Towards a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in artificial intelligence
The rapid innovation in artificial intelligence (AI) is raising concerns regarding human autonomy, agency, fairness, and justice. While responsible stewardship of innovation calls for public engagement, inclusiveness, and informed discourse, AI seemingly challenges such informed discourse by way of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Technology in society 2021-02, Vol.64, p.101475, Article 101475 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 101475 |
| container_title | Technology in society |
| container_volume | 64 |
| creator | Buhmann, Alexander Fieseler, Christian |
| description | The rapid innovation in artificial intelligence (AI) is raising concerns regarding human autonomy, agency, fairness, and justice. While responsible stewardship of innovation calls for public engagement, inclusiveness, and informed discourse, AI seemingly challenges such informed discourse by way of its opacity (poor transparency, explainability, and accountability). We apply a deliberative approach to propose a framework for responsible innovation in AI. This framework foregrounds discourse principles geared to help offset these opacity challenges. To support better public governance, we consider the mutual roles and dependencies of organizations that develop and apply AI, as well as civil society actors, and investigative media in exploring pathways for responsible AI innovation.
•Discussion of how AI challenges informed public discourse by way of its poor transparency, explainability, and accountability.•Proposition of a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in AI to offset these challenges.•Specification of roles of AI developers, civil society actors, and investigative media in deliberation for responsible AI innovation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101475 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2551250747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0160791X20312781</els_id><sourcerecordid>2551250747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-89532d5f3405b673c653c73781747d5c643f4580a8ea3a6bfdb7e869286fef363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QRhwPTWZPLsSKb6g4KaKu5DJ3GjG6aQmY4v_3tTp3tV98N1zOQehS4JnBBNx3c4GsB8p2FmFq78dk_wITYiS85JWkh2jSeZwKefk7RSdpdRijCllaoJeV2FnYpMKUzTQ-RqiGfwWChfNGnYhfhYuxCJC2oQ--bqDwvd92GYo9LktTBy889abLk8DdJ1_h97COTpxpktwcahT9HJ_t1o8lsvnh6fF7bK0VLGhVHNOq4Y7yjCvhaRWcGollYpIJhtuBaOOcYWNAkONqF1TS1BiXinhwFFBp-hq1N3E8PUNadBt-I59fqkrzknFcRbKFB8pG0NKEZzeRL828UcTrPcR6lYfItT7CPUYYb67Ge8gW9h6iDpZv7fX-Ah20E3w_yj8AvutfWE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2551250747</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in artificial intelligence</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Buhmann, Alexander ; Fieseler, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Buhmann, Alexander ; Fieseler, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>The rapid innovation in artificial intelligence (AI) is raising concerns regarding human autonomy, agency, fairness, and justice. While responsible stewardship of innovation calls for public engagement, inclusiveness, and informed discourse, AI seemingly challenges such informed discourse by way of its opacity (poor transparency, explainability, and accountability). We apply a deliberative approach to propose a framework for responsible innovation in AI. This framework foregrounds discourse principles geared to help offset these opacity challenges. To support better public governance, we consider the mutual roles and dependencies of organizations that develop and apply AI, as well as civil society actors, and investigative media in exploring pathways for responsible AI innovation.
•Discussion of how AI challenges informed public discourse by way of its poor transparency, explainability, and accountability.•Proposition of a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in AI to offset these challenges.•Specification of roles of AI developers, civil society actors, and investigative media in deliberation for responsible AI innovation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-791X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3274</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101475</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accountability ; AI governance ; Artificial intelligence ; Autonomy ; Civil society ; Deliberation ; Discourse ; Governance ; Innovations ; Intelligence ; Management ; Opacity ; Public participation ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>Technology in society, 2021-02, Vol.64, p.101475, Article 101475</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-89532d5f3405b673c653c73781747d5c643f4580a8ea3a6bfdb7e869286fef363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-89532d5f3405b673c653c73781747d5c643f4580a8ea3a6bfdb7e869286fef363</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8077-496X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101475$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,33755,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buhmann, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fieseler, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Towards a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in artificial intelligence</title><title>Technology in society</title><description>The rapid innovation in artificial intelligence (AI) is raising concerns regarding human autonomy, agency, fairness, and justice. While responsible stewardship of innovation calls for public engagement, inclusiveness, and informed discourse, AI seemingly challenges such informed discourse by way of its opacity (poor transparency, explainability, and accountability). We apply a deliberative approach to propose a framework for responsible innovation in AI. This framework foregrounds discourse principles geared to help offset these opacity challenges. To support better public governance, we consider the mutual roles and dependencies of organizations that develop and apply AI, as well as civil society actors, and investigative media in exploring pathways for responsible AI innovation.
•Discussion of how AI challenges informed public discourse by way of its poor transparency, explainability, and accountability.•Proposition of a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in AI to offset these challenges.•Specification of roles of AI developers, civil society actors, and investigative media in deliberation for responsible AI innovation.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>AI governance</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Deliberation</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Opacity</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>0160-791X</issn><issn>1879-3274</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QRhwPTWZPLsSKb6g4KaKu5DJ3GjG6aQmY4v_3tTp3tV98N1zOQehS4JnBBNx3c4GsB8p2FmFq78dk_wITYiS85JWkh2jSeZwKefk7RSdpdRijCllaoJeV2FnYpMKUzTQ-RqiGfwWChfNGnYhfhYuxCJC2oQ--bqDwvd92GYo9LktTBy889abLk8DdJ1_h97COTpxpktwcahT9HJ_t1o8lsvnh6fF7bK0VLGhVHNOq4Y7yjCvhaRWcGollYpIJhtuBaOOcYWNAkONqF1TS1BiXinhwFFBp-hq1N3E8PUNadBt-I59fqkrzknFcRbKFB8pG0NKEZzeRL828UcTrPcR6lYfItT7CPUYYb67Ge8gW9h6iDpZv7fX-Ah20E3w_yj8AvutfWE</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Buhmann, Alexander</creator><creator>Fieseler, Christian</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8077-496X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Towards a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in artificial intelligence</title><author>Buhmann, Alexander ; Fieseler, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-89532d5f3405b673c653c73781747d5c643f4580a8ea3a6bfdb7e869286fef363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>AI governance</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Deliberation</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Opacity</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buhmann, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fieseler, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Technology in society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buhmann, Alexander</au><au>Fieseler, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in artificial intelligence</atitle><jtitle>Technology in society</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>64</volume><spage>101475</spage><pages>101475-</pages><artnum>101475</artnum><issn>0160-791X</issn><eissn>1879-3274</eissn><abstract>The rapid innovation in artificial intelligence (AI) is raising concerns regarding human autonomy, agency, fairness, and justice. While responsible stewardship of innovation calls for public engagement, inclusiveness, and informed discourse, AI seemingly challenges such informed discourse by way of its opacity (poor transparency, explainability, and accountability). We apply a deliberative approach to propose a framework for responsible innovation in AI. This framework foregrounds discourse principles geared to help offset these opacity challenges. To support better public governance, we consider the mutual roles and dependencies of organizations that develop and apply AI, as well as civil society actors, and investigative media in exploring pathways for responsible AI innovation.
•Discussion of how AI challenges informed public discourse by way of its poor transparency, explainability, and accountability.•Proposition of a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in AI to offset these challenges.•Specification of roles of AI developers, civil society actors, and investigative media in deliberation for responsible AI innovation.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101475</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8077-496X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0160-791X |
| ispartof | Technology in society, 2021-02, Vol.64, p.101475, Article 101475 |
| issn | 0160-791X 1879-3274 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2551250747 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Accountability AI governance Artificial intelligence Autonomy Civil society Deliberation Discourse Governance Innovations Intelligence Management Opacity Public participation Transparency |
| title | Towards a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in artificial intelligence |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T14%3A43%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20a%20deliberative%20framework%20for%20responsible%20innovation%20in%20artificial%20intelligence&rft.jtitle=Technology%20in%20society&rft.au=Buhmann,%20Alexander&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=64&rft.spage=101475&rft.pages=101475-&rft.artnum=101475&rft.issn=0160-791X&rft.eissn=1879-3274&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101475&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2551250747%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2551250747&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0160791X20312781&rfr_iscdi=true |