The social investment litmus test: Family formation, employment and poverty
Over the past decade, the notion of ‘social investment’ (SI) has gained considerable traction in the political debates over welfare state futures. The multifaceted character of SI policy interventions, the effects of policy complementarities and interactions for different social groups and generatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of European social policy 2021-07, Vol.31 (3), p.282-296 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 296 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 282 |
container_title | Journal of European social policy |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Plavgo, Ilze Hemerijck, Anton |
description | Over the past decade, the notion of ‘social investment’ (SI) has gained considerable traction in the political debates over welfare state futures. The multifaceted character of SI policy interventions, the effects of policy complementarities and interactions for different social groups and generational cohorts, and the challenge of delineating effects across different time dimensions, we argue, are not (yet) properly addressed by current empirical research. This paper contributes to reorienting the measurement of SI returns into a longer-term perspective, conceptualising them as people’s work- and welfare- related outcomes. It operationalises in a novel fashion macro-level data across OECD countries to analyse the medium-term aggregate effects of SI stock, flow and buffer policies with a focus on arguably the most critical stages in the post-industrial life-cycle course: transition into employment and family formation. Our findings imply that the so-called ‘Matthew effects’, following the biblical proverb ‘to him that hath shall be given’, identified in previous research stem from a measurement of SI returns conceptualised in a short-term redistributive perspective. Moving on to longer-term returns to SI policies at the societal level reveals positive outcomes for families with children. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0958928720950627 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2549637133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0958928720950627</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2549637133</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-87a46c8987307bc16f02d2f62e8a53337d6cb75bc81b2c4e0b177dded5196f0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqLgWr17DHi1mkfzqDdZXBUXvKznkqapdmmbmqQL_femVhAETzPD95iZD4BLjG4wFuIW5UzmRAoSG8SJOAIrnHGcCsLzY7Ca4XTGT8GZ93uEMCeMrMDL7sNAb3WjWtj0B-NDZ_oA2yZ0o4chzndwo7qmnWBtXadCY_traLqhtdM3U_UVHOzBuDCdg5Natd5c_NQEvG0eduundPv6-Ly-36aaMhxSKVTGtcyloEiUGvMakYrUnBipGKVUVFyXgpVa4pLozKAy_ldVpmI4j9ySJuBq8R2c_RzjicXejq6PKwvCspxTgaNNAtDC0s5670xdDK7plJsKjIo5suJvZFGSLhKv3s2v6b_8L5U2a0I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549637133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The social investment litmus test: Family formation, employment and poverty</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Plavgo, Ilze ; Hemerijck, Anton</creator><creatorcontrib>Plavgo, Ilze ; Hemerijck, Anton</creatorcontrib><description>Over the past decade, the notion of ‘social investment’ (SI) has gained considerable traction in the political debates over welfare state futures. The multifaceted character of SI policy interventions, the effects of policy complementarities and interactions for different social groups and generational cohorts, and the challenge of delineating effects across different time dimensions, we argue, are not (yet) properly addressed by current empirical research. This paper contributes to reorienting the measurement of SI returns into a longer-term perspective, conceptualising them as people’s work- and welfare- related outcomes. It operationalises in a novel fashion macro-level data across OECD countries to analyse the medium-term aggregate effects of SI stock, flow and buffer policies with a focus on arguably the most critical stages in the post-industrial life-cycle course: transition into employment and family formation. Our findings imply that the so-called ‘Matthew effects’, following the biblical proverb ‘to him that hath shall be given’, identified in previous research stem from a measurement of SI returns conceptualised in a short-term redistributive perspective. Moving on to longer-term returns to SI policies at the societal level reveals positive outcomes for families with children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-9287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7269</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0958928720950627</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aggregate data ; Children ; Concept formation ; Employment ; Families & family life ; Investments ; Life transitions ; Measurement ; Postindustrial societies ; Poverty ; Research methodology ; Social groups ; Welfare state</subject><ispartof>Journal of European social policy, 2021-07, Vol.31 (3), p.282-296</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-87a46c8987307bc16f02d2f62e8a53337d6cb75bc81b2c4e0b177dded5196f0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-87a46c8987307bc16f02d2f62e8a53337d6cb75bc81b2c4e0b177dded5196f0b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0958928720950627$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958928720950627$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27864,27922,27923,33772,43619,43620</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plavgo, Ilze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemerijck, Anton</creatorcontrib><title>The social investment litmus test: Family formation, employment and poverty</title><title>Journal of European social policy</title><description>Over the past decade, the notion of ‘social investment’ (SI) has gained considerable traction in the political debates over welfare state futures. The multifaceted character of SI policy interventions, the effects of policy complementarities and interactions for different social groups and generational cohorts, and the challenge of delineating effects across different time dimensions, we argue, are not (yet) properly addressed by current empirical research. This paper contributes to reorienting the measurement of SI returns into a longer-term perspective, conceptualising them as people’s work- and welfare- related outcomes. It operationalises in a novel fashion macro-level data across OECD countries to analyse the medium-term aggregate effects of SI stock, flow and buffer policies with a focus on arguably the most critical stages in the post-industrial life-cycle course: transition into employment and family formation. Our findings imply that the so-called ‘Matthew effects’, following the biblical proverb ‘to him that hath shall be given’, identified in previous research stem from a measurement of SI returns conceptualised in a short-term redistributive perspective. Moving on to longer-term returns to SI policies at the societal level reveals positive outcomes for families with children.</description><subject>Aggregate data</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Concept formation</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Life transitions</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Postindustrial societies</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Social groups</subject><subject>Welfare state</subject><issn>0958-9287</issn><issn>1461-7269</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqLgWr17DHi1mkfzqDdZXBUXvKznkqapdmmbmqQL_femVhAETzPD95iZD4BLjG4wFuIW5UzmRAoSG8SJOAIrnHGcCsLzY7Ca4XTGT8GZ93uEMCeMrMDL7sNAb3WjWtj0B-NDZ_oA2yZ0o4chzndwo7qmnWBtXadCY_traLqhtdM3U_UVHOzBuDCdg5Natd5c_NQEvG0eduundPv6-Ly-36aaMhxSKVTGtcyloEiUGvMakYrUnBipGKVUVFyXgpVa4pLozKAy_ldVpmI4j9ySJuBq8R2c_RzjicXejq6PKwvCspxTgaNNAtDC0s5670xdDK7plJsKjIo5suJvZFGSLhKv3s2v6b_8L5U2a0I</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Plavgo, Ilze</creator><creator>Hemerijck, Anton</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>The social investment litmus test: Family formation, employment and poverty</title><author>Plavgo, Ilze ; Hemerijck, Anton</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-87a46c8987307bc16f02d2f62e8a53337d6cb75bc81b2c4e0b177dded5196f0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aggregate data</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Concept formation</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Life transitions</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Postindustrial societies</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Social groups</topic><topic>Welfare state</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plavgo, Ilze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemerijck, Anton</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of European social policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plavgo, Ilze</au><au>Hemerijck, Anton</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The social investment litmus test: Family formation, employment and poverty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of European social policy</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>282</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>282-296</pages><issn>0958-9287</issn><eissn>1461-7269</eissn><abstract>Over the past decade, the notion of ‘social investment’ (SI) has gained considerable traction in the political debates over welfare state futures. The multifaceted character of SI policy interventions, the effects of policy complementarities and interactions for different social groups and generational cohorts, and the challenge of delineating effects across different time dimensions, we argue, are not (yet) properly addressed by current empirical research. This paper contributes to reorienting the measurement of SI returns into a longer-term perspective, conceptualising them as people’s work- and welfare- related outcomes. It operationalises in a novel fashion macro-level data across OECD countries to analyse the medium-term aggregate effects of SI stock, flow and buffer policies with a focus on arguably the most critical stages in the post-industrial life-cycle course: transition into employment and family formation. Our findings imply that the so-called ‘Matthew effects’, following the biblical proverb ‘to him that hath shall be given’, identified in previous research stem from a measurement of SI returns conceptualised in a short-term redistributive perspective. Moving on to longer-term returns to SI policies at the societal level reveals positive outcomes for families with children.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0958928720950627</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0958-9287 |
ispartof | Journal of European social policy, 2021-07, Vol.31 (3), p.282-296 |
issn | 0958-9287 1461-7269 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2549637133 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Aggregate data Children Concept formation Employment Families & family life Investments Life transitions Measurement Postindustrial societies Poverty Research methodology Social groups Welfare state |
title | The social investment litmus test: Family formation, employment and poverty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T19%3A47%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20social%20investment%20litmus%20test:%20Family%20formation,%20employment%20and%20poverty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20European%20social%20policy&rft.au=Plavgo,%20Ilze&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=282&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=282-296&rft.issn=0958-9287&rft.eissn=1461-7269&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0958928720950627&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2549637133%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549637133&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0958928720950627&rfr_iscdi=true |