How ancestral subsistence strategies solve salmon starvation and the “protein problem” of Pacific Rim resources

This article provides a theoretical treatment of hunter–gatherer diet and physiology. Through a synthesis of nutritional studies, informed by ethno‐archaeological data, we examine the risk of protein‐rich diets for human survival, and how societies circumvent "salmon starvation" in the nor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of physical anthropology 2021-08, Vol.175 (4), p.741-761
Hauptverfasser: Tushingham, Shannon, Barton, Loukas, Bettinger, Robert L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 761
container_issue 4
container_start_page 741
container_title American journal of physical anthropology
container_volume 175
creator Tushingham, Shannon
Barton, Loukas
Bettinger, Robert L.
description This article provides a theoretical treatment of hunter–gatherer diet and physiology. Through a synthesis of nutritional studies, informed by ethno‐archaeological data, we examine the risk of protein‐rich diets for human survival, and how societies circumvent "salmon starvation" in the northeastern Pacific Rim. Fundamental nutritional constraints associated with salmon storage and consumption counter long‐standing assumptions about the engine of cultural evolution in the region. Excess consumption of lean meat can lead to protein poisoning, termed by early explorers “rabbit starvation.” While consumption of fats and carbohydrates is widely portrayed as a pathway to “offsetting” protein thresholds, there are true limits to the amount of protein individuals can consume, and constraints are most extreme for smaller individuals, children, and pregnant/nursing mothers. While this problem is not usually perceived as associated with fish, the risk of protein poisoning limits the amount of low‐fat fish that people can eat safely. Compared with smaller, mass‐harvested species (e.g., eulachon), dried salmon are exceedingly lean. Under certain circumstances fattier foods (small forage fish, marine mammals, whales, and even bears) or carbohydrate‐rich plants may have been preferred not just for taste but to circumvent this “dietary protein ceiling.” Simply put, “salmon specialization” cannot evolve without access to complimentary caloric energy through fat‐rich or carbohydrate‐rich resources. By extension, the evolution of storage‐based societies requires this problem be solved prior to or in tandem with‐salmon intensification. Without such solutions, increased mortality and reproductive rates would have made salmon reliance unsustainable. This insight is in line with genomic research suggesting protein toxicity avoidance was a powerful evolutionary force, possibly linked to genetic adaptations among First Americans. It is also relevant to evaluating the plausibility of other purportedly “focal” economies and informs understanding of the many solutions varied global societies have engineered to overcome physiological protein limits. A synthesis of nutritional data and regional ethno‐archaeological research demonstrates that Pacific Rim communities circumvented the “protein problem” and “salmon starvation” through subsistence strategizes and the application of ancestral nutrition knowledge. Avoidance of protein toxicity was critical to group survival, and salmon intens
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ajpa.24281
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2552116983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2552116983</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-8a4ce35b25bb215aeea1869792aba8bf97ffca58995e769472d650588f9301733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMotlY3PoAE3AlT8zOZSZalqFUKFtH1cGea0ZT5qcm0pbs-iL5cn8SMoy6FwM09-Tj35iB0TsmQEsKuYbGEIQuZpAeoT4mKAhmF4SHqE_8aqFDyHjpxbuHbyJ9j1ONcciII6SM3qTcYqky7xkKB3Sp1xjXaC7hVGv1qtMOuLtZegKKsK6-DXUNj_BWqOW7eNN7vPpa2brSpsK9pocv97hPXOZ5BZnKT4SdTYqtdvbJ-0ik6yqFw-uynDtDL7c3zeBJMH-_ux6NpkHER00BCmGkuUibSlFEBWgOVkYoVgxRkmqs4zzMQUimh40iFMZtHgggpc8UJjTkfoMvO1-_0vvI_TBZ-gcqPTJgQjNJIyZa66qjM1s5ZnSdLa0qw24SSpM03afNNvvP18MWP5Sot9fwP_Q3UA7QDNqbQ23-sktHDbNSZfgFxk4hl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552116983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How ancestral subsistence strategies solve salmon starvation and the “protein problem” of Pacific Rim resources</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tushingham, Shannon ; Barton, Loukas ; Bettinger, Robert L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tushingham, Shannon ; Barton, Loukas ; Bettinger, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><description>This article provides a theoretical treatment of hunter–gatherer diet and physiology. Through a synthesis of nutritional studies, informed by ethno‐archaeological data, we examine the risk of protein‐rich diets for human survival, and how societies circumvent "salmon starvation" in the northeastern Pacific Rim. Fundamental nutritional constraints associated with salmon storage and consumption counter long‐standing assumptions about the engine of cultural evolution in the region. Excess consumption of lean meat can lead to protein poisoning, termed by early explorers “rabbit starvation.” While consumption of fats and carbohydrates is widely portrayed as a pathway to “offsetting” protein thresholds, there are true limits to the amount of protein individuals can consume, and constraints are most extreme for smaller individuals, children, and pregnant/nursing mothers. While this problem is not usually perceived as associated with fish, the risk of protein poisoning limits the amount of low‐fat fish that people can eat safely. Compared with smaller, mass‐harvested species (e.g., eulachon), dried salmon are exceedingly lean. Under certain circumstances fattier foods (small forage fish, marine mammals, whales, and even bears) or carbohydrate‐rich plants may have been preferred not just for taste but to circumvent this “dietary protein ceiling.” Simply put, “salmon specialization” cannot evolve without access to complimentary caloric energy through fat‐rich or carbohydrate‐rich resources. By extension, the evolution of storage‐based societies requires this problem be solved prior to or in tandem with‐salmon intensification. Without such solutions, increased mortality and reproductive rates would have made salmon reliance unsustainable. This insight is in line with genomic research suggesting protein toxicity avoidance was a powerful evolutionary force, possibly linked to genetic adaptations among First Americans. It is also relevant to evaluating the plausibility of other purportedly “focal” economies and informs understanding of the many solutions varied global societies have engineered to overcome physiological protein limits. A synthesis of nutritional data and regional ethno‐archaeological research demonstrates that Pacific Rim communities circumvented the “protein problem” and “salmon starvation” through subsistence strategizes and the application of ancestral nutrition knowledge. Avoidance of protein toxicity was critical to group survival, and salmon intensification was contingent on the simultaneous intensification of secondary carbohydrate‐rich or fat‐rich resources, not as back up resources but as major dietary components. (Image: Kathryn Killackey).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-8644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2692-7691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.24281</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33830500</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>archaeology ; Body fat ; Carbohydrates ; Consumption ; Cultural change ; Diet ; Fats ; Fish ; food storage ; Genomics ; human metabolism ; hunter–gatherers ; Insight ; macronutrients ; Marine fish ; Marine mammals ; Meat ; Mothers ; nutrition ; paleo‐diet ; Physiology ; Poisoning ; protein toxicity ; Proteins ; Salmon ; Specialization ; Starvation ; Thresholds ; Toxicity ; traditional ecological knowledge ; Whales &amp; whaling</subject><ispartof>American journal of physical anthropology, 2021-08, Vol.175 (4), p.741-761</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-8a4ce35b25bb215aeea1869792aba8bf97ffca58995e769472d650588f9301733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-8a4ce35b25bb215aeea1869792aba8bf97ffca58995e769472d650588f9301733</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3739-9740 ; 0000-0003-1519-4226 ; 0000-0001-8454-3755</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajpa.24281$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajpa.24281$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33830500$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tushingham, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, Loukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettinger, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><title>How ancestral subsistence strategies solve salmon starvation and the “protein problem” of Pacific Rim resources</title><title>American journal of physical anthropology</title><addtitle>Am J Phys Anthropol</addtitle><description>This article provides a theoretical treatment of hunter–gatherer diet and physiology. Through a synthesis of nutritional studies, informed by ethno‐archaeological data, we examine the risk of protein‐rich diets for human survival, and how societies circumvent "salmon starvation" in the northeastern Pacific Rim. Fundamental nutritional constraints associated with salmon storage and consumption counter long‐standing assumptions about the engine of cultural evolution in the region. Excess consumption of lean meat can lead to protein poisoning, termed by early explorers “rabbit starvation.” While consumption of fats and carbohydrates is widely portrayed as a pathway to “offsetting” protein thresholds, there are true limits to the amount of protein individuals can consume, and constraints are most extreme for smaller individuals, children, and pregnant/nursing mothers. While this problem is not usually perceived as associated with fish, the risk of protein poisoning limits the amount of low‐fat fish that people can eat safely. Compared with smaller, mass‐harvested species (e.g., eulachon), dried salmon are exceedingly lean. Under certain circumstances fattier foods (small forage fish, marine mammals, whales, and even bears) or carbohydrate‐rich plants may have been preferred not just for taste but to circumvent this “dietary protein ceiling.” Simply put, “salmon specialization” cannot evolve without access to complimentary caloric energy through fat‐rich or carbohydrate‐rich resources. By extension, the evolution of storage‐based societies requires this problem be solved prior to or in tandem with‐salmon intensification. Without such solutions, increased mortality and reproductive rates would have made salmon reliance unsustainable. This insight is in line with genomic research suggesting protein toxicity avoidance was a powerful evolutionary force, possibly linked to genetic adaptations among First Americans. It is also relevant to evaluating the plausibility of other purportedly “focal” economies and informs understanding of the many solutions varied global societies have engineered to overcome physiological protein limits. A synthesis of nutritional data and regional ethno‐archaeological research demonstrates that Pacific Rim communities circumvented the “protein problem” and “salmon starvation” through subsistence strategizes and the application of ancestral nutrition knowledge. Avoidance of protein toxicity was critical to group survival, and salmon intensification was contingent on the simultaneous intensification of secondary carbohydrate‐rich or fat‐rich resources, not as back up resources but as major dietary components. (Image: Kathryn Killackey).</description><subject>archaeology</subject><subject>Body fat</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Cultural change</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Fats</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>food storage</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>human metabolism</subject><subject>hunter–gatherers</subject><subject>Insight</subject><subject>macronutrients</subject><subject>Marine fish</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>nutrition</subject><subject>paleo‐diet</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Poisoning</subject><subject>protein toxicity</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Specialization</subject><subject>Starvation</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>traditional ecological knowledge</subject><subject>Whales &amp; whaling</subject><issn>0002-9483</issn><issn>1096-8644</issn><issn>2692-7691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMotlY3PoAE3AlT8zOZSZalqFUKFtH1cGea0ZT5qcm0pbs-iL5cn8SMoy6FwM09-Tj35iB0TsmQEsKuYbGEIQuZpAeoT4mKAhmF4SHqE_8aqFDyHjpxbuHbyJ9j1ONcciII6SM3qTcYqky7xkKB3Sp1xjXaC7hVGv1qtMOuLtZegKKsK6-DXUNj_BWqOW7eNN7vPpa2brSpsK9pocv97hPXOZ5BZnKT4SdTYqtdvbJ-0ik6yqFw-uynDtDL7c3zeBJMH-_ux6NpkHER00BCmGkuUibSlFEBWgOVkYoVgxRkmqs4zzMQUimh40iFMZtHgggpc8UJjTkfoMvO1-_0vvI_TBZ-gcqPTJgQjNJIyZa66qjM1s5ZnSdLa0qw24SSpM03afNNvvP18MWP5Sot9fwP_Q3UA7QDNqbQ23-sktHDbNSZfgFxk4hl</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Tushingham, Shannon</creator><creator>Barton, Loukas</creator><creator>Bettinger, Robert L.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3739-9740</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1519-4226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8454-3755</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>How ancestral subsistence strategies solve salmon starvation and the “protein problem” of Pacific Rim resources</title><author>Tushingham, Shannon ; Barton, Loukas ; Bettinger, Robert L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-8a4ce35b25bb215aeea1869792aba8bf97ffca58995e769472d650588f9301733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>archaeology</topic><topic>Body fat</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Cultural change</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Fats</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>food storage</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>human metabolism</topic><topic>hunter–gatherers</topic><topic>Insight</topic><topic>macronutrients</topic><topic>Marine fish</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>nutrition</topic><topic>paleo‐diet</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Poisoning</topic><topic>protein toxicity</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Specialization</topic><topic>Starvation</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>traditional ecological knowledge</topic><topic>Whales &amp; whaling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tushingham, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, Loukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettinger, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>American journal of physical anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tushingham, Shannon</au><au>Barton, Loukas</au><au>Bettinger, Robert L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How ancestral subsistence strategies solve salmon starvation and the “protein problem” of Pacific Rim resources</atitle><jtitle>American journal of physical anthropology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Phys Anthropol</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>175</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>761</epage><pages>741-761</pages><issn>0002-9483</issn><eissn>1096-8644</eissn><eissn>2692-7691</eissn><abstract>This article provides a theoretical treatment of hunter–gatherer diet and physiology. Through a synthesis of nutritional studies, informed by ethno‐archaeological data, we examine the risk of protein‐rich diets for human survival, and how societies circumvent "salmon starvation" in the northeastern Pacific Rim. Fundamental nutritional constraints associated with salmon storage and consumption counter long‐standing assumptions about the engine of cultural evolution in the region. Excess consumption of lean meat can lead to protein poisoning, termed by early explorers “rabbit starvation.” While consumption of fats and carbohydrates is widely portrayed as a pathway to “offsetting” protein thresholds, there are true limits to the amount of protein individuals can consume, and constraints are most extreme for smaller individuals, children, and pregnant/nursing mothers. While this problem is not usually perceived as associated with fish, the risk of protein poisoning limits the amount of low‐fat fish that people can eat safely. Compared with smaller, mass‐harvested species (e.g., eulachon), dried salmon are exceedingly lean. Under certain circumstances fattier foods (small forage fish, marine mammals, whales, and even bears) or carbohydrate‐rich plants may have been preferred not just for taste but to circumvent this “dietary protein ceiling.” Simply put, “salmon specialization” cannot evolve without access to complimentary caloric energy through fat‐rich or carbohydrate‐rich resources. By extension, the evolution of storage‐based societies requires this problem be solved prior to or in tandem with‐salmon intensification. Without such solutions, increased mortality and reproductive rates would have made salmon reliance unsustainable. This insight is in line with genomic research suggesting protein toxicity avoidance was a powerful evolutionary force, possibly linked to genetic adaptations among First Americans. It is also relevant to evaluating the plausibility of other purportedly “focal” economies and informs understanding of the many solutions varied global societies have engineered to overcome physiological protein limits. A synthesis of nutritional data and regional ethno‐archaeological research demonstrates that Pacific Rim communities circumvented the “protein problem” and “salmon starvation” through subsistence strategizes and the application of ancestral nutrition knowledge. Avoidance of protein toxicity was critical to group survival, and salmon intensification was contingent on the simultaneous intensification of secondary carbohydrate‐rich or fat‐rich resources, not as back up resources but as major dietary components. (Image: Kathryn Killackey).</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33830500</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajpa.24281</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3739-9740</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1519-4226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8454-3755</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9483
ispartof American journal of physical anthropology, 2021-08, Vol.175 (4), p.741-761
issn 0002-9483
1096-8644
2692-7691
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2552116983
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects archaeology
Body fat
Carbohydrates
Consumption
Cultural change
Diet
Fats
Fish
food storage
Genomics
human metabolism
hunter–gatherers
Insight
macronutrients
Marine fish
Marine mammals
Meat
Mothers
nutrition
paleo‐diet
Physiology
Poisoning
protein toxicity
Proteins
Salmon
Specialization
Starvation
Thresholds
Toxicity
traditional ecological knowledge
Whales & whaling
title How ancestral subsistence strategies solve salmon starvation and the “protein problem” of Pacific Rim resources
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A47%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20ancestral%20subsistence%20strategies%20solve%20salmon%20starvation%20and%20the%20%E2%80%9Cprotein%20problem%E2%80%9D%20of%20Pacific%20Rim%20resources&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20physical%20anthropology&rft.au=Tushingham,%20Shannon&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=175&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=761&rft.pages=741-761&rft.issn=0002-9483&rft.eissn=1096-8644&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajpa.24281&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2552116983%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552116983&rft_id=info:pmid/33830500&rfr_iscdi=true