Using Random Forest Classification and Nationally Available Geospatial Data to Screen for Wetlands over Large Geographic Regions

Wetland impact assessments are an integral part of infrastructure projects aimed at protecting the important services wetlands provide for water resources and ecosystems. However, wetland surveys with the level of accuracy required by federal regulators can be time-consuming and costly. Streamlining...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water (Basel) 2019-06, Vol.11 (6), p.1158
Hauptverfasser: Felton, Benjamin R., O’Neil, Gina L., Robertson, Mary-Michael, Fitch, G. Michael, Goodall, Jonathan L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1158
container_title Water (Basel)
container_volume 11
creator Felton, Benjamin R.
O’Neil, Gina L.
Robertson, Mary-Michael
Fitch, G. Michael
Goodall, Jonathan L.
description Wetland impact assessments are an integral part of infrastructure projects aimed at protecting the important services wetlands provide for water resources and ecosystems. However, wetland surveys with the level of accuracy required by federal regulators can be time-consuming and costly. Streamlining this process by using already available geospatial data and classification algorithms to target more detailed wetland mapping efforts may support environmental planning efforts. The objective of this study was to create and test a methodology that could be applied nationally, leveraging existing data to quickly and inexpensively screen for potential wetlands over large geographic regions. An automated workflow implementing the methodology for a case study region in the coastal plain of Virginia is presented. When compared to verified wetlands mapped by experts, the methodology resulted in a much lower false negative rate of 22.6% compared to the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) false negative rate of 69.3%. However, because the methodology was designed as a screening approach, it did result in a slight decrease in overall classification accuracy compared to the NWI from 80.5% to 76.1%. Given the considerable decrease in wetland omission while maintaining comparable overall accuracy, the methodology shows potential as a wetland screening tool for targeting more detailed and costly wetland mapping efforts.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/w11061158
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2550318134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2550318134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d960561012825ca27f5546791dc0ee02b0641011b5dda267de6910a373282ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMtKw0AUHUTBUrvwDy64chGdRyaPZam2CkWhVlyG22QmpkwzcSatdOenO7Yi3s09cB5wDiGXjN4IkdPbT8ZowpjMTsiA01REcRyz03_4nIy8X9NwcZ5lkg7I16tv2hoW2FZ2A1PrlO9hYtD7Rjcl9o1tIXDwdIBozB7GO2wMroyCmbK-CwQauMMeobfwUjqlWtDWwZvqTbB6sDvlYI6uPjhqh917U8JC1SHRX5Azjcar0e8fkuX0fjl5iObPs8fJeB6VPOd9VOUJlQmjjGdclshTLWWcpDmrSqoU5SuaxIFlK1lVyJO0UknOKIpUBIPWYkiujrGdsx_bULJY260LhXzBpaSCZUzEQXV9VJXOeu-ULjrXbNDtC0aLn4mLv4nFN8v9bWo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2550318134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Random Forest Classification and Nationally Available Geospatial Data to Screen for Wetlands over Large Geographic Regions</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Felton, Benjamin R. ; O’Neil, Gina L. ; Robertson, Mary-Michael ; Fitch, G. Michael ; Goodall, Jonathan L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Felton, Benjamin R. ; O’Neil, Gina L. ; Robertson, Mary-Michael ; Fitch, G. Michael ; Goodall, Jonathan L.</creatorcontrib><description>Wetland impact assessments are an integral part of infrastructure projects aimed at protecting the important services wetlands provide for water resources and ecosystems. However, wetland surveys with the level of accuracy required by federal regulators can be time-consuming and costly. Streamlining this process by using already available geospatial data and classification algorithms to target more detailed wetland mapping efforts may support environmental planning efforts. The objective of this study was to create and test a methodology that could be applied nationally, leveraging existing data to quickly and inexpensively screen for potential wetlands over large geographic regions. An automated workflow implementing the methodology for a case study region in the coastal plain of Virginia is presented. When compared to verified wetlands mapped by experts, the methodology resulted in a much lower false negative rate of 22.6% compared to the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) false negative rate of 69.3%. However, because the methodology was designed as a screening approach, it did result in a slight decrease in overall classification accuracy compared to the NWI from 80.5% to 76.1%. Given the considerable decrease in wetland omission while maintaining comparable overall accuracy, the methodology shows potential as a wetland screening tool for targeting more detailed and costly wetland mapping efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w11061158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Automation ; Classification ; Clean Water Act-US ; Coastal plains ; Datasets ; Environmental planning ; Machine learning ; Mapping ; Methodology ; Planning ; Remote sensing ; Spatial data ; Topography ; Water resources ; Wetlands ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2019-06, Vol.11 (6), p.1158</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d960561012825ca27f5546791dc0ee02b0641011b5dda267de6910a373282ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d960561012825ca27f5546791dc0ee02b0641011b5dda267de6910a373282ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1112-4522</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Felton, Benjamin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Neil, Gina L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Mary-Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitch, G. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodall, Jonathan L.</creatorcontrib><title>Using Random Forest Classification and Nationally Available Geospatial Data to Screen for Wetlands over Large Geographic Regions</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>Wetland impact assessments are an integral part of infrastructure projects aimed at protecting the important services wetlands provide for water resources and ecosystems. However, wetland surveys with the level of accuracy required by federal regulators can be time-consuming and costly. Streamlining this process by using already available geospatial data and classification algorithms to target more detailed wetland mapping efforts may support environmental planning efforts. The objective of this study was to create and test a methodology that could be applied nationally, leveraging existing data to quickly and inexpensively screen for potential wetlands over large geographic regions. An automated workflow implementing the methodology for a case study region in the coastal plain of Virginia is presented. When compared to verified wetlands mapped by experts, the methodology resulted in a much lower false negative rate of 22.6% compared to the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) false negative rate of 69.3%. However, because the methodology was designed as a screening approach, it did result in a slight decrease in overall classification accuracy compared to the NWI from 80.5% to 76.1%. Given the considerable decrease in wetland omission while maintaining comparable overall accuracy, the methodology shows potential as a wetland screening tool for targeting more detailed and costly wetland mapping efforts.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Clean Water Act-US</subject><subject>Coastal plains</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Environmental planning</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUMtKw0AUHUTBUrvwDy64chGdRyaPZam2CkWhVlyG22QmpkwzcSatdOenO7Yi3s09cB5wDiGXjN4IkdPbT8ZowpjMTsiA01REcRyz03_4nIy8X9NwcZ5lkg7I16tv2hoW2FZ2A1PrlO9hYtD7Rjcl9o1tIXDwdIBozB7GO2wMroyCmbK-CwQauMMeobfwUjqlWtDWwZvqTbB6sDvlYI6uPjhqh917U8JC1SHRX5Azjcar0e8fkuX0fjl5iObPs8fJeB6VPOd9VOUJlQmjjGdclshTLWWcpDmrSqoU5SuaxIFlK1lVyJO0UknOKIpUBIPWYkiujrGdsx_bULJY260LhXzBpaSCZUzEQXV9VJXOeu-ULjrXbNDtC0aLn4mLv4nFN8v9bWo</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Felton, Benjamin R.</creator><creator>O’Neil, Gina L.</creator><creator>Robertson, Mary-Michael</creator><creator>Fitch, G. Michael</creator><creator>Goodall, Jonathan L.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1112-4522</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Using Random Forest Classification and Nationally Available Geospatial Data to Screen for Wetlands over Large Geographic Regions</title><author>Felton, Benjamin R. ; O’Neil, Gina L. ; Robertson, Mary-Michael ; Fitch, G. Michael ; Goodall, Jonathan L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d960561012825ca27f5546791dc0ee02b0641011b5dda267de6910a373282ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Clean Water Act-US</topic><topic>Coastal plains</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Environmental planning</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Felton, Benjamin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Neil, Gina L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Mary-Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitch, G. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodall, Jonathan L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Felton, Benjamin R.</au><au>O’Neil, Gina L.</au><au>Robertson, Mary-Michael</au><au>Fitch, G. Michael</au><au>Goodall, Jonathan L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Random Forest Classification and Nationally Available Geospatial Data to Screen for Wetlands over Large Geographic Regions</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1158</spage><pages>1158-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>Wetland impact assessments are an integral part of infrastructure projects aimed at protecting the important services wetlands provide for water resources and ecosystems. However, wetland surveys with the level of accuracy required by federal regulators can be time-consuming and costly. Streamlining this process by using already available geospatial data and classification algorithms to target more detailed wetland mapping efforts may support environmental planning efforts. The objective of this study was to create and test a methodology that could be applied nationally, leveraging existing data to quickly and inexpensively screen for potential wetlands over large geographic regions. An automated workflow implementing the methodology for a case study region in the coastal plain of Virginia is presented. When compared to verified wetlands mapped by experts, the methodology resulted in a much lower false negative rate of 22.6% compared to the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) false negative rate of 69.3%. However, because the methodology was designed as a screening approach, it did result in a slight decrease in overall classification accuracy compared to the NWI from 80.5% to 76.1%. Given the considerable decrease in wetland omission while maintaining comparable overall accuracy, the methodology shows potential as a wetland screening tool for targeting more detailed and costly wetland mapping efforts.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w11061158</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1112-4522</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4441
ispartof Water (Basel), 2019-06, Vol.11 (6), p.1158
issn 2073-4441
2073-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2550318134
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
subjects Accuracy
Algorithms
Aquatic ecosystems
Automation
Classification
Clean Water Act-US
Coastal plains
Datasets
Environmental planning
Machine learning
Mapping
Methodology
Planning
Remote sensing
Spatial data
Topography
Water resources
Wetlands
Workflow
title Using Random Forest Classification and Nationally Available Geospatial Data to Screen for Wetlands over Large Geographic Regions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T05%3A05%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Random%20Forest%20Classification%20and%20Nationally%20Available%20Geospatial%20Data%20to%20Screen%20for%20Wetlands%20over%20Large%20Geographic%20Regions&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Felton,%20Benjamin%20R.&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1158&rft.pages=1158-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w11061158&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2550318134%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2550318134&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true