How ancestral subsistence strategies solve salmon starvation and the “protein problem” of Pacific Rim resources
This article provides a theoretical treatment of hunter–gatherer diet and physiology. Through a synthesis of nutritional studies, informed by ethno‐archaeological data, we examine the risk of protein‐rich diets for human survival, and how societies circumvent "salmon starvation" in the nor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physical anthropology 2021-08, Vol.175 (4), p.741-761 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 761 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 741 |
container_title | American journal of physical anthropology |
container_volume | 175 |
creator | Tushingham, Shannon Barton, Loukas Bettinger, Robert L. |
description | This article provides a theoretical treatment of hunter–gatherer diet and physiology. Through a synthesis of nutritional studies, informed by ethno‐archaeological data, we examine the risk of protein‐rich diets for human survival, and how societies circumvent "salmon starvation" in the northeastern Pacific Rim. Fundamental nutritional constraints associated with salmon storage and consumption counter long‐standing assumptions about the engine of cultural evolution in the region. Excess consumption of lean meat can lead to protein poisoning, termed by early explorers “rabbit starvation.” While consumption of fats and carbohydrates is widely portrayed as a pathway to “offsetting” protein thresholds, there are true limits to the amount of protein individuals can consume, and constraints are most extreme for smaller individuals, children, and pregnant/nursing mothers. While this problem is not usually perceived as associated with fish, the risk of protein poisoning limits the amount of low‐fat fish that people can eat safely. Compared with smaller, mass‐harvested species (e.g., eulachon), dried salmon are exceedingly lean. Under certain circumstances fattier foods (small forage fish, marine mammals, whales, and even bears) or carbohydrate‐rich plants may have been preferred not just for taste but to circumvent this “dietary protein ceiling.” Simply put, “salmon specialization” cannot evolve without access to complimentary caloric energy through fat‐rich or carbohydrate‐rich resources. By extension, the evolution of storage‐based societies requires this problem be solved prior to or in tandem with‐salmon intensification. Without such solutions, increased mortality and reproductive rates would have made salmon reliance unsustainable. This insight is in line with genomic research suggesting protein toxicity avoidance was a powerful evolutionary force, possibly linked to genetic adaptations among First Americans. It is also relevant to evaluating the plausibility of other purportedly “focal” economies and informs understanding of the many solutions varied global societies have engineered to overcome physiological protein limits.
A synthesis of nutritional data and regional ethno‐archaeological research demonstrates that Pacific Rim communities circumvented the “protein problem” and “salmon starvation” through subsistence strategizes and the application of ancestral nutrition knowledge. Avoidance of protein toxicity was critical to group survival, and salmon intens |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ajpa.24281 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2552116983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2552116983</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-8a4ce35b25bb215aeea1869792aba8bf97ffca58995e769472d650588f9301733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMotlY3PoAE3AlT8zOZSZalqFUKFtH1cGea0ZT5qcm0pbs-iL5cn8SMoy6FwM09-Tj35iB0TsmQEsKuYbGEIQuZpAeoT4mKAhmF4SHqE_8aqFDyHjpxbuHbyJ9j1ONcciII6SM3qTcYqky7xkKB3Sp1xjXaC7hVGv1qtMOuLtZegKKsK6-DXUNj_BWqOW7eNN7vPpa2brSpsK9pocv97hPXOZ5BZnKT4SdTYqtdvbJ-0ik6yqFw-uynDtDL7c3zeBJMH-_ux6NpkHER00BCmGkuUibSlFEBWgOVkYoVgxRkmqs4zzMQUimh40iFMZtHgggpc8UJjTkfoMvO1-_0vvI_TBZ-gcqPTJgQjNJIyZa66qjM1s5ZnSdLa0qw24SSpM03afNNvvP18MWP5Sot9fwP_Q3UA7QDNqbQ23-sktHDbNSZfgFxk4hl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552116983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How ancestral subsistence strategies solve salmon starvation and the “protein problem” of Pacific Rim resources</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tushingham, Shannon ; Barton, Loukas ; Bettinger, Robert L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tushingham, Shannon ; Barton, Loukas ; Bettinger, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><description>This article provides a theoretical treatment of hunter–gatherer diet and physiology. Through a synthesis of nutritional studies, informed by ethno‐archaeological data, we examine the risk of protein‐rich diets for human survival, and how societies circumvent "salmon starvation" in the northeastern Pacific Rim. Fundamental nutritional constraints associated with salmon storage and consumption counter long‐standing assumptions about the engine of cultural evolution in the region. Excess consumption of lean meat can lead to protein poisoning, termed by early explorers “rabbit starvation.” While consumption of fats and carbohydrates is widely portrayed as a pathway to “offsetting” protein thresholds, there are true limits to the amount of protein individuals can consume, and constraints are most extreme for smaller individuals, children, and pregnant/nursing mothers. While this problem is not usually perceived as associated with fish, the risk of protein poisoning limits the amount of low‐fat fish that people can eat safely. Compared with smaller, mass‐harvested species (e.g., eulachon), dried salmon are exceedingly lean. Under certain circumstances fattier foods (small forage fish, marine mammals, whales, and even bears) or carbohydrate‐rich plants may have been preferred not just for taste but to circumvent this “dietary protein ceiling.” Simply put, “salmon specialization” cannot evolve without access to complimentary caloric energy through fat‐rich or carbohydrate‐rich resources. By extension, the evolution of storage‐based societies requires this problem be solved prior to or in tandem with‐salmon intensification. Without such solutions, increased mortality and reproductive rates would have made salmon reliance unsustainable. This insight is in line with genomic research suggesting protein toxicity avoidance was a powerful evolutionary force, possibly linked to genetic adaptations among First Americans. It is also relevant to evaluating the plausibility of other purportedly “focal” economies and informs understanding of the many solutions varied global societies have engineered to overcome physiological protein limits.
A synthesis of nutritional data and regional ethno‐archaeological research demonstrates that Pacific Rim communities circumvented the “protein problem” and “salmon starvation” through subsistence strategizes and the application of ancestral nutrition knowledge. Avoidance of protein toxicity was critical to group survival, and salmon intensification was contingent on the simultaneous intensification of secondary carbohydrate‐rich or fat‐rich resources, not as back up resources but as major dietary components. (Image: Kathryn Killackey).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-8644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2692-7691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.24281</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33830500</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>archaeology ; Body fat ; Carbohydrates ; Consumption ; Cultural change ; Diet ; Fats ; Fish ; food storage ; Genomics ; human metabolism ; hunter–gatherers ; Insight ; macronutrients ; Marine fish ; Marine mammals ; Meat ; Mothers ; nutrition ; paleo‐diet ; Physiology ; Poisoning ; protein toxicity ; Proteins ; Salmon ; Specialization ; Starvation ; Thresholds ; Toxicity ; traditional ecological knowledge ; Whales & whaling</subject><ispartof>American journal of physical anthropology, 2021-08, Vol.175 (4), p.741-761</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-8a4ce35b25bb215aeea1869792aba8bf97ffca58995e769472d650588f9301733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-8a4ce35b25bb215aeea1869792aba8bf97ffca58995e769472d650588f9301733</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3739-9740 ; 0000-0003-1519-4226 ; 0000-0001-8454-3755</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajpa.24281$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajpa.24281$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33830500$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tushingham, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, Loukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettinger, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><title>How ancestral subsistence strategies solve salmon starvation and the “protein problem” of Pacific Rim resources</title><title>American journal of physical anthropology</title><addtitle>Am J Phys Anthropol</addtitle><description>This article provides a theoretical treatment of hunter–gatherer diet and physiology. Through a synthesis of nutritional studies, informed by ethno‐archaeological data, we examine the risk of protein‐rich diets for human survival, and how societies circumvent "salmon starvation" in the northeastern Pacific Rim. Fundamental nutritional constraints associated with salmon storage and consumption counter long‐standing assumptions about the engine of cultural evolution in the region. Excess consumption of lean meat can lead to protein poisoning, termed by early explorers “rabbit starvation.” While consumption of fats and carbohydrates is widely portrayed as a pathway to “offsetting” protein thresholds, there are true limits to the amount of protein individuals can consume, and constraints are most extreme for smaller individuals, children, and pregnant/nursing mothers. While this problem is not usually perceived as associated with fish, the risk of protein poisoning limits the amount of low‐fat fish that people can eat safely. Compared with smaller, mass‐harvested species (e.g., eulachon), dried salmon are exceedingly lean. Under certain circumstances fattier foods (small forage fish, marine mammals, whales, and even bears) or carbohydrate‐rich plants may have been preferred not just for taste but to circumvent this “dietary protein ceiling.” Simply put, “salmon specialization” cannot evolve without access to complimentary caloric energy through fat‐rich or carbohydrate‐rich resources. By extension, the evolution of storage‐based societies requires this problem be solved prior to or in tandem with‐salmon intensification. Without such solutions, increased mortality and reproductive rates would have made salmon reliance unsustainable. This insight is in line with genomic research suggesting protein toxicity avoidance was a powerful evolutionary force, possibly linked to genetic adaptations among First Americans. It is also relevant to evaluating the plausibility of other purportedly “focal” economies and informs understanding of the many solutions varied global societies have engineered to overcome physiological protein limits.
A synthesis of nutritional data and regional ethno‐archaeological research demonstrates that Pacific Rim communities circumvented the “protein problem” and “salmon starvation” through subsistence strategizes and the application of ancestral nutrition knowledge. Avoidance of protein toxicity was critical to group survival, and salmon intensification was contingent on the simultaneous intensification of secondary carbohydrate‐rich or fat‐rich resources, not as back up resources but as major dietary components. (Image: Kathryn Killackey).</description><subject>archaeology</subject><subject>Body fat</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Cultural change</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Fats</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>food storage</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>human metabolism</subject><subject>hunter–gatherers</subject><subject>Insight</subject><subject>macronutrients</subject><subject>Marine fish</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>nutrition</subject><subject>paleo‐diet</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Poisoning</subject><subject>protein toxicity</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Specialization</subject><subject>Starvation</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>traditional ecological knowledge</subject><subject>Whales & whaling</subject><issn>0002-9483</issn><issn>1096-8644</issn><issn>2692-7691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMotlY3PoAE3AlT8zOZSZalqFUKFtH1cGea0ZT5qcm0pbs-iL5cn8SMoy6FwM09-Tj35iB0TsmQEsKuYbGEIQuZpAeoT4mKAhmF4SHqE_8aqFDyHjpxbuHbyJ9j1ONcciII6SM3qTcYqky7xkKB3Sp1xjXaC7hVGv1qtMOuLtZegKKsK6-DXUNj_BWqOW7eNN7vPpa2brSpsK9pocv97hPXOZ5BZnKT4SdTYqtdvbJ-0ik6yqFw-uynDtDL7c3zeBJMH-_ux6NpkHER00BCmGkuUibSlFEBWgOVkYoVgxRkmqs4zzMQUimh40iFMZtHgggpc8UJjTkfoMvO1-_0vvI_TBZ-gcqPTJgQjNJIyZa66qjM1s5ZnSdLa0qw24SSpM03afNNvvP18MWP5Sot9fwP_Q3UA7QDNqbQ23-sktHDbNSZfgFxk4hl</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Tushingham, Shannon</creator><creator>Barton, Loukas</creator><creator>Bettinger, Robert L.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3739-9740</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1519-4226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8454-3755</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>How ancestral subsistence strategies solve salmon starvation and the “protein problem” of Pacific Rim resources</title><author>Tushingham, Shannon ; Barton, Loukas ; Bettinger, Robert L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-8a4ce35b25bb215aeea1869792aba8bf97ffca58995e769472d650588f9301733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>archaeology</topic><topic>Body fat</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Cultural change</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Fats</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>food storage</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>human metabolism</topic><topic>hunter–gatherers</topic><topic>Insight</topic><topic>macronutrients</topic><topic>Marine fish</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>nutrition</topic><topic>paleo‐diet</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Poisoning</topic><topic>protein toxicity</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Specialization</topic><topic>Starvation</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>traditional ecological knowledge</topic><topic>Whales & whaling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tushingham, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, Loukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettinger, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>American journal of physical anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tushingham, Shannon</au><au>Barton, Loukas</au><au>Bettinger, Robert L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How ancestral subsistence strategies solve salmon starvation and the “protein problem” of Pacific Rim resources</atitle><jtitle>American journal of physical anthropology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Phys Anthropol</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>175</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>761</epage><pages>741-761</pages><issn>0002-9483</issn><eissn>1096-8644</eissn><eissn>2692-7691</eissn><abstract>This article provides a theoretical treatment of hunter–gatherer diet and physiology. Through a synthesis of nutritional studies, informed by ethno‐archaeological data, we examine the risk of protein‐rich diets for human survival, and how societies circumvent "salmon starvation" in the northeastern Pacific Rim. Fundamental nutritional constraints associated with salmon storage and consumption counter long‐standing assumptions about the engine of cultural evolution in the region. Excess consumption of lean meat can lead to protein poisoning, termed by early explorers “rabbit starvation.” While consumption of fats and carbohydrates is widely portrayed as a pathway to “offsetting” protein thresholds, there are true limits to the amount of protein individuals can consume, and constraints are most extreme for smaller individuals, children, and pregnant/nursing mothers. While this problem is not usually perceived as associated with fish, the risk of protein poisoning limits the amount of low‐fat fish that people can eat safely. Compared with smaller, mass‐harvested species (e.g., eulachon), dried salmon are exceedingly lean. Under certain circumstances fattier foods (small forage fish, marine mammals, whales, and even bears) or carbohydrate‐rich plants may have been preferred not just for taste but to circumvent this “dietary protein ceiling.” Simply put, “salmon specialization” cannot evolve without access to complimentary caloric energy through fat‐rich or carbohydrate‐rich resources. By extension, the evolution of storage‐based societies requires this problem be solved prior to or in tandem with‐salmon intensification. Without such solutions, increased mortality and reproductive rates would have made salmon reliance unsustainable. This insight is in line with genomic research suggesting protein toxicity avoidance was a powerful evolutionary force, possibly linked to genetic adaptations among First Americans. It is also relevant to evaluating the plausibility of other purportedly “focal” economies and informs understanding of the many solutions varied global societies have engineered to overcome physiological protein limits.
A synthesis of nutritional data and regional ethno‐archaeological research demonstrates that Pacific Rim communities circumvented the “protein problem” and “salmon starvation” through subsistence strategizes and the application of ancestral nutrition knowledge. Avoidance of protein toxicity was critical to group survival, and salmon intensification was contingent on the simultaneous intensification of secondary carbohydrate‐rich or fat‐rich resources, not as back up resources but as major dietary components. (Image: Kathryn Killackey).</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33830500</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajpa.24281</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3739-9740</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1519-4226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8454-3755</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9483 |
ispartof | American journal of physical anthropology, 2021-08, Vol.175 (4), p.741-761 |
issn | 0002-9483 1096-8644 2692-7691 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2552116983 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | archaeology Body fat Carbohydrates Consumption Cultural change Diet Fats Fish food storage Genomics human metabolism hunter–gatherers Insight macronutrients Marine fish Marine mammals Meat Mothers nutrition paleo‐diet Physiology Poisoning protein toxicity Proteins Salmon Specialization Starvation Thresholds Toxicity traditional ecological knowledge Whales & whaling |
title | How ancestral subsistence strategies solve salmon starvation and the “protein problem” of Pacific Rim resources |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A47%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20ancestral%20subsistence%20strategies%20solve%20salmon%20starvation%20and%20the%20%E2%80%9Cprotein%20problem%E2%80%9D%20of%20Pacific%20Rim%20resources&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20physical%20anthropology&rft.au=Tushingham,%20Shannon&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=175&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=761&rft.pages=741-761&rft.issn=0002-9483&rft.eissn=1096-8644&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajpa.24281&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2552116983%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552116983&rft_id=info:pmid/33830500&rfr_iscdi=true |