Spray Backstop: A Method to Reduce Orchard Spray Drift Potential without Limiting the Spray and Air Delivery

Unmanaged spray drift from orchard pesticide application contributes to environmental contamination and causes significant danger to farmworkers, nearby residential areas, and neighbors’ crops. Most drift control approaches do not guarantee adequate and uniform canopy spray coverage. Our goal was to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2020-11, Vol.12 (21), p.8862
Hauptverfasser: Pourreza, Alireza, Moghimi, Ali, Niederholzer, Franz J. A., Larbi, Peter A., Zuniga-Ramirez, German, Cheung, Kyle H., Khorsandi, Farzaneh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 21
container_start_page 8862
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 12
creator Pourreza, Alireza
Moghimi, Ali
Niederholzer, Franz J. A.
Larbi, Peter A.
Zuniga-Ramirez, German
Cheung, Kyle H.
Khorsandi, Farzaneh
description Unmanaged spray drift from orchard pesticide application contributes to environmental contamination and causes significant danger to farmworkers, nearby residential areas, and neighbors’ crops. Most drift control approaches do not guarantee adequate and uniform canopy spray coverage. Our goal was to develop a spray backstop system that could block drifting from the top without any negative impact on spray coverage and on-target deposition. The design included a foldable mast and a shade structure that covered the trees from the top. We used a continuous loop sampling to assess and quantify the effectiveness of spray backstop on drift potential reduction. We also collected leaf samples from different sections of trees to compare on-target deposition and coverage. The results showed that the spray backstop system could significantly (p-Value < 0.01) reduce drift potential from the top (78% on average). While we did not find any statistical difference in overall canopy deposition with and without the backstop system, we observed some improvement in treetops deposition. This experiment’s output suggests that growers may be able to adjust their air-assist sprayers for a more uniform spray coverage without concern about the off-target movement of spray droplets when they employ the spray backstop system.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su12218862
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2548871003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548871003</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-2ebf27b96ab63e60027d64d02b11df880a26fead49aac25d6a36bd967795362d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLw0AUhQdRsNRu_AUX3AnReTSTjLtan1Cp-FiHSebGTk0zcWai9N_b0oLezbmLj3PgI-SU0QshFL0MPeOc5bnkB2TAacYSRlN6-O8_JqMQlnRzQjDF5IA0r53Xa7jW1WeIrruCCTxhXDgD0cELmr5CmPtqob2BHXrjbR3h2UVso9UN_NgN3keY2ZWNtv2AuMA9qlsDE-vhBhv7jX59Qo5q3QQc7XNI3u9u36YPyWx-_zidzJKKqzQmHMuaZ6WSupQCJaU8M3JsKC8ZM3WeU81ljdqMldYVT43UQpZGySxTqZDciCE52_V23n31GGKxdL1vN5MFT8d5nrGtgCE531GVdyF4rIvO25X264LRYiu0-BMqfgFZt2e-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548871003</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spray Backstop: A Method to Reduce Orchard Spray Drift Potential without Limiting the Spray and Air Delivery</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Pourreza, Alireza ; Moghimi, Ali ; Niederholzer, Franz J. A. ; Larbi, Peter A. ; Zuniga-Ramirez, German ; Cheung, Kyle H. ; Khorsandi, Farzaneh</creator><creatorcontrib>Pourreza, Alireza ; Moghimi, Ali ; Niederholzer, Franz J. A. ; Larbi, Peter A. ; Zuniga-Ramirez, German ; Cheung, Kyle H. ; Khorsandi, Farzaneh</creatorcontrib><description>Unmanaged spray drift from orchard pesticide application contributes to environmental contamination and causes significant danger to farmworkers, nearby residential areas, and neighbors’ crops. Most drift control approaches do not guarantee adequate and uniform canopy spray coverage. Our goal was to develop a spray backstop system that could block drifting from the top without any negative impact on spray coverage and on-target deposition. The design included a foldable mast and a shade structure that covered the trees from the top. We used a continuous loop sampling to assess and quantify the effectiveness of spray backstop on drift potential reduction. We also collected leaf samples from different sections of trees to compare on-target deposition and coverage. The results showed that the spray backstop system could significantly (p-Value &lt; 0.01) reduce drift potential from the top (78% on average). While we did not find any statistical difference in overall canopy deposition with and without the backstop system, we observed some improvement in treetops deposition. This experiment’s output suggests that growers may be able to adjust their air-assist sprayers for a more uniform spray coverage without concern about the off-target movement of spray droplets when they employ the spray backstop system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su12218862</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Canopies ; Contamination ; Coverage ; Deposition ; Farmworkers ; Pest control ; Pesticide applications ; Pesticides ; Regulation ; Residential areas ; Schools ; Statistical methods ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2020-11, Vol.12 (21), p.8862</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-2ebf27b96ab63e60027d64d02b11df880a26fead49aac25d6a36bd967795362d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-2ebf27b96ab63e60027d64d02b11df880a26fead49aac25d6a36bd967795362d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8237-1985 ; 0000-0002-9249-8365 ; 0000-0001-8501-9314</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pourreza, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moghimi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niederholzer, Franz J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larbi, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuniga-Ramirez, German</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Kyle H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khorsandi, Farzaneh</creatorcontrib><title>Spray Backstop: A Method to Reduce Orchard Spray Drift Potential without Limiting the Spray and Air Delivery</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Unmanaged spray drift from orchard pesticide application contributes to environmental contamination and causes significant danger to farmworkers, nearby residential areas, and neighbors’ crops. Most drift control approaches do not guarantee adequate and uniform canopy spray coverage. Our goal was to develop a spray backstop system that could block drifting from the top without any negative impact on spray coverage and on-target deposition. The design included a foldable mast and a shade structure that covered the trees from the top. We used a continuous loop sampling to assess and quantify the effectiveness of spray backstop on drift potential reduction. We also collected leaf samples from different sections of trees to compare on-target deposition and coverage. The results showed that the spray backstop system could significantly (p-Value &lt; 0.01) reduce drift potential from the top (78% on average). While we did not find any statistical difference in overall canopy deposition with and without the backstop system, we observed some improvement in treetops deposition. This experiment’s output suggests that growers may be able to adjust their air-assist sprayers for a more uniform spray coverage without concern about the off-target movement of spray droplets when they employ the spray backstop system.</description><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Coverage</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Farmworkers</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pesticide applications</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Residential areas</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLw0AUhQdRsNRu_AUX3AnReTSTjLtan1Cp-FiHSebGTk0zcWai9N_b0oLezbmLj3PgI-SU0QshFL0MPeOc5bnkB2TAacYSRlN6-O8_JqMQlnRzQjDF5IA0r53Xa7jW1WeIrruCCTxhXDgD0cELmr5CmPtqob2BHXrjbR3h2UVso9UN_NgN3keY2ZWNtv2AuMA9qlsDE-vhBhv7jX59Qo5q3QQc7XNI3u9u36YPyWx-_zidzJKKqzQmHMuaZ6WSupQCJaU8M3JsKC8ZM3WeU81ljdqMldYVT43UQpZGySxTqZDciCE52_V23n31GGKxdL1vN5MFT8d5nrGtgCE531GVdyF4rIvO25X264LRYiu0-BMqfgFZt2e-</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Pourreza, Alireza</creator><creator>Moghimi, Ali</creator><creator>Niederholzer, Franz J. A.</creator><creator>Larbi, Peter A.</creator><creator>Zuniga-Ramirez, German</creator><creator>Cheung, Kyle H.</creator><creator>Khorsandi, Farzaneh</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8237-1985</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9249-8365</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8501-9314</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Spray Backstop: A Method to Reduce Orchard Spray Drift Potential without Limiting the Spray and Air Delivery</title><author>Pourreza, Alireza ; Moghimi, Ali ; Niederholzer, Franz J. A. ; Larbi, Peter A. ; Zuniga-Ramirez, German ; Cheung, Kyle H. ; Khorsandi, Farzaneh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-2ebf27b96ab63e60027d64d02b11df880a26fead49aac25d6a36bd967795362d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Coverage</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Farmworkers</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pesticide applications</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Residential areas</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pourreza, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moghimi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niederholzer, Franz J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larbi, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuniga-Ramirez, German</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Kyle H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khorsandi, Farzaneh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pourreza, Alireza</au><au>Moghimi, Ali</au><au>Niederholzer, Franz J. A.</au><au>Larbi, Peter A.</au><au>Zuniga-Ramirez, German</au><au>Cheung, Kyle H.</au><au>Khorsandi, Farzaneh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spray Backstop: A Method to Reduce Orchard Spray Drift Potential without Limiting the Spray and Air Delivery</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>8862</spage><pages>8862-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Unmanaged spray drift from orchard pesticide application contributes to environmental contamination and causes significant danger to farmworkers, nearby residential areas, and neighbors’ crops. Most drift control approaches do not guarantee adequate and uniform canopy spray coverage. Our goal was to develop a spray backstop system that could block drifting from the top without any negative impact on spray coverage and on-target deposition. The design included a foldable mast and a shade structure that covered the trees from the top. We used a continuous loop sampling to assess and quantify the effectiveness of spray backstop on drift potential reduction. We also collected leaf samples from different sections of trees to compare on-target deposition and coverage. The results showed that the spray backstop system could significantly (p-Value &lt; 0.01) reduce drift potential from the top (78% on average). While we did not find any statistical difference in overall canopy deposition with and without the backstop system, we observed some improvement in treetops deposition. This experiment’s output suggests that growers may be able to adjust their air-assist sprayers for a more uniform spray coverage without concern about the off-target movement of spray droplets when they employ the spray backstop system.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su12218862</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8237-1985</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9249-8365</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8501-9314</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2020-11, Vol.12 (21), p.8862
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2548871003
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Canopies
Contamination
Coverage
Deposition
Farmworkers
Pest control
Pesticide applications
Pesticides
Regulation
Residential areas
Schools
Statistical methods
Trees
title Spray Backstop: A Method to Reduce Orchard Spray Drift Potential without Limiting the Spray and Air Delivery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A21%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spray%20Backstop:%20A%20Method%20to%20Reduce%20Orchard%20Spray%20Drift%20Potential%20without%20Limiting%20the%20Spray%20and%20Air%20Delivery&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Pourreza,%20Alireza&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=8862&rft.pages=8862-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su12218862&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2548871003%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548871003&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true