice&rft.au=M%20Valera%20Rubio&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A111&rft.epage=A112&rft.pages=A111-A112&rft.issn=2047-9956&rft.eissn=2047-9964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-eahpconf.229&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2552771521%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552771521&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true