Joint Registration and Segmentation via Multi-Task Learning for Adaptive Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer
Medical image registration and segmentation are two of the most frequent tasks in medical image analysis. As these tasks are complementary and correlated, it would be beneficial to apply them simultaneously in a joint manner. In this paper, we formulate registration and segmentation as a joint probl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE access 2021, Vol.9, p.95551-95568 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 95568 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 95551 |
container_title | IEEE access |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Elmahdy, Mohamed S. Beljaards, Laurens Yousefi, Sahar Sokooti, Hessam Verbeek, Fons Van Der Heide, Uulke A. Staring, Marius |
description | Medical image registration and segmentation are two of the most frequent tasks in medical image analysis. As these tasks are complementary and correlated, it would be beneficial to apply them simultaneously in a joint manner. In this paper, we formulate registration and segmentation as a joint problem via a Multi-Task Learning (MTL) setting, allowing these tasks to leverage their strengths and mitigate their weaknesses through the sharing of beneficial information. We propose to merge these tasks not only on the loss level, but on the architectural level as well. We studied this approach in the context of adaptive image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer, where planning and follow-up CT images as well as their corresponding contours are available for training. At testing time the contours of the follow-up scans are not available, which is a common scenario in adaptive radiotherapy. The study involves two datasets from different manufacturers and institutes. The first dataset was divided into training (12 patients) and validation (6 patients), and was used to optimize and validate the methodology, while the second dataset (14 patients) was used as an independent test set. We carried out an extensive quantitative comparison between the quality of the automatically generated contours from different network architectures as well as loss weighting methods. Moreover, we evaluated the quality of the generated deformation vector field (DVF). We show that MTL algorithms outperform their Single-Task Learning (STL) counterparts and achieve better generalization on the independent test set. The best algorithm achieved a mean surface distance of 1.06 ± 0.3 mm, 1.27 ± 0.4 mm, 0.91 ± 0.4 mm, and 1.76 ± 0.8 mm on the validation set for the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum, respectively. The high accuracy of the proposed method combined with the fast inference speed, makes it a promising method for automatic re-contouring of follow-up scans for adaptive radiotherapy, potentially reducing treatment related complications and therefore improving patients quality-of-life after treatment. The source code is available at https://github.com/moelmahdy/JRS-MTL . |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3091011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2551365132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9460972</ieee_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_99b9664860a441988bf9b462aafc6f8e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2551365132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-4e39aca35a6f3dcc86ae74de7b1f2b99f027fd8433432fdc8dd66ed3a603c813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUV1rGzEQPEoLDWl-QV4EfT5XX6eTHs2RtikuLbHfxZ60cuQ6J1cnB_Lvo_RC6MKyy7Azu8s0zTWjK8ao-bIehpvtdsUpZytBDaOMvWsuOFOmFZ1Q7__rPzZX83ygNXSFuv6iuf-R4lTIHe7jXDKUmCYCkydb3D_gVBbgMQL5eT6W2O5g_kM2CHmK056ElMnaw6nERyR34GMq95jh9ERSIL9zmisfyQCTw_yp-RDgOOPVa71sdl9vdsP3dvPr2-2w3rROUl1aicKAA9GBCsI7pxVgLz32Iwt8NCZQ3gevpRBS8OCd9l4p9AIUFU4zcdncLrI-wcGecnyA_GQTRPsPSHlvIZfojmiNGY1SUisKUjKj9RjMKBUHCE4FjVXr86J1yunvGediD-mcp3q95V3HhKrJ65RYplx9eM4Y3rYyal8MsotB9sUg-2pQZV0vrIiIbwwjFTU9F89_n40f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2551365132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Joint Registration and Segmentation via Multi-Task Learning for Adaptive Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer</title><source>IEEE Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Elmahdy, Mohamed S. ; Beljaards, Laurens ; Yousefi, Sahar ; Sokooti, Hessam ; Verbeek, Fons ; Van Der Heide, Uulke A. ; Staring, Marius</creator><creatorcontrib>Elmahdy, Mohamed S. ; Beljaards, Laurens ; Yousefi, Sahar ; Sokooti, Hessam ; Verbeek, Fons ; Van Der Heide, Uulke A. ; Staring, Marius</creatorcontrib><description>Medical image registration and segmentation are two of the most frequent tasks in medical image analysis. As these tasks are complementary and correlated, it would be beneficial to apply them simultaneously in a joint manner. In this paper, we formulate registration and segmentation as a joint problem via a Multi-Task Learning (MTL) setting, allowing these tasks to leverage their strengths and mitigate their weaknesses through the sharing of beneficial information. We propose to merge these tasks not only on the loss level, but on the architectural level as well. We studied this approach in the context of adaptive image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer, where planning and follow-up CT images as well as their corresponding contours are available for training. At testing time the contours of the follow-up scans are not available, which is a common scenario in adaptive radiotherapy. The study involves two datasets from different manufacturers and institutes. The first dataset was divided into training (12 patients) and validation (6 patients), and was used to optimize and validate the methodology, while the second dataset (14 patients) was used as an independent test set. We carried out an extensive quantitative comparison between the quality of the automatically generated contours from different network architectures as well as loss weighting methods. Moreover, we evaluated the quality of the generated deformation vector field (DVF). We show that MTL algorithms outperform their Single-Task Learning (STL) counterparts and achieve better generalization on the independent test set. The best algorithm achieved a mean surface distance of 1.06 ± 0.3 mm, 1.27 ± 0.4 mm, 0.91 ± 0.4 mm, and 1.76 ± 0.8 mm on the validation set for the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum, respectively. The high accuracy of the proposed method combined with the fast inference speed, makes it a promising method for automatic re-contouring of follow-up scans for adaptive radiotherapy, potentially reducing treatment related complications and therefore improving patients quality-of-life after treatment. The source code is available at https://github.com/moelmahdy/JRS-MTL .</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3091011</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAECCG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>adaptive radiotherapy ; Algorithms ; Biomedical imaging ; Bladder ; Computed tomography ; Computer architecture ; contour propagation ; Contouring ; Contours ; convolutional neural networks (CNN) ; Datasets ; deformable image registration ; dynamic weight averaging ; Fields (mathematics) ; Image analysis ; Image registration ; Image resolution ; Image segmentation ; Machine learning ; Medical imaging ; multi task learning (MTL) ; Planning ; Prostate cancer ; Radiation therapy ; Registration ; Source code ; Task analysis ; Test sets ; Testing time ; Training ; uncertainty weighting ; Weighting methods</subject><ispartof>IEEE access, 2021, Vol.9, p.95551-95568</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-4e39aca35a6f3dcc86ae74de7b1f2b99f027fd8433432fdc8dd66ed3a603c813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-4e39aca35a6f3dcc86ae74de7b1f2b99f027fd8433432fdc8dd66ed3a603c813</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2396-2504 ; 0000-0002-2434-5500 ; 0000-0003-2885-5812 ; 0000-0002-6282-7973 ; 0000-0001-8432-3082</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9460972$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,4024,27633,27923,27924,27925,54933</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elmahdy, Mohamed S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beljaards, Laurens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefi, Sahar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sokooti, Hessam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbeek, Fons</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Heide, Uulke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staring, Marius</creatorcontrib><title>Joint Registration and Segmentation via Multi-Task Learning for Adaptive Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer</title><title>IEEE access</title><addtitle>Access</addtitle><description>Medical image registration and segmentation are two of the most frequent tasks in medical image analysis. As these tasks are complementary and correlated, it would be beneficial to apply them simultaneously in a joint manner. In this paper, we formulate registration and segmentation as a joint problem via a Multi-Task Learning (MTL) setting, allowing these tasks to leverage their strengths and mitigate their weaknesses through the sharing of beneficial information. We propose to merge these tasks not only on the loss level, but on the architectural level as well. We studied this approach in the context of adaptive image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer, where planning and follow-up CT images as well as their corresponding contours are available for training. At testing time the contours of the follow-up scans are not available, which is a common scenario in adaptive radiotherapy. The study involves two datasets from different manufacturers and institutes. The first dataset was divided into training (12 patients) and validation (6 patients), and was used to optimize and validate the methodology, while the second dataset (14 patients) was used as an independent test set. We carried out an extensive quantitative comparison between the quality of the automatically generated contours from different network architectures as well as loss weighting methods. Moreover, we evaluated the quality of the generated deformation vector field (DVF). We show that MTL algorithms outperform their Single-Task Learning (STL) counterparts and achieve better generalization on the independent test set. The best algorithm achieved a mean surface distance of 1.06 ± 0.3 mm, 1.27 ± 0.4 mm, 0.91 ± 0.4 mm, and 1.76 ± 0.8 mm on the validation set for the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum, respectively. The high accuracy of the proposed method combined with the fast inference speed, makes it a promising method for automatic re-contouring of follow-up scans for adaptive radiotherapy, potentially reducing treatment related complications and therefore improving patients quality-of-life after treatment. The source code is available at https://github.com/moelmahdy/JRS-MTL .</description><subject>adaptive radiotherapy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biomedical imaging</subject><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computer architecture</subject><subject>contour propagation</subject><subject>Contouring</subject><subject>Contours</subject><subject>convolutional neural networks (CNN)</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>deformable image registration</subject><subject>dynamic weight averaging</subject><subject>Fields (mathematics)</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Image registration</subject><subject>Image resolution</subject><subject>Image segmentation</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>multi task learning (MTL)</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Source code</subject><subject>Task analysis</subject><subject>Test sets</subject><subject>Testing time</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>uncertainty weighting</subject><subject>Weighting methods</subject><issn>2169-3536</issn><issn>2169-3536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUV1rGzEQPEoLDWl-QV4EfT5XX6eTHs2RtikuLbHfxZ60cuQ6J1cnB_Lvo_RC6MKyy7Azu8s0zTWjK8ao-bIehpvtdsUpZytBDaOMvWsuOFOmFZ1Q7__rPzZX83ygNXSFuv6iuf-R4lTIHe7jXDKUmCYCkydb3D_gVBbgMQL5eT6W2O5g_kM2CHmK056ElMnaw6nERyR34GMq95jh9ERSIL9zmisfyQCTw_yp-RDgOOPVa71sdl9vdsP3dvPr2-2w3rROUl1aicKAA9GBCsI7pxVgLz32Iwt8NCZQ3gevpRBS8OCd9l4p9AIUFU4zcdncLrI-wcGecnyA_GQTRPsPSHlvIZfojmiNGY1SUisKUjKj9RjMKBUHCE4FjVXr86J1yunvGediD-mcp3q95V3HhKrJ65RYplx9eM4Y3rYyal8MsotB9sUg-2pQZV0vrIiIbwwjFTU9F89_n40f</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Elmahdy, Mohamed S.</creator><creator>Beljaards, Laurens</creator><creator>Yousefi, Sahar</creator><creator>Sokooti, Hessam</creator><creator>Verbeek, Fons</creator><creator>Van Der Heide, Uulke A.</creator><creator>Staring, Marius</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2396-2504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2434-5500</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2885-5812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6282-7973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8432-3082</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Joint Registration and Segmentation via Multi-Task Learning for Adaptive Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer</title><author>Elmahdy, Mohamed S. ; Beljaards, Laurens ; Yousefi, Sahar ; Sokooti, Hessam ; Verbeek, Fons ; Van Der Heide, Uulke A. ; Staring, Marius</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-4e39aca35a6f3dcc86ae74de7b1f2b99f027fd8433432fdc8dd66ed3a603c813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>adaptive radiotherapy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biomedical imaging</topic><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computer architecture</topic><topic>contour propagation</topic><topic>Contouring</topic><topic>Contours</topic><topic>convolutional neural networks (CNN)</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>deformable image registration</topic><topic>dynamic weight averaging</topic><topic>Fields (mathematics)</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Image registration</topic><topic>Image resolution</topic><topic>Image segmentation</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>multi task learning (MTL)</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Source code</topic><topic>Task analysis</topic><topic>Test sets</topic><topic>Testing time</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>uncertainty weighting</topic><topic>Weighting methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elmahdy, Mohamed S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beljaards, Laurens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefi, Sahar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sokooti, Hessam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbeek, Fons</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Der Heide, Uulke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staring, Marius</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elmahdy, Mohamed S.</au><au>Beljaards, Laurens</au><au>Yousefi, Sahar</au><au>Sokooti, Hessam</au><au>Verbeek, Fons</au><au>Van Der Heide, Uulke A.</au><au>Staring, Marius</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Joint Registration and Segmentation via Multi-Task Learning for Adaptive Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer</atitle><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle><stitle>Access</stitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>95551</spage><epage>95568</epage><pages>95551-95568</pages><issn>2169-3536</issn><eissn>2169-3536</eissn><coden>IAECCG</coden><abstract>Medical image registration and segmentation are two of the most frequent tasks in medical image analysis. As these tasks are complementary and correlated, it would be beneficial to apply them simultaneously in a joint manner. In this paper, we formulate registration and segmentation as a joint problem via a Multi-Task Learning (MTL) setting, allowing these tasks to leverage their strengths and mitigate their weaknesses through the sharing of beneficial information. We propose to merge these tasks not only on the loss level, but on the architectural level as well. We studied this approach in the context of adaptive image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer, where planning and follow-up CT images as well as their corresponding contours are available for training. At testing time the contours of the follow-up scans are not available, which is a common scenario in adaptive radiotherapy. The study involves two datasets from different manufacturers and institutes. The first dataset was divided into training (12 patients) and validation (6 patients), and was used to optimize and validate the methodology, while the second dataset (14 patients) was used as an independent test set. We carried out an extensive quantitative comparison between the quality of the automatically generated contours from different network architectures as well as loss weighting methods. Moreover, we evaluated the quality of the generated deformation vector field (DVF). We show that MTL algorithms outperform their Single-Task Learning (STL) counterparts and achieve better generalization on the independent test set. The best algorithm achieved a mean surface distance of 1.06 ± 0.3 mm, 1.27 ± 0.4 mm, 0.91 ± 0.4 mm, and 1.76 ± 0.8 mm on the validation set for the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum, respectively. The high accuracy of the proposed method combined with the fast inference speed, makes it a promising method for automatic re-contouring of follow-up scans for adaptive radiotherapy, potentially reducing treatment related complications and therefore improving patients quality-of-life after treatment. The source code is available at https://github.com/moelmahdy/JRS-MTL .</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3091011</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2396-2504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2434-5500</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2885-5812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6282-7973</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8432-3082</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-3536 |
ispartof | IEEE access, 2021, Vol.9, p.95551-95568 |
issn | 2169-3536 2169-3536 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2551365132 |
source | IEEE Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | adaptive radiotherapy Algorithms Biomedical imaging Bladder Computed tomography Computer architecture contour propagation Contouring Contours convolutional neural networks (CNN) Datasets deformable image registration dynamic weight averaging Fields (mathematics) Image analysis Image registration Image resolution Image segmentation Machine learning Medical imaging multi task learning (MTL) Planning Prostate cancer Radiation therapy Registration Source code Task analysis Test sets Testing time Training uncertainty weighting Weighting methods |
title | Joint Registration and Segmentation via Multi-Task Learning for Adaptive Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T12%3A25%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Joint%20Registration%20and%20Segmentation%20via%20Multi-Task%20Learning%20for%20Adaptive%20Radiotherapy%20of%20Prostate%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20access&rft.au=Elmahdy,%20Mohamed%20S.&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=95551&rft.epage=95568&rft.pages=95551-95568&rft.issn=2169-3536&rft.eissn=2169-3536&rft.coden=IAECCG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3091011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2551365132%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2551365132&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9460972&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_99b9664860a441988bf9b462aafc6f8e&rfr_iscdi=true |