Testing one-loop galaxy bias: Joint analysis of power spectrum and bispectrum
We present a joint likelihood analysis of the real-space power spectrum and bispectrum measured from a variety of halo and galaxy mock catalogs. A novel aspect of this work is the inclusion of nonlinear triangle configurations for the bispectrum, made possible by a complete next-to-leading order (&q...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physical review. D 2021-06, Vol.103 (12), p.1, Article 123550 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Physical review. D |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Eggemeier, Alexander Scoccimarro, Román Smith, Robert E. Crocce, Martin Pezzotta, Andrea Sánchez, Ariel G. |
description | We present a joint likelihood analysis of the real-space power spectrum and bispectrum measured from a variety of halo and galaxy mock catalogs. A novel aspect of this work is the inclusion of nonlinear triangle configurations for the bispectrum, made possible by a complete next-to-leading order ("one-loop") description of galaxy bias, as is already common practice for the power spectrum. Based on the goodness of fit and the unbiasedness of the parameter posteriors, we accomplish a stringent validation of this model compared to the leading order ("tree-level") bispectrum. Using measurement uncertainties that correspond to an effective survey volume of 6 (Gpc/h)3, we determine that the one-loop corrections roughly double the applicable range of scales, from ∼0.17 h/Mpc (tree level) to ∼0.3 h/Mpc. This converts into a 1.5–2x improvement on constraints of the linear bias parameter at fixed cosmology, and a 1.5–2.4x shrinkage of uncertainties on the amplitude of fluctuations As, which clearly demonstrates the benefit of extracting information from nonlinear scales despite having to marginalize over a larger number of bias parameters. Besides, our precise measurements of galaxy bias parameters up to fourth order allow for thorough comparisons to coevolution relations, showing excellent agreement for all contributions generated by the nonlocal action of gravity. Using these relations in the likelihood analysis does not compromise the model validity and is crucial for obtaining the quoted improvements on As. We also analyzed the impact of higher-derivative and scale-dependent stochastic terms, finding that for a subset of our tracers the former can boost the performance of the tree-level model with constraints on As that are only slightly degraded compared to the one-loop model. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123550 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2549948558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2549948558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-b82571fc02545d1b06b5a946f696a58fd46e55ae9719e3aeeda5fc34cbac0a163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UE1PwzAUixBITGO_gEskzh1J06QNNzS-NQRC4xy9psno1DUl6YD-ezKVcXq2nmXZRuickjmlhF2-fgzhzXzdzCOZ05RxTo7QJM1ykhCSyuN_TMkpmoWwIREKInNKJ-h5ZUJft2vsWpM0znV4DQ38DLisIVzhJ1e3PYYWmiHUATuLO_dtPA6d0b3fbeOritIDPUMnFppgZn93it7vbleLh2T5cv-4uF4mmhVFn5RFynNqNUl5xitaElFykJmwQgrgha0yYTgHEyNKw8CYCrjVLNMlaAJUsCm6GH077z53sYHauJ2PKYOKllJmBedFVLFRpb0LwRurOl9vwQ-KErWfTh2mU3syTsd-AaX0Y8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549948558</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing one-loop galaxy bias: Joint analysis of power spectrum and bispectrum</title><source>American Physical Society Journals</source><creator>Eggemeier, Alexander ; Scoccimarro, Román ; Smith, Robert E. ; Crocce, Martin ; Pezzotta, Andrea ; Sánchez, Ariel G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eggemeier, Alexander ; Scoccimarro, Román ; Smith, Robert E. ; Crocce, Martin ; Pezzotta, Andrea ; Sánchez, Ariel G.</creatorcontrib><description>We present a joint likelihood analysis of the real-space power spectrum and bispectrum measured from a variety of halo and galaxy mock catalogs. A novel aspect of this work is the inclusion of nonlinear triangle configurations for the bispectrum, made possible by a complete next-to-leading order ("one-loop") description of galaxy bias, as is already common practice for the power spectrum. Based on the goodness of fit and the unbiasedness of the parameter posteriors, we accomplish a stringent validation of this model compared to the leading order ("tree-level") bispectrum. Using measurement uncertainties that correspond to an effective survey volume of 6 (Gpc/h)3, we determine that the one-loop corrections roughly double the applicable range of scales, from ∼0.17 h/Mpc (tree level) to ∼0.3 h/Mpc. This converts into a 1.5–2x improvement on constraints of the linear bias parameter at fixed cosmology, and a 1.5–2.4x shrinkage of uncertainties on the amplitude of fluctuations As, which clearly demonstrates the benefit of extracting information from nonlinear scales despite having to marginalize over a larger number of bias parameters. Besides, our precise measurements of galaxy bias parameters up to fourth order allow for thorough comparisons to coevolution relations, showing excellent agreement for all contributions generated by the nonlocal action of gravity. Using these relations in the likelihood analysis does not compromise the model validity and is crucial for obtaining the quoted improvements on As. We also analyzed the impact of higher-derivative and scale-dependent stochastic terms, finding that for a subset of our tracers the former can boost the performance of the tree-level model with constraints on As that are only slightly degraded compared to the one-loop model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2470-0010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2470-0029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123550</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>College Park: American Physical Society</publisher><subject>Bias ; Constraint modelling ; Cosmology ; Galaxies ; Goodness of fit ; Impact analysis ; Parameters ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Physical review. D, 2021-06, Vol.103 (12), p.1, Article 123550</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Physical Society Jun 15, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-b82571fc02545d1b06b5a946f696a58fd46e55ae9719e3aeeda5fc34cbac0a163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-b82571fc02545d1b06b5a946f696a58fd46e55ae9719e3aeeda5fc34cbac0a163</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1841-8910</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2862,2863,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eggemeier, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scoccimarro, Román</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crocce, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pezzotta, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Ariel G.</creatorcontrib><title>Testing one-loop galaxy bias: Joint analysis of power spectrum and bispectrum</title><title>Physical review. D</title><description>We present a joint likelihood analysis of the real-space power spectrum and bispectrum measured from a variety of halo and galaxy mock catalogs. A novel aspect of this work is the inclusion of nonlinear triangle configurations for the bispectrum, made possible by a complete next-to-leading order ("one-loop") description of galaxy bias, as is already common practice for the power spectrum. Based on the goodness of fit and the unbiasedness of the parameter posteriors, we accomplish a stringent validation of this model compared to the leading order ("tree-level") bispectrum. Using measurement uncertainties that correspond to an effective survey volume of 6 (Gpc/h)3, we determine that the one-loop corrections roughly double the applicable range of scales, from ∼0.17 h/Mpc (tree level) to ∼0.3 h/Mpc. This converts into a 1.5–2x improvement on constraints of the linear bias parameter at fixed cosmology, and a 1.5–2.4x shrinkage of uncertainties on the amplitude of fluctuations As, which clearly demonstrates the benefit of extracting information from nonlinear scales despite having to marginalize over a larger number of bias parameters. Besides, our precise measurements of galaxy bias parameters up to fourth order allow for thorough comparisons to coevolution relations, showing excellent agreement for all contributions generated by the nonlocal action of gravity. Using these relations in the likelihood analysis does not compromise the model validity and is crucial for obtaining the quoted improvements on As. We also analyzed the impact of higher-derivative and scale-dependent stochastic terms, finding that for a subset of our tracers the former can boost the performance of the tree-level model with constraints on As that are only slightly degraded compared to the one-loop model.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Constraint modelling</subject><subject>Cosmology</subject><subject>Galaxies</subject><subject>Goodness of fit</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>2470-0010</issn><issn>2470-0029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UE1PwzAUixBITGO_gEskzh1J06QNNzS-NQRC4xy9psno1DUl6YD-ezKVcXq2nmXZRuickjmlhF2-fgzhzXzdzCOZ05RxTo7QJM1ykhCSyuN_TMkpmoWwIREKInNKJ-h5ZUJft2vsWpM0znV4DQ38DLisIVzhJ1e3PYYWmiHUATuLO_dtPA6d0b3fbeOritIDPUMnFppgZn93it7vbleLh2T5cv-4uF4mmhVFn5RFynNqNUl5xitaElFykJmwQgrgha0yYTgHEyNKw8CYCrjVLNMlaAJUsCm6GH077z53sYHauJ2PKYOKllJmBedFVLFRpb0LwRurOl9vwQ-KErWfTh2mU3syTsd-AaX0Y8g</recordid><startdate>20210630</startdate><enddate>20210630</enddate><creator>Eggemeier, Alexander</creator><creator>Scoccimarro, Román</creator><creator>Smith, Robert E.</creator><creator>Crocce, Martin</creator><creator>Pezzotta, Andrea</creator><creator>Sánchez, Ariel G.</creator><general>American Physical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1841-8910</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210630</creationdate><title>Testing one-loop galaxy bias: Joint analysis of power spectrum and bispectrum</title><author>Eggemeier, Alexander ; Scoccimarro, Román ; Smith, Robert E. ; Crocce, Martin ; Pezzotta, Andrea ; Sánchez, Ariel G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-b82571fc02545d1b06b5a946f696a58fd46e55ae9719e3aeeda5fc34cbac0a163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Constraint modelling</topic><topic>Cosmology</topic><topic>Galaxies</topic><topic>Goodness of fit</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eggemeier, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scoccimarro, Román</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crocce, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pezzotta, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Ariel G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eggemeier, Alexander</au><au>Scoccimarro, Román</au><au>Smith, Robert E.</au><au>Crocce, Martin</au><au>Pezzotta, Andrea</au><au>Sánchez, Ariel G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing one-loop galaxy bias: Joint analysis of power spectrum and bispectrum</atitle><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle><date>2021-06-30</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><artnum>123550</artnum><issn>2470-0010</issn><eissn>2470-0029</eissn><abstract>We present a joint likelihood analysis of the real-space power spectrum and bispectrum measured from a variety of halo and galaxy mock catalogs. A novel aspect of this work is the inclusion of nonlinear triangle configurations for the bispectrum, made possible by a complete next-to-leading order ("one-loop") description of galaxy bias, as is already common practice for the power spectrum. Based on the goodness of fit and the unbiasedness of the parameter posteriors, we accomplish a stringent validation of this model compared to the leading order ("tree-level") bispectrum. Using measurement uncertainties that correspond to an effective survey volume of 6 (Gpc/h)3, we determine that the one-loop corrections roughly double the applicable range of scales, from ∼0.17 h/Mpc (tree level) to ∼0.3 h/Mpc. This converts into a 1.5–2x improvement on constraints of the linear bias parameter at fixed cosmology, and a 1.5–2.4x shrinkage of uncertainties on the amplitude of fluctuations As, which clearly demonstrates the benefit of extracting information from nonlinear scales despite having to marginalize over a larger number of bias parameters. Besides, our precise measurements of galaxy bias parameters up to fourth order allow for thorough comparisons to coevolution relations, showing excellent agreement for all contributions generated by the nonlocal action of gravity. Using these relations in the likelihood analysis does not compromise the model validity and is crucial for obtaining the quoted improvements on As. We also analyzed the impact of higher-derivative and scale-dependent stochastic terms, finding that for a subset of our tracers the former can boost the performance of the tree-level model with constraints on As that are only slightly degraded compared to the one-loop model.</abstract><cop>College Park</cop><pub>American Physical Society</pub><doi>10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123550</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1841-8910</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2470-0010 |
ispartof | Physical review. D, 2021-06, Vol.103 (12), p.1, Article 123550 |
issn | 2470-0010 2470-0029 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2549948558 |
source | American Physical Society Journals |
subjects | Bias Constraint modelling Cosmology Galaxies Goodness of fit Impact analysis Parameters Uncertainty |
title | Testing one-loop galaxy bias: Joint analysis of power spectrum and bispectrum |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T07%3A47%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20one-loop%20galaxy%20bias:%20Joint%20analysis%20of%20power%20spectrum%20and%20bispectrum&rft.jtitle=Physical%20review.%20D&rft.au=Eggemeier,%20Alexander&rft.date=2021-06-30&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.artnum=123550&rft.issn=2470-0010&rft.eissn=2470-0029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123550&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2549948558%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549948558&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |