Behavior of PBTC, HEDP, and Aminophosphonates in the Process of Wastewater Treatment

Ten times at intervals of 1–2 months, individual treatment stages of two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were analyzed for the five quantitatively most widely used phosphonates. The total dissolved concentration of the investigated phosphonates in the influents was between 131 µg/L and 384 µg/L....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water (Basel) 2020-01, Vol.12 (1), p.53
Hauptverfasser: Rott, Eduard, Happel, Oliver, Armbruster, Dominic, Minke, Ralf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 53
container_title Water (Basel)
container_volume 12
creator Rott, Eduard
Happel, Oliver
Armbruster, Dominic
Minke, Ralf
description Ten times at intervals of 1–2 months, individual treatment stages of two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were analyzed for the five quantitatively most widely used phosphonates. The total dissolved concentration of the investigated phosphonates in the influents was between 131 µg/L and 384 µg/L. The nitrogen-free phosphonates 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid (PBTC) and 1-hydroxyethylidene(1,1-diphosphonic acid) (HEDP) accounted for an average proportion of 83–85%. Diethylenetriaminepenta(methylene phosphonic acid) (DTPMP) contributed with 13–14%, whereas aminotris(methylphosphonic acid) (ATMP) (≤15 µg/L) and ethylenediaminetetra(methylene phosphonic acid) (EDTMP) (≤11 µg/L) contents detected in the WWTP influents were comparatively low. The application of new analytical methods allowed the quantification of phosphonates in the solid fraction of the WWTP influents for the first time. High loads of phosphonates were determined (223–2555 mg/kg), indicating that 20%–80% of the phosphonates are present in the adsorbed state. The removal of total dissolved phosphonate by secondary clarification was between 69.7% and 92.4% (medians: 90.7% and 87.7%). In both WWTPs, HEDP (medians: 89.2% and 86.4%) was slightly better eliminated than PBTC (medians: 87.2% and 82.5%). In the sand filtration stage of a WWTP, the average removal was not further improved. In contrast, an additional removal of dissolved phosphonates could be achieved by activated carbon treatment (median: 96.4%). The proportion of phosphonate-P in the dissolved unreactive phosphorus fraction was consistently between 10% and 40% throughout all treatment stages.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/w12010053
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2550509713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A810510499</galeid><sourcerecordid>A810510499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f2dc452173e90f96328524adfe098ba380e3051d5355596f9058a0a4048dd2d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUU1LAzEQXUTBUnvwHwQ8CW2dbJJucmxrtULBHlY8hrhJ7JZuUpOtxX9vSsUPcIZhhpn35sFMll1iGBIi4GaPc8AAjJxknRwKMqCU4tNf9XnWi3ENyajgnEEnKydmpd5rH5C3aDkpp300n90u-0g5jcZN7fx25WMKp1oTUe1QuzJoGXxlYjxwnlVszT4NAyqDUW1jXHuRnVm1iab3lbvZ092snM4Hi8f7h-l4MagIE-3A5rqiLMcFMQKsGJGcs5wqbQ0I_qIIB0OAYc0IY0yMrADGFSgKlGud64J0s6vj3m3wbzsTW7n2u-CSpMwZAwaiwOQH9ao2RtbO-jaoqqljJcccJ4F0DJFQw39QybVp6so7Y-vU_0O4PhKq4GMMxsptqBsVPiQGeXiH_H4H-QTud3e_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550509713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavior of PBTC, HEDP, and Aminophosphonates in the Process of Wastewater Treatment</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Rott, Eduard ; Happel, Oliver ; Armbruster, Dominic ; Minke, Ralf</creator><creatorcontrib>Rott, Eduard ; Happel, Oliver ; Armbruster, Dominic ; Minke, Ralf</creatorcontrib><description>Ten times at intervals of 1–2 months, individual treatment stages of two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were analyzed for the five quantitatively most widely used phosphonates. The total dissolved concentration of the investigated phosphonates in the influents was between 131 µg/L and 384 µg/L. The nitrogen-free phosphonates 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid (PBTC) and 1-hydroxyethylidene(1,1-diphosphonic acid) (HEDP) accounted for an average proportion of 83–85%. Diethylenetriaminepenta(methylene phosphonic acid) (DTPMP) contributed with 13–14%, whereas aminotris(methylphosphonic acid) (ATMP) (≤15 µg/L) and ethylenediaminetetra(methylene phosphonic acid) (EDTMP) (≤11 µg/L) contents detected in the WWTP influents were comparatively low. The application of new analytical methods allowed the quantification of phosphonates in the solid fraction of the WWTP influents for the first time. High loads of phosphonates were determined (223–2555 mg/kg), indicating that 20%–80% of the phosphonates are present in the adsorbed state. The removal of total dissolved phosphonate by secondary clarification was between 69.7% and 92.4% (medians: 90.7% and 87.7%). In both WWTPs, HEDP (medians: 89.2% and 86.4%) was slightly better eliminated than PBTC (medians: 87.2% and 82.5%). In the sand filtration stage of a WWTP, the average removal was not further improved. In contrast, an additional removal of dissolved phosphonates could be achieved by activated carbon treatment (median: 96.4%). The proportion of phosphonate-P in the dissolved unreactive phosphorus fraction was consistently between 10% and 40% throughout all treatment stages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w12010053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Activated carbon ; Analytical methods ; Carboxylic acids ; Chromatography ; Diphosphonates ; Effluents ; Evaluation ; Influents ; Mass spectrometry ; Methods ; Methylene ; Molybdenum ; Phosphonates ; Phosphonic acids ; Phosphorus ; Purification ; Sand filters ; Scientific imaging ; Sedimentation &amp; deposition ; Sewage ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewater treatment plants ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2020-01, Vol.12 (1), p.53</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f2dc452173e90f96328524adfe098ba380e3051d5355596f9058a0a4048dd2d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f2dc452173e90f96328524adfe098ba380e3051d5355596f9058a0a4048dd2d73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3190-6350 ; 0000-0002-6921-2752</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rott, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Happel, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armbruster, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minke, Ralf</creatorcontrib><title>Behavior of PBTC, HEDP, and Aminophosphonates in the Process of Wastewater Treatment</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>Ten times at intervals of 1–2 months, individual treatment stages of two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were analyzed for the five quantitatively most widely used phosphonates. The total dissolved concentration of the investigated phosphonates in the influents was between 131 µg/L and 384 µg/L. The nitrogen-free phosphonates 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid (PBTC) and 1-hydroxyethylidene(1,1-diphosphonic acid) (HEDP) accounted for an average proportion of 83–85%. Diethylenetriaminepenta(methylene phosphonic acid) (DTPMP) contributed with 13–14%, whereas aminotris(methylphosphonic acid) (ATMP) (≤15 µg/L) and ethylenediaminetetra(methylene phosphonic acid) (EDTMP) (≤11 µg/L) contents detected in the WWTP influents were comparatively low. The application of new analytical methods allowed the quantification of phosphonates in the solid fraction of the WWTP influents for the first time. High loads of phosphonates were determined (223–2555 mg/kg), indicating that 20%–80% of the phosphonates are present in the adsorbed state. The removal of total dissolved phosphonate by secondary clarification was between 69.7% and 92.4% (medians: 90.7% and 87.7%). In both WWTPs, HEDP (medians: 89.2% and 86.4%) was slightly better eliminated than PBTC (medians: 87.2% and 82.5%). In the sand filtration stage of a WWTP, the average removal was not further improved. In contrast, an additional removal of dissolved phosphonates could be achieved by activated carbon treatment (median: 96.4%). The proportion of phosphonate-P in the dissolved unreactive phosphorus fraction was consistently between 10% and 40% throughout all treatment stages.</description><subject>Activated carbon</subject><subject>Analytical methods</subject><subject>Carboxylic acids</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Diphosphonates</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Influents</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Methylene</subject><subject>Molybdenum</subject><subject>Phosphonates</subject><subject>Phosphonic acids</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>Sand filters</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Sedimentation &amp; deposition</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptUU1LAzEQXUTBUnvwHwQ8CW2dbJJucmxrtULBHlY8hrhJ7JZuUpOtxX9vSsUPcIZhhpn35sFMll1iGBIi4GaPc8AAjJxknRwKMqCU4tNf9XnWi3ENyajgnEEnKydmpd5rH5C3aDkpp300n90u-0g5jcZN7fx25WMKp1oTUe1QuzJoGXxlYjxwnlVszT4NAyqDUW1jXHuRnVm1iab3lbvZ092snM4Hi8f7h-l4MagIE-3A5rqiLMcFMQKsGJGcs5wqbQ0I_qIIB0OAYc0IY0yMrADGFSgKlGud64J0s6vj3m3wbzsTW7n2u-CSpMwZAwaiwOQH9ao2RtbO-jaoqqljJcccJ4F0DJFQw39QybVp6so7Y-vU_0O4PhKq4GMMxsptqBsVPiQGeXiH_H4H-QTud3e_</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Rott, Eduard</creator><creator>Happel, Oliver</creator><creator>Armbruster, Dominic</creator><creator>Minke, Ralf</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3190-6350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6921-2752</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Behavior of PBTC, HEDP, and Aminophosphonates in the Process of Wastewater Treatment</title><author>Rott, Eduard ; Happel, Oliver ; Armbruster, Dominic ; Minke, Ralf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f2dc452173e90f96328524adfe098ba380e3051d5355596f9058a0a4048dd2d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Activated carbon</topic><topic>Analytical methods</topic><topic>Carboxylic acids</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Diphosphonates</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Influents</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Methylene</topic><topic>Molybdenum</topic><topic>Phosphonates</topic><topic>Phosphonic acids</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>Sand filters</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Sedimentation &amp; deposition</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rott, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Happel, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armbruster, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minke, Ralf</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rott, Eduard</au><au>Happel, Oliver</au><au>Armbruster, Dominic</au><au>Minke, Ralf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavior of PBTC, HEDP, and Aminophosphonates in the Process of Wastewater Treatment</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><pages>53-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>Ten times at intervals of 1–2 months, individual treatment stages of two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were analyzed for the five quantitatively most widely used phosphonates. The total dissolved concentration of the investigated phosphonates in the influents was between 131 µg/L and 384 µg/L. The nitrogen-free phosphonates 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid (PBTC) and 1-hydroxyethylidene(1,1-diphosphonic acid) (HEDP) accounted for an average proportion of 83–85%. Diethylenetriaminepenta(methylene phosphonic acid) (DTPMP) contributed with 13–14%, whereas aminotris(methylphosphonic acid) (ATMP) (≤15 µg/L) and ethylenediaminetetra(methylene phosphonic acid) (EDTMP) (≤11 µg/L) contents detected in the WWTP influents were comparatively low. The application of new analytical methods allowed the quantification of phosphonates in the solid fraction of the WWTP influents for the first time. High loads of phosphonates were determined (223–2555 mg/kg), indicating that 20%–80% of the phosphonates are present in the adsorbed state. The removal of total dissolved phosphonate by secondary clarification was between 69.7% and 92.4% (medians: 90.7% and 87.7%). In both WWTPs, HEDP (medians: 89.2% and 86.4%) was slightly better eliminated than PBTC (medians: 87.2% and 82.5%). In the sand filtration stage of a WWTP, the average removal was not further improved. In contrast, an additional removal of dissolved phosphonates could be achieved by activated carbon treatment (median: 96.4%). The proportion of phosphonate-P in the dissolved unreactive phosphorus fraction was consistently between 10% and 40% throughout all treatment stages.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w12010053</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3190-6350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6921-2752</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4441
ispartof Water (Basel), 2020-01, Vol.12 (1), p.53
issn 2073-4441
2073-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2550509713
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Activated carbon
Analytical methods
Carboxylic acids
Chromatography
Diphosphonates
Effluents
Evaluation
Influents
Mass spectrometry
Methods
Methylene
Molybdenum
Phosphonates
Phosphonic acids
Phosphorus
Purification
Sand filters
Scientific imaging
Sedimentation & deposition
Sewage
Wastewater treatment
Wastewater treatment plants
Water treatment
title Behavior of PBTC, HEDP, and Aminophosphonates in the Process of Wastewater Treatment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T00%3A34%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavior%20of%20PBTC,%20HEDP,%20and%20Aminophosphonates%20in%20the%20Process%20of%20Wastewater%20Treatment&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Rott,%20Eduard&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.pages=53-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w12010053&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA810510499%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550509713&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A810510499&rfr_iscdi=true