Trusts and the Chinese Civil Code: toward a new era of codification
Abstract Starting from 28 May 2020, China, which has long been considered a civil law jurisdiction, finally has its own Civil Code. However, among 1260 articles of the Code, trust is mentioned only once. From a perspective of comparative law, the trust’s appearance in the civil code has always been...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Trusts & trustees 2021-06, Vol.27 (1-2), p.82-89 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 89 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 82 |
| container_title | Trusts & trustees |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Qu, Jian |
| description | Abstract
Starting from 28 May 2020, China, which has long been considered a civil law jurisdiction, finally has its own Civil Code. However, among 1260 articles of the Code, trust is mentioned only once. From a perspective of comparative law, the trust’s appearance in the civil code has always been informative for observing its transplantation process. Thus, by investigating the five rounds of civil law codification in China over decades, as well as the considerable controversy regarding trusts and codification, this article attempts to discuss the reasons, implications, and influences of the legislative result of trusts in the Code. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/tandt/ttaa101 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2549230876</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/tandt/ttaa101</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2549230876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1571-4b3e2f1a46fcf8b0c45165cd6b1fc23000491b4d30cb629248d8cfd64b670d9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EElXpyG6JhSXUFztOwoYiKEiVWMps-VM1KnGxHSr-PYZ2Z3pveO493YPQNZA7ID1dZjmavMxZSiBwhmbQNnVVA5DzMlNOK2g7cokWKXlFWMsZ1A2boWETp5QTLts4by0etn60qaT_8js8BGPvcQ4HGQ2WeLQHbKPEwWEdjHdey-zDeIUunNwluzjlHL09PW6G52r9unoZHtaVhqaFiilqaweScaddp4hmDfBGG67A6ZoSQlgPihlKtOJ1X7POdNoZzhRvieklnaObY-8-hs_JpizewxTHclKUX_pS0bW8UNWR0jGkFK0T--g_ZPwWQMSvKvGnSpxUFf72yIdp_w_6A7BZanU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549230876</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trusts and the Chinese Civil Code: toward a new era of codification</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Qu, Jian</creator><creatorcontrib>Qu, Jian</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Starting from 28 May 2020, China, which has long been considered a civil law jurisdiction, finally has its own Civil Code. However, among 1260 articles of the Code, trust is mentioned only once. From a perspective of comparative law, the trust’s appearance in the civil code has always been informative for observing its transplantation process. Thus, by investigating the five rounds of civil law codification in China over decades, as well as the considerable controversy regarding trusts and codification, this article attempts to discuss the reasons, implications, and influences of the legislative result of trusts in the Code.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-1780</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-2110</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/tandt/ttaa101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Civil law ; State court decisions ; Trusts</subject><ispartof>Trusts & trustees, 2021-06, Vol.27 (1-2), p.82-89</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qu, Jian</creatorcontrib><title>Trusts and the Chinese Civil Code: toward a new era of codification</title><title>Trusts & trustees</title><description>Abstract
Starting from 28 May 2020, China, which has long been considered a civil law jurisdiction, finally has its own Civil Code. However, among 1260 articles of the Code, trust is mentioned only once. From a perspective of comparative law, the trust’s appearance in the civil code has always been informative for observing its transplantation process. Thus, by investigating the five rounds of civil law codification in China over decades, as well as the considerable controversy regarding trusts and codification, this article attempts to discuss the reasons, implications, and influences of the legislative result of trusts in the Code.</description><subject>Civil law</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Trusts</subject><issn>1363-1780</issn><issn>1752-2110</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EElXpyG6JhSXUFztOwoYiKEiVWMps-VM1KnGxHSr-PYZ2Z3pveO493YPQNZA7ID1dZjmavMxZSiBwhmbQNnVVA5DzMlNOK2g7cokWKXlFWMsZ1A2boWETp5QTLts4by0etn60qaT_8js8BGPvcQ4HGQ2WeLQHbKPEwWEdjHdey-zDeIUunNwluzjlHL09PW6G52r9unoZHtaVhqaFiilqaweScaddp4hmDfBGG67A6ZoSQlgPihlKtOJ1X7POdNoZzhRvieklnaObY-8-hs_JpizewxTHclKUX_pS0bW8UNWR0jGkFK0T--g_ZPwWQMSvKvGnSpxUFf72yIdp_w_6A7BZanU</recordid><startdate>20210608</startdate><enddate>20210608</enddate><creator>Qu, Jian</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210608</creationdate><title>Trusts and the Chinese Civil Code: toward a new era of codification</title><author>Qu, Jian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1571-4b3e2f1a46fcf8b0c45165cd6b1fc23000491b4d30cb629248d8cfd64b670d9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Civil law</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Trusts</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qu, Jian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>UK & Ireland Database</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Trusts & trustees</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qu, Jian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trusts and the Chinese Civil Code: toward a new era of codification</atitle><jtitle>Trusts & trustees</jtitle><date>2021-06-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>82-89</pages><issn>1363-1780</issn><eissn>1752-2110</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Starting from 28 May 2020, China, which has long been considered a civil law jurisdiction, finally has its own Civil Code. However, among 1260 articles of the Code, trust is mentioned only once. From a perspective of comparative law, the trust’s appearance in the civil code has always been informative for observing its transplantation process. Thus, by investigating the five rounds of civil law codification in China over decades, as well as the considerable controversy regarding trusts and codification, this article attempts to discuss the reasons, implications, and influences of the legislative result of trusts in the Code.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/tandt/ttaa101</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1363-1780 |
| ispartof | Trusts & trustees, 2021-06, Vol.27 (1-2), p.82-89 |
| issn | 1363-1780 1752-2110 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2549230876 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | Civil law State court decisions Trusts |
| title | Trusts and the Chinese Civil Code: toward a new era of codification |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A23%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trusts%20and%20the%20Chinese%20Civil%20Code:%20toward%20a%20new%20era%20of%20codification&rft.jtitle=Trusts%20&%20trustees&rft.au=Qu,%20Jian&rft.date=2021-06-08&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=82-89&rft.issn=1363-1780&rft.eissn=1752-2110&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/tandt/ttaa101&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2549230876%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549230876&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/tandt/ttaa101&rfr_iscdi=true |