Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa

Purpose Following the urgency to curb environmental impacts across all sectors globally, this is the first life cycle assessment of different wine grape farming practices suitable for commercial conventional production in South Africa, aiming at better understanding the potentials to reduce adverse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of life cycle assessment 2021-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1374-1390
Hauptverfasser: Russo, V., Strever, A. E., Ponstein, H. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1390
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1374
container_title The international journal of life cycle assessment
container_volume 26
creator Russo, V.
Strever, A. E.
Ponstein, H. J.
description Purpose Following the urgency to curb environmental impacts across all sectors globally, this is the first life cycle assessment of different wine grape farming practices suitable for commercial conventional production in South Africa, aiming at better understanding the potentials to reduce adverse effects on the environment and on human health. Methods An attributional life cycle assessment was conducted on eight different scenarios that reduce the inputs of herbicides and insecticides compared against a business as usual (BAU) scenario. We assess several impact categories based on ReCiPe, namely global warming potential, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial toxicity, freshwater toxicity, marine toxicity, human carcinogenic toxicity and human non-carcinogenic toxicity, human health and ecosystems. A water footprint assessment based on the AWARE method accounts for potential impacts within the watershed. Results and discussion Results show that in our impact assessment, more sustainable farming practices do not always outperform the BAU scenario, which relies on synthetic fertiliser and agrochemicals. As a main trend, most of the impact categories were dominated by energy requirements of wine grape production in an irrigated vineyard, namely the usage of electricity for irrigation pumps and diesel for agricultural machinery. The most favourable scenario across the impact categories provided a low diesel usage, strongly reduced herbicides and the absence of insecticides as it applied cover crops and an integrated pest management. Pesticides and heavy metals contained in agrochemicals are the main contributors to emissions to soil that affected the toxicity categories and impose a risk on human health, which is particularly relevant for the manual labour-intensive South African wine sector. However, we suggest that impacts of agrochemicals on human health and the environment are undervalued in the assessment. The 70% reduction of toxic agrochemicals such as Glyphosate and Paraquat and the 100% reduction of Chlorpyriphos in vineyards hardly affected the model results for human and ecotoxicity. Our concerns are magnified by the fact that manual labour plays a substantial role in South African vineyards, increasing the exposure of humans to these toxic chemicals at their workplace. Conclusions A more sustainable wine grape production is possible when shifting to integrated grape production practices that reduce the inputs of agroche
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11367-021-01911-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2552185591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2552185591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-c9668a07cb9796fad66f4e92e7c390474a74a7fb6aec2caf2368fa04506704ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LwzAch4MoOKdfwFPAczVvTZqTjDFfYOBBPYcsS7aMtalJOty3t10Fb0Lgf_k9T-AB4Baje4yQeEgYUy4KRHCBsMS4oGdggjlmhSgROQcTJFlVUMrkJbhKaYf6JZLlBNSL73Yfom82MHUpa9_old_7fIRtyLbJXu8T9A08-MYedVwnmLcxdJstXM5nj3Bx8GvbGAtdDDV0OtaDqY3aZG_siXwPXd7CmYve6Gtw4Xqhvfm9U_D5tPiYvxTLt-fX-WxZGMppLozkvNJImJUUkju95twxK4kVhkrEBNPDcyuurSFGO0J55TRiJeICMevoFNyN3jaGr86mrHahi03_pSJlSXBVlhL3KzKuTAwpRetUG32t41FhpIasasyq-ljqlFXRHqIjlNqhmo1_6n-oH6thfC8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552185591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Russo, V. ; Strever, A. E. ; Ponstein, H. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Russo, V. ; Strever, A. E. ; Ponstein, H. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Following the urgency to curb environmental impacts across all sectors globally, this is the first life cycle assessment of different wine grape farming practices suitable for commercial conventional production in South Africa, aiming at better understanding the potentials to reduce adverse effects on the environment and on human health. Methods An attributional life cycle assessment was conducted on eight different scenarios that reduce the inputs of herbicides and insecticides compared against a business as usual (BAU) scenario. We assess several impact categories based on ReCiPe, namely global warming potential, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial toxicity, freshwater toxicity, marine toxicity, human carcinogenic toxicity and human non-carcinogenic toxicity, human health and ecosystems. A water footprint assessment based on the AWARE method accounts for potential impacts within the watershed. Results and discussion Results show that in our impact assessment, more sustainable farming practices do not always outperform the BAU scenario, which relies on synthetic fertiliser and agrochemicals. As a main trend, most of the impact categories were dominated by energy requirements of wine grape production in an irrigated vineyard, namely the usage of electricity for irrigation pumps and diesel for agricultural machinery. The most favourable scenario across the impact categories provided a low diesel usage, strongly reduced herbicides and the absence of insecticides as it applied cover crops and an integrated pest management. Pesticides and heavy metals contained in agrochemicals are the main contributors to emissions to soil that affected the toxicity categories and impose a risk on human health, which is particularly relevant for the manual labour-intensive South African wine sector. However, we suggest that impacts of agrochemicals on human health and the environment are undervalued in the assessment. The 70% reduction of toxic agrochemicals such as Glyphosate and Paraquat and the 100% reduction of Chlorpyriphos in vineyards hardly affected the model results for human and ecotoxicity. Our concerns are magnified by the fact that manual labour plays a substantial role in South African vineyards, increasing the exposure of humans to these toxic chemicals at their workplace. Conclusions A more sustainable wine grape production is possible when shifting to integrated grape production practices that reduce the inputs of agrochemicals. Further, improved water and related electricity management through drip irrigation, deficit irrigation and photovoltaic-powered irrigation is recommendable, relieving stress on local water bodies, enhancing drought-preparedness planning and curbing CO 2 emissions embodied in products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0948-3349</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11367-021-01911-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acidification ; Agricultural equipment ; Agricultural practices ; Agricultural technology ; Agrochemicals ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Carcinogens ; Categories ; Chemical pest control ; Climate change ; Cover crops ; Diesel ; Drought ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Electricity ; Energy requirements ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental effects ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Environmental impact ; Eutrophication ; Farming ; Fruits ; Global warming ; Glyphosate ; Grapes ; Heavy metals ; Herbicides ; Insecticides ; Integrated pest management ; Irrigation ; Lca for Agriculture ; Life cycle analysis ; Life cycle assessment ; Life cycles ; Paraquat ; Pest control ; Pesticides ; Photovoltaics ; Physical work ; Sustainability ; Sustainable agriculture ; Sustainable practices ; Toxicity ; Vineyards ; Vitis vinifera ; Water consumption ; Wine ; Wineries &amp; vineyards</subject><ispartof>The international journal of life cycle assessment, 2021-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1374-1390</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-c9668a07cb9796fad66f4e92e7c390474a74a7fb6aec2caf2368fa04506704ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-c9668a07cb9796fad66f4e92e7c390474a74a7fb6aec2caf2368fa04506704ef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0466-6577</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11367-021-01911-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11367-021-01911-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Russo, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strever, A. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponstein, H. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa</title><title>The international journal of life cycle assessment</title><addtitle>Int J Life Cycle Assess</addtitle><description>Purpose Following the urgency to curb environmental impacts across all sectors globally, this is the first life cycle assessment of different wine grape farming practices suitable for commercial conventional production in South Africa, aiming at better understanding the potentials to reduce adverse effects on the environment and on human health. Methods An attributional life cycle assessment was conducted on eight different scenarios that reduce the inputs of herbicides and insecticides compared against a business as usual (BAU) scenario. We assess several impact categories based on ReCiPe, namely global warming potential, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial toxicity, freshwater toxicity, marine toxicity, human carcinogenic toxicity and human non-carcinogenic toxicity, human health and ecosystems. A water footprint assessment based on the AWARE method accounts for potential impacts within the watershed. Results and discussion Results show that in our impact assessment, more sustainable farming practices do not always outperform the BAU scenario, which relies on synthetic fertiliser and agrochemicals. As a main trend, most of the impact categories were dominated by energy requirements of wine grape production in an irrigated vineyard, namely the usage of electricity for irrigation pumps and diesel for agricultural machinery. The most favourable scenario across the impact categories provided a low diesel usage, strongly reduced herbicides and the absence of insecticides as it applied cover crops and an integrated pest management. Pesticides and heavy metals contained in agrochemicals are the main contributors to emissions to soil that affected the toxicity categories and impose a risk on human health, which is particularly relevant for the manual labour-intensive South African wine sector. However, we suggest that impacts of agrochemicals on human health and the environment are undervalued in the assessment. The 70% reduction of toxic agrochemicals such as Glyphosate and Paraquat and the 100% reduction of Chlorpyriphos in vineyards hardly affected the model results for human and ecotoxicity. Our concerns are magnified by the fact that manual labour plays a substantial role in South African vineyards, increasing the exposure of humans to these toxic chemicals at their workplace. Conclusions A more sustainable wine grape production is possible when shifting to integrated grape production practices that reduce the inputs of agrochemicals. Further, improved water and related electricity management through drip irrigation, deficit irrigation and photovoltaic-powered irrigation is recommendable, relieving stress on local water bodies, enhancing drought-preparedness planning and curbing CO 2 emissions embodied in products.</description><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Agricultural equipment</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agricultural technology</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Categories</subject><subject>Chemical pest control</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Cover crops</subject><subject>Diesel</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Energy requirements</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Economics</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>Grapes</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Integrated pest management</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Lca for Agriculture</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>Paraquat</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Photovoltaics</subject><subject>Physical work</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Sustainable practices</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Vineyards</subject><subject>Vitis vinifera</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><subject>Wine</subject><subject>Wineries &amp; vineyards</subject><issn>0948-3349</issn><issn>1614-7502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LwzAch4MoOKdfwFPAczVvTZqTjDFfYOBBPYcsS7aMtalJOty3t10Fb0Lgf_k9T-AB4Baje4yQeEgYUy4KRHCBsMS4oGdggjlmhSgROQcTJFlVUMrkJbhKaYf6JZLlBNSL73Yfom82MHUpa9_old_7fIRtyLbJXu8T9A08-MYedVwnmLcxdJstXM5nj3Bx8GvbGAtdDDV0OtaDqY3aZG_siXwPXd7CmYve6Gtw4Xqhvfm9U_D5tPiYvxTLt-fX-WxZGMppLozkvNJImJUUkju95twxK4kVhkrEBNPDcyuurSFGO0J55TRiJeICMevoFNyN3jaGr86mrHahi03_pSJlSXBVlhL3KzKuTAwpRetUG32t41FhpIasasyq-ljqlFXRHqIjlNqhmo1_6n-oH6thfC8</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Russo, V.</creator><creator>Strever, A. E.</creator><creator>Ponstein, H. J.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0466-6577</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa</title><author>Russo, V. ; Strever, A. E. ; Ponstein, H. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-c9668a07cb9796fad66f4e92e7c390474a74a7fb6aec2caf2368fa04506704ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Agricultural equipment</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agricultural technology</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Categories</topic><topic>Chemical pest control</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Cover crops</topic><topic>Diesel</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Energy requirements</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Economics</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>Grapes</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Integrated pest management</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Lca for Agriculture</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>Paraquat</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Photovoltaics</topic><topic>Physical work</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Sustainable practices</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Vineyards</topic><topic>Vitis vinifera</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><topic>Wine</topic><topic>Wineries &amp; vineyards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Russo, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strever, A. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponstein, H. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The international journal of life cycle assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Russo, V.</au><au>Strever, A. E.</au><au>Ponstein, H. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of life cycle assessment</jtitle><stitle>Int J Life Cycle Assess</stitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1374</spage><epage>1390</epage><pages>1374-1390</pages><issn>0948-3349</issn><eissn>1614-7502</eissn><abstract>Purpose Following the urgency to curb environmental impacts across all sectors globally, this is the first life cycle assessment of different wine grape farming practices suitable for commercial conventional production in South Africa, aiming at better understanding the potentials to reduce adverse effects on the environment and on human health. Methods An attributional life cycle assessment was conducted on eight different scenarios that reduce the inputs of herbicides and insecticides compared against a business as usual (BAU) scenario. We assess several impact categories based on ReCiPe, namely global warming potential, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial toxicity, freshwater toxicity, marine toxicity, human carcinogenic toxicity and human non-carcinogenic toxicity, human health and ecosystems. A water footprint assessment based on the AWARE method accounts for potential impacts within the watershed. Results and discussion Results show that in our impact assessment, more sustainable farming practices do not always outperform the BAU scenario, which relies on synthetic fertiliser and agrochemicals. As a main trend, most of the impact categories were dominated by energy requirements of wine grape production in an irrigated vineyard, namely the usage of electricity for irrigation pumps and diesel for agricultural machinery. The most favourable scenario across the impact categories provided a low diesel usage, strongly reduced herbicides and the absence of insecticides as it applied cover crops and an integrated pest management. Pesticides and heavy metals contained in agrochemicals are the main contributors to emissions to soil that affected the toxicity categories and impose a risk on human health, which is particularly relevant for the manual labour-intensive South African wine sector. However, we suggest that impacts of agrochemicals on human health and the environment are undervalued in the assessment. The 70% reduction of toxic agrochemicals such as Glyphosate and Paraquat and the 100% reduction of Chlorpyriphos in vineyards hardly affected the model results for human and ecotoxicity. Our concerns are magnified by the fact that manual labour plays a substantial role in South African vineyards, increasing the exposure of humans to these toxic chemicals at their workplace. Conclusions A more sustainable wine grape production is possible when shifting to integrated grape production practices that reduce the inputs of agrochemicals. Further, improved water and related electricity management through drip irrigation, deficit irrigation and photovoltaic-powered irrigation is recommendable, relieving stress on local water bodies, enhancing drought-preparedness planning and curbing CO 2 emissions embodied in products.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11367-021-01911-3</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0466-6577</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0948-3349
ispartof The international journal of life cycle assessment, 2021-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1374-1390
issn 0948-3349
1614-7502
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2552185591
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Acidification
Agricultural equipment
Agricultural practices
Agricultural technology
Agrochemicals
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide emissions
Carcinogens
Categories
Chemical pest control
Climate change
Cover crops
Diesel
Drought
Earth and Environmental Science
Electricity
Energy requirements
Environment
Environmental Chemistry
Environmental Economics
Environmental effects
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Environmental impact
Eutrophication
Farming
Fruits
Global warming
Glyphosate
Grapes
Heavy metals
Herbicides
Insecticides
Integrated pest management
Irrigation
Lca for Agriculture
Life cycle analysis
Life cycle assessment
Life cycles
Paraquat
Pest control
Pesticides
Photovoltaics
Physical work
Sustainability
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable practices
Toxicity
Vineyards
Vitis vinifera
Water consumption
Wine
Wineries & vineyards
title Exploring sustainability potentials in vineyards through LCA? Evidence from farming practices in South Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A29%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20sustainability%20potentials%20in%20vineyards%20through%20LCA?%20Evidence%20from%20farming%20practices%20in%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20life%20cycle%20assessment&rft.au=Russo,%20V.&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1374&rft.epage=1390&rft.pages=1374-1390&rft.issn=0948-3349&rft.eissn=1614-7502&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11367-021-01911-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2552185591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552185591&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true