Divergent imaginaries? Co-producing practitioner and householder perspective to cooling demand response in India

With the rise in cooling demand and the permeation of decentralised renewable energy resources in electricity networks, electricity demand-side management (DSM) has become a major tool for electricity planning and decarbonisation in the Global South. In India, the commercial application of DSM is no...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 2021-05, Vol.152, p.112222, Article 112222
Hauptverfasser: Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O., Peacock, Andrew D., Payne, Sarah R., Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P., Jenkins, David P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 112222
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 152
creator Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O.
Peacock, Andrew D.
Payne, Sarah R.
Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P.
Jenkins, David P.
description With the rise in cooling demand and the permeation of decentralised renewable energy resources in electricity networks, electricity demand-side management (DSM) has become a major tool for electricity planning and decarbonisation in the Global South. In India, the commercial application of DSM is not new, yet utility-driven residential-scale demand response (DR) remains an unexplored area. This paper contributes on two fronts – to explicate householders and practitioner's perceptions of DR: disjunctions between these perceptions and its implications for the acceptance of residential DR. Using a co-production approach, this paper draws insights from two sets of stakeholders in India - 25 DR policy and utility experts and 24 household consumers. Our results show that technological saviourism pervasively underscores practitioners understanding of DR and householder agency, a crucial factor in the adoption of DR at the residential scale remains a missing piece. The paper concludes that without considering householder agency, delivering a decarbonised future based on demand response will be challenging and consumers may remain locked into-existing socio-cultural practices that negate the adoption of DR. •India's residential scale DR remains an untapped area.•Practitioners perception of DR is coloured by technology saviourism.•Agency and negotiations are key issues that will determine householder's acceptability of DR.•Future residential DR policy must be driven by a co-production process.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112222
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2550542546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421521000914</els_id><sourcerecordid>2550542546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a0b3160af384dcdadc4bbe87e702c8c942610931f9c4fb1cc01950f3911ad4ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKu_wEvA89aZ3ezXQUTqV6HgRc8hTWbblJqsyW7Bf29qPTuXYZj3neF9GLtGmCFgdbudkev9bpZDjjPEPNUJm2BTF1lV1_Upm0ABmIkcy3N2EeMWAETTignrH-2ewprcwO2nWlungqV4z-c-64M3o7Zuzfug9GAH6x0FrpzhGz9G2vidSXNPIfaU9nvig-fa-93BY-jzoAwUe-8icev4whmrLtlZp3aRrv76lH08P73PX7Pl28ti_rDMtIB2yBSsCqxAdUUjjDbKaLFaUVNTDbludCvyCqEtsGu16FaoNWBbQle0iMqIrium7OZ4N8X4GikOcuvH4NJLmZcllCIvRZVUxVGlg48xUCf7kDiEb4kgD2jlVv6ilQe08og2ue6OLkoB9paCjNqS02RsSCSk8fZf_w8u2oVD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550542546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Divergent imaginaries? Co-producing practitioner and householder perspective to cooling demand response in India</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O. ; Peacock, Andrew D. ; Payne, Sarah R. ; Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P. ; Jenkins, David P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O. ; Peacock, Andrew D. ; Payne, Sarah R. ; Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P. ; Jenkins, David P.</creatorcontrib><description>With the rise in cooling demand and the permeation of decentralised renewable energy resources in electricity networks, electricity demand-side management (DSM) has become a major tool for electricity planning and decarbonisation in the Global South. In India, the commercial application of DSM is not new, yet utility-driven residential-scale demand response (DR) remains an unexplored area. This paper contributes on two fronts – to explicate householders and practitioner's perceptions of DR: disjunctions between these perceptions and its implications for the acceptance of residential DR. Using a co-production approach, this paper draws insights from two sets of stakeholders in India - 25 DR policy and utility experts and 24 household consumers. Our results show that technological saviourism pervasively underscores practitioners understanding of DR and householder agency, a crucial factor in the adoption of DR at the residential scale remains a missing piece. The paper concludes that without considering householder agency, delivering a decarbonised future based on demand response will be challenging and consumers may remain locked into-existing socio-cultural practices that negate the adoption of DR. •India's residential scale DR remains an untapped area.•Practitioners perception of DR is coloured by technology saviourism.•Agency and negotiations are key issues that will determine householder's acceptability of DR.•Future residential DR policy must be driven by a co-production process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adoption of innovations ; Co-production ; Consumers ; Cooling ; Cooling flexibility ; Cooling systems ; Decentralization ; Demand side management ; Electric power demand ; Electricity ; Energy management ; Energy policy ; Energy resources ; Energy sources ; Households ; India ; Perceptions ; Policy ; Renewable energy ; Residential demand response ; Southern Hemisphere</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2021-05, Vol.152, p.112222, Article 112222</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a0b3160af384dcdadc4bbe87e702c8c942610931f9c4fb1cc01950f3911ad4ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a0b3160af384dcdadc4bbe87e702c8c942610931f9c4fb1cc01950f3911ad4ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112222$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27853,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, Sarah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, David P.</creatorcontrib><title>Divergent imaginaries? Co-producing practitioner and householder perspective to cooling demand response in India</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>With the rise in cooling demand and the permeation of decentralised renewable energy resources in electricity networks, electricity demand-side management (DSM) has become a major tool for electricity planning and decarbonisation in the Global South. In India, the commercial application of DSM is not new, yet utility-driven residential-scale demand response (DR) remains an unexplored area. This paper contributes on two fronts – to explicate householders and practitioner's perceptions of DR: disjunctions between these perceptions and its implications for the acceptance of residential DR. Using a co-production approach, this paper draws insights from two sets of stakeholders in India - 25 DR policy and utility experts and 24 household consumers. Our results show that technological saviourism pervasively underscores practitioners understanding of DR and householder agency, a crucial factor in the adoption of DR at the residential scale remains a missing piece. The paper concludes that without considering householder agency, delivering a decarbonised future based on demand response will be challenging and consumers may remain locked into-existing socio-cultural practices that negate the adoption of DR. •India's residential scale DR remains an untapped area.•Practitioners perception of DR is coloured by technology saviourism.•Agency and negotiations are key issues that will determine householder's acceptability of DR.•Future residential DR policy must be driven by a co-production process.</description><subject>Adoption of innovations</subject><subject>Co-production</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Cooling flexibility</subject><subject>Cooling systems</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Demand side management</subject><subject>Electric power demand</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Energy management</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy resources</subject><subject>Energy sources</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Residential demand response</subject><subject>Southern Hemisphere</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKu_wEvA89aZ3ezXQUTqV6HgRc8hTWbblJqsyW7Bf29qPTuXYZj3neF9GLtGmCFgdbudkev9bpZDjjPEPNUJm2BTF1lV1_Upm0ABmIkcy3N2EeMWAETTignrH-2ewprcwO2nWlungqV4z-c-64M3o7Zuzfug9GAH6x0FrpzhGz9G2vidSXNPIfaU9nvig-fa-93BY-jzoAwUe-8icev4whmrLtlZp3aRrv76lH08P73PX7Pl28ti_rDMtIB2yBSsCqxAdUUjjDbKaLFaUVNTDbludCvyCqEtsGu16FaoNWBbQle0iMqIrium7OZ4N8X4GikOcuvH4NJLmZcllCIvRZVUxVGlg48xUCf7kDiEb4kgD2jlVv6ilQe08og2ue6OLkoB9paCjNqS02RsSCSk8fZf_w8u2oVD</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O.</creator><creator>Peacock, Andrew D.</creator><creator>Payne, Sarah R.</creator><creator>Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P.</creator><creator>Jenkins, David P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Divergent imaginaries? Co-producing practitioner and householder perspective to cooling demand response in India</title><author>Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O. ; Peacock, Andrew D. ; Payne, Sarah R. ; Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P. ; Jenkins, David P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a0b3160af384dcdadc4bbe87e702c8c942610931f9c4fb1cc01950f3911ad4ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adoption of innovations</topic><topic>Co-production</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Cooling flexibility</topic><topic>Cooling systems</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Demand side management</topic><topic>Electric power demand</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Energy management</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy resources</topic><topic>Energy sources</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Residential demand response</topic><topic>Southern Hemisphere</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peacock, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, Sarah R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, David P.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O.</au><au>Peacock, Andrew D.</au><au>Payne, Sarah R.</au><au>Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P.</au><au>Jenkins, David P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Divergent imaginaries? Co-producing practitioner and householder perspective to cooling demand response in India</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>152</volume><spage>112222</spage><pages>112222-</pages><artnum>112222</artnum><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><abstract>With the rise in cooling demand and the permeation of decentralised renewable energy resources in electricity networks, electricity demand-side management (DSM) has become a major tool for electricity planning and decarbonisation in the Global South. In India, the commercial application of DSM is not new, yet utility-driven residential-scale demand response (DR) remains an unexplored area. This paper contributes on two fronts – to explicate householders and practitioner's perceptions of DR: disjunctions between these perceptions and its implications for the acceptance of residential DR. Using a co-production approach, this paper draws insights from two sets of stakeholders in India - 25 DR policy and utility experts and 24 household consumers. Our results show that technological saviourism pervasively underscores practitioners understanding of DR and householder agency, a crucial factor in the adoption of DR at the residential scale remains a missing piece. The paper concludes that without considering householder agency, delivering a decarbonised future based on demand response will be challenging and consumers may remain locked into-existing socio-cultural practices that negate the adoption of DR. •India's residential scale DR remains an untapped area.•Practitioners perception of DR is coloured by technology saviourism.•Agency and negotiations are key issues that will determine householder's acceptability of DR.•Future residential DR policy must be driven by a co-production process.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112222</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2021-05, Vol.152, p.112222, Article 112222
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2550542546
source PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adoption of innovations
Co-production
Consumers
Cooling
Cooling flexibility
Cooling systems
Decentralization
Demand side management
Electric power demand
Electricity
Energy management
Energy policy
Energy resources
Energy sources
Households
India
Perceptions
Policy
Renewable energy
Residential demand response
Southern Hemisphere
title Divergent imaginaries? Co-producing practitioner and householder perspective to cooling demand response in India
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T22%3A00%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Divergent%20imaginaries?%20Co-producing%20practitioner%20and%20householder%20perspective%20to%20cooling%20demand%20response%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Osunmuyiwa,%20Olufolahan%20O.&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=152&rft.spage=112222&rft.pages=112222-&rft.artnum=112222&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2550542546%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550542546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421521000914&rfr_iscdi=true