Exploring Explicit Delay Time for Volume Compensation in Feedforward Control of Canal Systems

In the open channel control algorithm, good feed-forward controllers will reduce the transition time of the canal and improve performance. Feedforward control algorithms based on active storage compensation are greatly affected by delay time. However, there is no literature comparing the three most...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water (Basel) 2019-05, Vol.11 (5), p.1080
Hauptverfasser: Liao, Wenjun, Guan, Guanghua, Tian, Xin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1080
container_title Water (Basel)
container_volume 11
creator Liao, Wenjun
Guan, Guanghua
Tian, Xin
description In the open channel control algorithm, good feed-forward controllers will reduce the transition time of the canal and improve performance. Feedforward control algorithms based on active storage compensation are greatly affected by delay time. However, there is no literature comparing the three most commonly used algorithms, namely volume step compensation, dynamic wave principle and water balance models, under the operation mode of constant water level downstream. In order to compare the existing three algorithms, and to avoid storage calculation by calculating the constant non-uniform water surface line or identification of relevant parameters, combined with the open channel constant gradient flow theory with the storage compensation algorithm, a delay time explicit algorithm is proposed in this study. Tested on the first canal pool of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Test Canal 2, the performance of the delay time explicit algorithm is assessed and compared to that of the three conventional algorithms. In the current water intake plan, i.e., in the second hour, the intake begins to take 1.2 m3/s, and the upstream flow of the canal pool changes from 6 m3/s to 7.2 m3/s, among the three existing algorithms, the volume step compensation algorithm has better performance in terms of time to achieve stability, i.e., 1.25 h. The actual adjusted storage accounts for 99.6% of the target adjusted storage, which can basically meet the requirement of compensated storage of the canal pool. The delay time explicit algorithm only needs 1.47 h to stabilize the regulation system. The fluctuation of water level and discharge in the regulation process is small. The actual adjusted storage accounts for 99.6% of the target adjusted storage, which can basically meet the requirement of compensated storage for the canal pool. The delay time calculated by explicit algorithm can provide references for the determination of delay time in feedforward control.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/w11051080
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2550455035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A791285872</galeid><sourcerecordid>A791285872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-cae8a0a673d2d7010254e9392de2682305bc939d2741f83868135e1abd9f886a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1LAzEQDaJgqT34DwKePLTmY7ObPZa1VaHgwepNlnQzKSm7yZpsqf33plTEGYZ58_GG4SF0S8mM85I8HCglghJJLtCIkYJPsyyjl__wNZrEuCPJslJKQUboc_Hdtz5Yt8UnZBs74Edo1RGvbQfY-IA_fLtPsPJdDy6qwXqHrcNLAJ3GBxV0mrkh-BZ7gyvlVIvfjnGALt6gK6PaCJPfPEbvy8W6ep6uXp9eqvlq2nBOh2mjQCqi8oJrpgtCCRMZlLxkGlguGSdi06RSsyKjRnKZS8oFULXRpZEyV3yM7s53--C_9hCHeuf3IT0SayYEyVJwkbZm562taqG2zvghqCa5hs423oGxqT8vSsqkkAVLhPszoQk-xgCm7oPtVDjWlNQnxes_xfkPZIpxHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550455035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring Explicit Delay Time for Volume Compensation in Feedforward Control of Canal Systems</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Liao, Wenjun ; Guan, Guanghua ; Tian, Xin</creator><creatorcontrib>Liao, Wenjun ; Guan, Guanghua ; Tian, Xin</creatorcontrib><description>In the open channel control algorithm, good feed-forward controllers will reduce the transition time of the canal and improve performance. Feedforward control algorithms based on active storage compensation are greatly affected by delay time. However, there is no literature comparing the three most commonly used algorithms, namely volume step compensation, dynamic wave principle and water balance models, under the operation mode of constant water level downstream. In order to compare the existing three algorithms, and to avoid storage calculation by calculating the constant non-uniform water surface line or identification of relevant parameters, combined with the open channel constant gradient flow theory with the storage compensation algorithm, a delay time explicit algorithm is proposed in this study. Tested on the first canal pool of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Test Canal 2, the performance of the delay time explicit algorithm is assessed and compared to that of the three conventional algorithms. In the current water intake plan, i.e., in the second hour, the intake begins to take 1.2 m3/s, and the upstream flow of the canal pool changes from 6 m3/s to 7.2 m3/s, among the three existing algorithms, the volume step compensation algorithm has better performance in terms of time to achieve stability, i.e., 1.25 h. The actual adjusted storage accounts for 99.6% of the target adjusted storage, which can basically meet the requirement of compensated storage of the canal pool. The delay time explicit algorithm only needs 1.47 h to stabilize the regulation system. The fluctuation of water level and discharge in the regulation process is small. The actual adjusted storage accounts for 99.6% of the target adjusted storage, which can basically meet the requirement of compensated storage for the canal pool. The delay time calculated by explicit algorithm can provide references for the determination of delay time in feedforward control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w11051080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Algorithms ; Automation ; Canals ; Civil engineers ; Compensation ; Control algorithms ; Control systems ; Control theory ; Delay time ; Experiments ; Feedforward control ; Flow theory ; Gradient flow ; Open channels ; Parameter identification ; Storage ; Water ; Water balance ; Water discharge ; Water intake ; Water intakes ; Water level fluctuations ; Water levels ; Water waves ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2019-05, Vol.11 (5), p.1080</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-cae8a0a673d2d7010254e9392de2682305bc939d2741f83868135e1abd9f886a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-cae8a0a673d2d7010254e9392de2682305bc939d2741f83868135e1abd9f886a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8696-8527</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liao, Wenjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guan, Guanghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Xin</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring Explicit Delay Time for Volume Compensation in Feedforward Control of Canal Systems</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>In the open channel control algorithm, good feed-forward controllers will reduce the transition time of the canal and improve performance. Feedforward control algorithms based on active storage compensation are greatly affected by delay time. However, there is no literature comparing the three most commonly used algorithms, namely volume step compensation, dynamic wave principle and water balance models, under the operation mode of constant water level downstream. In order to compare the existing three algorithms, and to avoid storage calculation by calculating the constant non-uniform water surface line or identification of relevant parameters, combined with the open channel constant gradient flow theory with the storage compensation algorithm, a delay time explicit algorithm is proposed in this study. Tested on the first canal pool of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Test Canal 2, the performance of the delay time explicit algorithm is assessed and compared to that of the three conventional algorithms. In the current water intake plan, i.e., in the second hour, the intake begins to take 1.2 m3/s, and the upstream flow of the canal pool changes from 6 m3/s to 7.2 m3/s, among the three existing algorithms, the volume step compensation algorithm has better performance in terms of time to achieve stability, i.e., 1.25 h. The actual adjusted storage accounts for 99.6% of the target adjusted storage, which can basically meet the requirement of compensated storage of the canal pool. The delay time explicit algorithm only needs 1.47 h to stabilize the regulation system. The fluctuation of water level and discharge in the regulation process is small. The actual adjusted storage accounts for 99.6% of the target adjusted storage, which can basically meet the requirement of compensated storage for the canal pool. The delay time calculated by explicit algorithm can provide references for the determination of delay time in feedforward control.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Canals</subject><subject>Civil engineers</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Control algorithms</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Control theory</subject><subject>Delay time</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Feedforward control</subject><subject>Flow theory</subject><subject>Gradient flow</subject><subject>Open channels</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Storage</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water balance</subject><subject>Water discharge</subject><subject>Water intake</subject><subject>Water intakes</subject><subject>Water level fluctuations</subject><subject>Water levels</subject><subject>Water waves</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUE1LAzEQDaJgqT34DwKePLTmY7ObPZa1VaHgwepNlnQzKSm7yZpsqf33plTEGYZ58_GG4SF0S8mM85I8HCglghJJLtCIkYJPsyyjl__wNZrEuCPJslJKQUboc_Hdtz5Yt8UnZBs74Edo1RGvbQfY-IA_fLtPsPJdDy6qwXqHrcNLAJ3GBxV0mrkh-BZ7gyvlVIvfjnGALt6gK6PaCJPfPEbvy8W6ep6uXp9eqvlq2nBOh2mjQCqi8oJrpgtCCRMZlLxkGlguGSdi06RSsyKjRnKZS8oFULXRpZEyV3yM7s53--C_9hCHeuf3IT0SayYEyVJwkbZm562taqG2zvghqCa5hs423oGxqT8vSsqkkAVLhPszoQk-xgCm7oPtVDjWlNQnxes_xfkPZIpxHw</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Liao, Wenjun</creator><creator>Guan, Guanghua</creator><creator>Tian, Xin</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8696-8527</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>Exploring Explicit Delay Time for Volume Compensation in Feedforward Control of Canal Systems</title><author>Liao, Wenjun ; Guan, Guanghua ; Tian, Xin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-cae8a0a673d2d7010254e9392de2682305bc939d2741f83868135e1abd9f886a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Canals</topic><topic>Civil engineers</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Control algorithms</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Control theory</topic><topic>Delay time</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Feedforward control</topic><topic>Flow theory</topic><topic>Gradient flow</topic><topic>Open channels</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Storage</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water balance</topic><topic>Water discharge</topic><topic>Water intake</topic><topic>Water intakes</topic><topic>Water level fluctuations</topic><topic>Water levels</topic><topic>Water waves</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liao, Wenjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guan, Guanghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Xin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liao, Wenjun</au><au>Guan, Guanghua</au><au>Tian, Xin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring Explicit Delay Time for Volume Compensation in Feedforward Control of Canal Systems</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1080</spage><pages>1080-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>In the open channel control algorithm, good feed-forward controllers will reduce the transition time of the canal and improve performance. Feedforward control algorithms based on active storage compensation are greatly affected by delay time. However, there is no literature comparing the three most commonly used algorithms, namely volume step compensation, dynamic wave principle and water balance models, under the operation mode of constant water level downstream. In order to compare the existing three algorithms, and to avoid storage calculation by calculating the constant non-uniform water surface line or identification of relevant parameters, combined with the open channel constant gradient flow theory with the storage compensation algorithm, a delay time explicit algorithm is proposed in this study. Tested on the first canal pool of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Test Canal 2, the performance of the delay time explicit algorithm is assessed and compared to that of the three conventional algorithms. In the current water intake plan, i.e., in the second hour, the intake begins to take 1.2 m3/s, and the upstream flow of the canal pool changes from 6 m3/s to 7.2 m3/s, among the three existing algorithms, the volume step compensation algorithm has better performance in terms of time to achieve stability, i.e., 1.25 h. The actual adjusted storage accounts for 99.6% of the target adjusted storage, which can basically meet the requirement of compensated storage of the canal pool. The delay time explicit algorithm only needs 1.47 h to stabilize the regulation system. The fluctuation of water level and discharge in the regulation process is small. The actual adjusted storage accounts for 99.6% of the target adjusted storage, which can basically meet the requirement of compensated storage for the canal pool. The delay time calculated by explicit algorithm can provide references for the determination of delay time in feedforward control.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w11051080</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8696-8527</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4441
ispartof Water (Basel), 2019-05, Vol.11 (5), p.1080
issn 2073-4441
2073-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2550455035
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
subjects Agricultural production
Algorithms
Automation
Canals
Civil engineers
Compensation
Control algorithms
Control systems
Control theory
Delay time
Experiments
Feedforward control
Flow theory
Gradient flow
Open channels
Parameter identification
Storage
Water
Water balance
Water discharge
Water intake
Water intakes
Water level fluctuations
Water levels
Water waves
Workloads
title Exploring Explicit Delay Time for Volume Compensation in Feedforward Control of Canal Systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T13%3A01%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20Explicit%20Delay%20Time%20for%20Volume%20Compensation%20in%20Feedforward%20Control%20of%20Canal%20Systems&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Liao,%20Wenjun&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1080&rft.pages=1080-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w11051080&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA791285872%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550455035&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A791285872&rfr_iscdi=true