Diversity ideologies and flourishing: An Australian study comparing polyculturalism, multiculturalism, and colorblindness

In pluralistic societies such as Australia, an emerging diversity ideology of polyculturalism promotes sharing ideas and practices among people from diverse cultural traditions. What are the psychological associations of endorsing polyculturalism in contrast to multiculturalism and colorblindness, e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of intercultural relations 2021-03, Vol.81, p.236-251
Hauptverfasser: Virgona, Ariane, Kashima, Emiko S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 251
container_issue
container_start_page 236
container_title International journal of intercultural relations
container_volume 81
creator Virgona, Ariane
Kashima, Emiko S.
description In pluralistic societies such as Australia, an emerging diversity ideology of polyculturalism promotes sharing ideas and practices among people from diverse cultural traditions. What are the psychological associations of endorsing polyculturalism in contrast to multiculturalism and colorblindness, especially for an individual’s psychological well-being? We tested a path model to investigate if diversity ideologies are associated with flourishing through ethnocultural empathy, intercultural contact quality, and cultural identity clarity, using questionnaire responses of 255 Australians. The results supported our hypothesis that polyculturalism is associated with higher ethnocultural empathy and higher-quality intercultural contact and with higher flourishing through these pathways. Simultaneously, polyculturalism also associated with lower cultural identity clarity and indirectly with lower flourishing through this pathway. In contrast, the results did not support the link between these mediators and multiculturalism or colorblindness. Our findings indicate that polyculturalism has both positive and negative associations with eudaimonic well-being for those who endorse this ideology and suggest the increasing relevance of polyculturalism for Australians and the need for further research.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.02.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2549948676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0147176721000250</els_id><sourcerecordid>2549948676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-573d591aeb1f3991c7ae9040c2687d318e688ca9ac2481cb2711f589412538f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOxCAUJUYTx9FfMCRubQX6gLpy4juZxM3sCQN0pGFoBTpJ_16a0YUrVzf3nsfNOQBcY5RjhOu7LjedcdFrmxNEcI5IjhA5AQvMaJHRqiKnYIFwSTNMa3oOLkLoUGIgxhZgejIH7YOJEzRK97bfGR2gcAq2th-9CZ_G7e7hysHVGKIX1ggHQxzVBGW_H4RPMBx6O8nRxnHGw_4W7tNi_lxmR5ns_dYap5wO4RKctcIGffUzl2Dz8rx5fMvWH6_vj6t1JosSxayihaoaLPQWt0XTYEmFblCJJKkZVQVmumZMikZIUjIst4Ri3FasKTGpCtYWS3BztB18_zXqEHmXcrn0kZOqbJqS1bROrPrIkr4PweuWD97shZ84RnxumXf8t2U-t8wR4anDJHw4CnWKcDDa8yCNdlIr47WMXPXmP4tv6yGMPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549948676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diversity ideologies and flourishing: An Australian study comparing polyculturalism, multiculturalism, and colorblindness</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Virgona, Ariane ; Kashima, Emiko S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Virgona, Ariane ; Kashima, Emiko S.</creatorcontrib><description>In pluralistic societies such as Australia, an emerging diversity ideology of polyculturalism promotes sharing ideas and practices among people from diverse cultural traditions. What are the psychological associations of endorsing polyculturalism in contrast to multiculturalism and colorblindness, especially for an individual’s psychological well-being? We tested a path model to investigate if diversity ideologies are associated with flourishing through ethnocultural empathy, intercultural contact quality, and cultural identity clarity, using questionnaire responses of 255 Australians. The results supported our hypothesis that polyculturalism is associated with higher ethnocultural empathy and higher-quality intercultural contact and with higher flourishing through these pathways. Simultaneously, polyculturalism also associated with lower cultural identity clarity and indirectly with lower flourishing through this pathway. In contrast, the results did not support the link between these mediators and multiculturalism or colorblindness. Our findings indicate that polyculturalism has both positive and negative associations with eudaimonic well-being for those who endorse this ideology and suggest the increasing relevance of polyculturalism for Australians and the need for further research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-1767</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7552</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.02.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Brunswick: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Colorblindness ; Cultural contact ; Cultural identity ; Cultural identity clarity ; Cultural tradition ; Empathy ; Ethnocultural empathy ; Flourishing ; Ideology ; Intercultural contact ; Intercultural interaction ; Intercultural sensitivity ; Multiculturalism ; Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism ; Polyculturalism ; Psychological well being ; Responses ; Well being</subject><ispartof>International journal of intercultural relations, 2021-03, Vol.81, p.236-251</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-573d591aeb1f3991c7ae9040c2687d318e688ca9ac2481cb2711f589412538f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-573d591aeb1f3991c7ae9040c2687d318e688ca9ac2481cb2711f589412538f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7281-7173</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176721000250$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,33751,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Virgona, Ariane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashima, Emiko S.</creatorcontrib><title>Diversity ideologies and flourishing: An Australian study comparing polyculturalism, multiculturalism, and colorblindness</title><title>International journal of intercultural relations</title><description>In pluralistic societies such as Australia, an emerging diversity ideology of polyculturalism promotes sharing ideas and practices among people from diverse cultural traditions. What are the psychological associations of endorsing polyculturalism in contrast to multiculturalism and colorblindness, especially for an individual’s psychological well-being? We tested a path model to investigate if diversity ideologies are associated with flourishing through ethnocultural empathy, intercultural contact quality, and cultural identity clarity, using questionnaire responses of 255 Australians. The results supported our hypothesis that polyculturalism is associated with higher ethnocultural empathy and higher-quality intercultural contact and with higher flourishing through these pathways. Simultaneously, polyculturalism also associated with lower cultural identity clarity and indirectly with lower flourishing through this pathway. In contrast, the results did not support the link between these mediators and multiculturalism or colorblindness. Our findings indicate that polyculturalism has both positive and negative associations with eudaimonic well-being for those who endorse this ideology and suggest the increasing relevance of polyculturalism for Australians and the need for further research.</description><subject>Colorblindness</subject><subject>Cultural contact</subject><subject>Cultural identity</subject><subject>Cultural identity clarity</subject><subject>Cultural tradition</subject><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Ethnocultural empathy</subject><subject>Flourishing</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Intercultural contact</subject><subject>Intercultural interaction</subject><subject>Intercultural sensitivity</subject><subject>Multiculturalism</subject><subject>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</subject><subject>Polyculturalism</subject><subject>Psychological well being</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>0147-1767</issn><issn>1873-7552</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMtOxCAUJUYTx9FfMCRubQX6gLpy4juZxM3sCQN0pGFoBTpJ_16a0YUrVzf3nsfNOQBcY5RjhOu7LjedcdFrmxNEcI5IjhA5AQvMaJHRqiKnYIFwSTNMa3oOLkLoUGIgxhZgejIH7YOJEzRK97bfGR2gcAq2th-9CZ_G7e7hysHVGKIX1ggHQxzVBGW_H4RPMBx6O8nRxnHGw_4W7tNi_lxmR5ns_dYap5wO4RKctcIGffUzl2Dz8rx5fMvWH6_vj6t1JosSxayihaoaLPQWt0XTYEmFblCJJKkZVQVmumZMikZIUjIst4Ri3FasKTGpCtYWS3BztB18_zXqEHmXcrn0kZOqbJqS1bROrPrIkr4PweuWD97shZ84RnxumXf8t2U-t8wR4anDJHw4CnWKcDDa8yCNdlIr47WMXPXmP4tv6yGMPQ</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Virgona, Ariane</creator><creator>Kashima, Emiko S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7281-7173</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Diversity ideologies and flourishing: An Australian study comparing polyculturalism, multiculturalism, and colorblindness</title><author>Virgona, Ariane ; Kashima, Emiko S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-573d591aeb1f3991c7ae9040c2687d318e688ca9ac2481cb2711f589412538f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Colorblindness</topic><topic>Cultural contact</topic><topic>Cultural identity</topic><topic>Cultural identity clarity</topic><topic>Cultural tradition</topic><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Ethnocultural empathy</topic><topic>Flourishing</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Intercultural contact</topic><topic>Intercultural interaction</topic><topic>Intercultural sensitivity</topic><topic>Multiculturalism</topic><topic>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</topic><topic>Polyculturalism</topic><topic>Psychological well being</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Virgona, Ariane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashima, Emiko S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International journal of intercultural relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Virgona, Ariane</au><au>Kashima, Emiko S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diversity ideologies and flourishing: An Australian study comparing polyculturalism, multiculturalism, and colorblindness</atitle><jtitle>International journal of intercultural relations</jtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>81</volume><spage>236</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>236-251</pages><issn>0147-1767</issn><eissn>1873-7552</eissn><abstract>In pluralistic societies such as Australia, an emerging diversity ideology of polyculturalism promotes sharing ideas and practices among people from diverse cultural traditions. What are the psychological associations of endorsing polyculturalism in contrast to multiculturalism and colorblindness, especially for an individual’s psychological well-being? We tested a path model to investigate if diversity ideologies are associated with flourishing through ethnocultural empathy, intercultural contact quality, and cultural identity clarity, using questionnaire responses of 255 Australians. The results supported our hypothesis that polyculturalism is associated with higher ethnocultural empathy and higher-quality intercultural contact and with higher flourishing through these pathways. Simultaneously, polyculturalism also associated with lower cultural identity clarity and indirectly with lower flourishing through this pathway. In contrast, the results did not support the link between these mediators and multiculturalism or colorblindness. Our findings indicate that polyculturalism has both positive and negative associations with eudaimonic well-being for those who endorse this ideology and suggest the increasing relevance of polyculturalism for Australians and the need for further research.</abstract><cop>New Brunswick</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.02.002</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7281-7173</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-1767
ispartof International journal of intercultural relations, 2021-03, Vol.81, p.236-251
issn 0147-1767
1873-7552
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2549948676
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Colorblindness
Cultural contact
Cultural identity
Cultural identity clarity
Cultural tradition
Empathy
Ethnocultural empathy
Flourishing
Ideology
Intercultural contact
Intercultural interaction
Intercultural sensitivity
Multiculturalism
Multiculturalism & pluralism
Polyculturalism
Psychological well being
Responses
Well being
title Diversity ideologies and flourishing: An Australian study comparing polyculturalism, multiculturalism, and colorblindness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A33%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diversity%20ideologies%20and%20flourishing:%20An%20Australian%20study%20comparing%20polyculturalism,%20multiculturalism,%20and%20colorblindness&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20intercultural%20relations&rft.au=Virgona,%20Ariane&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=81&rft.spage=236&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=236-251&rft.issn=0147-1767&rft.eissn=1873-7552&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.02.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2549948676%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549948676&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0147176721000250&rfr_iscdi=true