Liquid–Liquid Continuous Extraction and Fractional Distillation for the Removal of Organic Compounds from the Wastewater of the Oil Industry
This is the first study to carry out a laboratory-scale assay to assess the potentiality of continuous liquid–liquid extraction with dichloromethane (CLLEDCM) and high-power fractional distillation (HPFD) as a treatment to decontaminate the wastewater generated by the petroleum industry (WW). The an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water (Basel) 2019-07, Vol.11 (7), p.1452 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1452 |
container_title | Water (Basel) |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Vegas Mendoza, Sonia Milena Avella Moreno, Eliseo Guerrero Fajardo, Carlos Alberto Fierro Medina, Ricardo |
description | This is the first study to carry out a laboratory-scale assay to assess the potentiality of continuous liquid–liquid extraction with dichloromethane (CLLEDCM) and high-power fractional distillation (HPFD) as a treatment to decontaminate the wastewater generated by the petroleum industry (WW). The analytical parameters of treated wastewater (TWW) evidenced a remarkable quality improvement compared to the original WW. CLLEDCM–HPFD yielded 92.4%–98.5% of the WW mass as more environmentally friendly water. Compared to the original values determined in the WW, total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) decreased by 95.0%–100.0%, and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) decreased by 90.5%–99.9%. Taking into account the yield of the treated water, the amount of pollutant removed, and the risks of each process, the order of the potentiality of these treatments, from highest to lowest, was HPFD > CLLEDCM–HPFD > CLLEDCM. CLLEDCM treatment alone produced TWW with poorer quality, and the CLLEDCM–HPFD sequence involved the greatest consumption of time and energy (0.390–0.905 kWh/kg). CLLEDCM-only was the least effective treatment because the TWW obtained failed to comply with the regulations of oil-producing countries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/w11071452 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2550487320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A791289213</galeid><sourcerecordid>A791289213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b9cb9806675ebf0e66922a29383a3385724506d432d9a96632637c7ea647bd4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUc1OwzAMrhBITGMH3iASJw4d-WvSHKexwaRJkxCIY5W26cjUJluSMnbjCbjwhjwJ3Y8Q9sH25--zZDuKrhEcEiLg3RYhyBFN8FnUw5CTmFKKzv_ll9HA-xXsjIo0TWAv-prrTavLn8_vYwLG1gRtWtt6MPkIThZBWwOkKcH0VMga3GsfdF3LQ6-yDoQ3BZ5UY9-7pq3Awi2l0UU3rFnb1pQeVM42B9ar9EFtZVBuT9wjC12DmSlbH9zuKrqoZO3V4BT70ct08jx-jOeLh9l4NI8LQlCIc1HkIoWM8UTlFVSMCYwlFiQlkpA04ZgmkJWU4FJIwRjBjPCCK8koz0takH50c5y7dnbTKh-ylW1dt5rPcJJAmnKCYccaHllLWatMm8ruD9J5qRpdWKMq3eEjLhBOBUakE9weBYWz3jtVZWunG-l2GYLZ_kXZ34vIL4r9hHk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550487320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Liquid–Liquid Continuous Extraction and Fractional Distillation for the Removal of Organic Compounds from the Wastewater of the Oil Industry</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Vegas Mendoza, Sonia Milena ; Avella Moreno, Eliseo ; Guerrero Fajardo, Carlos Alberto ; Fierro Medina, Ricardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Vegas Mendoza, Sonia Milena ; Avella Moreno, Eliseo ; Guerrero Fajardo, Carlos Alberto ; Fierro Medina, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><description>This is the first study to carry out a laboratory-scale assay to assess the potentiality of continuous liquid–liquid extraction with dichloromethane (CLLEDCM) and high-power fractional distillation (HPFD) as a treatment to decontaminate the wastewater generated by the petroleum industry (WW). The analytical parameters of treated wastewater (TWW) evidenced a remarkable quality improvement compared to the original WW. CLLEDCM–HPFD yielded 92.4%–98.5% of the WW mass as more environmentally friendly water. Compared to the original values determined in the WW, total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) decreased by 95.0%–100.0%, and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) decreased by 90.5%–99.9%. Taking into account the yield of the treated water, the amount of pollutant removed, and the risks of each process, the order of the potentiality of these treatments, from highest to lowest, was HPFD > CLLEDCM–HPFD > CLLEDCM. CLLEDCM treatment alone produced TWW with poorer quality, and the CLLEDCM–HPFD sequence involved the greatest consumption of time and energy (0.390–0.905 kWh/kg). CLLEDCM-only was the least effective treatment because the TWW obtained failed to comply with the regulations of oil-producing countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w11071452</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Activated carbon ; Alkalinity ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Crude oil ; Decontamination ; Dichloromethane ; Distillation ; Fractional distillation ; Heat ; Hydrocarbons ; Oil and gas industry ; Organic compounds ; Petroleum ; Petroleum hydrocarbons ; Petroleum industry ; Petroleum industry wastewaters ; Pollutant removal ; Pollutants ; Quality control ; Salinity ; Surface water ; Treated water ; Vacuum distillation ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2019-07, Vol.11 (7), p.1452</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b9cb9806675ebf0e66922a29383a3385724506d432d9a96632637c7ea647bd4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b9cb9806675ebf0e66922a29383a3385724506d432d9a96632637c7ea647bd4c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9844-4114</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vegas Mendoza, Sonia Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avella Moreno, Eliseo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero Fajardo, Carlos Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fierro Medina, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><title>Liquid–Liquid Continuous Extraction and Fractional Distillation for the Removal of Organic Compounds from the Wastewater of the Oil Industry</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>This is the first study to carry out a laboratory-scale assay to assess the potentiality of continuous liquid–liquid extraction with dichloromethane (CLLEDCM) and high-power fractional distillation (HPFD) as a treatment to decontaminate the wastewater generated by the petroleum industry (WW). The analytical parameters of treated wastewater (TWW) evidenced a remarkable quality improvement compared to the original WW. CLLEDCM–HPFD yielded 92.4%–98.5% of the WW mass as more environmentally friendly water. Compared to the original values determined in the WW, total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) decreased by 95.0%–100.0%, and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) decreased by 90.5%–99.9%. Taking into account the yield of the treated water, the amount of pollutant removed, and the risks of each process, the order of the potentiality of these treatments, from highest to lowest, was HPFD > CLLEDCM–HPFD > CLLEDCM. CLLEDCM treatment alone produced TWW with poorer quality, and the CLLEDCM–HPFD sequence involved the greatest consumption of time and energy (0.390–0.905 kWh/kg). CLLEDCM-only was the least effective treatment because the TWW obtained failed to comply with the regulations of oil-producing countries.</description><subject>Activated carbon</subject><subject>Alkalinity</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Crude oil</subject><subject>Decontamination</subject><subject>Dichloromethane</subject><subject>Distillation</subject><subject>Fractional distillation</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Oil and gas industry</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Petroleum hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Petroleum industry</subject><subject>Petroleum industry wastewaters</subject><subject>Pollutant removal</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Treated water</subject><subject>Vacuum distillation</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUc1OwzAMrhBITGMH3iASJw4d-WvSHKexwaRJkxCIY5W26cjUJluSMnbjCbjwhjwJ3Y8Q9sH25--zZDuKrhEcEiLg3RYhyBFN8FnUw5CTmFKKzv_ll9HA-xXsjIo0TWAv-prrTavLn8_vYwLG1gRtWtt6MPkIThZBWwOkKcH0VMga3GsfdF3LQ6-yDoQ3BZ5UY9-7pq3Awi2l0UU3rFnb1pQeVM42B9ar9EFtZVBuT9wjC12DmSlbH9zuKrqoZO3V4BT70ct08jx-jOeLh9l4NI8LQlCIc1HkIoWM8UTlFVSMCYwlFiQlkpA04ZgmkJWU4FJIwRjBjPCCK8koz0takH50c5y7dnbTKh-ylW1dt5rPcJJAmnKCYccaHllLWatMm8ruD9J5qRpdWKMq3eEjLhBOBUakE9weBYWz3jtVZWunG-l2GYLZ_kXZ34vIL4r9hHk</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Vegas Mendoza, Sonia Milena</creator><creator>Avella Moreno, Eliseo</creator><creator>Guerrero Fajardo, Carlos Alberto</creator><creator>Fierro Medina, Ricardo</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9844-4114</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Liquid–Liquid Continuous Extraction and Fractional Distillation for the Removal of Organic Compounds from the Wastewater of the Oil Industry</title><author>Vegas Mendoza, Sonia Milena ; Avella Moreno, Eliseo ; Guerrero Fajardo, Carlos Alberto ; Fierro Medina, Ricardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b9cb9806675ebf0e66922a29383a3385724506d432d9a96632637c7ea647bd4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Activated carbon</topic><topic>Alkalinity</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Crude oil</topic><topic>Decontamination</topic><topic>Dichloromethane</topic><topic>Distillation</topic><topic>Fractional distillation</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Oil and gas industry</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Petroleum hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Petroleum industry</topic><topic>Petroleum industry wastewaters</topic><topic>Pollutant removal</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Treated water</topic><topic>Vacuum distillation</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vegas Mendoza, Sonia Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avella Moreno, Eliseo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero Fajardo, Carlos Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fierro Medina, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vegas Mendoza, Sonia Milena</au><au>Avella Moreno, Eliseo</au><au>Guerrero Fajardo, Carlos Alberto</au><au>Fierro Medina, Ricardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Liquid–Liquid Continuous Extraction and Fractional Distillation for the Removal of Organic Compounds from the Wastewater of the Oil Industry</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1452</spage><pages>1452-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>This is the first study to carry out a laboratory-scale assay to assess the potentiality of continuous liquid–liquid extraction with dichloromethane (CLLEDCM) and high-power fractional distillation (HPFD) as a treatment to decontaminate the wastewater generated by the petroleum industry (WW). The analytical parameters of treated wastewater (TWW) evidenced a remarkable quality improvement compared to the original WW. CLLEDCM–HPFD yielded 92.4%–98.5% of the WW mass as more environmentally friendly water. Compared to the original values determined in the WW, total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) decreased by 95.0%–100.0%, and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) decreased by 90.5%–99.9%. Taking into account the yield of the treated water, the amount of pollutant removed, and the risks of each process, the order of the potentiality of these treatments, from highest to lowest, was HPFD > CLLEDCM–HPFD > CLLEDCM. CLLEDCM treatment alone produced TWW with poorer quality, and the CLLEDCM–HPFD sequence involved the greatest consumption of time and energy (0.390–0.905 kWh/kg). CLLEDCM-only was the least effective treatment because the TWW obtained failed to comply with the regulations of oil-producing countries.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w11071452</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9844-4114</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2073-4441 |
ispartof | Water (Basel), 2019-07, Vol.11 (7), p.1452 |
issn | 2073-4441 2073-4441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2550487320 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Activated carbon Alkalinity Chemical oxygen demand Crude oil Decontamination Dichloromethane Distillation Fractional distillation Heat Hydrocarbons Oil and gas industry Organic compounds Petroleum Petroleum hydrocarbons Petroleum industry Petroleum industry wastewaters Pollutant removal Pollutants Quality control Salinity Surface water Treated water Vacuum distillation Wastewater Wastewater treatment Water pollution |
title | Liquid–Liquid Continuous Extraction and Fractional Distillation for the Removal of Organic Compounds from the Wastewater of the Oil Industry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T03%3A46%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Liquid%E2%80%93Liquid%20Continuous%20Extraction%20and%20Fractional%20Distillation%20for%20the%20Removal%20of%20Organic%20Compounds%20from%20the%20Wastewater%20of%20the%20Oil%20Industry&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Vegas%20Mendoza,%20Sonia%20Milena&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1452&rft.pages=1452-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w11071452&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA791289213%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550487320&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A791289213&rfr_iscdi=true |