Behavior of PBTC, HEDP, and Aminophosphonates in the Process of Wastewater Treatment
Ten times at intervals of 1–2 months, individual treatment stages of two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were analyzed for the five quantitatively most widely used phosphonates. The total dissolved concentration of the investigated phosphonates in the influents was between 131 µg/L and 384 µg/L....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water (Basel) 2020-01, Vol.12 (1), p.53 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 53 |
container_title | Water (Basel) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Rott, Eduard Happel, Oliver Armbruster, Dominic Minke, Ralf |
description | Ten times at intervals of 1–2 months, individual treatment stages of two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were analyzed for the five quantitatively most widely used phosphonates. The total dissolved concentration of the investigated phosphonates in the influents was between 131 µg/L and 384 µg/L. The nitrogen-free phosphonates 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid (PBTC) and 1-hydroxyethylidene(1,1-diphosphonic acid) (HEDP) accounted for an average proportion of 83–85%. Diethylenetriaminepenta(methylene phosphonic acid) (DTPMP) contributed with 13–14%, whereas aminotris(methylphosphonic acid) (ATMP) (≤15 µg/L) and ethylenediaminetetra(methylene phosphonic acid) (EDTMP) (≤11 µg/L) contents detected in the WWTP influents were comparatively low. The application of new analytical methods allowed the quantification of phosphonates in the solid fraction of the WWTP influents for the first time. High loads of phosphonates were determined (223–2555 mg/kg), indicating that 20%–80% of the phosphonates are present in the adsorbed state. The removal of total dissolved phosphonate by secondary clarification was between 69.7% and 92.4% (medians: 90.7% and 87.7%). In both WWTPs, HEDP (medians: 89.2% and 86.4%) was slightly better eliminated than PBTC (medians: 87.2% and 82.5%). In the sand filtration stage of a WWTP, the average removal was not further improved. In contrast, an additional removal of dissolved phosphonates could be achieved by activated carbon treatment (median: 96.4%). The proportion of phosphonate-P in the dissolved unreactive phosphorus fraction was consistently between 10% and 40% throughout all treatment stages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/w12010053 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2550509713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A810510499</galeid><sourcerecordid>A810510499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f2dc452173e90f96328524adfe098ba380e3051d5355596f9058a0a4048dd2d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUU1LAzEQXUTBUnvwHwQ8CW2dbJJucmxrtULBHlY8hrhJ7JZuUpOtxX9vSsUPcIZhhpn35sFMll1iGBIi4GaPc8AAjJxknRwKMqCU4tNf9XnWi3ENyajgnEEnKydmpd5rH5C3aDkpp300n90u-0g5jcZN7fx25WMKp1oTUe1QuzJoGXxlYjxwnlVszT4NAyqDUW1jXHuRnVm1iab3lbvZ092snM4Hi8f7h-l4MagIE-3A5rqiLMcFMQKsGJGcs5wqbQ0I_qIIB0OAYc0IY0yMrADGFSgKlGud64J0s6vj3m3wbzsTW7n2u-CSpMwZAwaiwOQH9ao2RtbO-jaoqqljJcccJ4F0DJFQw39QybVp6so7Y-vU_0O4PhKq4GMMxsptqBsVPiQGeXiH_H4H-QTud3e_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550509713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavior of PBTC, HEDP, and Aminophosphonates in the Process of Wastewater Treatment</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Rott, Eduard ; Happel, Oliver ; Armbruster, Dominic ; Minke, Ralf</creator><creatorcontrib>Rott, Eduard ; Happel, Oliver ; Armbruster, Dominic ; Minke, Ralf</creatorcontrib><description>Ten times at intervals of 1–2 months, individual treatment stages of two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were analyzed for the five quantitatively most widely used phosphonates. The total dissolved concentration of the investigated phosphonates in the influents was between 131 µg/L and 384 µg/L. The nitrogen-free phosphonates 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid (PBTC) and 1-hydroxyethylidene(1,1-diphosphonic acid) (HEDP) accounted for an average proportion of 83–85%. Diethylenetriaminepenta(methylene phosphonic acid) (DTPMP) contributed with 13–14%, whereas aminotris(methylphosphonic acid) (ATMP) (≤15 µg/L) and ethylenediaminetetra(methylene phosphonic acid) (EDTMP) (≤11 µg/L) contents detected in the WWTP influents were comparatively low. The application of new analytical methods allowed the quantification of phosphonates in the solid fraction of the WWTP influents for the first time. High loads of phosphonates were determined (223–2555 mg/kg), indicating that 20%–80% of the phosphonates are present in the adsorbed state. The removal of total dissolved phosphonate by secondary clarification was between 69.7% and 92.4% (medians: 90.7% and 87.7%). In both WWTPs, HEDP (medians: 89.2% and 86.4%) was slightly better eliminated than PBTC (medians: 87.2% and 82.5%). In the sand filtration stage of a WWTP, the average removal was not further improved. In contrast, an additional removal of dissolved phosphonates could be achieved by activated carbon treatment (median: 96.4%). The proportion of phosphonate-P in the dissolved unreactive phosphorus fraction was consistently between 10% and 40% throughout all treatment stages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w12010053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Activated carbon ; Analytical methods ; Carboxylic acids ; Chromatography ; Diphosphonates ; Effluents ; Evaluation ; Influents ; Mass spectrometry ; Methods ; Methylene ; Molybdenum ; Phosphonates ; Phosphonic acids ; Phosphorus ; Purification ; Sand filters ; Scientific imaging ; Sedimentation & deposition ; Sewage ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewater treatment plants ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2020-01, Vol.12 (1), p.53</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f2dc452173e90f96328524adfe098ba380e3051d5355596f9058a0a4048dd2d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f2dc452173e90f96328524adfe098ba380e3051d5355596f9058a0a4048dd2d73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3190-6350 ; 0000-0002-6921-2752</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rott, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Happel, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armbruster, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minke, Ralf</creatorcontrib><title>Behavior of PBTC, HEDP, and Aminophosphonates in the Process of Wastewater Treatment</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>Ten times at intervals of 1–2 months, individual treatment stages of two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were analyzed for the five quantitatively most widely used phosphonates. The total dissolved concentration of the investigated phosphonates in the influents was between 131 µg/L and 384 µg/L. The nitrogen-free phosphonates 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid (PBTC) and 1-hydroxyethylidene(1,1-diphosphonic acid) (HEDP) accounted for an average proportion of 83–85%. Diethylenetriaminepenta(methylene phosphonic acid) (DTPMP) contributed with 13–14%, whereas aminotris(methylphosphonic acid) (ATMP) (≤15 µg/L) and ethylenediaminetetra(methylene phosphonic acid) (EDTMP) (≤11 µg/L) contents detected in the WWTP influents were comparatively low. The application of new analytical methods allowed the quantification of phosphonates in the solid fraction of the WWTP influents for the first time. High loads of phosphonates were determined (223–2555 mg/kg), indicating that 20%–80% of the phosphonates are present in the adsorbed state. The removal of total dissolved phosphonate by secondary clarification was between 69.7% and 92.4% (medians: 90.7% and 87.7%). In both WWTPs, HEDP (medians: 89.2% and 86.4%) was slightly better eliminated than PBTC (medians: 87.2% and 82.5%). In the sand filtration stage of a WWTP, the average removal was not further improved. In contrast, an additional removal of dissolved phosphonates could be achieved by activated carbon treatment (median: 96.4%). The proportion of phosphonate-P in the dissolved unreactive phosphorus fraction was consistently between 10% and 40% throughout all treatment stages.</description><subject>Activated carbon</subject><subject>Analytical methods</subject><subject>Carboxylic acids</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Diphosphonates</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Influents</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Methylene</subject><subject>Molybdenum</subject><subject>Phosphonates</subject><subject>Phosphonic acids</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>Sand filters</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Sedimentation & deposition</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptUU1LAzEQXUTBUnvwHwQ8CW2dbJJucmxrtULBHlY8hrhJ7JZuUpOtxX9vSsUPcIZhhpn35sFMll1iGBIi4GaPc8AAjJxknRwKMqCU4tNf9XnWi3ENyajgnEEnKydmpd5rH5C3aDkpp300n90u-0g5jcZN7fx25WMKp1oTUe1QuzJoGXxlYjxwnlVszT4NAyqDUW1jXHuRnVm1iab3lbvZ092snM4Hi8f7h-l4MagIE-3A5rqiLMcFMQKsGJGcs5wqbQ0I_qIIB0OAYc0IY0yMrADGFSgKlGud64J0s6vj3m3wbzsTW7n2u-CSpMwZAwaiwOQH9ao2RtbO-jaoqqljJcccJ4F0DJFQw39QybVp6so7Y-vU_0O4PhKq4GMMxsptqBsVPiQGeXiH_H4H-QTud3e_</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Rott, Eduard</creator><creator>Happel, Oliver</creator><creator>Armbruster, Dominic</creator><creator>Minke, Ralf</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3190-6350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6921-2752</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Behavior of PBTC, HEDP, and Aminophosphonates in the Process of Wastewater Treatment</title><author>Rott, Eduard ; Happel, Oliver ; Armbruster, Dominic ; Minke, Ralf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f2dc452173e90f96328524adfe098ba380e3051d5355596f9058a0a4048dd2d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Activated carbon</topic><topic>Analytical methods</topic><topic>Carboxylic acids</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Diphosphonates</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Influents</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Methylene</topic><topic>Molybdenum</topic><topic>Phosphonates</topic><topic>Phosphonic acids</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>Sand filters</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Sedimentation & deposition</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rott, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Happel, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armbruster, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minke, Ralf</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rott, Eduard</au><au>Happel, Oliver</au><au>Armbruster, Dominic</au><au>Minke, Ralf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavior of PBTC, HEDP, and Aminophosphonates in the Process of Wastewater Treatment</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><pages>53-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>Ten times at intervals of 1–2 months, individual treatment stages of two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were analyzed for the five quantitatively most widely used phosphonates. The total dissolved concentration of the investigated phosphonates in the influents was between 131 µg/L and 384 µg/L. The nitrogen-free phosphonates 2-phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid (PBTC) and 1-hydroxyethylidene(1,1-diphosphonic acid) (HEDP) accounted for an average proportion of 83–85%. Diethylenetriaminepenta(methylene phosphonic acid) (DTPMP) contributed with 13–14%, whereas aminotris(methylphosphonic acid) (ATMP) (≤15 µg/L) and ethylenediaminetetra(methylene phosphonic acid) (EDTMP) (≤11 µg/L) contents detected in the WWTP influents were comparatively low. The application of new analytical methods allowed the quantification of phosphonates in the solid fraction of the WWTP influents for the first time. High loads of phosphonates were determined (223–2555 mg/kg), indicating that 20%–80% of the phosphonates are present in the adsorbed state. The removal of total dissolved phosphonate by secondary clarification was between 69.7% and 92.4% (medians: 90.7% and 87.7%). In both WWTPs, HEDP (medians: 89.2% and 86.4%) was slightly better eliminated than PBTC (medians: 87.2% and 82.5%). In the sand filtration stage of a WWTP, the average removal was not further improved. In contrast, an additional removal of dissolved phosphonates could be achieved by activated carbon treatment (median: 96.4%). The proportion of phosphonate-P in the dissolved unreactive phosphorus fraction was consistently between 10% and 40% throughout all treatment stages.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w12010053</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3190-6350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6921-2752</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2073-4441 |
ispartof | Water (Basel), 2020-01, Vol.12 (1), p.53 |
issn | 2073-4441 2073-4441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2550509713 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Activated carbon Analytical methods Carboxylic acids Chromatography Diphosphonates Effluents Evaluation Influents Mass spectrometry Methods Methylene Molybdenum Phosphonates Phosphonic acids Phosphorus Purification Sand filters Scientific imaging Sedimentation & deposition Sewage Wastewater treatment Wastewater treatment plants Water treatment |
title | Behavior of PBTC, HEDP, and Aminophosphonates in the Process of Wastewater Treatment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T00%3A34%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavior%20of%20PBTC,%20HEDP,%20and%20Aminophosphonates%20in%20the%20Process%20of%20Wastewater%20Treatment&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Rott,%20Eduard&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.pages=53-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w12010053&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA810510499%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550509713&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A810510499&rfr_iscdi=true |