Divergent imaginaries? Co-producing practitioner and householder perspective to cooling demand response in India
With the rise in cooling demand and the permeation of decentralised renewable energy resources in electricity networks, electricity demand-side management (DSM) has become a major tool for electricity planning and decarbonisation in the Global South. In India, the commercial application of DSM is no...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2021-05, Vol.152, p.112222, Article 112222 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 112222 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 152 |
creator | Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O. Peacock, Andrew D. Payne, Sarah R. Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P. Jenkins, David P. |
description | With the rise in cooling demand and the permeation of decentralised renewable energy resources in electricity networks, electricity demand-side management (DSM) has become a major tool for electricity planning and decarbonisation in the Global South. In India, the commercial application of DSM is not new, yet utility-driven residential-scale demand response (DR) remains an unexplored area. This paper contributes on two fronts – to explicate householders and practitioner's perceptions of DR: disjunctions between these perceptions and its implications for the acceptance of residential DR. Using a co-production approach, this paper draws insights from two sets of stakeholders in India - 25 DR policy and utility experts and 24 household consumers. Our results show that technological saviourism pervasively underscores practitioners understanding of DR and householder agency, a crucial factor in the adoption of DR at the residential scale remains a missing piece. The paper concludes that without considering householder agency, delivering a decarbonised future based on demand response will be challenging and consumers may remain locked into-existing socio-cultural practices that negate the adoption of DR.
•India's residential scale DR remains an untapped area.•Practitioners perception of DR is coloured by technology saviourism.•Agency and negotiations are key issues that will determine householder's acceptability of DR.•Future residential DR policy must be driven by a co-production process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112222 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2550542546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421521000914</els_id><sourcerecordid>2550542546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a0b3160af384dcdadc4bbe87e702c8c942610931f9c4fb1cc01950f3911ad4ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKu_wEvA89aZ3ezXQUTqV6HgRc8hTWbblJqsyW7Bf29qPTuXYZj3neF9GLtGmCFgdbudkev9bpZDjjPEPNUJm2BTF1lV1_Upm0ABmIkcy3N2EeMWAETTignrH-2ewprcwO2nWlungqV4z-c-64M3o7Zuzfug9GAH6x0FrpzhGz9G2vidSXNPIfaU9nvig-fa-93BY-jzoAwUe-8icev4whmrLtlZp3aRrv76lH08P73PX7Pl28ti_rDMtIB2yBSsCqxAdUUjjDbKaLFaUVNTDbludCvyCqEtsGu16FaoNWBbQle0iMqIrium7OZ4N8X4GikOcuvH4NJLmZcllCIvRZVUxVGlg48xUCf7kDiEb4kgD2jlVv6ilQe08og2ue6OLkoB9paCjNqS02RsSCSk8fZf_w8u2oVD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550542546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Divergent imaginaries? Co-producing practitioner and householder perspective to cooling demand response in India</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O. ; Peacock, Andrew D. ; Payne, Sarah R. ; Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P. ; Jenkins, David P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O. ; Peacock, Andrew D. ; Payne, Sarah R. ; Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P. ; Jenkins, David P.</creatorcontrib><description>With the rise in cooling demand and the permeation of decentralised renewable energy resources in electricity networks, electricity demand-side management (DSM) has become a major tool for electricity planning and decarbonisation in the Global South. In India, the commercial application of DSM is not new, yet utility-driven residential-scale demand response (DR) remains an unexplored area. This paper contributes on two fronts – to explicate householders and practitioner's perceptions of DR: disjunctions between these perceptions and its implications for the acceptance of residential DR. Using a co-production approach, this paper draws insights from two sets of stakeholders in India - 25 DR policy and utility experts and 24 household consumers. Our results show that technological saviourism pervasively underscores practitioners understanding of DR and householder agency, a crucial factor in the adoption of DR at the residential scale remains a missing piece. The paper concludes that without considering householder agency, delivering a decarbonised future based on demand response will be challenging and consumers may remain locked into-existing socio-cultural practices that negate the adoption of DR.
•India's residential scale DR remains an untapped area.•Practitioners perception of DR is coloured by technology saviourism.•Agency and negotiations are key issues that will determine householder's acceptability of DR.•Future residential DR policy must be driven by a co-production process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adoption of innovations ; Co-production ; Consumers ; Cooling ; Cooling flexibility ; Cooling systems ; Decentralization ; Demand side management ; Electric power demand ; Electricity ; Energy management ; Energy policy ; Energy resources ; Energy sources ; Households ; India ; Perceptions ; Policy ; Renewable energy ; Residential demand response ; Southern Hemisphere</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2021-05, Vol.152, p.112222, Article 112222</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a0b3160af384dcdadc4bbe87e702c8c942610931f9c4fb1cc01950f3911ad4ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a0b3160af384dcdadc4bbe87e702c8c942610931f9c4fb1cc01950f3911ad4ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112222$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27853,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, Sarah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, David P.</creatorcontrib><title>Divergent imaginaries? Co-producing practitioner and householder perspective to cooling demand response in India</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>With the rise in cooling demand and the permeation of decentralised renewable energy resources in electricity networks, electricity demand-side management (DSM) has become a major tool for electricity planning and decarbonisation in the Global South. In India, the commercial application of DSM is not new, yet utility-driven residential-scale demand response (DR) remains an unexplored area. This paper contributes on two fronts – to explicate householders and practitioner's perceptions of DR: disjunctions between these perceptions and its implications for the acceptance of residential DR. Using a co-production approach, this paper draws insights from two sets of stakeholders in India - 25 DR policy and utility experts and 24 household consumers. Our results show that technological saviourism pervasively underscores practitioners understanding of DR and householder agency, a crucial factor in the adoption of DR at the residential scale remains a missing piece. The paper concludes that without considering householder agency, delivering a decarbonised future based on demand response will be challenging and consumers may remain locked into-existing socio-cultural practices that negate the adoption of DR.
•India's residential scale DR remains an untapped area.•Practitioners perception of DR is coloured by technology saviourism.•Agency and negotiations are key issues that will determine householder's acceptability of DR.•Future residential DR policy must be driven by a co-production process.</description><subject>Adoption of innovations</subject><subject>Co-production</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Cooling flexibility</subject><subject>Cooling systems</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Demand side management</subject><subject>Electric power demand</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Energy management</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy resources</subject><subject>Energy sources</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Residential demand response</subject><subject>Southern Hemisphere</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKu_wEvA89aZ3ezXQUTqV6HgRc8hTWbblJqsyW7Bf29qPTuXYZj3neF9GLtGmCFgdbudkev9bpZDjjPEPNUJm2BTF1lV1_Upm0ABmIkcy3N2EeMWAETTignrH-2ewprcwO2nWlungqV4z-c-64M3o7Zuzfug9GAH6x0FrpzhGz9G2vidSXNPIfaU9nvig-fa-93BY-jzoAwUe-8icev4whmrLtlZp3aRrv76lH08P73PX7Pl28ti_rDMtIB2yBSsCqxAdUUjjDbKaLFaUVNTDbludCvyCqEtsGu16FaoNWBbQle0iMqIrium7OZ4N8X4GikOcuvH4NJLmZcllCIvRZVUxVGlg48xUCf7kDiEb4kgD2jlVv6ilQe08og2ue6OLkoB9paCjNqS02RsSCSk8fZf_w8u2oVD</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O.</creator><creator>Peacock, Andrew D.</creator><creator>Payne, Sarah R.</creator><creator>Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P.</creator><creator>Jenkins, David P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Divergent imaginaries? Co-producing practitioner and householder perspective to cooling demand response in India</title><author>Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O. ; Peacock, Andrew D. ; Payne, Sarah R. ; Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P. ; Jenkins, David P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a0b3160af384dcdadc4bbe87e702c8c942610931f9c4fb1cc01950f3911ad4ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adoption of innovations</topic><topic>Co-production</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Cooling flexibility</topic><topic>Cooling systems</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Demand side management</topic><topic>Electric power demand</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Energy management</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy resources</topic><topic>Energy sources</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Residential demand response</topic><topic>Southern Hemisphere</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, Sarah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, David P.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O.</au><au>Peacock, Andrew D.</au><au>Payne, Sarah R.</au><au>Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P.</au><au>Jenkins, David P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Divergent imaginaries? Co-producing practitioner and householder perspective to cooling demand response in India</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>152</volume><spage>112222</spage><pages>112222-</pages><artnum>112222</artnum><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><abstract>With the rise in cooling demand and the permeation of decentralised renewable energy resources in electricity networks, electricity demand-side management (DSM) has become a major tool for electricity planning and decarbonisation in the Global South. In India, the commercial application of DSM is not new, yet utility-driven residential-scale demand response (DR) remains an unexplored area. This paper contributes on two fronts – to explicate householders and practitioner's perceptions of DR: disjunctions between these perceptions and its implications for the acceptance of residential DR. Using a co-production approach, this paper draws insights from two sets of stakeholders in India - 25 DR policy and utility experts and 24 household consumers. Our results show that technological saviourism pervasively underscores practitioners understanding of DR and householder agency, a crucial factor in the adoption of DR at the residential scale remains a missing piece. The paper concludes that without considering householder agency, delivering a decarbonised future based on demand response will be challenging and consumers may remain locked into-existing socio-cultural practices that negate the adoption of DR.
•India's residential scale DR remains an untapped area.•Practitioners perception of DR is coloured by technology saviourism.•Agency and negotiations are key issues that will determine householder's acceptability of DR.•Future residential DR policy must be driven by a co-production process.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112222</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2021-05, Vol.152, p.112222, Article 112222 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2550542546 |
source | PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adoption of innovations Co-production Consumers Cooling Cooling flexibility Cooling systems Decentralization Demand side management Electric power demand Electricity Energy management Energy policy Energy resources Energy sources Households India Perceptions Policy Renewable energy Residential demand response Southern Hemisphere |
title | Divergent imaginaries? Co-producing practitioner and householder perspective to cooling demand response in India |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T22%3A00%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Divergent%20imaginaries?%20Co-producing%20practitioner%20and%20householder%20perspective%20to%20cooling%20demand%20response%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Osunmuyiwa,%20Olufolahan%20O.&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=152&rft.spage=112222&rft.pages=112222-&rft.artnum=112222&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2550542546%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550542546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421521000914&rfr_iscdi=true |