Who can best find Waldo? Exploring individual differences that bolster performance in a security surveillance microworld

Summary Closed‐circuit television (CCTV) surveillance units largely rely on the support of surveillance operators. Although this job is cognitively challenging, few studies have investigated the main human factors improving the ability to detect critical incidents in this context. This study aimed t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied cognitive psychology 2021-07, Vol.35 (4), p.1044-1057
Hauptverfasser: Marois, Alexandre, Hodgetts, Helen M., Chamberland, Cindy, Williot, Alexandre, Tremblay, Sébastien
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1057
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1044
container_title Applied cognitive psychology
container_volume 35
creator Marois, Alexandre
Hodgetts, Helen M.
Chamberland, Cindy
Williot, Alexandre
Tremblay, Sébastien
description Summary Closed‐circuit television (CCTV) surveillance units largely rely on the support of surveillance operators. Although this job is cognitively challenging, few studies have investigated the main human factors improving the ability to detect critical incidents in this context. This study aimed to explore the contribution of individual characteristics and cognitive abilities to performance in a realistic CCTV monitoring simulation. Non‐expert participants took part in a surveillance simulation and were screened on several measures of individual differences. Improved detection abilities and quicker speed of detection were related to lower age and to better knowledge of the area, cognitive flexibility, working memory, and visual/threat detection abilities. Moreover, more false alarms were associated with higher goal commitment but with lower working memory, visual/threat detection abilities, and cognitive flexibility. Results highlight the potential to screen for a series of cognitive and non‐cognitive skills as part of personnel selection procedures for CCTV centers.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acp.3837
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2550985282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1301845</ericid><sourcerecordid>2550985282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3157-866c0eda0dc1fa9c1ac91897e901fe3d054c039084792e8be48c5d975b8e25cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouH6Af0AIePFSnbTNNjmJLOsXgh6UPZY0mWok29SkVfffm3XFm6fAPA_vZF5CjhicMYD8XOn-rBBFtUUmDKTMoMphm0xACJGVIGCX7MX4BgByyvIJ-Vq8eqpVRxuMA21tZ-hCOeMv6Pyrdz7Y7oWmof2wZlSOGtu2GLDTGOnwqgbaeBcHDLTH0PqwVIkknyoaUY_BDisax_CB1rkftLQ6-E8fnDkgO61yEQ9_333yfDV_mt1k9w_Xt7PL-0wXjFeZmE41oFFgNGuV1ExpyYSsUAJrsTDASw2FBFFWMkfRYCk0N7LijcCc66bYJyeb3D749zEdWb_5MXRpZZ1zDlLwXOTJOt1Y6XsxBmzrPtilCquaQb3utU691utek3q8UTFY_afN71gBTJQ88WzDP63D1b859eXs8SfvG3GPhIM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550985282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Who can best find Waldo? Exploring individual differences that bolster performance in a security surveillance microworld</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Marois, Alexandre ; Hodgetts, Helen M. ; Chamberland, Cindy ; Williot, Alexandre ; Tremblay, Sébastien</creator><creatorcontrib>Marois, Alexandre ; Hodgetts, Helen M. ; Chamberland, Cindy ; Williot, Alexandre ; Tremblay, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Closed‐circuit television (CCTV) surveillance units largely rely on the support of surveillance operators. Although this job is cognitively challenging, few studies have investigated the main human factors improving the ability to detect critical incidents in this context. This study aimed to explore the contribution of individual characteristics and cognitive abilities to performance in a realistic CCTV monitoring simulation. Non‐expert participants took part in a surveillance simulation and were screened on several measures of individual differences. Improved detection abilities and quicker speed of detection were related to lower age and to better knowledge of the area, cognitive flexibility, working memory, and visual/threat detection abilities. Moreover, more false alarms were associated with higher goal commitment but with lower working memory, visual/threat detection abilities, and cognitive flexibility. Results highlight the potential to screen for a series of cognitive and non‐cognitive skills as part of personnel selection procedures for CCTV centers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-4080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acp.3837</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley</publisher><subject>Age Differences ; Closed circuit television ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive Ability ; Cognitive flexibility ; Cognitive skills ; Correlation ; Critical incidents ; Critical Incidents Method ; Human factors ; Human Factors Engineering ; Individual Differences ; Measures (Individuals) ; Memory ; Operators ; Personnel selection ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Safety ; Security Personnel ; security surveillance ; Short Term Memory ; Simulation ; Surveillance ; Television ; Threats</subject><ispartof>Applied cognitive psychology, 2021-07, Vol.35 (4), p.1044-1057</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3157-866c0eda0dc1fa9c1ac91897e901fe3d054c039084792e8be48c5d975b8e25cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3157-866c0eda0dc1fa9c1ac91897e901fe3d054c039084792e8be48c5d975b8e25cb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4309-5700 ; 0000-0002-4127-4134 ; 0000-0001-6999-4742 ; 0000-0003-1505-0329</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facp.3837$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facp.3837$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,30980,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1301845$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marois, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgetts, Helen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberland, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williot, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><title>Who can best find Waldo? Exploring individual differences that bolster performance in a security surveillance microworld</title><title>Applied cognitive psychology</title><description>Summary Closed‐circuit television (CCTV) surveillance units largely rely on the support of surveillance operators. Although this job is cognitively challenging, few studies have investigated the main human factors improving the ability to detect critical incidents in this context. This study aimed to explore the contribution of individual characteristics and cognitive abilities to performance in a realistic CCTV monitoring simulation. Non‐expert participants took part in a surveillance simulation and were screened on several measures of individual differences. Improved detection abilities and quicker speed of detection were related to lower age and to better knowledge of the area, cognitive flexibility, working memory, and visual/threat detection abilities. Moreover, more false alarms were associated with higher goal commitment but with lower working memory, visual/threat detection abilities, and cognitive flexibility. Results highlight the potential to screen for a series of cognitive and non‐cognitive skills as part of personnel selection procedures for CCTV centers.</description><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Closed circuit television</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Cognitive flexibility</subject><subject>Cognitive skills</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Critical incidents</subject><subject>Critical Incidents Method</subject><subject>Human factors</subject><subject>Human Factors Engineering</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Operators</subject><subject>Personnel selection</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Security Personnel</subject><subject>security surveillance</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Television</subject><subject>Threats</subject><issn>0888-4080</issn><issn>1099-0720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouH6Af0AIePFSnbTNNjmJLOsXgh6UPZY0mWok29SkVfffm3XFm6fAPA_vZF5CjhicMYD8XOn-rBBFtUUmDKTMoMphm0xACJGVIGCX7MX4BgByyvIJ-Vq8eqpVRxuMA21tZ-hCOeMv6Pyrdz7Y7oWmof2wZlSOGtu2GLDTGOnwqgbaeBcHDLTH0PqwVIkknyoaUY_BDisax_CB1rkftLQ6-E8fnDkgO61yEQ9_333yfDV_mt1k9w_Xt7PL-0wXjFeZmE41oFFgNGuV1ExpyYSsUAJrsTDASw2FBFFWMkfRYCk0N7LijcCc66bYJyeb3D749zEdWb_5MXRpZZ1zDlLwXOTJOt1Y6XsxBmzrPtilCquaQb3utU691utek3q8UTFY_afN71gBTJQ88WzDP63D1b859eXs8SfvG3GPhIM</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Marois, Alexandre</creator><creator>Hodgetts, Helen M.</creator><creator>Chamberland, Cindy</creator><creator>Williot, Alexandre</creator><creator>Tremblay, Sébastien</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4309-5700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4127-4134</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6999-4742</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1505-0329</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Who can best find Waldo? Exploring individual differences that bolster performance in a security surveillance microworld</title><author>Marois, Alexandre ; Hodgetts, Helen M. ; Chamberland, Cindy ; Williot, Alexandre ; Tremblay, Sébastien</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3157-866c0eda0dc1fa9c1ac91897e901fe3d054c039084792e8be48c5d975b8e25cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Closed circuit television</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Cognitive flexibility</topic><topic>Cognitive skills</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Critical incidents</topic><topic>Critical Incidents Method</topic><topic>Human factors</topic><topic>Human Factors Engineering</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Operators</topic><topic>Personnel selection</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Security Personnel</topic><topic>security surveillance</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Television</topic><topic>Threats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marois, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgetts, Helen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberland, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williot, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marois, Alexandre</au><au>Hodgetts, Helen M.</au><au>Chamberland, Cindy</au><au>Williot, Alexandre</au><au>Tremblay, Sébastien</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1301845</ericid><atitle>Who can best find Waldo? Exploring individual differences that bolster performance in a security surveillance microworld</atitle><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1044</spage><epage>1057</epage><pages>1044-1057</pages><issn>0888-4080</issn><eissn>1099-0720</eissn><abstract>Summary Closed‐circuit television (CCTV) surveillance units largely rely on the support of surveillance operators. Although this job is cognitively challenging, few studies have investigated the main human factors improving the ability to detect critical incidents in this context. This study aimed to explore the contribution of individual characteristics and cognitive abilities to performance in a realistic CCTV monitoring simulation. Non‐expert participants took part in a surveillance simulation and were screened on several measures of individual differences. Improved detection abilities and quicker speed of detection were related to lower age and to better knowledge of the area, cognitive flexibility, working memory, and visual/threat detection abilities. Moreover, more false alarms were associated with higher goal commitment but with lower working memory, visual/threat detection abilities, and cognitive flexibility. Results highlight the potential to screen for a series of cognitive and non‐cognitive skills as part of personnel selection procedures for CCTV centers.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/acp.3837</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4309-5700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4127-4134</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6999-4742</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1505-0329</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-4080
ispartof Applied cognitive psychology, 2021-07, Vol.35 (4), p.1044-1057
issn 0888-4080
1099-0720
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2550985282
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Age Differences
Closed circuit television
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive Ability
Cognitive flexibility
Cognitive skills
Correlation
Critical incidents
Critical Incidents Method
Human factors
Human Factors Engineering
Individual Differences
Measures (Individuals)
Memory
Operators
Personnel selection
Recognition (Psychology)
Safety
Security Personnel
security surveillance
Short Term Memory
Simulation
Surveillance
Television
Threats
title Who can best find Waldo? Exploring individual differences that bolster performance in a security surveillance microworld
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T11%3A56%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Who%20can%20best%20find%20Waldo?%20Exploring%20individual%20differences%20that%20bolster%20performance%20in%20a%20security%20surveillance%20microworld&rft.jtitle=Applied%20cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Marois,%20Alexandre&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1044&rft.epage=1057&rft.pages=1044-1057&rft.issn=0888-4080&rft.eissn=1099-0720&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acp.3837&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2550985282%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550985282&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1301845&rfr_iscdi=true