Primary care providers' role in newborn screening result notification for cystic fibrosis

Objective To explore primary care providers' (PCPs') role in result notification for newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF), given that expanded NBS has increased the number of positive screening test results, drawing attention to the role of PCPs in supporting families. Design C...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian family physician 2021-06, Vol.67 (6), p.439-448
Hauptverfasser: Hayeems, Robin Z., Miller, Fiona A., Barg, Carolyn J., Bombard, Yvonne, Chakraborty, Pranesh, Potter, Beth K., Patton, Sarah, Bytautas, Jessica Peace, Tam, Karen, Taylor, Louise, Kerr, Elizabeth, Davies, Christine, Milburn, Jennifer, Ratjen, Felix, Guttmann, Astrid, Carroll, June C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 448
container_issue 6
container_start_page 439
container_title Canadian family physician
container_volume 67
creator Hayeems, Robin Z.
Miller, Fiona A.
Barg, Carolyn J.
Bombard, Yvonne
Chakraborty, Pranesh
Potter, Beth K.
Patton, Sarah
Bytautas, Jessica Peace
Tam, Karen
Taylor, Louise
Kerr, Elizabeth
Davies, Christine
Milburn, Jennifer
Ratjen, Felix
Guttmann, Astrid
Carroll, June C.
description Objective To explore primary care providers' (PCPs') role in result notification for newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF), given that expanded NBS has increased the number of positive screening test results, drawing attention to the role of PCPs in supporting families. Design Cross-sectional survey and qualitative interviews. Setting Ontario. Participants Primary care providers (FPs, pediatricians, and midwives) who received a positive CF NBS result for an infant in their practice in the 6 months before the study. Main outcome measures Whether the PCP notified the family of the initial positive CF screening result. Results Data from 321 PCP surveys (response rate of 51%) are reported, including 208 FPs, 68 pediatricians, and 45 midwives. Interviews were completed with 34 PCPs. Most (65%) surveyed PCPs reported notifying the infant's family of the initial positive screening result; 81% agreed that they have an important role to play in NBS; and 88% said it was important for PCPs, rather than the NBS centre, to notify families of initial positive results. With support and information from NBS centres, 68% would be extremely or very confident in doing so; this dropped to 54% when reflecting on their recent reporting experience. More than half (58%) of all PCPs said written point-of-care information from the NBS centre was the most helpful format. Adjusted for relevant factors, written educational information was associated with a lower rate of notifying families than written plus verbal information (risk ratio of 0.79; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.92). In the interviews, PCPs emphasized the challenge of balancing required content knowledge with the desire for the news to come from a familiar provider. Conclusion Most PCPs notify families of NBS results and value this role. These data are relevant as NBS programs and other genomic services expand and consider ways of keeping PCPs confident and actively involved.
doi_str_mv 10.46747/cfp.6706439
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2549038365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2541321925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-da9a00b04cf595c39fc3164735d78d530c8b6d3c3a3ad7a1abb214ee43c3e5e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9rFDEUx4Modq3ePEvAg4JOze-ZXARZWhUKelDQU8hkXmrKbLImmZb-96bddVFPnhKSz3u87_sg9JSSE6F60b9xfnuieqIE1_fQivZUdpLJ4T5aEUKGjkvy7Qg9KuWSENYg-hAdcUFZL5Reoe-fc9jYfIOdzYC3OV2FCXJ5gXOaAYeII1yPKUdcXAaIIV7gDGWZK46pBh-crSFF7FPG7qbU4LAPY04llMfogbdzgSf78xh9PTv9sv7QnX96_3H97rxzbYjaTVZbQkYinJdaOq6941SJnsupHybJiRtGNXHHLbdTb6kdR0YFgGhPIIHwY_R213e7jBuYHMSa7Wy2u1wm2WD-_onhh7lIV2ZgpC1BtwYv9w1y-rlAqWYTioN5thHSUgyTgnJGNZMNff4PepmWHFu8W0oTPnB1S73eUa4tomTwh2EoMXfOTHNm9s4a_uzPAAf4t6QGDDvgGsbkiwsQHRywJlkpKgXT7UbFOtQ7Jeu0xNpKX_1_Kf8FbAW1CA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549038365</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Primary care providers' role in newborn screening result notification for cystic fibrosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hayeems, Robin Z. ; Miller, Fiona A. ; Barg, Carolyn J. ; Bombard, Yvonne ; Chakraborty, Pranesh ; Potter, Beth K. ; Patton, Sarah ; Bytautas, Jessica Peace ; Tam, Karen ; Taylor, Louise ; Kerr, Elizabeth ; Davies, Christine ; Milburn, Jennifer ; Ratjen, Felix ; Guttmann, Astrid ; Carroll, June C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hayeems, Robin Z. ; Miller, Fiona A. ; Barg, Carolyn J. ; Bombard, Yvonne ; Chakraborty, Pranesh ; Potter, Beth K. ; Patton, Sarah ; Bytautas, Jessica Peace ; Tam, Karen ; Taylor, Louise ; Kerr, Elizabeth ; Davies, Christine ; Milburn, Jennifer ; Ratjen, Felix ; Guttmann, Astrid ; Carroll, June C.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To explore primary care providers' (PCPs') role in result notification for newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF), given that expanded NBS has increased the number of positive screening test results, drawing attention to the role of PCPs in supporting families. Design Cross-sectional survey and qualitative interviews. Setting Ontario. Participants Primary care providers (FPs, pediatricians, and midwives) who received a positive CF NBS result for an infant in their practice in the 6 months before the study. Main outcome measures Whether the PCP notified the family of the initial positive CF screening result. Results Data from 321 PCP surveys (response rate of 51%) are reported, including 208 FPs, 68 pediatricians, and 45 midwives. Interviews were completed with 34 PCPs. Most (65%) surveyed PCPs reported notifying the infant's family of the initial positive screening result; 81% agreed that they have an important role to play in NBS; and 88% said it was important for PCPs, rather than the NBS centre, to notify families of initial positive results. With support and information from NBS centres, 68% would be extremely or very confident in doing so; this dropped to 54% when reflecting on their recent reporting experience. More than half (58%) of all PCPs said written point-of-care information from the NBS centre was the most helpful format. Adjusted for relevant factors, written educational information was associated with a lower rate of notifying families than written plus verbal information (risk ratio of 0.79; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.92). In the interviews, PCPs emphasized the challenge of balancing required content knowledge with the desire for the news to come from a familiar provider. Conclusion Most PCPs notify families of NBS results and value this role. These data are relevant as NBS programs and other genomic services expand and consider ways of keeping PCPs confident and actively involved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-350X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1715-5258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6706439</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34127469</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MISSISSAUGA: Coll Family Physicians Canada</publisher><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies ; Cystic fibrosis ; Cystic Fibrosis - diagnosis ; Diagnostic tests ; Family physicians ; General &amp; Internal Medicine ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical screening ; Medicine, General &amp; Internal ; Neonatal care ; Neonatal Screening ; Newborn babies ; Ontario ; Pediatrics ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care ; Science &amp; Technology</subject><ispartof>Canadian family physician, 2021-06, Vol.67 (6), p.439-448</ispartof><rights>Copyright © the College of Family Physicians of Canada.</rights><rights>Copyright College of Family Physicians of Canada Jun 1, 2021</rights><rights>Copyright © the College of Family Physicians of Canada 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>6</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000661542900014</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-da9a00b04cf595c39fc3164735d78d530c8b6d3c3a3ad7a1abb214ee43c3e5e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-da9a00b04cf595c39fc3164735d78d530c8b6d3c3a3ad7a1abb214ee43c3e5e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202749/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202749/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,887,27933,27934,39267,53800,53802</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34127469$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hayeems, Robin Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Fiona A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barg, Carolyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bombard, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Pranesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, Beth K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patton, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bytautas, Jessica Peace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milburn, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratjen, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guttmann, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, June C.</creatorcontrib><title>Primary care providers' role in newborn screening result notification for cystic fibrosis</title><title>Canadian family physician</title><addtitle>CAN FAM PHYSICIAN</addtitle><addtitle>Can Fam Physician</addtitle><description>Objective To explore primary care providers' (PCPs') role in result notification for newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF), given that expanded NBS has increased the number of positive screening test results, drawing attention to the role of PCPs in supporting families. Design Cross-sectional survey and qualitative interviews. Setting Ontario. Participants Primary care providers (FPs, pediatricians, and midwives) who received a positive CF NBS result for an infant in their practice in the 6 months before the study. Main outcome measures Whether the PCP notified the family of the initial positive CF screening result. Results Data from 321 PCP surveys (response rate of 51%) are reported, including 208 FPs, 68 pediatricians, and 45 midwives. Interviews were completed with 34 PCPs. Most (65%) surveyed PCPs reported notifying the infant's family of the initial positive screening result; 81% agreed that they have an important role to play in NBS; and 88% said it was important for PCPs, rather than the NBS centre, to notify families of initial positive results. With support and information from NBS centres, 68% would be extremely or very confident in doing so; this dropped to 54% when reflecting on their recent reporting experience. More than half (58%) of all PCPs said written point-of-care information from the NBS centre was the most helpful format. Adjusted for relevant factors, written educational information was associated with a lower rate of notifying families than written plus verbal information (risk ratio of 0.79; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.92). In the interviews, PCPs emphasized the challenge of balancing required content knowledge with the desire for the news to come from a familiar provider. Conclusion Most PCPs notify families of NBS results and value this role. These data are relevant as NBS programs and other genomic services expand and consider ways of keeping PCPs confident and actively involved.</description><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Cystic fibrosis</subject><subject>Cystic Fibrosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>General &amp; Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine, General &amp; Internal</subject><subject>Neonatal care</subject><subject>Neonatal Screening</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><issn>0008-350X</issn><issn>1715-5258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9rFDEUx4Modq3ePEvAg4JOze-ZXARZWhUKelDQU8hkXmrKbLImmZb-96bddVFPnhKSz3u87_sg9JSSE6F60b9xfnuieqIE1_fQivZUdpLJ4T5aEUKGjkvy7Qg9KuWSENYg-hAdcUFZL5Reoe-fc9jYfIOdzYC3OV2FCXJ5gXOaAYeII1yPKUdcXAaIIV7gDGWZK46pBh-crSFF7FPG7qbU4LAPY04llMfogbdzgSf78xh9PTv9sv7QnX96_3H97rxzbYjaTVZbQkYinJdaOq6941SJnsupHybJiRtGNXHHLbdTb6kdR0YFgGhPIIHwY_R213e7jBuYHMSa7Wy2u1wm2WD-_onhh7lIV2ZgpC1BtwYv9w1y-rlAqWYTioN5thHSUgyTgnJGNZMNff4PepmWHFu8W0oTPnB1S73eUa4tomTwh2EoMXfOTHNm9s4a_uzPAAf4t6QGDDvgGsbkiwsQHRywJlkpKgXT7UbFOtQ7Jeu0xNpKX_1_Kf8FbAW1CA</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Hayeems, Robin Z.</creator><creator>Miller, Fiona A.</creator><creator>Barg, Carolyn J.</creator><creator>Bombard, Yvonne</creator><creator>Chakraborty, Pranesh</creator><creator>Potter, Beth K.</creator><creator>Patton, Sarah</creator><creator>Bytautas, Jessica Peace</creator><creator>Tam, Karen</creator><creator>Taylor, Louise</creator><creator>Kerr, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Davies, Christine</creator><creator>Milburn, Jennifer</creator><creator>Ratjen, Felix</creator><creator>Guttmann, Astrid</creator><creator>Carroll, June C.</creator><general>Coll Family Physicians Canada</general><general>College of Family Physicians of Canada</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Primary care providers' role in newborn screening result notification for cystic fibrosis</title><author>Hayeems, Robin Z. ; Miller, Fiona A. ; Barg, Carolyn J. ; Bombard, Yvonne ; Chakraborty, Pranesh ; Potter, Beth K. ; Patton, Sarah ; Bytautas, Jessica Peace ; Tam, Karen ; Taylor, Louise ; Kerr, Elizabeth ; Davies, Christine ; Milburn, Jennifer ; Ratjen, Felix ; Guttmann, Astrid ; Carroll, June C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-da9a00b04cf595c39fc3164735d78d530c8b6d3c3a3ad7a1abb214ee43c3e5e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Cystic fibrosis</topic><topic>Cystic Fibrosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>General &amp; Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine, General &amp; Internal</topic><topic>Neonatal care</topic><topic>Neonatal Screening</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayeems, Robin Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Fiona A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barg, Carolyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bombard, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Pranesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, Beth K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patton, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bytautas, Jessica Peace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milburn, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratjen, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guttmann, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, June C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian family physician</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayeems, Robin Z.</au><au>Miller, Fiona A.</au><au>Barg, Carolyn J.</au><au>Bombard, Yvonne</au><au>Chakraborty, Pranesh</au><au>Potter, Beth K.</au><au>Patton, Sarah</au><au>Bytautas, Jessica Peace</au><au>Tam, Karen</au><au>Taylor, Louise</au><au>Kerr, Elizabeth</au><au>Davies, Christine</au><au>Milburn, Jennifer</au><au>Ratjen, Felix</au><au>Guttmann, Astrid</au><au>Carroll, June C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Primary care providers' role in newborn screening result notification for cystic fibrosis</atitle><jtitle>Canadian family physician</jtitle><stitle>CAN FAM PHYSICIAN</stitle><addtitle>Can Fam Physician</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>439</spage><epage>448</epage><pages>439-448</pages><issn>0008-350X</issn><eissn>1715-5258</eissn><abstract>Objective To explore primary care providers' (PCPs') role in result notification for newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF), given that expanded NBS has increased the number of positive screening test results, drawing attention to the role of PCPs in supporting families. Design Cross-sectional survey and qualitative interviews. Setting Ontario. Participants Primary care providers (FPs, pediatricians, and midwives) who received a positive CF NBS result for an infant in their practice in the 6 months before the study. Main outcome measures Whether the PCP notified the family of the initial positive CF screening result. Results Data from 321 PCP surveys (response rate of 51%) are reported, including 208 FPs, 68 pediatricians, and 45 midwives. Interviews were completed with 34 PCPs. Most (65%) surveyed PCPs reported notifying the infant's family of the initial positive screening result; 81% agreed that they have an important role to play in NBS; and 88% said it was important for PCPs, rather than the NBS centre, to notify families of initial positive results. With support and information from NBS centres, 68% would be extremely or very confident in doing so; this dropped to 54% when reflecting on their recent reporting experience. More than half (58%) of all PCPs said written point-of-care information from the NBS centre was the most helpful format. Adjusted for relevant factors, written educational information was associated with a lower rate of notifying families than written plus verbal information (risk ratio of 0.79; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.92). In the interviews, PCPs emphasized the challenge of balancing required content knowledge with the desire for the news to come from a familiar provider. Conclusion Most PCPs notify families of NBS results and value this role. These data are relevant as NBS programs and other genomic services expand and consider ways of keeping PCPs confident and actively involved.</abstract><cop>MISSISSAUGA</cop><pub>Coll Family Physicians Canada</pub><pmid>34127469</pmid><doi>10.46747/cfp.6706439</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-350X
ispartof Canadian family physician, 2021-06, Vol.67 (6), p.439-448
issn 0008-350X
1715-5258
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2549038365
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cross-Sectional Studies
Cystic fibrosis
Cystic Fibrosis - diagnosis
Diagnostic tests
Family physicians
General & Internal Medicine
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Medical diagnosis
Medical screening
Medicine, General & Internal
Neonatal care
Neonatal Screening
Newborn babies
Ontario
Pediatrics
Primary care
Primary Health Care
Science & Technology
title Primary care providers' role in newborn screening result notification for cystic fibrosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T05%3A44%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Primary%20care%20providers'%20role%20in%20newborn%20screening%20result%20notification%20for%20cystic%20fibrosis&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20family%20physician&rft.au=Hayeems,%20Robin%20Z.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=439&rft.epage=448&rft.pages=439-448&rft.issn=0008-350X&rft.eissn=1715-5258&rft_id=info:doi/10.46747/cfp.6706439&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2541321925%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549038365&rft_id=info:pmid/34127469&rfr_iscdi=true