Diversity ideologies and flourishing: An Australian study comparing polyculturalism, multiculturalism, and colorblindness
In pluralistic societies such as Australia, an emerging diversity ideology of polyculturalism promotes sharing ideas and practices among people from diverse cultural traditions. What are the psychological associations of endorsing polyculturalism in contrast to multiculturalism and colorblindness, e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of intercultural relations 2021-03, Vol.81, p.236-251 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 251 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 236 |
container_title | International journal of intercultural relations |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Virgona, Ariane Kashima, Emiko S. |
description | In pluralistic societies such as Australia, an emerging diversity ideology of polyculturalism promotes sharing ideas and practices among people from diverse cultural traditions. What are the psychological associations of endorsing polyculturalism in contrast to multiculturalism and colorblindness, especially for an individual’s psychological well-being? We tested a path model to investigate if diversity ideologies are associated with flourishing through ethnocultural empathy, intercultural contact quality, and cultural identity clarity, using questionnaire responses of 255 Australians. The results supported our hypothesis that polyculturalism is associated with higher ethnocultural empathy and higher-quality intercultural contact and with higher flourishing through these pathways. Simultaneously, polyculturalism also associated with lower cultural identity clarity and indirectly with lower flourishing through this pathway. In contrast, the results did not support the link between these mediators and multiculturalism or colorblindness. Our findings indicate that polyculturalism has both positive and negative associations with eudaimonic well-being for those who endorse this ideology and suggest the increasing relevance of polyculturalism for Australians and the need for further research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.02.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2549948676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0147176721000250</els_id><sourcerecordid>2549948676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-573d591aeb1f3991c7ae9040c2687d318e688ca9ac2481cb2711f589412538f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOxCAUJUYTx9FfMCRubQX6gLpy4juZxM3sCQN0pGFoBTpJ_16a0YUrVzf3nsfNOQBcY5RjhOu7LjedcdFrmxNEcI5IjhA5AQvMaJHRqiKnYIFwSTNMa3oOLkLoUGIgxhZgejIH7YOJEzRK97bfGR2gcAq2th-9CZ_G7e7hysHVGKIX1ggHQxzVBGW_H4RPMBx6O8nRxnHGw_4W7tNi_lxmR5ns_dYap5wO4RKctcIGffUzl2Dz8rx5fMvWH6_vj6t1JosSxayihaoaLPQWt0XTYEmFblCJJKkZVQVmumZMikZIUjIst4Ri3FasKTGpCtYWS3BztB18_zXqEHmXcrn0kZOqbJqS1bROrPrIkr4PweuWD97shZ84RnxumXf8t2U-t8wR4anDJHw4CnWKcDDa8yCNdlIr47WMXPXmP4tv6yGMPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549948676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diversity ideologies and flourishing: An Australian study comparing polyculturalism, multiculturalism, and colorblindness</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Virgona, Ariane ; Kashima, Emiko S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Virgona, Ariane ; Kashima, Emiko S.</creatorcontrib><description>In pluralistic societies such as Australia, an emerging diversity ideology of polyculturalism promotes sharing ideas and practices among people from diverse cultural traditions. What are the psychological associations of endorsing polyculturalism in contrast to multiculturalism and colorblindness, especially for an individual’s psychological well-being? We tested a path model to investigate if diversity ideologies are associated with flourishing through ethnocultural empathy, intercultural contact quality, and cultural identity clarity, using questionnaire responses of 255 Australians. The results supported our hypothesis that polyculturalism is associated with higher ethnocultural empathy and higher-quality intercultural contact and with higher flourishing through these pathways. Simultaneously, polyculturalism also associated with lower cultural identity clarity and indirectly with lower flourishing through this pathway. In contrast, the results did not support the link between these mediators and multiculturalism or colorblindness. Our findings indicate that polyculturalism has both positive and negative associations with eudaimonic well-being for those who endorse this ideology and suggest the increasing relevance of polyculturalism for Australians and the need for further research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-1767</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7552</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.02.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Brunswick: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Colorblindness ; Cultural contact ; Cultural identity ; Cultural identity clarity ; Cultural tradition ; Empathy ; Ethnocultural empathy ; Flourishing ; Ideology ; Intercultural contact ; Intercultural interaction ; Intercultural sensitivity ; Multiculturalism ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Polyculturalism ; Psychological well being ; Responses ; Well being</subject><ispartof>International journal of intercultural relations, 2021-03, Vol.81, p.236-251</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-573d591aeb1f3991c7ae9040c2687d318e688ca9ac2481cb2711f589412538f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-573d591aeb1f3991c7ae9040c2687d318e688ca9ac2481cb2711f589412538f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7281-7173</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176721000250$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,33751,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Virgona, Ariane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashima, Emiko S.</creatorcontrib><title>Diversity ideologies and flourishing: An Australian study comparing polyculturalism, multiculturalism, and colorblindness</title><title>International journal of intercultural relations</title><description>In pluralistic societies such as Australia, an emerging diversity ideology of polyculturalism promotes sharing ideas and practices among people from diverse cultural traditions. What are the psychological associations of endorsing polyculturalism in contrast to multiculturalism and colorblindness, especially for an individual’s psychological well-being? We tested a path model to investigate if diversity ideologies are associated with flourishing through ethnocultural empathy, intercultural contact quality, and cultural identity clarity, using questionnaire responses of 255 Australians. The results supported our hypothesis that polyculturalism is associated with higher ethnocultural empathy and higher-quality intercultural contact and with higher flourishing through these pathways. Simultaneously, polyculturalism also associated with lower cultural identity clarity and indirectly with lower flourishing through this pathway. In contrast, the results did not support the link between these mediators and multiculturalism or colorblindness. Our findings indicate that polyculturalism has both positive and negative associations with eudaimonic well-being for those who endorse this ideology and suggest the increasing relevance of polyculturalism for Australians and the need for further research.</description><subject>Colorblindness</subject><subject>Cultural contact</subject><subject>Cultural identity</subject><subject>Cultural identity clarity</subject><subject>Cultural tradition</subject><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Ethnocultural empathy</subject><subject>Flourishing</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Intercultural contact</subject><subject>Intercultural interaction</subject><subject>Intercultural sensitivity</subject><subject>Multiculturalism</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Polyculturalism</subject><subject>Psychological well being</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>0147-1767</issn><issn>1873-7552</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMtOxCAUJUYTx9FfMCRubQX6gLpy4juZxM3sCQN0pGFoBTpJ_16a0YUrVzf3nsfNOQBcY5RjhOu7LjedcdFrmxNEcI5IjhA5AQvMaJHRqiKnYIFwSTNMa3oOLkLoUGIgxhZgejIH7YOJEzRK97bfGR2gcAq2th-9CZ_G7e7hysHVGKIX1ggHQxzVBGW_H4RPMBx6O8nRxnHGw_4W7tNi_lxmR5ns_dYap5wO4RKctcIGffUzl2Dz8rx5fMvWH6_vj6t1JosSxayihaoaLPQWt0XTYEmFblCJJKkZVQVmumZMikZIUjIst4Ri3FasKTGpCtYWS3BztB18_zXqEHmXcrn0kZOqbJqS1bROrPrIkr4PweuWD97shZ84RnxumXf8t2U-t8wR4anDJHw4CnWKcDDa8yCNdlIr47WMXPXmP4tv6yGMPQ</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Virgona, Ariane</creator><creator>Kashima, Emiko S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7281-7173</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Diversity ideologies and flourishing: An Australian study comparing polyculturalism, multiculturalism, and colorblindness</title><author>Virgona, Ariane ; Kashima, Emiko S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-573d591aeb1f3991c7ae9040c2687d318e688ca9ac2481cb2711f589412538f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Colorblindness</topic><topic>Cultural contact</topic><topic>Cultural identity</topic><topic>Cultural identity clarity</topic><topic>Cultural tradition</topic><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Ethnocultural empathy</topic><topic>Flourishing</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Intercultural contact</topic><topic>Intercultural interaction</topic><topic>Intercultural sensitivity</topic><topic>Multiculturalism</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Polyculturalism</topic><topic>Psychological well being</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Virgona, Ariane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashima, Emiko S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International journal of intercultural relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Virgona, Ariane</au><au>Kashima, Emiko S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diversity ideologies and flourishing: An Australian study comparing polyculturalism, multiculturalism, and colorblindness</atitle><jtitle>International journal of intercultural relations</jtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>81</volume><spage>236</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>236-251</pages><issn>0147-1767</issn><eissn>1873-7552</eissn><abstract>In pluralistic societies such as Australia, an emerging diversity ideology of polyculturalism promotes sharing ideas and practices among people from diverse cultural traditions. What are the psychological associations of endorsing polyculturalism in contrast to multiculturalism and colorblindness, especially for an individual’s psychological well-being? We tested a path model to investigate if diversity ideologies are associated with flourishing through ethnocultural empathy, intercultural contact quality, and cultural identity clarity, using questionnaire responses of 255 Australians. The results supported our hypothesis that polyculturalism is associated with higher ethnocultural empathy and higher-quality intercultural contact and with higher flourishing through these pathways. Simultaneously, polyculturalism also associated with lower cultural identity clarity and indirectly with lower flourishing through this pathway. In contrast, the results did not support the link between these mediators and multiculturalism or colorblindness. Our findings indicate that polyculturalism has both positive and negative associations with eudaimonic well-being for those who endorse this ideology and suggest the increasing relevance of polyculturalism for Australians and the need for further research.</abstract><cop>New Brunswick</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.02.002</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7281-7173</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-1767 |
ispartof | International journal of intercultural relations, 2021-03, Vol.81, p.236-251 |
issn | 0147-1767 1873-7552 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2549948676 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Colorblindness Cultural contact Cultural identity Cultural identity clarity Cultural tradition Empathy Ethnocultural empathy Flourishing Ideology Intercultural contact Intercultural interaction Intercultural sensitivity Multiculturalism Multiculturalism & pluralism Polyculturalism Psychological well being Responses Well being |
title | Diversity ideologies and flourishing: An Australian study comparing polyculturalism, multiculturalism, and colorblindness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A33%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diversity%20ideologies%20and%20flourishing:%20An%20Australian%20study%20comparing%20polyculturalism,%20multiculturalism,%20and%20colorblindness&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20intercultural%20relations&rft.au=Virgona,%20Ariane&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=81&rft.spage=236&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=236-251&rft.issn=0147-1767&rft.eissn=1873-7552&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.02.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2549948676%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549948676&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0147176721000250&rfr_iscdi=true |