Evaluation of Trapping Schemes to Detect Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)

Management responses to invasive forest insects are facilitated by the use of detection traps ideally baited with species-specific semiochemicals. Emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, is currently invading North American forests, and since its detection in 2002, development of monitorin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic entomology 2021-06, Vol.114 (3), p.1201-1210
Hauptverfasser: Tobin, Patrick C., Strom, Brian L., Francese, Joseph A., Herms, Daniel A., McCullough, Deborah G., Poland, Therese M., Ryall, Krista L., Scarr, Taylor, Silk, Peter J., Thistle, Harold W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1210
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1201
container_title Journal of economic entomology
container_volume 114
creator Tobin, Patrick C.
Strom, Brian L.
Francese, Joseph A.
Herms, Daniel A.
McCullough, Deborah G.
Poland, Therese M.
Ryall, Krista L.
Scarr, Taylor
Silk, Peter J.
Thistle, Harold W.
description Management responses to invasive forest insects are facilitated by the use of detection traps ideally baited with species-specific semiochemicals. Emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, is currently invading North American forests, and since its detection in 2002, development of monitoring tools has been a primary research objective. We compared six trapping schemes for A. planipennis over 2 yr at sites in four U.S. states and one Canadian province that represented a range of background A. planipennis densities, canopy coverage, and ash basal area. We also developed a region-wide phenology model. Across all sites and both years, the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentile of adult flight occurred at 428, 587, and 837 accumulated degree-days, respectively, using a base temperature threshold of 10°C and a start date of 1 January. Most trapping schemes captured comparable numbers of beetles with the exception of purple prism traps (USDA APHIS PPQ), which captured significantly fewer adults. Trapping schemes varied in their trap catch across the gradient of ash basal area, although when considering trap catch as a binary response variable, trapping schemes were more likely to detect A. planipennis in areas with a higher ash component. Results could assist managers in optimizing trap selection, placement, and timing of deployment given local weather conditions, forest composition, and A. planipennis density.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jee/toab065
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2549640880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A698308695</galeid><oup_id>10.1093/jee/toab065</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A698308695</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b421t-41b9f50d2074d09f78c141d663679feef0ba0583f575b11bd04b26499bb5a0473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1r3DAQxUVJSTZpTr0XQaEkFCcjS5al3jab7QcEeugWejOSPUq82JYry4X-91HwpseGOQw8fjPv8Qh5y-CKgebXe8Tr6I0FWbwiK6a5ynLNfh2RFUCeZyA0PyGn07QHYDJncExOOFe8LJVakd32j-lmE1s_UO_oLphxbId7-qN-wB4nGj29xYh1pNseg-kaup4e6I0PGOjFxnfox5j0T_RmHgNOsW0MXr4hr53pJjw_7DPy8_N2t_ma3X3_8m2zvsusyFnMBLPaFdDkUIoGtCtVzQRrpOSy1A7RgTVQKO6KsrCM2QaEzaXQ2trCgCj5GXm__B2D_z0n92rv5zAkyyovhJYClIJEXS3UvemwagfnYzB1mgb7tvYDujbpa6kVByV1kQ4-Lgd18NMU0FVjaHsT_lYMqqfKq1R5dag80e8OIWbbY_OPfe44AR8WwM_jC58uF9C2PsX6L_sIFRmWhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549640880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Trapping Schemes to Detect Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tobin, Patrick C. ; Strom, Brian L. ; Francese, Joseph A. ; Herms, Daniel A. ; McCullough, Deborah G. ; Poland, Therese M. ; Ryall, Krista L. ; Scarr, Taylor ; Silk, Peter J. ; Thistle, Harold W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tobin, Patrick C. ; Strom, Brian L. ; Francese, Joseph A. ; Herms, Daniel A. ; McCullough, Deborah G. ; Poland, Therese M. ; Ryall, Krista L. ; Scarr, Taylor ; Silk, Peter J. ; Thistle, Harold W.</creatorcontrib><description>Management responses to invasive forest insects are facilitated by the use of detection traps ideally baited with species-specific semiochemicals. Emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, is currently invading North American forests, and since its detection in 2002, development of monitoring tools has been a primary research objective. We compared six trapping schemes for A. planipennis over 2 yr at sites in four U.S. states and one Canadian province that represented a range of background A. planipennis densities, canopy coverage, and ash basal area. We also developed a region-wide phenology model. Across all sites and both years, the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentile of adult flight occurred at 428, 587, and 837 accumulated degree-days, respectively, using a base temperature threshold of 10°C and a start date of 1 January. Most trapping schemes captured comparable numbers of beetles with the exception of purple prism traps (USDA APHIS PPQ), which captured significantly fewer adults. Trapping schemes varied in their trap catch across the gradient of ash basal area, although when considering trap catch as a binary response variable, trapping schemes were more likely to detect A. planipennis in areas with a higher ash component. Results could assist managers in optimizing trap selection, placement, and timing of deployment given local weather conditions, forest composition, and A. planipennis density.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jee/toab065</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33837788</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agrilus planipennis ; Beetles ; Coleoptera ; Emerald ash borer ; Entomology ; FOREST ENTOMOLOGY ; Forest management ; Forestry ; Invasive insects ; Invasive species ; Natural resources ; Nonnative species ; pest management ; Petroleum chemicals industry ; sampling ; semiochemical ; Semiochemicals ; survey and detection ; Trapping ; Traps ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2021-06, Vol.114 (3), p.1201-1210</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Oxford University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b421t-41b9f50d2074d09f78c141d663679feef0ba0583f575b11bd04b26499bb5a0473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b421t-41b9f50d2074d09f78c141d663679feef0ba0583f575b11bd04b26499bb5a0473</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0237-7963</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33837788$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tobin, Patrick C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strom, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francese, Joseph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herms, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Deborah G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poland, Therese M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryall, Krista L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarr, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silk, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thistle, Harold W.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Trapping Schemes to Detect Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>Management responses to invasive forest insects are facilitated by the use of detection traps ideally baited with species-specific semiochemicals. Emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, is currently invading North American forests, and since its detection in 2002, development of monitoring tools has been a primary research objective. We compared six trapping schemes for A. planipennis over 2 yr at sites in four U.S. states and one Canadian province that represented a range of background A. planipennis densities, canopy coverage, and ash basal area. We also developed a region-wide phenology model. Across all sites and both years, the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentile of adult flight occurred at 428, 587, and 837 accumulated degree-days, respectively, using a base temperature threshold of 10°C and a start date of 1 January. Most trapping schemes captured comparable numbers of beetles with the exception of purple prism traps (USDA APHIS PPQ), which captured significantly fewer adults. Trapping schemes varied in their trap catch across the gradient of ash basal area, although when considering trap catch as a binary response variable, trapping schemes were more likely to detect A. planipennis in areas with a higher ash component. Results could assist managers in optimizing trap selection, placement, and timing of deployment given local weather conditions, forest composition, and A. planipennis density.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agrilus planipennis</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Emerald ash borer</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>FOREST ENTOMOLOGY</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Invasive insects</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>pest management</subject><subject>Petroleum chemicals industry</subject><subject>sampling</subject><subject>semiochemical</subject><subject>Semiochemicals</subject><subject>survey and detection</subject><subject>Trapping</subject><subject>Traps</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1r3DAQxUVJSTZpTr0XQaEkFCcjS5al3jab7QcEeugWejOSPUq82JYry4X-91HwpseGOQw8fjPv8Qh5y-CKgebXe8Tr6I0FWbwiK6a5ynLNfh2RFUCeZyA0PyGn07QHYDJncExOOFe8LJVakd32j-lmE1s_UO_oLphxbId7-qN-wB4nGj29xYh1pNseg-kaup4e6I0PGOjFxnfox5j0T_RmHgNOsW0MXr4hr53pJjw_7DPy8_N2t_ma3X3_8m2zvsusyFnMBLPaFdDkUIoGtCtVzQRrpOSy1A7RgTVQKO6KsrCM2QaEzaXQ2trCgCj5GXm__B2D_z0n92rv5zAkyyovhJYClIJEXS3UvemwagfnYzB1mgb7tvYDujbpa6kVByV1kQ4-Lgd18NMU0FVjaHsT_lYMqqfKq1R5dag80e8OIWbbY_OPfe44AR8WwM_jC58uF9C2PsX6L_sIFRmWhA</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Tobin, Patrick C.</creator><creator>Strom, Brian L.</creator><creator>Francese, Joseph A.</creator><creator>Herms, Daniel A.</creator><creator>McCullough, Deborah G.</creator><creator>Poland, Therese M.</creator><creator>Ryall, Krista L.</creator><creator>Scarr, Taylor</creator><creator>Silk, Peter J.</creator><creator>Thistle, Harold W.</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0237-7963</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Trapping Schemes to Detect Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)</title><author>Tobin, Patrick C. ; Strom, Brian L. ; Francese, Joseph A. ; Herms, Daniel A. ; McCullough, Deborah G. ; Poland, Therese M. ; Ryall, Krista L. ; Scarr, Taylor ; Silk, Peter J. ; Thistle, Harold W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b421t-41b9f50d2074d09f78c141d663679feef0ba0583f575b11bd04b26499bb5a0473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agrilus planipennis</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Emerald ash borer</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>FOREST ENTOMOLOGY</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Invasive insects</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>pest management</topic><topic>Petroleum chemicals industry</topic><topic>sampling</topic><topic>semiochemical</topic><topic>Semiochemicals</topic><topic>survey and detection</topic><topic>Trapping</topic><topic>Traps</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tobin, Patrick C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strom, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francese, Joseph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herms, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullough, Deborah G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poland, Therese M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryall, Krista L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarr, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silk, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thistle, Harold W.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tobin, Patrick C.</au><au>Strom, Brian L.</au><au>Francese, Joseph A.</au><au>Herms, Daniel A.</au><au>McCullough, Deborah G.</au><au>Poland, Therese M.</au><au>Ryall, Krista L.</au><au>Scarr, Taylor</au><au>Silk, Peter J.</au><au>Thistle, Harold W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Trapping Schemes to Detect Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1201</spage><epage>1210</epage><pages>1201-1210</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><abstract>Management responses to invasive forest insects are facilitated by the use of detection traps ideally baited with species-specific semiochemicals. Emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, is currently invading North American forests, and since its detection in 2002, development of monitoring tools has been a primary research objective. We compared six trapping schemes for A. planipennis over 2 yr at sites in four U.S. states and one Canadian province that represented a range of background A. planipennis densities, canopy coverage, and ash basal area. We also developed a region-wide phenology model. Across all sites and both years, the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentile of adult flight occurred at 428, 587, and 837 accumulated degree-days, respectively, using a base temperature threshold of 10°C and a start date of 1 January. Most trapping schemes captured comparable numbers of beetles with the exception of purple prism traps (USDA APHIS PPQ), which captured significantly fewer adults. Trapping schemes varied in their trap catch across the gradient of ash basal area, although when considering trap catch as a binary response variable, trapping schemes were more likely to detect A. planipennis in areas with a higher ash component. Results could assist managers in optimizing trap selection, placement, and timing of deployment given local weather conditions, forest composition, and A. planipennis density.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>33837788</pmid><doi>10.1093/jee/toab065</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0237-7963</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0493
ispartof Journal of economic entomology, 2021-06, Vol.114 (3), p.1201-1210
issn 0022-0493
1938-291X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2549640880
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agriculture
Agrilus planipennis
Beetles
Coleoptera
Emerald ash borer
Entomology
FOREST ENTOMOLOGY
Forest management
Forestry
Invasive insects
Invasive species
Natural resources
Nonnative species
pest management
Petroleum chemicals industry
sampling
semiochemical
Semiochemicals
survey and detection
Trapping
Traps
Trees
title Evaluation of Trapping Schemes to Detect Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T16%3A36%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Trapping%20Schemes%20to%20Detect%20Emerald%20Ash%20Borer%20(Coleoptera:%20Buprestidae)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Tobin,%20Patrick%20C.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1201&rft.epage=1210&rft.pages=1201-1210&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jee/toab065&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA698308695%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549640880&rft_id=info:pmid/33837788&rft_galeid=A698308695&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jee/toab065&rfr_iscdi=true